Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

BMW 323Ci

Options
  • 12-10-2005 3:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭


    Hi,

    I am looking at a 2000 BMW 323Ci with 57000 miles on it but am wondering if anyone has any advice on anything that could be wrong with it (more so this particular model and year!).
    In general, does anyone have a similar 323Ci and if so, what do you think of it?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 65,405 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    As with buying any second hand BMW over here, I'd recommend you have the car checked out properly. PM kbannon who could recommend an expert to check the car out

    Apart from that, it is important to verify the origin of the car. If it is an original Irish (Republic) car your chances are much better than if it is a UK import possibly having been fed dirty petrol causing engine damage. Google for BMW Nikasil


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 627 ✭✭✭preilly79


    check that the indicators work. they seem to be faulty on most every beemer i see ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭mackerski


    I have a non-coupé version of the same car, but a year older. Mine has seen a little more road (just over 100,000km right now), but it's a fine car that has treated me well (and I it, I bought it new, so I wasn't subject to anyone elses abuse). At that age, there are a few niggles that arise, some of which have been costly for me - brake discs, some suspension bits, that kind of thing. I'd ask for details of any recent work, and getting it inspected to a level of detail that will spot imminent work requirements may be worthwhile.

    I will echo preilly79 on the matter of minor electrical stuff - I had the OBC stalk -end button die on me and had a brief spell of odd inicator behaviour that seems to have resolved itself. It might sound small, but those stalk controls are not cheap. The sunroof controls, too, are temperamental - the controlling software seems to have some can't-get-there-from-here issues, such that you may, say, be unable to close the thing from the tilt setting without opening it fully first.

    I'm still a happy owner, though, so just make sure to look this one in the mouth a bit and you may come away satisfied.

    Dermot


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,405 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    preilly79 wrote:
    check that the indicators work. they seem to be faulty on most every beemer i see ;)

    Yeah the indicators are important. They will be checked during any NCT test. I'm confident the OP will really appreciate your most constructive contribution


  • Registered Users Posts: 653 ✭✭✭DukeDredd


    mackerski wrote:
    At that age, there are a few niggles that arise, some of which have been costly for me - brake discs, some suspension bits, that kind of thing. I'd ask for details of any recent work, and getting it inspected to a level of detail that will spot imminent work requirements may be worthwhile.

    I will echo preilly79 on the matter of minor electrical stuff - I had the OBC stalk -end button die on me and had a brief spell of odd inicator behaviour that seems to have resolved itself. It might sound small, but those stalk controls are not cheap. The sunroof controls, too, are temperamental - the controlling software seems to have some can't-get-there-from-here issues, such that you may, say, be unable to close the thing from the tilt setting without opening it fully first.

    I'm still a happy owner, though, so just make sure to look this one in the mouth a bit and you may come away satisfied.

    Dermot

    This is what i don't get about most BMW owners - they find the likes of what you just listed above acceptable!! Is it that you think faults like this in cars are the norm and to be expected or something...?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭mackerski


    DukeDredd wrote:
    This is what i don't get about most BMW owners - they find the likes of what you just listed above acceptable!! Is it that you think faults like this in cars are the norm and to be expected or something...?

    I don't find it acceptable. But the car drives very well and always has done. There are real issues with some of the newer electronics, and I'd be posing some serious questions about any future model I'd buy. I've never had a car that was perfect - in fact, I've had some real lemons - but my current one is, on balance, very good.

    Dermot


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Thanks guys,

    The dealer selling it is offering a 3 month/3000 mile warranty which seems quite short to me - is this the norm? I will only get cover for anything that goes wrong very quickly after I buy it - should I be worried about this?

    If I was to get someone to check out the car for me, who should I ask? The AA?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭mackerski


    How current is the service record on the car? If, for instance, a main dealer gave it a recent comprehensive service, it should insulate you against a lot of the wear-and-tear based replacements I mentioned above.

    Dermot


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Full service history is a must - make sure you read through ti. BMW services go as follows:-
    Oil service
    Inspection I
    Oil
    Inspection II
    Oil
    Inspection I
    etc.

    Check all electrics for faults. There should be nothing that doesn't work. Check that aircon works.
    I know there was some kind of issue with the rear subframe also - will investigate for you.

    Bring a BMW Specialist with you. See www.bmwcarclubireland.com/contacts.php for some. Personally I can recommend Robert Harrison or Robert Furley. These guys will also do servicing for you.

    Read through the FAQ on www.e46fanatics.com/faq/faqs.php


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    unkel wrote:
    If it is an original Irish (Republic) car your chances are much better than if it is a UK import possibly having been fed dirty petrol causing engine damage. Google for BMW Nikasil

    Nikasil was never an issue on E46 models - only on the previous model (E36). Rear subframe damage is an unfortunate and expensive problem with the E46 Coupes built between 99 and Feb 2000, so either make sure the warranty work was done on it or that its still in good condition - its an expensive job if you end up paying for it yourself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Cheers again guys,

    I really appreciate your help here.

    According to the dealer, the original service history is not with the car (it used to be a company car - should this be a concern??) but he has since had it fully serviced by a BMW dealer so hopefully, as you say, most wear and tear issues will be fixed! Apparently the brake discs were changed at this service also.

    How much does a BMW Specialist charge on average to check the car out? What sort of notice do they need?

    Regarding the sub-frame damage, what exactly is it and how can this be checked for?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    carrollf wrote:
    According to the dealer, the original service history is not with the car (it used to be a company car - should this be a concern??) but he has since had it fully serviced by a BMW dealer so hopefully, as you say, most wear and tear issues will be fixed! Apparently the brake discs were changed at this service also.
    Find out the name of the dealer and check it out! Alternatively contact BMW Ireland and see if they can help you with its history.
    I would strongly advise not taking it if there is no history! There are loads of these out there so you don't have to settle on this.
    carrollf wrote:
    How much does a BMW Specialist charge on average to check the car out? What sort of notice do they need?
    Specialists vary obviously they can be less than half of the labour costs compared to a dealer. Ring them for more info.
    carrollf wrote:
    Regarding the sub-frame damage, what exactly is it and how can this be checked for?
    There are a few threads on the BMW Club forum and also
    http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=157603
    http://forum.e46fanatics.com/showthread.php?t=195602&highlight=subframe


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Actually, if you can, come down to Mondello on Sunday morning and you can talk to E46 coupe owners (including one who had the rare misfortune of suffering from the rear subframe damage).
    They will know more about E46 coupes than myself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    I would strongly advise not taking it if there is no history! There are loads of these out there so you don't have to settle on this.

    There don't seem to be many 323Ci's in Ireland for sale now! Loads of 318Ci but not much of anything else. I am looking in the wrong place? My ideal car would be a 2001 320Ci but can't find one!


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Thanks

    The 320 is as powerful as the 323 and I presume that the subframe issues do not exist in the newer 320Ci?? For me I think the 320Ci is the better option. More expensive however than the 00 323Ci I spotted - it was going for €21000 while the 320Ci is closer to €28000


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭mackerski


    carrollf wrote:
    The 320 is as powerful as the 323

    No it isn't. At least, it wasn't in 1999, where the 320 was 2.0l (or close) and the 323 2.5l. I test-drove the 320 and was going to buy one, but made the last-minute decision to go for the extra oomph. (This was in Germany, the decider was that the insurance was no dearer). The 323 is noticably more powerful.

    Dermot


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Thanks Dermot,
    I mean the newer 320Ci 2.2L - it has 170bhp which I think is the same as the 323Ci ??

    My real worry is the rear subframe issue - this sounds like a disaster if the 323Ci has damage here! Does this issue exist at all with 2001 model 320Ci's?


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Does anyone know if the NCT would pick up on the subframe issue?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    carrollf wrote:
    Thanks Dermot,
    I mean the newer 320Ci 2.2L - it has 170bhp which I think is the same as the 323Ci ??

    My real worry is the rear subframe issue - this sounds like a disaster if the 323Ci has damage here! Does this issue exist at all with 2001 model 320Ci's?

    The problem was rectified in Feb 2000, so it won't be an issue on any 320ci. The 323ci is quite a bit more powerful than the 320ci though, most that I've seen dynoed have been 190BHP+, despite factory figures being similar to the 320ci. It should be a bit more torque-y too.

    As far as I know, if the subframe is on its way out, it tears away from the boot floor - and you can see the fracture lines very clearly. Theres also alot of noise generated by the rear axle, which should be quite obvious, and the rear end will feel quite flaky, and nowhere near as steady as it should be. As Killian said, one of the guys on the BMW car club forum experienced it - I'd recommend registering over there where theres a bit more collective knowledge.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 627 ✭✭✭preilly79


    unkel wrote:
    Yeah the indicators are important. They will be checked during any NCT test. I'm confident the OP will really appreciate your most constructive contribution

    lighten up


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,405 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    kdevitt wrote:
    Nikasil was never an issue on E46 models - only on the previous model (E36).

    Nope, you're wrong there. Although it's a very complex issue. The M52 engine in the E46 model we are talking about can have either Nikasil (alloy) or steel liners. The latter indeed do not suffer from the Nikasil issue :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 65,405 ✭✭✭✭unkel
    Chauffe, Marcel, chauffe!


    preilly79 wrote:
    lighten up

    Well I do drive a BMW, so you can't expect me to light up my indicators...

    Any constructive contribution from you on this thread?


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Lets say I bring an expert with me to look at the car and he says it's fine, what are the chances of me experiencing the subframe issue in 6 months when the warranty runs out? It seems very risky and impossible to prevent! Apologies if i'm boring you with this issue but I was all set to buy this 323Ci until the subframe issue came up - now I'm very nervous!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    carrollf wrote:
    Lets say I bring an expert with me to look at the car and he says it's fine, what are the chances of me experiencing the subframe issue in 6 months when the warranty runs out? It seems very risky and impossible to prevent! Apologies if i'm boring you with this issue but I was all set to buy this 323Ci until the subframe issue came up - now I'm very nervous!

    Check the build date, if its after Feb 2000 - it won't be affected. If its before then, you can buying a strengthening kit afaik.

    @Unkel - the E46 6 cylinders only came with the M52TU engine, which is double VANOS. You're the first person I've ever heard to say E46's were affected? (Given that they stopped production of Nikasil blocks in March 98 which was before the E46 was launched) Where did you read this?


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 39,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I have to say that Ken is correct on that one
    See www.bmwcarclubforum.co.uk/nikasil.htm

    Regarding the subframe - I don't believe that it should be a huge concern as very few cars suffered. However, get it looked by a specialist at and if it gets the all clear then hopefully it stays that way. Nobody can predict what happens in the future but as you will have bought a car with a full BMW service history* then you may get help from BMW Irl. As was said before, ask on a BMW forum where you will get loads of E46 Ci owners responding.

    * as I said - don't buy without a fBMWsh. A car this young hadn't really a valid reason to go elsewhere. Contact the previous owner/BMW Irl about service history. If the gdealer won't help you with the previous owners details then run away.


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Thanks again guys, you've been really helpful.

    I think i'll drop down to Mondello on Sunday - sounds like fun!


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭carrollf


    Regarding the FBMWSH, the dealer says that when he got the car it used to be a company car and he didn't get the service history with it. However, he has since had it fully serviced by a BMW garage and he has all these details.

    Is having the last service details enough? Would that service have spotted any other damage?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭ds20prefecture


    Walk away. The dealer is bullshitting you.

    Being a company car does not preclude having a full service history. In fact, most company cars I have seen have exemplary histories - people are more inclined to make sure the car they drive is properly serviced if they don't have to pay for it directly.

    The last service is the one you largely ignore when buying a car from a dealer, as it was probably done by them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,277 ✭✭✭kdevitt


    Sounds very dodgy alright. BMW dealers should store the service records for any cars serviced with them, if you can even get the name of the dealer you may be able to track down the previous service history, if any...


Advertisement