Chelsea: Ranieri's signings vs. Mourinho's signings

Necronomicon

Since Mourinho is into his second season at the helm of Chelsea after replacing Ranieri, I thought it would be interesting to draw up a comparison of their signings. I googled it trying to find a figure that each of them have spent, but couldn't find anything. I also couldn't find a full list of players, so if I've excluded any of them, throw them into the list. (I know Ranieri made signings pre-Abramovich but I've tried to keep them from 2003 onwards, with the exception of Lampard).
Ranieri
Glen Johnson
Wayne Bridge
Frank Lampard
Damien Duff
Joe Cole
Geremi
Juan Veron
Arjen Robben
Claude Makelele
Adrian Mutu
Hernan Crespo
Petr Cech

Mourinho
Paulo Fereira
Ricardo Carvalho
Assier Del Horno
Tiago
Michael Essien
(That young fella Diarra?)
Shaun Wright-Phillips
Didier Drogba
Mateja Kezman

I guess there's a bit of a grey area with Cech and Robben, as Ranieri initiated the deals, but they arrived the summer Mourinho came.

So, who's made the better/more influential signings? Ranieri has made some vital ones, such as Makelele, but there has been some dead-wood as well. That said, two of Jose's men have left the club too.

Royale with Cheese

Peter Kenyon's probably responsible for the signing of Veron.

MrJoeSoap

Scott Parker also under Ranieri.

KdjaCL

Roman bought 5 of those players listed under Ranieri , Ranieri bought Hasselbaink tbh better striker than all of Mourinhos added together
Left out the entire team Ranieir had that got them into the CL pre Roman, good manager till he got all that money Which imo was the better built team and not a free shot an Fm2006 with a billion in the bank.

kdjac

Pigman II

A quick scan of that list would suggest Raneiri got the better players in (Lampard, Duff, Cole, Makelele, Cech). Doesn't really matter tho as I reckon Raneiri could have had all the players Mourinho has now and he would STILL have been incapable of getting as much out of them.