Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

When did Gemma O Doherty go batshyt crazy?

1…116117119121122…150

Comments

  • #3542
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    .

    All scandals and cover ups are only exposed by whistle blowing.
    Placing questions on the public record on the issue of chemtrails would be a start


  • #3543
    TheRepentent
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    DubInMeath wrote: »

    What's with the lgbt style avatar on your profile by the way?


    think he caught something googling gay unicorns......



    https://www.btselem.org/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes


  • #3544
    WinnyThePoo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,417 ✭✭✭WinnyThePoo


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    No you wont, you'll keep saying different things or asking questions back at people to try bury the question you refused to answer.

    I only have 1 account btw.

    I fail to see what would be gained by switching between 2 accounts so you can refuse to answer 2 people instead of 1.
    Ok so you logged out of Winnie the poo.
    Grand so , now what question would you like answered?
    Lol


  • #3545
    Larbre34
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,418 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    All scandals and cover ups are only exposed by whistle blowing.
    Placing questions on the public record on the issue of chemtrails would be a start

    No current public representative, even Mick Wallace et al. would touch that bullshyte.

    Try asking a public rep to put a question on it, see what reaction you get. And it'd just the reaction it deserves.

    Jesus I thought the world might actually become more enlightened as we moved through the 21st Century, but I actually worry for humanity now in a post-truth pseudo-science world. Any old kind of dangerous, seditious and irresponsible bollocks is fair game.


  • #3546
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    No current public representative, even Mick Wallace et al. would touch that bullshyte.

    Try asking a public rep to put a question on it, see what reaction you get. And it'd just the reaction it deserves.

    Jesus I thought the world might actually become more enlightened as we moved through the 21st Century, but I actually worry for humanity now in a post-truth pseudo-science world. Any old kind of dangerous, seditious and irresponsible bollocks is fair game.

    My only argument is the lady has the right to opinions I don't agree with her on everything.
    But my defense of her is only for her right to say whatever she likes.
    It's the rush to shut her down , deplatform her and call her crazy.
    A lot of personal attacks on messenger rather than the points she makes.
    Seems like their is mob waiting in th long grass for her,
    It the motivation of her critics I wonder about


  • Advertisement
  • #3547
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Again, calling out her bull**** and saying why its bull**** is not shutting her down.

    She can self publish all she wants.

    Saying shes being shut down doent make it so.

    The only one doing any shutting down is her when she blocks anyone that questions her. If her opinions hold up, why does she need to block people?


  • #3548
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    Guy:Incognito wrote: »
    Again, calling out her bull**** and saying why its bull**** is not shutting her down.

    She can self publish all she wants.

    Saying shes being shut down doent make it so.

    The only one doing any shutting down is her when she blocks anyone that questions her. If her opinions hold up, why does she need to block people?

    I agree with you she should not block people who disagree with her and discuss and back up theories,
    Maybe she feels intimated by the amount of people attacking her who knows.
    What are you so worked up over her?


  • #3549
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    Are you posting from two different accounts?

    Most posters are a bit sick of your postings so you'll find loads that consider you to be deflecting.


  • #3550
    ogsjw
    Site Banned Posts: 328 ✭✭ogsjw


    lbc2019 wrote: »
    Some of her posts on twitter lately seem to be off the charts.

    You can't make an OP like this and not post examples, it's illegal.


  • #3551
    Birneybau
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,413 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    batgoat wrote: »
    Most posters are a bit sick of your postings so you'll find loads that consider you to be deflecting.

    And to add to ignore list would halve the bloody thread.


  • Advertisement
  • #3552
    Guy:Incognito
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,244 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    I agree with you she should not block people who disagree with her and discuss and back up theories,
    Maybe she feels intimated by the amount of people attacking her who knows.
    What are you so worked up over her?

    If she feels attacked, maybe public office isnt for her. Will she want other MEP's banned if they question her?


    In what way am I worked up? Because I question things? Isnt questioning things good? Or only if its Gemma that does the questioning?


  • #3553
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,851 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ogsjw wrote: »
    You can't make an OP like this and not post examples, it's illegal.

    It's what now? Quit yo jibber jabber :rolleyes:


  • #3554
    gandalf
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    I agree with you she should not block people who disagree with her and discuss and back up theories,
    Maybe she feels intimated by the amount of people attacking her who knows.
    What are you so worked up over her?

    I think it's because a lot of us don't like people spouting absolute falsehoods which she is doing. As for shutting her down I've already said that if anyone can back up their claims with credible proof then I have no problem with them airing their views. GoD does not back up her outlandish fictions and shuts anyone down who asks relevant questions about these views. She is the architect of her own downfall...


  • #3555
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    So your aligning yourself with Muslims who feel the same way but hate Muslims that's some mental gymnastics alright. I'd say you'd hate yourself if you got a black eye.

    What's with the lgbt style avatar on your profile by the way?

    I dont recall ever saying I hated Muslims. Thats some real Cathy Newman style reasoning you have.

    I also have no problem with the LGBT community.

    What I do have a problem with is Dildo wielding, foul mouthed, hyper sexualised people engaging with children. I suspect you'll find most people feel the same.


  • #3556
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Patty Hearst wrote: »
    I dont recall ever saying I hated Muslims. Thats some real Cathy Newman style reasoning you have.

    I also have no problem with the LGBT community.

    What I do have a problem with is Dildo wielding, foul mouthed, hyper sexualised people engaging with children. I suspect you'll find most people feel the same.
    And unicorns... They're not dildo wielding or anything so clearly you have unique concerns.


  • #3557
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    My only argument is the lady has the right to opinions I don't agree with her on everything.
    But my defense of her is only for her right to say whatever she likes.
    It's the rush to shut her down , deplatform her and call her crazy.
    A lot of personal attacks on messenger rather than the points she makes.
    Seems like their is mob waiting in th long grass for her,
    It the motivation of her critics I wonder about

    You can be sure they're tied in some way to PBP, Soc Dems, Sinn Fein and various parasitical NGO orgs.

    In fact I have a few personal acquaintances who suffer (as those here do) from 'GDS' or 'Gemma Derangement Syndrome' and each of them are tied to one or other of the above.

    Its a real pity because if they put as much energy into attacking the corrupt elements of the Irish Political sphere we might actually get somewhere in this country.

    But alas they're fully on board the gravy train and have a taste of that sweet taxpayer moolah and will not give it up. Gemma of course is doing her best to derail that train and this is one reason why they have lapsed into Gemma Derangement Syndrome


  • #3558
    CosmicFool
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 492 ✭✭CosmicFool


    Patty Hearst wrote: »
    You can be sure they're tied in some way to PBP, Soc Dems, Sinn Fein and various parasitical NGO orgs.

    In fact I have a few personal acquaintances who suffer (as those here do) from 'GDS' or 'Gemma Derangement Syndrome' and each of them are tied to one or other of the above.

    Its a real pity because if they put as much energy into attacking the corrupt elements of the Irish Political sphere we might actually get somewhere in this country.

    But alas they're fully on board the gravy train and have a taste of that sweet taxpayer moolah and will not give it up. Gemma of course is doing her best to derail that train and this is one reason why they have lapsed into Gemma Derangement Syndrome

    Your trolling is better than most. Well done.


  • #3559
    Charles Ingles
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,180 ✭✭✭Charles Ingles


    CosmicFool wrote: »
    Your trolling is better than most. Well done.

    I thought he was being genuine


  • #3560
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    batgoat wrote: »
    And unicorns... They're not dildo wielding or anything so clearly you have unique concerns.

    Ah yes the Unicorns...

    I'm quite satisfied that I have conclusively proven the use of Unicorn imagery and trans/gender ideology

    But as a great man once said of a certain caliber of Leftist

    "As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation"


  • #3561
    Larbre34
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,418 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    My only argument is the lady has the right to opinions I don't agree with her on everything.
    But my defense of her is only for her right to say whatever she likes.
    It's the rush to shut her down , deplatform her and call her crazy.
    A lot of personal attacks on messenger rather than the points she makes.
    Seems like their is mob waiting in th long grass for her,
    It the motivation of her critics I wonder about

    You know what, she DOESN'T have the right to dangerous, baseless and subversive opinions.

    You ask why are we so worked up over her? Because she and her ilk prey on the vulnerable, the ignorant and the weakest in society to shore up their vanity projects. They are dangerous..

    WHO figures quoted by the head of the Irish College of GPs yesterday - Notified cases of measles in the EU in 2005; five thousand.

    Cases in 2018? 85 f*cking thousand....

    All thanks to dangerous fools like her and the long discredited anti-vaxx "theory"

    Maybe we can spray a few chemtrails to protect the babies too young to be vaccinated or those with compromised immune systems from the stupid fool parents who would kill them by socialising unvaccinated kids for their own misguided vanity. I swear to f**k it makes my blood boil.


  • Advertisement
  • #3562
    Nobelium
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,093 ✭✭✭Nobelium


    Free speech is also free to be contradicted.


  • #3563
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Patty Hearst wrote: »
    Ah yes the Unicorns...

    I'm quite satisfied that I have conclusively proven the use of Unicorn imagery and trans/gender ideology

    But as a great man once said of a certain caliber of Leftist

    "As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation"

    Unicorns can be used in two different contexts, you are aware of this right? It's also the National animal of Scotland, is that also a part of the plot?


  • #3564
    SafeSurfer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    You know what, she DOESN'T have the right to dangerous, baseless and subversive opinions.

    You ask why are we so worked up over her? Because she and her ilk prey on the vulnerable, the ignorant and the weakest in society to shore up their vanity projects. They are dangerous..

    WHO figures quoted by the head of the Irish College of GPs yesterday - Notified cases of measles in the EU in 2005; five thousand.

    Cases in 2018? 85 f*cking thousand....

    All thanks to dangerous fools like her and the long discredited anti-vaxx "theory"

    Maybe we can spray a few chemtrails to protect the babies too young to be vaccinated or those with compromised immune systems from the stupid fool parents who would kill them by socialising unvaccinated kids for their own misguided vanity. I swear to f**k it makes my blood boil.

    Have you considered that the rise in measles cases in Europe could be a result of the huge influx of people from countries who were never vaccinated rather than as a consequence of a small percentage of anti vaxers?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • #3565
    TaurenDruid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Charles Ingles wrote: »
    All scandals and cover ups are only exposed by whistle blowing.
    Placing questions on the public record on the issue of chemtrails would be a start

    I'd love to be in the government department/EU office that gets that parliamentary question in...

    "Will the minister make a statement on her department's knowledge of chemtrails, their effects on humans, the controls put in place to authorise their use, the chemicals involved, and identify the organisations manufacturing and distributing them?"

    "..."

    "..."

    "..."

    "BWAHAHAHA good one, you had me going there for a minute!"

    "No, it's real."

    "Nah, seriously, I'm busy, I've ten other PQs to research. We've ones in about the increased cases of measles and why is it happening, the fall in cervical cancer since the HPV vaccine came in, the cost overrun in the children's hospital, the private clinic being incorporated into the children's hospital..."

    "Yeah, but this is actually a real one."

    "..."

    "I'll give it to the intern..."

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • #3566
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    Have you considered that the rise in measles cases in Europe could be a result of the huge influx of people from countries who were never vaccinated rather than as a consequence of a small percentage of anti vaxers?

    And isn't it strange that many of the same people who decry Anti Vaxers also advocate for the unchecked importation of multitudes of Un Vaccinated people?


  • #3567
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Patty Hearst wrote: »
    Ah yes the Unicorns...

    I'm quite satisfied that I have conclusively proven the use of Unicorn imagery and trans/gender ideology

    But as a great man once said of a certain caliber of Leftist

    "As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation"

    Nope and no evidence offended to backup your brainwashing theory either.


  • #3568
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    batgoat wrote: »
    Unicorns can be used in two different contexts, you are aware of this right? It's also the National animal of Scotland, is that also a part of the plot?

    You're proving the point in the quote..beautifully


  • #3569
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Patty Hearst wrote: »
    And isn't it strange that many of the same people who decry Anti Vaxers also advocate for the unchecked importation of multitudes of Un Vaccinated people?

    And how do you know that their unvaccinated?


  • #3570
    TaurenDruid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    ogsjw wrote: »
    You can't make an OP like this and not post examples, it's illegal.

    No, it isn't, as all it is is an opinion; and there have been plenty of examples posted of the bizarre stuff she's coming out with, including screenshots and links.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Advertisement
  • #3571
    Patty Hearst
    Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    Nope and no evidence offended to backup your brainwashing theory either.

    More Cathy Newmanesque debate. I never mentioned Brainwashing. Or maybe you're projecting?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement