Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Toxicity of Man

  • 01-02-2003 1:43pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,025 ✭✭✭


    New American health probe thingy. They found lots of pretty dangerous pollutants in their test group.

    http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden/es.php

    Love this quote:
    A more precise picture of human contamination with industrial chemicals, pollutants and pesticides is not possible because chemical companies are not required to tell EPA how their compounds are used or monitor where their products end up in the environment. Neither does U.S. law require chemical companies to conduct basic health and safety testing of their products either before or after they are commercialized. Eighty percent of all applications to produce a new chemical are approved by the U.S. EPA with no health and safety data. Eighty percent of these are approved in three weeks.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,564 ✭✭✭Typedef


    It's interesting, just how polluted one can become and still be considered to be, uncontaminated.

    Sort of like a shade of grey schema, when it comes to 'safe' levels of radiation. Allegedly the radiation emitted from Sellafield is 'safe', in terms of it's levels, however, when one takes into account the type of radiation emitted by Sellafield, vis-a-vis cancer clusters in and around Nuclear reactors, it becomes obvious that such broadband shade of grey attitudes to pollutants are all to often, spurious assumptions.


Advertisement