Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Broadband pings/download speed.

1356714

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    mbroaders, can you ping: "clarity.jolt.co.uk"

    Your the first I've seen that has same router as me and Netsource. My line isn't live yet :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 38 Colin_Celbridge


    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=249

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 35ms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 491 ✭✭flav0rflav


    Netsource RADSL, to jolt, ethernet router.

    C:\Program Files>tracert clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Fast.Start [192.168.100.1]
    2 21 ms 22 ms 20 ms rt004dub.netsource.ie [213.79.63.254]
    3 19 ms 19 ms 23 ms rt001dub.netsource.ie [212.17.32.97]
    4 40 ms 31 ms 33 ms rt001thl.uk.vianw.net [195.102.254.69]
    5 31 ms 37 ms 31 ms r1thl.vianw.net [213.2.253.1]
    6 35 ms 38 ms 33 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.66.224.59]
    7 31 ms 35 ms 33 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
    8 34 ms 33 ms 35 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

    Trace complete.

    C:\Program Files>ping clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 34ms


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 48 BlackFlag


    Originally posted by jonski
    35 , did u say 35 , 35 is better than 180 (on a good night when the rest of ye have gone to bed ) , oh I could play with 35 .

    /me dreams of playing with 35

    Thanks alot blackflag.
    hehe I too stay up all hours playing halflife DM and on certain servers ie Barrys (clan) hit 18-25 about 4am
    and the diff between my old isdn and this is that it is so stable during peak times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Mr. Fancypants


    Originally posted by ando
    mbroaders, can you ping: "clarity.jolt.co.uk"

    Your the first I've seen that has same router as me and Netsource. My line isn't live yet :rolleyes:

    Sure Thing


    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 34ms



    Have been playing RTCW on some Jolt Servers today and had a constant stable in game ping of 45 :) Finding it a little hard having to aim at people rather than a few feet ahead :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭nadir


    just for comparison and if anyone is interested.
    I have a cable connection from casema in the netherlands. (512 - full duplex)

    PING boards.ie (217.114.166.147) from 81.68.130.19 : 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from www.boards.ie (217.114.166.147): icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=49.0 ms
    64 bytes from www.boards.ie (217.114.166.147): icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=55.6 ms
    64 bytes from www.boards.ie (217.114.166.147): icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=41.6 ms
    64 bytes from www.boards.ie (217.114.166.147): icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=47.0 msPING clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11) from 81.68.130.19 : 56(84) bytes of data
    .
    PING clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11) from 81.68.130.19 : 56(84) bytes of data
    .
    64 bytes from clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11): icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=31.2 ms
    64 bytes from clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11): icmp_seq=2 ttl=247 time=27.8 ms
    64 bytes from clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11): icmp_seq=3 ttl=247 time=35.4 ms
    64 bytes from clarity.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.11): icmp_seq=4 ttl=247 time=40.9 ms

    --- clarity.jolt.co.uk ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% loss, time 3030ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 27.841/33.868/40.952/4.903 ms


    I pay 45 euro per month, flat rate, no cap. Downloaded 60 or so gigs in the first month, no complaints.
    :ninja:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    C:\>ping clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 30ms

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 50ms, Average = 42ms

    C:\>ping www.netsource.ie

    Pinging www.netsource.ie [212.17.32.48] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=125
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=125
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=125
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=125

    Ping statistics for 212.17.32.48:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 20ms, Average = 20ms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Netsource SOHO (512/128) RADSL


    pings

    Address / Date / Time / RTTMin /RTTMax / RTTAve

    www.boards.ie 05/16/2003 02:32:34 45 70 45
    www.boards.ie 05/16/2003 02:32:34 52 70 52
    www.boards.ie 05/16/2003 02:32:35 51 70 51
    www.boards.ie 05/16/2003 02:33:27 58 70 58

    www.jolt.co.uk 05/15/2003 19:58:00 39 39 39
    www.jolt.co.uk 05/15/2003 19:58:37 38 39 38
    www.jolt.co.uk 05/15/2003 19:58:41 39 39 39
    www.jolt.co.uk 05/16/2003 02:33:27 50 50 50
    www.jolt.co.uk 05/16/2003 02:33:35 38 50 38
    www.jolt.co.uk 05/16/2003 02:33:38 35 50 35

    Happy Days are here again!!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Macker


    Netsource

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 44ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 57ms

    C:\DOCUME~1\GERRY>ping www.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 61ms, Average = 46ms

    50 kb/sec from Microsoft


    Macker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    Netsource:

    Downloading is great, 53-55KBps from microsoft and stable but pings are a disaster. TBH I don't give a f*ck bout download speeds, its low pings I want :mad:

    Back to isdn I go, unless I give esat/eircom a go?


    C:\>ping www.boards.ie

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=291ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=330ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=311ms TTL=53
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=53

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 130ms, Maximum = 330ms, Average = 265ms

    C:\>ping www.netsource.ie

    Pinging www.netsource.ie [212.17.32.48] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=126
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=126
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=126
    Reply from 212.17.32.48: bytes=32 time=200ms TTL=126

    Ping statistics for 212.17.32.48:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 100ms, Maximum = 200ms, Average = 152ms

    C:\>tracert clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.1
    2 311 ms 260 ms 231 ms rt004dub.netsource.ie [213.79.63.254]
    3 180 ms 220 ms 241 ms rt001dub.netsource.ie [212.17.32.97]
    4 320 ms 221 ms 170 ms rt001kil.netsource.ie [212.17.32.101]
    5 200 ms 211 ms 270 ms t3-4-2-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [64.213.22.253]
    6 240 ms 261 ms 250 ms so6-0-0-2488M.cr2.LON3.gblx.net [64.212.107.241]

    7 201 ms 140 ms 140 ms pos2-0-622M.ar2.LON2.gblx.net [208.49.136.58]
    8 211 ms 260 ms 310 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.66.224.59]
    9 331 ms * 40 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
    10 160 ms 221 ms 160 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

    Trace complete.

    C:\>tracert clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.1
    2 30 ms 40 ms 50 ms rt004dub.netsource.ie [213.79.63.254]
    3 230 ms 240 ms 331 ms rt001dub.netsource.ie [212.17.32.97]
    4 350 ms 341 ms 310 ms rt001kil.netsource.ie [212.17.32.101]
    5 171 ms 240 ms 200 ms t3-4-2-0.ar1.dub1.gblx.net [64.213.22.253]
    6 151 ms 170 ms 130 ms so6-0-0-2488M.cr2.LON3.gblx.net [64.212.107.241]

    7 241 ms 260 ms 210 ms pos2-0-622M.ar2.LON2.gblx.net [208.49.136.58]
    8 231 ms 230 ms 261 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.66.224.59]
    9 * * 280 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
    10 290 ms 320 ms 220 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

    Trace complete.

    C:\>



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Mr. Fancypants


    Its just a problem with the network Ando. Im sure they will sort it out next week. Bit of a pain at the moment tho'. Pings have been quite good up until recently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,036 ✭✭✭BArra


    it just seems to be a little teething problems


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    I hope its only teething problems ;)

    I'm just a little concerned about the line error's that I'm getting but


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Eircom i stream starter
    using d-link dsl504
    Web pages are flying in, almost like the blink of an eye
    I am on the Arklow exchange :)



    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=54
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=54

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 22ms

    D:\>ping clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 30ms

    I also did a test at: http://www.bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/stats.html
    which gave the following:
    Details

    Your raw speed was 416554.04 bits per second which is the same as:

    Communications

    416.6 kilobits per second
    How communication devices are rated. Kilo means 1,000 and mega means 1,000,000. Examples include 56k modem and 10Mbit Ethernet

    Storage

    50.8 kilobytes per second
    The way data is measured on your hard drive and how file sharing and FTP programs measure transfer speeds. Kilo is 1,024 and mega is 1,048,576.

    1MB file download

    20.1 seconds
    The time it would take you to download a 1 megabyte file at this speed.

    Rating

    Compared to all connection types worldwide, yours is great

    mm


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    D:\>tracert clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Tracing route to clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.1
    2 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms c104-1.bas1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.
    ]
    3 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms fe0-1.edge1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.
    05]
    4 30 ms 40 ms 30 ms pos0-0-0.core1.thn.london.eircom.net [159.1
    1.98]
    5 30 ms 20 ms 30 ms lon1-9.nildram.net [195.66.224.59]
    6 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms jolt-gw.nildram.net [195.149.20.126]
    7 30 ms 30 ms 30 ms clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11]

    Trace complete.
    and for the boards


    D:\>tracert boards.ie

    Tracing route to boards.ie [217.114.166.147]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <10 ms 10 ms <10 ms 192.168.0.1
    2 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms c104-1.bas1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.104
    ]
    3 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms fe0-1.edge1.prp.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.155
    05]
    4 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms atm4-0-39.peering1.inex.dublin.eircom.net [159
    34.191.126]
    5 20 ms 20 ms 30 ms fe0-0-brian.DUB.router.COLT.NET [193.1.208.204

    6 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms s1-0-0-acc-2.IE.COLT.NET [212.74.64.170]
    7 20 ms 20 ms 30 ms 217.173.97.170
    8 60 ms 230 ms 211 ms 217.114.160.43
    9 20 ms 21 ms 20 ms www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147]

    Trace complete.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    n1 for the tracerts man ;)

    I'm getting "39.4 kilobytes per second" with netsource :(


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    Downgraded from Eircoms 1mb uncapped to 512/128 solo. My pings have halfed (so have my download speeds)


    C:\>ping www.boards.ie

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=55

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 24ms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭carbsy


    Netsource RADSL - 512/128

    52k/sec average downloading from ftp.esat.net (ftp://ftp.esat.net/pub/linux/mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso) and similar results from other sites.

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=186ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=156ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=52
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=52

    Ping statistics for 217.114.166.147:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 141ms, Maximum = 186ms, Average = 159ms

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=249
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=249

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 146ms, Maximum = 161ms, Average = 153ms

    **UPDATE**

    Downloads seem to be stable now but the pings are still awful , lets hope they sort out the Latency issue soon.

    carb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭irishguy


    i dont fine anything wrong with that ft i am getting 137kbs off it :) using download accelerator without using it i am getting 12kbs. so i would advise u getting download accelerator


  • Registered Users Posts: 171 ✭✭paddyman


    Sorry irishguy but whats happening to your connection? what service are u on? whats this download accelerator?

    just never heard of it

    tnx


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭fatguy


    Netsource SOHO RADSL:

    C:\WINDOWS\Desktop>ping clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=253ms TTL=248
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=282ms TTL=248

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 182ms, Maximum = 282ms, Average = 233ms

    I'm getting 5k/s to the file that carsby linked.

    Unacceptable. I'm writing a snooty email right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    Originally posted by fatguy
    I'm getting 5k/s to the file that carsby linked.

    Unacceptable. I'm writing a snooty email right now.

    ftp://ftp.esat.net/pub/linux/mandrake/iso/Mandrake91-cd1-inst.i586.iso

    yeah, I'm now getting a whopping 7KBps to that file


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 kc10


    did that speed test at www.bandwidthplace.com and my raw speed was 26 kb/s and was at 1 in the mornin , thats kilobits per second,is there something wrong at my exchange or something like that ,only got set up today on netsource.did a ping test and got 200 average latency.when surfing the net pages are pretty slow to open,but download accelerator can get up to about 500kb/s but usually about 200. downloading internet explorer servicepack it only went at about 5kB/s. any opinions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭irishguy


    kc10 what connection do u have?
    paddyman, i am on powernet from chorus 512/128. download accelerator makes multiple connections to the same site or different sites to increase the connection speed, it a download manager there are loads of them out there i find this the best. google for it


  • Registered Users Posts: 30 kc10


    my netsource 512/128 is able to download at full speed,pings are down from 400ms yesterday to 40ms today at jolt.co.uk,very happy now as i was going to ring up today and complain,must have been a network problem yesterday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 228 ✭✭MrB


    I've noticed that the Netsource pings can be good during the day and go to hell in the evening/night! Lets hope they've got that extra capacity on line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,751 ✭✭✭Ste-


    Getting horrible pings and download speeds of about 17KB/ps

    :rolleyes:

    Happening the last week or so.
    Can anything be done ?
    Dublin 7 area.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 363 ✭✭melachi


    Does anyone have the eircom starter pack?
    Is it stable all the time (ping wise) or does it go bad during the evening/night as well as the netsource one?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,935 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    pings are perfect 24hrs a day for me.

    C:\>ping www.boards.ie

    Pinging www.boards.ie [217.114.166.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=55
    Reply from 217.114.166.147: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=55


    Actually 29ms looks a bit high. Im off to write a letter of complaint :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,426 ✭✭✭ando


    any news on getting the extra bandwidth Netsource?


    this is a joke

    C:\>ping clarity.jolt.co.uk

    Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=310ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=247
    Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=220ms TTL=247

    Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 220ms, Maximum = 331ms, Average = 283ms


Advertisement