Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

win 2k

  • 11-02-2000 11:23pm
    #1
    elexes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,471 ✭✭✭


    right one simple yes r no question . is win 2k faster then 98 or nt ?


Comments

  • #2
    SantaHoe
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,488 ✭✭✭SantaHoe


    Faster: Probably
    Even More Buggy: Yes


  • #3
    dollar
    Closed Accounts Posts: 35 ✭dollar


    Faster doing what? As far as openGL and games go then Win2K is not as fast, but if you want more speed then just upgrade your processor man.

    Note: If you want to run Win2K then you really should have 128Mb or RAM.


  • #4
    elexes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,471 ✭✭✭elexes


    like dose it take up more resorces


  • #5
    whitetrash
    Registered Users Posts: 746 ✭✭✭whitetrash


    i have it installed on 32mb of ram and it is...allright. not great but i will get another 32 and see how it is from there.
    "Damn those f**king monkeys!!!"
    wHiTe-TrAsH.cjb.net



  • #6
    paw
    Closed Accounts Posts: 19 ✭paw


    Faster: no.
    Even more buggy: no.


    Its essentially nt5 + directx7 games-wise. But for me its far more stable than 98, and even more stable than NT4. i hate 98. Even though quake is faster in 98, ive been using NT4 instead. I only use 98 for CD burning.

    Anyway, win2k non-games-wise just kicks ass. So good. Mmmmm. NT done right. I'll be switching to win2k fulltime once all the drivers are out and working.

    paw


  • Advertisement
Advertisement