Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Abortion in Ireland: 2 years on

  • 30-06-2020 01:56PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31


    Now that we've all had time to collect our thoughts, I was hoping to gather some opinions on what people in this country think of the longterm effects Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018 have been. With the benefit of hindsight, is there anybody who would have changed their vote?

    For full disclosure, I voted No in the referendum, which was apparently a pretty odd point of view for 21 year old Trinity student, who was otherwise not particularly right-wing. I would not change it.

    But the argument from the Yes side (made by most lobby groups) that I found most convincing is that legalising abortion would not change the raw number of abortions but only the locations. This has turned out to be completely untrue.

    The number of abortions was 6,666 last year (2019). In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK. It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been misled. Would this have changed your vote?


«13456718

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,785 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Would this have changed your vote?


    In my case, no it wouldn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    No, I would have still voted to repeal. Absolutely, 100%


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,249 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Voted yes and would still 100 percent vote yes again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 290 ✭✭lozenges


    Voted to repeal and would do so again without hesitation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Why would it?

    I voted yes so women had access to abortion, they do so where’s the issue??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,996 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Voted to repeal and would do so again, it's a womans body and as a man my only role is to facilitate whatever choice a woman wants to make.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭thomas anderson.


    Hey look, a Trinity student...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭The Mighty Quinn


    The sky hasn't fallen in yet, has it.

    It just means slightly less trauma for many girls, women & families quietly in the background. Let them have that small peace, don't be re-hashing the same old ****e.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,999 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    The number of abortions was 6,666 last year (2019). In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK. It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been mislead. Would this have changed your vote?

    I would guess that not every Irish woman getting abortions in the UK would have divulged all of their information. Therefore, the numbers in 2017 are probably under represented.

    If you really want an abortion something like a short and inexpensive trip to the UK wouldn't put you off the idea. It's something you would think long and hard about too; the fact that proximal distance is shorter in 2019 than in 2017 wouldn't sway your decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31 downinbigsmoke


    Hey look, a Trinity student...

    Sorry, I only mentioned that because it's Ireland's most liberal university.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,481 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Hey look, a Trinity student...

    Serious posts only please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The number of abortions was 6,666 last year (2019). In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK. It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been mislead. Would this have changed your vote?
    Where did that 3,061 come from though?

    My understanding is that previous to 2019, this data was collected from UK statistics based on the home address of women who had obtained abortions there.

    Which means that realistically 3,061 is a minimum figure. How many women didn't give an Irish home address? How many gave a local address so as to remain anonymous? How many went to other places in Europe - EU citizens would probably go to their home country to get an abortion rather than go to England.

    It doesn't seem to me that the Irish public have been misled. Far from it - that 3,061 is an honest figure - "These are the women that we know about, who are going to the UK". Where they could have done all sorts of extrapolations and manipulations, they didn't.

    It now seems likely that the numbers we had underestimated the number of abortions by more than 50%.

    Would I change my vote? Nope. Absolutely not. This even solidifies further for me that it was the right thing to do.

    The number of 6,666 last year is statistic zero. It is the first time we have an actual, traceable number for the number of Irish residents getting abortions.

    If it shoots up next year, you might have a point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,901 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    I'd still vote no, I thought it would lead to wholesale abortion and I wasn't happy that potential fathers have no rights. Those figures pretty much reinforce my reasons for voting no.
    No issue if it's for medical reasons but that's not what the vote was on.
    I'd like to see the data behind the figures to see who's having them, if it's girls who don't have the means or feel they don't have support it's a travesty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,996 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I'd still vote no, I thought it would lead to wholesale abortion and I wasn't happy that potential fathers have no rights. Those figures pretty much reinforce my reasons for voting no.
    No issue if it's for medical reasons but that's not what the vote was on.
    I'd like to see the data behind the figures to see who's having them, if it's girls who don't have the means or feel they don't have support it's a travesty.
    The vote was on removing the constitutional ban and allowing the government to govern as they see fit.


    Potential fathers is an emotive issue but if you look at it logically, you cannot control the woman's body. If she doesnt want it and you do, what do you propose to do, enforce her to carry to term?


    Also, frankly, it's none of anyone's business why they are having terminations. The people voted, the law was introduced, no reason is needed up to 12 weeks. To be honest, I'd be in favor of a 24 week timeframe like the UK. Or, no timeframe at all. If a woman wants an abortion, she should have one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 686 ✭✭✭0xzmro3n4y7lb5


    Now that we've all had time to collect our thoughts, I was hoping to gather some opinions on what people in this country think of the longterm effects Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018 have been. With the benefit of hindsight, is there anybody who would have changed their vote?

    For full disclosure, I voted No in the referendum, which was apparently a pretty odd point of view for 21 year old Trinity student, who was otherwise not particularly right-wing. I would not change it.

    But the argument from the Yes side (made by most lobby groups) that I found most convincing is that legalising abortion would not change the raw number of abortions but only the locations. This has turned out to be completely untrue.

    The number of abortions was 6,666 last year (2019). In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK. It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been mislead. Would this have changed your vote?

    People accessing abortions in UK often put down UK addresses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,801 ✭✭✭Roanmore


    Now that we've all had time to collect our thoughts, I was hoping to gather some opinions on what people in this country think of the longterm effects Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018 have been. With the benefit of hindsight, is there anybody who would have changed their vote?

    For full disclosure, I voted No in the referendum, which was apparently a pretty odd point of view for 21 year old Trinity student, who was otherwise not particularly right-wing. I would not change it.

    But the argument from the Yes side (made by most lobby groups) that I found most convincing is that legalising abortion would not change the raw number of abortions but only the locations. This has turned out to be completely untrue.

    The number of abortions was 6,666 last year (2019). In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK. It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been mislead. Would this have changed your vote?

    Your post is a bit ingenious.
    There were a lot of people who gave birth where the foetus was not viable. They did not go to England to have an abortion for a number of reasons.
    That option is now available to them.

    Have you figures for that? Absolute figures is not the right way to do it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    We don't know what the number was in the past. Not all women would give their correct address. Some women from Ireland go to countries other than the UK such a sc the Netherlands.

    Would I change my vote. Not a chance. I voted yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭crossman47


    I voted yes, partly at least because of the case doctors made that it created difficulties for them. Now that I see over 6,000 abortions, I would have to consider changing my vote. That number is horrific when only a small number were on genuine medical grounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,363 ✭✭✭nozzferrahhtoo


    seamus wrote: »
    Which means that realistically 3,061 is a minimum figure. How many women didn't give an Irish home address? How many gave a local address so as to remain anonymous? How many went to other places in Europe - EU citizens would probably go to their home country to get an abortion rather than go to England.

    I wonder if we should add to that list of questions "How many women performed some DIY or equivalent, or self medicated it away, on Irish soil and were therefore not included in any statistic either who are now able to access a legitimate option".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭KiKi III


    Voted yes, would do so again.

    Women were also going to Amsterdam and other locations for abortions, or unsafely ordering abortion pills online.

    There’s no reason to believe the actual numbers of abortions has dramatically increased.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    If those numbers are to reduce we need decent sex education and easy access to affordable contraception which I believe we were told would happen but seems to have been placed on the long finger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,351 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    As a father of two young kids both under the age of 3, I would absolutely still vote yes tomorrow.

    On a separate note, the religious crackpots are going to go nuts over that specific 6666 number.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭KiKi III


    eviltwin wrote: »
    If those numbers are to reduce we need decent sex education and easy access to affordable contraception which I believe we were told would happen but seems to have been placed on the long finger.

    Any truly anti-abortion activist would be very much in favour of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 976 ✭✭✭grayzer75


    It was a no from me and remains so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,217 ✭✭✭FionnK86


    I would vote to repeal, as I did 2 years ago. Like above posters, I'm a man & have no right to say what a woman can do with their body just as much as when the missus tells me to stop drinking guiness because of the farts and the beer belly, I can tell her to mind her own business.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭quokula


    I wasn't living in Ireland at the time, I think I would have voted yes but I was on the fence and I certainly would have put more research and thought into it if I was at home and did have a vote. I don't see it as a straightforward black and white issue. Fundamentally we're saying that there is some specific day, and before that day a developing human has no rights, and after that day they do. Whether that is at 12 weeks, 24 weeks or at birth, it is a pretty significant decision. Which is why I would have educated myself more if I was going to vote.

    One thing I did notice amongst friends (who were pretty much 100% yes) is that pretty much every article and argument shared prior to the referendum was about women with serious medical conditions being denied life saving healthcare because of the baby (which I don't see how anyone could possibly argue against), then the day after the referendum that seemed to go out the window in favour of state-funded on demand abortion for anyone in any circumstances (which is of course more controversial)

    It seemed a little disingenuous looking on from a distance. I'm not sure I even know what the state of the actual law is now as it hasn't personally effected me or anyone I know of - which is the reason I'd most likely lean towards yes as it is perhaps not my place to dictate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    As a father of two young kids both under the age of 3, I vote absolutely still vote yes tomorrow.

    On a separate note, the religious crackpots are going to go nuts over that specific 6666 number.

    It is a weird number though.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,481 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Trolling posts and responses deleted. A user has been banned. Please bear the charter in mind when posting.

    Thanks.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    quokula wrote: »
    I wasn't living in Ireland at the time, I think I would have voted yes but I was on the fence and I certainly would have put more research and thought into it if I was at home and did have a vote. I don't see it as a straightforward black and white issue. Fundamentally we're saying that there is some specific day, and before that day a developing human has no rights, and after that day they do. Whether that is at 12 weeks, 24 weeks or at birth, it is a pretty significant decision. Which is why I would have educated myself more if I was going to vote.

    One thing I did notice amongst friends (who were pretty much 100% yes) is that pretty much every article and argument shared prior to the referendum was about women with serious medical conditions being denied life saving healthcare because of the baby (which I don't see how anyone could possibly argue against), then the day after the referendum that seemed to go out the window in favour of state-funded on demand abortion for anyone in any circumstances (which is of course more controversial)

    It seemed a little disingenuous looking on from a distance. I'm not sure I even know what the state of the actual law is now as it hasn't personally effected me or anyone I know of - which is the reason I'd most likely lean towards yes as it is perhaps not my place to dictate.

    I agree with you. There was way too much focus on the difficult cases when in reality most women don't have those reasons. It was a bit dishonest


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,653 ✭✭✭KiKi III


    quokula wrote: »
    I wasn't living in Ireland at the time, I think I would have voted yes but I was on the fence and I certainly would have put more research and thought into it if I was at home and did have a vote. I don't see it as a straightforward black and white issue. Fundamentally we're saying that there is some specific day, and before that day a developing human has no rights, and after that day they do. Whether that is at 12 weeks, 24 weeks or at birth, it is a pretty significant decision. Which is why I would have educated myself more if I was going to vote.

    One thing I did notice amongst friends (who were pretty much 100% yes) is that pretty much every article and argument shared prior to the referendum was about women with serious medical conditions being denied life saving healthcare because of the baby (which I don't see how anyone could possibly argue against), then the day after the referendum that seemed to go out the window in favour of state-funded on demand abortion for anyone in any circumstances (which is of course more controversial)

    It seemed a little disingenuous looking on from a distance. I'm not sure I even know what the state of the actual law is now as it hasn't personally effected me or anyone I know of - which is the reason I'd most likely lean towards yes as it is perhaps not my place to dictate.

    You obviously weren’t paying close attention. The government made it very clear well in advance that they were going to legislate for abortion on request up to 12 weeks.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,711 Mod ✭✭✭✭yerwanthere123


    Voted to repeal and would still do so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭Acosta


    I'm delighted the women of Ireland no longer need to justify themselves to the Iona Youth Defence crowd.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,018 ✭✭✭✭fits


    It’s a very high number for a not inconsequential procedure for many. I’d prefer if it was lower.

    However voted yes and still woyld.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,644 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1116484/
    (1999) In total, 5892 women who had abortions in Britain last year gave their address as being in the republic, compared with the 1997 figure of 5336.

    in 2001 the figure was 6,673

    the numbers today match what the historical numbers were that travelled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,159 ✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    seamus wrote: »
    Where did that 3,061 come from though?

    My understanding is that previous to 2019, this data was collected from UK statistics based on the home address of women who had obtained abortions there.

    Which means that realistically 3,061 is a minimum figure. How many women didn't give an Irish home address? How many gave a local address so as to remain anonymous? How many went to other places in Europe - EU citizens would probably go to their home country to get an abortion rather than go to England.

    It doesn't seem to me that the Irish public have been misled. Far from it - that 3,061 is an honest figure - "These are the women that we know about, who are going to the UK". Where they could have done all sorts of extrapolations and manipulations, they didn't.

    It now seems likely that the numbers we had underestimated the number of abortions by more than 50%.

    Would I change my vote? Nope. Absolutely not. This even solidifies further for me that it was the right thing to do.

    The number of 6,666 last year is statistic zero. It is the first time we have an actual, traceable number for the number of Irish residents getting abortions.

    If it shoots up next year, you might have a point.

    Also how many people would have ordered dodgy pills from the internet rather than travel abroad.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 916 ✭✭✭1hnr79jr65


    As a guy i voted Yes for abortion and i still would. There are certain circumstances where by i would not agree with abortion (not religious reasons as im not religious), however to ensure women had access to the facility if they felt they needed it, i thought it was the right thing to do voting yes.

    For those that argue the point about "potential fathers rights", well until a baby is born, that's all the person is in this equation is a potential father. Zero rights to make a decision on a woman's welfare and body autonomy as it should be, perhaps if you could carry the embryo to term then maybe there would be a case to argue there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 635 ✭✭✭dubstepper


    The abortion factories Waters warned us of never appeared. I thought he was going to leave the country if it passed? More hot air.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭The Mighty Quinn


    KiKi III wrote: »
    abortion on request up to 12 weeks.

    Thanks for cleaning this up KiKi. I really dislike the "on demand" terminology.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 224 ✭✭Glinda


    The number hovered around four thousand for decades. That's just the number who travelled to Britain and who also gave their address as being in Ireland.

    The most likely explanation for the fall in numbers in recent years is 1. the availability of medical abortions (i.e. pills) that can be bought on the internet and taken at home in private without the need for surgery and 2. the inclusion now of women who would previously (and understandably) not have given their true home address when registering in Britain.

    This is the first time there has ever been an accurate count of the number of Irish women availing of a safe and legal abortion service.

    What is and isn't a good reason to have an abortion is only a question you need to form an opinion on if you are the person concerned, or they have asked you for advice. Otherwise, something is happening to their body, with potentially life-altering consequences, so the decision should be theirs. Nobody else has anywhere near as much to lose. So nobody else should get to decide.

    Ultimately, despite recent legal changes, I think we are still struggling wiht the idea that a woman who has an abortion isn't doing anything wrong. We still have a little way to go on this one - I think some are still patting themselves on the back for forgiving these women, or tolerating their behaviour, but there is a lingering sense that the women should be ashamed. They shouldn't.

    If you want to do something genuine about abortion rates, do something about unwanted pregnancy. And that would need to be something that works. But that would mean tackling a whole rats nest of issues, from misogynistic sexual shaming and stereotyping, to tackling education around consent, and allowing people real, free and educated control over their own sexual behaviour.

    Funny, people who are against abortion are all too often against all the measures that have ever been shown to reduce it. You'd almost think it was really about controlling women...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,638 ✭✭✭Infini


    I voted yes to repeal as well, it's up to those involved to deal with the issues, problems and complications involved not zealots with no buisness or involvement in personal matters.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    I was staunchly in favour of a Yes vote and I haven’t changed my opinion on that.

    It’s a private matter between a woman and her doctor and it’s none of my business. Exporting our women to foreign healthcare services was a dark period in our history but I’m proud that we are now taking responsibility and looking after our citizens.

    I still personally don’t think it’s something I’d ever do myself, but I don’t believe that gives me the authority to make that choice on behalf of other women and couples, whose circumstances and life story I know nothing about.

    The dirty, manipulative, dishonest and hyperbolic campaign endorsed by the No vote shows how little they care for women or babies, where’s all the free contraception and better sex education that they promised? None of it came to fruition, they didn’t care then and they don’t care now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    quokula wrote: »
    One thing I did notice amongst friends (who were pretty much 100% yes) is that pretty much every article and argument shared prior to the referendum was about women with serious medical conditions being denied life saving healthcare because of the baby (which I don't see how anyone could possibly argue against), then the day after the referendum that seemed to go out the window in favour of state-funded on demand abortion for anyone in any circumstances (which is of course more controversial)

    It seemed a little disingenuous looking on from a distance. I'm not sure I even know what the state of the actual law is now as it hasn't personally effected me or anyone I know of - which is the reason I'd most likely lean towards yes as it is perhaps not my place to dictate.
    As mentioned above, the intention to legislate for abortion up to 12 weeks was always there and was well publicised.

    However, there is a good reason why there was a heavy focus on rape, suicide and FFAs;

    The question was asked about why repeal was necessary at all - couldn't we legislate for rape, suicide and FFAs without changing the constitution? And the answer was no. We had taken the legislation as far as we could. The conditions to "qualify" for an abortion were very narrow and as such many women could not.
    One particular case involved a young woman who was suicidal. And the process to determine whether she could get an abortion took so long that she ended up giving birth (under anaesthetic) to a live child 12 weeks early which was taken into care.
    We also had a situation where a braindead pregnant women was kept on life support unnecessarily because there were questions about whether it was constitutional to let her die.

    So we had to repeal the 8th amendment. Any suggestions to replace the text were similarly too narrow, to open to interpretation, too likely to result in women not being able to access abortion when they needed to.

    So the next question was - If we repeal the 8th, surely we can legislate to allow abortion only for rape, suicide or FFA?

    But it's the same answer. The result would be situations where women in need would not be able to access abortion and would have to lie, self-medicate or travel in order to get an abortion. The women who were at their most vulnerable were the ones we were trying to protect. And any roadblock to obtaining an abortion puts vulnerable women at risk.

    So, it was settled on allowing an open regime where an abortion could be requested in the first twelve weeks, and later again for FFAs.
    This still puts some vulnerable women at risk, and it would be my hope that we could expand this further, perhaps to 15 weeks. But for now it finds a balance between decency, autonomy and difficult ethical questions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,595 ✭✭✭Tork


    I voted to repeal the 8th and have no regrets. I'd do it again if the referendum was to be re-run. Nothing has changed for me in that regard.

    What I would like to see is a breakdown of why all these abortions were sought and if there is anything that can be done to reduce the numbers. Some of these are unavoidable, such as fatal foetal abnormalities but my guess is that they make up a small percentage of the final figures. How many of these crisis pregnancies were as a result of people not using contraception properly or not using any at all? Are there problems accessing the morning after pill? Is cost a factor? Do we need to educate our teenagers better when they're still in school? How many of these women might have considered keeping their child if there were better supports in place? Other reasons?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Mearings


    For full disclosure, I voted No in the referendum, which was apparently a pretty odd point of view for 21 year old Trinity student, who was otherwise not particularly right-wing. I would not change it.


    Your full disclosure did not include your gender.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,698 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Now that we've all had time to collect our thoughts, I was hoping to gather some opinions on what people in this country think of the longterm effects Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018 have been. With the benefit of hindsight, is there anybody who would have changed their vote?

    I would hope not.
    The legislation was published and it was very easy to understand what it was going to mean.
    If anybody didn't bother to inform themselves before the vote then that's a reflection on them.

    But the argument from the Yes side (made by most lobby groups) that I found most convincing is that legalising abortion would not change the raw number of abortions but only the locations. This has turned out to be completely untrue.

    You have provided no basis for this assertion.
    In 2017 (which was quite a high year) there were 3,061 abortions linked to Ireland in the UK.

    Those are only the ones we know about, who gave an RoI address.
    Some women travelled to countries other than the UK.
    It ignores illegal abortion pills which are unquantifiable, although:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/decrease-in-number-of-irish-women-having-uk-abortions-1.3522768
    One online provider reported that 1,217 women from Ireland “received the medical abortion pill” from their service in 2017. A second online provider reported that 878 women from the Republic “used the service” in 2017.

    It seems to me (but maybe not you) the public have been mislead.

    Everybody knew, or should have known, exactly what they were voting for.

    BTW I don't think the current legislation goes nearly far enough, and I'm far from alone in thinking that. Some women are still having to travel to the UK. FF in Health though so we can probably forget about any meaningful change.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,698 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Glinda wrote: »
    The most likely explanation for the fall in numbers in recent years is 1. the availability of medical abortions (i.e. pills) that can be bought on the internet and taken at home in private without the need for surgery and 2. the inclusion now of women who would previously (and understandably) not have given their true home address when registering in Britain.

    Don't forget the morning-after pill.

    SusieBlue wrote: »
    The dirty, manipulative, dishonest and hyperbolic campaign endorsed by the No vote shows how little they care for women or babies, where’s all the free contraception and better sex education that they promised? None of it came to fruition, they didn’t care then and they don’t care now.

    Did they actually promise any of that? I don't think so, the vast majority of them (the No campaign, as opposed to No voters) are religious fundies who are opposed to proper sex education, and often contraception as well.

    Tork wrote: »
    What I would like to see is a breakdown of why all these abortions were sought and if there is anything that can be done to reduce the numbers.

    it's none of your business or anyone else's business.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭screamer


    I voted no, mainly because of the fact that it was just a blanket 12 week thing, and gives no choice to people who for example might have a foetus with downs to terminate as the testing is not available within a 12 week timeframe.
    I think it’s sad there are so many unwanted pregnancies, but at the end of the day, no one (as in the do gooders who picket GP clinics) is going to help you raise that little person, be there to give you a hand or support in the middle of the night when you’re walking the floor with them, or generally give a fiddlers. From that point of view, if someone is not able/ interested or ready to bring another life into the world that decision is on them, and much as I don’t agree with it, I don’t judge them either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,104 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    I would never want to see women oppressed in this country again, mostly by men who want to control them. That day is long gone thankfully regarding Divorce and Abortion now.

    Most of the figures quoted represent those who can now access terminations within twelve weeks in tablet form. Heretofore it was over the internet. No one is identified, and there is medical follow up if needed.

    Those who access abortions regarding FFA or threat to life of the mother will not do that to defy anyone, it must be heartbreaking to make that decision one way or another. Compassion and understanding are needed.

    But anyway, it doesn't matter anymore, it is here, it is legal, and we have come a long way as a country.

    Family and Life Organisation is one to watch though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭amdublin


    I voted to repeal. I'd vote again that way if the referendum was tomorrow.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,481 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: Whether or not abortion is morally correct is not the point of this thread, it is about the impact of the referendum and associated legislation on Ireland.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
Advertisement