Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Idiot newbie needs help here

  • 13-11-2001 9:21pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 311 ✭✭


    Hi guys,

    Seeing as a huge pile of crap is building up on my hard disk and everything's running slowly I was thinking about reformatting.
    Only problem is it scares the ****e out of me, one reason being I want my upgraded RAM and gfx card to work and another being that when I formatted the hard disk of my last comp it got slower each time not faster.

    Basically what I wanna know is, what should I do before formatting to get a successful format? Should I uninstall everything, defrag, scandisk, etc.

    The way I've always done it is to back up important stuff on CD-RW, then uninstall everything, run Disk Cleanup, ScanDisk, then go into DOS and type
    Format C:
    is there anything I'm doing wrong here or is there anything else I should do?

    Thanks,
    Simon.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭SickBoy


    These are the steps you should take;

    1. Backup anything critical.
    2. Fdisk
    3. Create partition
    4. Format new partition
    5. Install OS

    Jimmy...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭phaxx


    All you need to do is backup your stuff, then format the drive, there's no need to uninstall or defrag or anything, all that's doing is nicely sorting your data before you destroy it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 512 ✭✭✭beaver


    "one reason being I want my upgraded RAM and gfx card to work and another being that when I formatted the hard disk of my last comp it got slower each time not faster"

    What are you on about Re. the graphics card and RAM?

    Also, formatting your harddrive is not a holy grail for speeding up your machine. Now if your machine is becoming clogged up with sh|t, then a format and reinstall can be a good idea so you can start afresh.

    Have you tried defragging your drive?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Yes why not defrag your hdd?

    All so if ppl are not so snobbish about unix like idea's, how about you creat a new partition say 250mb and then use this partition and this partition alone as your virtual memory and defrag that regularly?

    Some hard core windowz gamers have apparently received speed increases with this so it may be worth considering


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,478 ✭✭✭GoneShootin


    b4 you go and format, which by the way was scary for my first time too, head to the following site :

    http://www.sad50.k12.me.us/MSAD50/Thomaston/GVHS/~lindak/diskspeed/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 512 ✭✭✭beaver


    What's snobbish about swap space? Windows swaps all the time, just generally to your main Windows partition.

    If by snobby you mean the ability to comprehend that having a seperate partition for swap might be a good idea... well, then, yeah :)

    Also, if you want significant speed increases on specific applications and you've got the RAM, considerusing a RAMdrive. For example, I set aside about 50 megs of RAM to load Photoshop files into. Runs nice and quickly...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭SickBoy


    How do you create a RAMDrive under Win2k/XP ??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 311 ✭✭Zaphod Beeblebrox


    Thanks for the help ladz :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 512 ✭✭✭beaver


    I'm using a program called RAMdisk NT...

    It's pretty sweet, will automatically load an image into the RAMdrive at startup and dump it back to disk afterwards if you so please...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 311 ✭✭Zaphod Beeblebrox


    Er... sorry me again :)

    I still haven't got round to doing it since I'm still backing up all my incriminating CIA photos of George Bush with a donkey... erm I mean my hardware drivers... and just noticed the comment someone made about creating a small partition and using just that for virtual memory (swap space) making the PC a bit faster.

    I remember doing something like that a while ago on another PC but I have the memory of a goldfish. A dead goldfish.
    If Typedef (who I think suggested it) or anyone else could tell me how to do this (using FDisk since I'm formatting my drive anyway) I would be your bitch... er I mean be grateful.

    PS if I wanted to scandisk or defrag my hard drive would having that kind of partition be a problem?

    Cheers.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    You're my bitch anyway - .....I mean sure I'd love to help ;)

    Errm it's been a while since I used dos based fdisk so the below may contain some obvious errors?

    If we assume you have booted from boot disk or windowz9x cd

    Then you might want to try something like

    someprompt:\fdisk
    >Y - enable large disk support
    option 1
    use everything bar 250mb of disk space and set partition to active
    create -extended dos partition
    create logical in extended dos partition using rest of disk
    exit fdisk
    reboot
    format c: /u
    format d: /u

    echo /windowz_sux - for performance
    echo bill_blowz_sheep

    cd e:\win98 or whatever
    setup /i /m
    once windowz is installed
    right click my computer
    properties
    performance? - or wherever I might actually look at windows when I'm in work tomorrow and tweak this post a bit if there are any obvious errors

    set the entire D drive and entire D: drive only as your "virtual memory" or swap space

    /Note
    Above may contian errors


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    DO NOT set a 250mb partition at the end of the drive for the swap file, only silly people do that. If you use a big graphics image or open too many programs you'll run out of swap file space.

    The swap file being at the end of the drive with the partition will mean the hard drive has to constantly swap between the end and the start of the drive.

    'course this might explain why typedef gets all confuddled with Windows, not being able to use it properly can lead to increased tension and eventually hatred of a product


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 512 ✭✭✭beaver


    Anyone who's familiar with the fragmentation/defragmentation process knows that Windows doesn't put data specifically to the start of the drive. So, if we're talking about a disk with only 2 partitions, one for Windows, etc. and one for swap, Windows will not necessarily be flipping between the start and end of the drive when it runs out of swap.

    In any case, unless you're a print designer, what are you going to be doing with images that size?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Originally posted by astrofool
    DO NOT set a 250mb partition at the end of the drive for the swap file, only silly people do that. If you use a big graphics image or open too many programs you'll run out of swap file space.
    Well the dudes on lunuxnewbie.org who still for some obscure purpose use windowz seem to swear by this technique, of course I have no knowledge 'where' exactly in the partition scheme the windows swap partition is put by the gamers on lno, but putting it before the windowz partition would leave a 9x system unbootable and putting it in the middle would make 3 partitions would it not? All so, how would the position of the swap partition make a difference to the speed, surely if it were in the middle it would just be swapping between it's current position and the middle of the drive?
    The advantage of a swap partition is that you can defrag your swap partition or even format it at will apparently? which speeds up the access times and does not fragment your windows file system, or so the guys on linuxnewbie.org seem to think sooo........?
    'course this might explain why typedef gets all confuddled with Windows, not being able to use it properly can lead to increased tension and eventually hatred of a product
    Now now, don't be bitchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,793 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    this type of thing has gone back years, where people thought putting the swap file on a partition helped, when in fact it did diddly, often reducing performance, and then having a 200meg extra drive there thats not needed.

    Modern defragmenters already seperate out the swap file if needed, + the best way to do it is to set a MINIMUM size swap file of 512MB, that way it rarely if ever goes over that limit, stays at the start of the drive so is nice and fast, won't get mixed into other files and folders as it's already got ample space to use, and can expand when needed.

    the end of the drive thing is a physical thing, being that it gets slower, less through put, like those cd-rom thingies, which have 48X max on outer track, but 12X on inner tracks, putting one of the most used files in one of the slowest part of the drive makes little if any sense.

    Tried it myself once, and things went pear shaped doing any graphical work, so had to set it back to c: anyway.

    then again, Linux people must know the best way to use windows, look at you "I can't get Me stable.."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭JustHalf


    Originally posted by astrofool
    then again, Linux people must know the best way to use windows, look at you "I can't get Me stable.."
    In fairness, who can? I mean, we keep telling him to get Windows 2000! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Who says I don't have a nice warezd version of 2k?

    2k is by no means stable, I mean I just love it when a program won't end task and I have to try and log off to get the fscking program to end, especially when this sort of thing does not work don't you?

    Oh I forgot you're version of 2k must have been the freak mutagenic version that actually worked :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭JustHalf


    *sigh*


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    yawn.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 285 ✭✭marauder


    I did this on an old 200MHz PPro system I have with 32MB RAM and it works fine.. even runs UT.
    IF you can get hold of a copy of partition magic then it can do this stuff for you without having to wipe your disk....

    that said I couldn't be arsed doing it on my other systems and anyway, if you forget you have c as swap and d as your main drive and you install something without changing for c: to d: and don't notice it strange things can happen......:eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭Gerry


    Astrofool is quite correct, having swap at the end would be quite harmful to performance. Say if windows is doing something, and it runs out of memory, well whatever about everything else windows usually resides at the start of the disk. So windows could be swapping itself, meaning the disk head has to constantly move between the centre of the disk and the outer edge. A 512 mb swapfile, on the windows partition should be plenty, if you are flush with harddrive space, allocate more.

    In win2k you can see in disk defragmenter where the swapfile is, quite nice.


Advertisement