Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

MOAB - Mother of all Bombs

Options
2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 645 ✭✭✭TomF


    I don't remember reading about any nuclear bombs dropping on China or North Korea during the Korean War, nor in the Viet-Nam War. How come?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty



    Taken from StrategyPage.com


    February 27, 2003: The U.S. Air Force is developing a new, 2nd generation, ten ton large, low air burst bomb. It will replace the older "Daisy Cutter" 7.5 ton bomb developed during the 1960s. This was a 7.5 ton bomb using a semi-liquid explosive for clearing landing zones in the Vietnam jungle. The terms "Daisy Cutter" actually comes from the four foot probe at the bottom of the bomb which triggered the explosion without creating a crater (helicopters don't like to land in craters.) The probe was later replaced with a radar altimeter fuze, but the nickname "Daisy Cutter" stuck.

    The official designation was BLU-82 (or "Big Blue"). Until the BLU-82 came along, the biggest non-nuclear explosion obtainable was with a FAE (Fuel Air Explosives). FAE works by dropping a bomb that is actually a large aerosol dispenser. When the FAE "explodes" it first dispenses a large cloud of flammable material (anything like gasoline or propane will work). The cloud is then ignited and huge explosion results. There's one drawback, the size and density of the aerosol cloud depends a lot on the wind, air temperature and humidity. So the power of the explosion will vary a lot. But it's difficult to get a FAE to work in a bomb larger than 2000 pounds. The replacement for the BLU-82 bomb, called MOAB (Massive Ordnance Air Burst) simply uses nine tons of more powerful tritonal explosives, rather that 6.3 tons of the slurry of ammonium nitrate and powdered aluminum used in the BLU-82.

    In dry, dusty conditions, the Daisy Cutter produces a mushroom cloud similar to that created by a nuclear explosion (and for the same reason, the sheer size of the explosion creates an upward pull that sends up a "mushroom" of smoke and dust on a column of smoke). In addition to a more powerful explosion, MOAB doesn’t need a parachute, like the Daisy Cutter, but uses a GPS (like JDAM) and an aerodynamic body to detonate the bomb at a precise area. Thus the MOAB can be dropped from a higher altitude (like outside the range of machine-guns and rifles). Like the Daisy Cutter, MOAB is shoved out the back of a cargo aircraft (usually a C-130, but since the MOAB uses GPS and higher altitude drops, the C-17 can probably be used as well.)

    MOAB is a highly destructive and terrifying weapon. If used in Iraq, it would demoralize any Iraqi troops in the vicinity who survived the explosion. The force of a MOAB explosion is sufficient to knock over tanks and kill any people within several hundred meters of the detonation. After the 1991 Gulf War, the United States started to get rid of it's various FAE weapons. But some were left in the inventory when the Afghanistan came along and the success of Daisy Cutters there, plus the new Russian research in FAE weapons, led to the new American research effort.

    There may be larger, or simply more powerful, FAE weapons in the works. But for the moment, MOAB, using pretty old fashioned technology, is the biggest non-nuclear bomb around.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 645 ✭✭✭TomF


    I posted that without looking at it closely, sorry. I didn't mean to suggest that the U.S. was at war with China in the Viet-Nam War, only that I don't remember reading about any nuclear bombs being dropped by the U.S. during that war.

    As for the Korean War, well, I think everyone must know that when the U.S. drove the Communists all the way from South Korea to the border between North Korea and China, the Chinese Army invaded Korea and drove the Allied forces way back across the 38th Parallel and farther south. General Douglas MacArthur lost his command because he wanted to bomb China, and President Truman removed him from the theatre. There may not have been declared war between the U.S. and China, but in these modern times of war without declarations, it was as close as I want to see.

    Anyway, the point I wanted to make was that even while the Chinese hordes with their human-wave attacks on Allied positions were at their worst, I don't remember hearing or reading anything about the U.S. dropping nuclear bombs.

    Did I miss something?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭Éomer of Rohan


    You are correct that only two nuclear weapons have ever been dropped in anger; those in Japan - however General MacArthur was removed from his post because he actually suggested a massive nuclear strike against Northern Korea and specific targets in China. In Viet - Nam, the American government formally offered nuclear weaponry to the French government when they were caught by the Dien Bien Phu disaster. In the Turkey / Iran / Russia / Azerbaijan dispute, American nuclear bombers were put on their highest alert with orders to bomb Russia if her troops moved into Iran to support the left wing uprisings.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 645 ✭✭✭TomF


    Sabre-rattling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,335 ✭✭✭Éomer of Rohan


    None of the other nuclear powers except India and Pakistan do it and isn't the US supposed to be the sensible nation, the de facto world policeman?


Advertisement