Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Bush appoints John Roberts to Chief Justice

Options
  • 05-09-2005 6:14pm
    #1
    Hobbes
    Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭


    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4698685.stm

    Clearly the perfect man for the choice with his track record of respecting human rights, seperation of church and state and the womens right to choose.


Comments

  • Options
    #2
    President4Life
    Closed Accounts Posts: 36 ✭President4Life


    Yes he is probably not as conservative as one might have expected coming from Bush. Maybe the US won't become a religious nanny-state as many feared.


  • Options
    #3
    TomF
    Closed Accounts Posts: 645 ✭✭✭TomF


    "seperate"

    Hmm. Don't forget, there's "a rat" in "separate".


  • Options
    #4
    jhegarty
    Registered Users Posts: 6,440 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    Hobbes wrote:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4698685.stm

    Clearly the perfect man for the choice with his track record of respecting human rights, seperation of church and state and the womens right to choose.


    In 1990, he co-wrote a brief urging the high court to overturn Roe v Wade

    that’s all that all that really matters to bush... appoint enough justices to overturn Row V wade with varying other view on other issues, so they get approved by congress...


  • Options
    #5
    therecklessone
    Registered Users Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭therecklessone


    Hobbes wrote:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4698685.stm

    Clearly the perfect man for the choice with his track record of respecting human rights, seperation of church and state and the womens right to choose.

    Might have mislaid the sarcasm tags Hobbes.


  • Options
    #6
    therecklessone
    Registered Users Posts: 17,213 ✭✭✭✭therecklessone


    TomF wrote:
    "seperate"

    Hmm. Don't forget, there's "a rat" in "separate".

    There's an "om" in TomF. Whats your point?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #7
    daveirl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Options
    #8
    Hobbes
    Registered Users Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    jhegarty wrote:
    that’s all that all that really matters to bush... appoint enough justices to overturn Row V wade with varying other view on other issues, so they get approved by congress...

    I just wonder with his approval rating in the toilet at the moment would he be able to pull it off?


  • Options
    #9
    jhegarty
    Registered Users Posts: 6,440 ✭✭✭jhegarty


    Hobbes wrote:
    I just wonder with his approval rating in the toilet at the moment would he be able to pull it off?


    the problem is this guy has cross-party support... now I admit more support on one side than the other , but I am sure they will be all thinking about some of the other judges bush could come up with, he is as good as they could hope for...


Advertisement