Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

9/11 Conspiracy

123457»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,883 ✭✭✭Ghost Rider


    I know there are lots of theories, and I think I was fairly clear about recognising that fact to begin with. But it seems to me that where they differ is in questions such as (a) who was behind 911 and (b) their motivations. I'm not particularly interested in those variations. I'm interested in what they have in common i.e. what is the evidence that 911 was NOT the work of ideologically motivated, non-American hijackers?

    As you point out, positive evidence is sorely lacking. What is not lacking are arguments of the "US authorities should have done X , but didn't - therefore something was awry" variety.
    Wicknight wrote:

    Also, I was simply asking you to be more specific, cause as I said there are hundreds of theories that could fall under "inside job"


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,486 ✭✭✭miju


    Wicknight wrote:
    An example would be the talk about what a plane crashing into the pentgon should have looked like. And therefore because it didn't, someone must be lying. This ignores the fact that most of these people have no idea what a plane crashing into the pentegon should look like in the first place.

    sorry to burst yer bubble there, but theorists do know what a plane hitting a building looks like as therea mulitude of footage of it coming in at high angle and very high velocity and slamming into WTC 1 and 2, so similiar buildings and crashes, all 3 re-enforced (penatagon more so granted) and it was crystal clear on the footage on WYC 1 and 2 that a plane hit them NOT the case in any way shape or form at the pentagon, nothing even remotely like it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 246 ✭✭ccd


    It's worth noting that Niall O'Dowd of the Irish Voice paper, was sheduled for a number of mettings that morning in September. But some, as stillunexplained reason never attended. It is also worth pointing out Niall's bother is Deputy Fergus O'Dowd. Bare in mind Fine Geals links with the bilderberg commisson thru people like John Bruton and Peter Sutherland. Might be nothing could BE something


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 tjd


    go to google videos and type in loose change watch it it is interesting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,506 ✭✭✭SpitfireIV


    tjd wrote:
    go to google videos and type in loose change watch it it is interesting


    Interesting.............YES! :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25 CoBurN


    here are those URL's mate, may i suggest the order you watch:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...1&q=alex+jones
    Bush link to JFK

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...05639&q=9%2F11
    in plane site, scary U.S. Gov did it!!!

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...35034&q=9%2F11
    in plane site part2

    )http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...2&q=alex+jones
    BBC doc on alexJ
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...1&q=alex+jones
    rise of Police state

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...8&q=alex+jones
    rise of Police state2

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...3&q=alex+jones
    rise of Police state3

    alot of viewing there, but really engrossing stuff, check em out, make up your own mind....enjoy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25 CoBurN


    try these links much more indept, i am quite sure u will find it fascinating, and i know it will evoke a new line of thought even to the most sceptical of us.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...0&q=illuminati
    Illuminati Part1
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...7&q=illuminati
    illuminati Part2

    Just copied these in from another converse, think you guys might like em...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭solas


    I didn't read through all ten pages yet so I apologise if it's already been mentioned. For some reason lately I've been picking up on lots of links to the "demolition" of wtc 7. It seems to paint a clear cut image of some of the other stories which occured on 9/11 but which have taken a back seat.

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/cutter.html
    Larry Silverstein, the controller of the destroyed WTC complex, stated plainly in a PBS documentary that he and the FDNY decided jointly to demolish the Solomon Bros. building, or WTC 7, late in the afternoon of Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001.
    In the documentary "America Rebuilds", aired September 2002, Silverstein makes the following statement;

    "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

    lots of stuff on wtc 7 out there which makes for interesting reading.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,486 ✭✭✭miju


    on a side note look what comes up as number one result when you search for "norday brothers 911" http://www.google.ie/search?num=50&hl=en&safe=off&q=norday+brothers+911&btnG=Search&meta=

    the mens in black are coming for me i tells you :=)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,111 ✭✭✭tba


    http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=60876

    I wonder will the White House will blame this on the Iraq too.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement