Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The origin of the species

  • 11-07-2002 10:07am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭


    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992533

    There is of course a counterbalance, well sort of, to the above article.

    Recently in the US the state has mandated the funding of schools who do not teach the theory of evolution as the origin of life, but rather religious creationism which comes at a time when archaeologists seem to be closer than ever to finding the divergence point of hominids.

    A Little Fable

    "ALAS", said the mouse, " the world is growing smaller every day. A the begining it was so big that I was afraid, I kept running and running, and I was glad when at last I saw walls far away to the right and left, but these lonh walls have narrowed so quickly that I am in the last chamber already, and there in the corner stands the trap that I must run into." " You only need to change your direction", said the cat, and ate it up.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 447 ✭✭cerebus


    Originally posted by Typedef

    Recently in the US the state has mandated the funding of schools who do not teach the theory of evolution as the origin of life, but rather religious creationism which comes at a time when archaeologists seem to be closer than ever to finding the divergence point of hominids.


    Is this strictly true? Maybe you'd have a reference for it? (just out of interest!)

    I thought that individual states (usual suspects like Kentucky, etc.) have decided at various stages that the theory of evolution had to be represented as "one possible explanation" for the development of current flora and fauna, with creationism given equal billing. These decisions keep getting challenged in the courts AFAIK, due to the whole constitutional seperation of religion and state thing.

    Or are you talking about the school voucher system the US Supreme Court recently ruled on? I guess this could potentially give federal funding to schools which promote creationism, but I imagine this would get challenged through the US legal system.

    Just in case you're interested here's a rather tongue in cheek synthesis of evolution and creationism - check http://www.oz.net/~travis/sms/descent.htm for some background info...

    synthes.gif

    On a somewhat related note, I was within spitting distance (presuming you could spit 10km) of the Burgess Shale last week. Unfortunately they restrict access to the site and all the available spaces were taken. Just have to go back (and make sure we reserve a slot next time) I guess!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    Or are you talking about the school voucher system the US Supreme Court recently ruled on? I guess this could potentially give federal funding to schools which promote creationism, but I imagine this would get challenged through the US legal system.

    Exactly as far as I can tell from a cursory googling the Supreme court has ruled that the voucher scheme being extended to religous schools 'who also happen to teach creationism' does not breach the first amendament of the US constitution.

    Thus it is a form of state sponsored exponenciation of religous agenda, although I'm quite sure the ruling was not meant as such.

    I just thought it was an interesting dicotomy.

    Yeah


Advertisement