Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gaming Processors

  • 06-07-2002 7:25pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭


    I'm in the process of making my own gaming pc and I was wondering what processor and motherboard would be best. I know the AMD Athlon's beat the Pentium 4's but don't the Athlon's have an overheating problem? Any help on the matter of this and any advice on motherboards would be brilliant.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,815 ✭✭✭✭po0k


    this is a topic for the technology boards, as nothing is being tweaked or modified here.
    You'd get a better response from that board tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭PPC


    And if ya do a bit of searching on the Tech board its been asked quiet alot. And some views by people


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭Doodee


    ppl often say that Athalons are better than p4 but that is still much debated.

    either cpu will do and at good speeds you shouldnt have a problem, mobo will definitly be your problem, I currently have a P4 1.6Ghz, my porblem is that I have sd ram, teh mobo is an MSI one, I have a Radeon 8500LE 128MB and instead of the normal 6,000+ 3dmarks that other seem to get my performance is hindered down to around the 4,000 or even the 5,000. I have Catalyst drivers and all...

    anyways my point is make sure you get a nice mobo regardless of the CPu.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,761 ✭✭✭✭Winters


    Get a good bit of ram aswell. You will need a minimum of 256MB for any PC.. i would recommend 512 MB for games .. It should make it run better...

    Doodee.. are you saying the MSI mobos are a load of poo? I was looking at getting one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,396 ✭✭✭PPC


    I had an MSI (6340 i think it was) and it was a terrible board.
    I've heard that they got better now but i won't go back to them for a while.
    ATM i'd either go for Abit, Asus or Soyo.
    I myself got a soyo board and am very pleased with it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,042 ✭✭✭spooky donkey


    Well for a gaming machine id say that the video card is the most important thing to decide, nvidia are best but the ati boards are comming on leaps and bounds and are a bit cheaper!

    I go for athlon processors myself as I feel you get more power per eruo as they are far cheaper that P4`s with the same amount of clout.

    And when concidering on mother boards look more to the chip set on the board rather than the make of board, get some chipset reviews. I barley rember that my board is made by Elite but i did a fair bit of research on its chip set sis737 which got good reviews.

    Hope i dident confuse you too much, hope this helps


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 973 ✭✭✭ThrAx


    Don't get an MSI they're complete fucking shite i had one and all it did was not work and be slow :) (a lot like #meat# lol) Anyway get a nice Abit KT7 and an Athlon XP 2000+ and go for at least 128megs DDR (preferably 256 or above if u have the cash).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭JustHalf


    You obviously don't have a KT7 using DDR-RAM. Is it the KR7A, and the 'T' is a typo?

    For a gaming machine where money isn't a problem, I'd go for a 2GHz+ P4 with 1066 RDRAM.

    Which is what I'm going for myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,761 ✭✭✭✭Winters


    Well. Ive finally decided on my Pc..

    Im gonna get the Abit KR7A, XP 1700, 256Mb Ram.. was hopeing to go for 512 but ram is expensive at the moment...

    AMD are a lot cheaper then P4.. from what ive heard 2.0 Ghz p4s seem to have a slight overheating problem... but wouldnt you at 2Ghz? :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭JustHalf


    I'll see what it's like at 2.67, and give you a shout.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭Gerry


    Originally posted by Winters
    Well. Ive finally decided on my Pc..

    Im gonna get the Abit KR7A, XP 1700, 256Mb Ram.. was hopeing to go for 512 but ram is expensive at the moment...

    AMD are a lot cheaper then P4.. from what ive heard 2.0 Ghz p4s seem to have a slight overheating problem... but wouldnt you at 2Ghz? :D

    Erm, where did you hear this?

    figures taken from www.sandpile.org

    Maximum power ( all transistors switched on )

    P4 northwood 2.0ghz

    66 W (2.0 GHz 0.13 µm µPGA478 @ 1.50 V)

    amd xp 1700+:

    1466 MHz PM: 64.0 W

    The athlon runs normally closer to its maximum power than the p4 does, this is because the p4 is better at shutting down units which it is not using at the time.

    If we look at typical power consumption figures:

    P4 northwood 2.0ghz

    52.4 W (2.0 GHz 0.13 µm µPGA478 @ 1.50 V)

    Amd xp 1700+

    1466 MHz PM: 57.4 W

    So for typical use, the p4 runs cooler, ( or certainly not any hotter overall ) and I would say a p4 2.0ghz northwood is faster in games than an xp 1700+. The only reason to buy the amd is price.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 973 ✭✭✭ThrAx


    Yup, KR7 forgot the KT7 didn't support DDR.


Advertisement