Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
The Bible, Creationism, and Prophecy (part 1)
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
daithifleming wrote: »
......OK.....if 'Intelligent Geography' is the use of a MAP!!!!
.......what is 'Moronic Geography' then????
.......is it the expectation that a Monkey can use a map ....perhaps!!!!!!:eek:
0 -
ScofflawWhat can I say? I am...amazed anew.
What can I say?
To be amazed once by CS is good…..to be amazed anew by CS is VERY, VERY good!!!:D
WicknightAnd I'm sure having a PhD in Psychology places the good doctor in an excellent position to argue with biologists....
He certainly knows how they think!!!:)
Wicknight......the abiotic origin theory of petroleum production has been terrible at predicting where to find oil and as such has been pretty much abandoned by the vast majority of oil prospectors?
You are quite entitled to your opinion!!!!
……and such matters are Industrial Knowhow…….and thus not to be discussed in a public forum.:eek:
DaithiflemingI have yet to see a creationist model.
……..ALL Creationist Models that I know are very beautiful!!:cool:
Hot DogI hate manure.
……always a good point for an Evolutionist to start from!! !!!!!:eek::pac::pac::pac::) 0 -
......OK.....so 'Intelligent Geography' is the use of a MAP!!!!
.......what is 'Moronic Geography' then????
.......is it the expectation that a Monkey can use a map ....perhaps!!!!!!:eek:
......Ok.......SO......what does.........your post mean????
:cool:
Maybe......you think the........earth cannot........be flat ........as alll the flood ........water ......would drain off? :eek::o:p
Or maybe..........you are.....also a cartographic ....expert .....too?:eek::cool::eek::D0 -
Advertisement
-
......Ok.......SO......what does.........your post mean????:cool:
Maybe......you think the........earth cannot........be flat ........as alll the flood ........water ......would drain off? :eek::o:p
Or maybe..........you are.....also a cartographic ....expert .....too?:eek::cool::eek::D
My point was that 'Moronic Geography' would be expecting a monkey to(eventually) read a map.......or assuming that just because a map of the World is flat ......that Earth is also flat!!!!......Following up my requests for examples of censorship regarding peer-reviews of Creationist submissions, I have gathered a few more links that are helpful.
These links have shocked and apalled me......and should shock and apall any fair-minded person
I have recently looked in five libraries and failed to find EVEN ONE Creationist book…….and I have looked in four bookstores ….and AGAIN failed to find any Creationist book!!!!
……..but I did find full coverage of Evolution, from every possible angle, during my casual perusal of the reading material available to the Irish public!!!!:eek:0 -
-
Given that it has already established on this thread that articles from Creation Ministries cannot be trusted as they appear to have no proper form of editorial process and frequently post articles with lies and misrepresentations, I'm rather at a loss why you would continue to post articles from them?
WHEN was that established???
.....I must have missed that!!!eek::pac::pac::pac::) 0 -
-
-
……and here is a rather telling quote from a leading Conventional Astronomer on his experiences of the stultifying effects of, at least some, ‘peer review’ processes:-
‘Refereeing, or “peer review” as it is rather pompously called, is now unworkable. It has increasingly shown that it lets in the bad papers and excludes the good ones, exactly the opposite of what it is supposed to do. Just in abstract principle, science is suppose to be a competition of ideas and indeed, as we have seen, it is very competitive. Is it reasonable then to send your ideas and data to an anonymous competitor who can with impunity often steal, suppress or ridicule them? ... As a result more and more important observational results are simply not being published in the journals in which one would habitually look for such results. The referees themselves, with the aid of compliant editors, have turned what was originally a helpful system into a chaotic and mostly unprincipled form of censorship’
All quotes and no evidence, J C. All hat and no trousers.
The creationism modus operandi. :pac::pac::pac: 0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
As usual, logic deserted you the moment you put finger to keyboard....SO you believe in the 'banning' of books that you don't like.......in this case ONLY Creation Science books!!!:):)
Of course, I didn't say any such thing. For somebody who places such total trust in your ability to read and interpret difficult texts, you display a weird inability to read and interpret my easy ones!
I'm of course laughing at the fact that there's no discernible market for creationist claptrap in this country, and even the religious marketers themselves -- no strangers to selling nonsense -- regard it as infra dig.
*cool*!0 -
As usual, logic deserted you the moment you put finger to keyboard:):)
Of course, I didn't say any such thing. For somebody who places such total trust in your ability to read and interpret difficult texts, you display a weird inability to read and interpret my easy ones!
I'm of course laughing at the fact that there's no discernible market for creationist claptrap in this country, and even the religious marketers themselves -- no strangers to selling nonsense -- regard it as infra dig.
*cool*!
.......I can confirm that there is a very healthy market in Ireland for high quality Creation Science books and audiovisual media. The sales are mostly direct via the internet as well as through the growing network of Irish Christian bookshops.
....and therefore Creation Science DOESN'T need the mainstream bookshops!!!
Your statements have confirmed the deep resistance that exists against Creation Science .......and YOU have provided 'the trousers as well as the hat' in confirmation of the evidence which Wolfsbane's links eloquently provide in this regard!!!
Thanks Robin........I couldn't have proven it better myself!!!!:eek::D0 -
Interestingly, Theisic Evolutionists ALSO believe that both the Bible and the scientific evidence supports their position!!!!:DThese people genuinely believe that Earth is flat and that both the Bible and the scientific evidence supports that position.By the way in case anyone was wonder the Flat Earth Society is not a piss take. These people genuinely believe that Earth is flat and that both the Bible and the scientific evidence supports that position
Sounds awfully familiar
:pac::pac:
I'm sure the Flat Earth Hypothesis "sounds awfully familiar" ....to Evolutionists......given that BOTH hypotheses are severely 'evidentially challenged'.....and they BOTH can be disproven by simple means!!!!
The Flat Earth Hypothesis can be disproven by directly measuring the curvature of the Earth ...by simultanously measuring the angle of the Sun at two points on the Earth's Surface.......
.......and the Evolutionist Hypothesis that 'muck spontaneously evolved into Man' can be disproven by the fact that muck has NEVER been observed to spontaneously turn into anything.....other than MORE muck!!!!:eek::pac:
...and if you STILL believe in a Flat Earth and Evolution, could I suggest that you take a ride on the Space Shuttle and look DOWN...........and THEN try thinking about how long it takes something that is dead to spontanously spring back to life again!!! 0 -
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement