Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Competitive Reports and Evidence: Comparing .NET to J2EE

Options

Comments

  • Options
    #2
    McGintyMcGoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭McGintyMcGoo


    A link to a Microsoft site. Hmmmm, I wonder which technology will come out on top!!! :D:D


  • Options
    #3
    rsynnott
    Registered Users Posts: 4,003 ✭✭✭rsynnott


    Or, you know, one of IBM's studies which says the opposite. Or this: http://www.tommti-systems.de/go.html?http://www.tommti-systems.de/main-Dateien/reviews/languages/benchmarks.html
    which gives an idea of which data each side is picking and choosing.

    Hmm, and .NET is good for RAD of web pages. Pity about the awful, javascript laden HTML it produces...


  • Options
    #4
    mewso
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 8,950 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    Hehe I just posted it. Knew I could rely on the anti-microsoft brigade to pipe up. It's very easy to remove unwanted javascript in asp.net. I've done it many times but then omission is what it's all about eh. I'm no expert on J2EE but I'll try a novel approach if I ever want to investigate it. I'll approach it with an open mind.


  • Options
    #5
    Civilian_Target
    Registered Users Posts: 5,618 ✭✭✭Civilian_Target


    It would be nice to see a truly objective report about this sort of stuff - but who'd pay for it I guess.
    Personally, I've always been in the J2EE camp, and since I know how exactly how Microsoft present their Sharepoint performance results I'd be loate to trust any of their performance numbers without exact data of how they were obtained...


Advertisement