Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

if that idiot gets his way

Comments

  • #2
    Hobbes
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    Kind of funny, I was reading the CIA factbook and it mentions that the USA has said it reserves the right to lay claim to Antarctica and does not reconise any nations claims.

    Should be intresting if they find oil there.


  • #3
    smiles
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,648 ✭✭✭smiles


    Well considering oil companies paid the majority of his election costs....

    *grrrr*

    << Fio >>


  • #4
    Typedef
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Oh don't you understand, all those scientists who espouse the connection between fossil fuel and global warming are practicing 'bad science' according to professor Bush.
    It should also be noted that the 'scientist' that 'qualified' the Bush administration's sceptical view on the reality of global warming does not accept the connection between smoking and lung cancer, which is hardly surprising as he is a smoker himself! I am not calling the man's objectivity into question, but I find contradiction in what he says and moreover the 'scientist' in question is a meterologist and does not seem to specialise in climate change as a profession so is resultantly probably not the appropiate person to derive policy decisions from? The 'scientist' in question was covered in newsweek, but I don't think that one 'renegade' scientist such as he should be allowed to simply placate a vast body of opinion that seems to contradicte vast facets of his arguments, ergo, possibly the 'energy policy' of the current American administration and it's detremental effects on the climate are ill appreciated by the 'scientist' that has seemingly advised the President on this issue?

    If you or any member of your family find any pretzels acting in a suspicious manner, don't hesitate, inform the thought police asap


Advertisement