Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1131132134136137810

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,507 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves



    In other words you overpaid . Very few houses are still below crash prices most are 10-30% above it

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,275 ✭✭✭tobsey


    The 2013 price was unnatural. It was below the cost price, never mind the reasonably market price in stable conditions. Once demand caught up on supply it was always likely it would be worth far more.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I can't agree with that for the reason being that house price increases are not correlated to a rebound in earnings or an increase in mortgage lending. These price levels (and perhaps those slightly higher, achieved in 2015 - for me 2015 rents and prices are a good balance when measured against salaries) were a correction from the artificial prices of the 00s, with the increases since then again being inflated due to nothing which we can claim is solid or sustainable (i.e. QE, constant net immigration at levels which services and infrastructure cannot keep up with, government acting as a whale in the market).

    What I mean by not sustainable is that we are seeing a dramatic shift in the younger generations (under 35s in particular) seeking out alternatives to the mainstream political parties (i.e. SF and People Before Profit ("Let's ban all corporates from owning property") as they feel they are not being sufficiently catered for in the current system which is directly linked to the housing crisis. But for the actions of the State and QE, house prices should not be much higher than what they were in 2013-2015, which are more "natural".

    An IT article this morning from their business correspondent related to the government decision to delay publishing their political life saving Housing For All strategy, which we know is going to be backed by billions upon billions of borrowing. The article sets out what is often lacking in the reports on how to fix the housing crisis; mixed with increased supply, house prices must fall.

    The Government...has one shot at this one.

    Just throwing money at the problem, in other words, won’t fix it.

    It suggests that reducing private sector investment on non-housing construction projects is one way to free capacity. This could happen naturally if office demand slumps post Covid-19 – but the document even suggests that tax measures could be needed to discourage commercial building and direct resources to housebulding. The State trying to engineer a slump in commercial building would be some change after years of incentives to development.

    If the older generation of policymakers is going to pioneer a new way of living for younger people, then there is a lot of explaining – and more importantly listening – to be done. We haven’t even started this discussion yet. After all, this is those living in the suburbs with gardens and mortgages paid trying to explain to younger people that they can only aspire to something smaller.

    And the younger generation can legitimately ask whether those of us who own properties are happy to see prices fall to make them more affordable for them. Because, in the long term, if any housing plan is to work, homes will have to cost less.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    You mention increase in wages/mortgage lending, but neglected to consider another important driver in the property market, cash/savings. A significant proportion of sales in the last five yrs were completed without the need for finance and we’re not contingent on income. And I am not talking about investment funds, more about Irish property buyers with cash on deposit.


    So let’s recap on the the reasons why a property may have risen in price since 2013, the list is not exhaustive.

    • In 2013 the country was less than a yr after the low point of the last recession, property prices were at the bottom of a downward cycle that began in 2008.

    • There was unemployment, banks were not lending, confidence in jobs/economy/property market was low. There was a surplus of houses, but people did not want to buy, so they saved.

    • Skip forward to 2020, full employment, large savings on deposit, CB rules mean credit is curtailed to ensure responsible lending, but buyers are sitting on large cash deposits.

    • Investors have entered the market buying huge swathes of developments, there is now a dearth of properties to buy, record low levels of listings on daft, but with rents so high, people see buying as a better alternative.

    • Add in the pandemic, those most affected employment wise are the low paid who would not necessarily be the buyers interested in that apartment. Employees on MNCs etc are now looking for a place to live/work from, close to the action in Dublin, possibly renting a room out for a tidy sum.

    • Building has been stifled by bureaucracy, lack of investment, cost of building, pandemic etc, so it will be yrs before supply catches up to demand. In a typical market, production ramps up to meet demand as producers strive to earn profits, but that does not happen in the property market here, so there is a funnelling effect, lots of buyers condensed into bidding on a few properties.

    You say the prices are not sustainable, high prices rarely are, hence why history has shown that has always been cycles of highs and lows in the property market.

    All these factors contribute to a price increase from the lows of 2013 to the highs of 2021, you have been around long enough, God knows you link enough long articles/ad listings, to surely have a grasp on why prices rose to the level they are at today.

    Post edited by Dav010 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,507 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    In 2013 we were at the low point of the property price crash in Dublin which started to rebound from then on. Cork, Galway and Limerick all took another 2-3 years to rebound. Builders could not build at below the cost of construction. We have had serious inward migration over the last 5 years. The case for the small landlord V the institutional landlord is varied. there is no such think as economies of scale in managing rental properties. The lad with 3-5 properties will always have lower costs as well as contacts and flexability than an institutional landlord to manage a group of properties. He will probably paint and carry out routine maintenance himself. It could cost 1.5-2K to repaint a 2-3 bed house or apartment for an institutional landlord, a smaller landlord will do this maybe for 3-500 euro. ditto for other minor repairs such as plumbing, heating replacing things such as fire alarms for certification.

    As demand ramps ups Dublin's labour costs increase's substantially as there is loads of construction work nearer to workers. Commercial construction in Dublin has also increased building costs. This is transferring down the country. At present in the area I live 15+ miles from Limerick builders are charging 130-150/sqfoot to go to builders finish on houses. Smaller jobs are 170-200/sqfoot. Builders want an answer straight away after giving a quote and will only honour that quote for 7-14 days. Pre pandemic costs were 70-80/sqfoot for house construction. To put this into context a 1500 sq foot bunglow would have cost 110-120k to build two years ago now its 200K+. That is to builders finish. This was the BidX auction yesterday there is still alot of house selling out there at below construction costs

    https://bidx1.com/en/en-ie/auction/properties/1731

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 721 ✭✭✭drogon.


    I know a good percentage of homes are/were being bought up by large organisations (Investments/Pension Funds/REIT etc), but do we have any reports on their occupancy rates?

    Just want to see if there are any figures out there if they are just holding property as assets or do they have tenants and are being actively rented out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    "house prices should not be much higher than what they were in 2013-2015, which are more "natural"

    That would be great, unfortunately that's not natural or realistic, regardless if its FFG or SF. Fundamentals of Demands/Supplies will dictate the price of private market. Hardly anyone would build new homes for 2013 prices. Even in 2013 there wasn't much of construction when costs were lower.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    You can look at the companies annual reports. They provide rates, and where their incomes flowing from.

    Overall Occupancy rate is around 90%-98%. Lower for the objects in Dublin city center, but higher outside city center.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    < MOD SNIP >

    Post edited by Graham on


  • Registered Users Posts: 616 ✭✭✭bureau2009


    Very good article on property by Fintan O'Toole in Irish Times today, 24/07/21 (Weekend Review section.)

    Maybe someone could post a link? Article is titled "From aristocrats to fat cats - the story of an Irish building site."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭Woah


    Article is paywalled for me! Does anyone know if those apartments on Griffith Avenue that were sold to a fund were always intended to be build to rent or where they originally for sale on the open market? Very disappointing if it's the latter.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Copy and paste to outline.com, if it isn’t up today, it usually is tomorrow.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    The happy days of outline are coming to a close as some people can't stop shouting about it from the rooftops.

    Basically, fintan says that the fund in South Carolina is an absentee landlord and paid €523k per unit so don't expect affordable rents in the new development.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    in 2008 it was easy credit, in 2021 the bubble lies in overleveraged funds!


    Central Bank: Ireland could face property ‘fire sale’


    "New report cites a need to explore possible policy interventions for indebted funds that hold €13.6 billion worth of real estate"


    "The Irish real estate sector is susceptible to a “fire sale” of property due to international funds that control billions of euro worth of homes and offices carrying significant levels of debt that may not be paid on time.

    A research paper published by the Central Bank said large property funds in Ireland with more than €13.6 billion in assets face narrow timeframes to start repaying borrowed cash, which could spark a “fire"




    Post edited by MacronvFrugals on


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Having said that if property keeps going up in the manner we have seen over the last 18 months you will have a property worth as much if not more than in 2008 as well as having equity in your back pocket by paying off a mortgage instead of rent, put it this way you would be in a much better position financially having paid off 13/14 years of a mortgage than someone who did not buy in 2008 and decided tor rent. Your case proves that buying is probably the the safest option even in the face of a pandemic or property crash and as Ireland do not do family home repossessions its no longer a bet for the person buying they can be secure in the knowledge that the left leanings of our political class will keep you in your family home even if you don't bother paying



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    and if anything with our new time scales going from 8 years to 4 months to get undocumented refugees to documented status if anything we are going to see a swarm of emigration inwards and guess what folks add that to our left leaning political class the mantra of housing for all will mean an even tighter squeeze on the supply side.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I just don't think the supply/demand forces are being allowed to function as they would in a less-State/central bank influenced, more competitive market. For example, it's just not sustainable for the State to compete with individuals for rentals (with the State now supporting a third of all tenancies in Ireland - a third! That goes to show the staggering and severe problems with affordability in the market). Other examples are with RPZs putting a floor under rents, laws that go too far protecting non-paying tenants and mortgagors, uneven tax regime for landlords. Bigger factors include central bank money-printing the last 10 years which is lighting a fire under the demand side with institutionals hoovering up properties around the world, including Ireland, in direct competition to individuals - again it's important to say that, with QE, it should not be required at these phenomenal levels if the financial system was on solid footing. Not to be too overdramatic but large parts of the financial system (with the property market included) are based on foundations of sand with QE printers being the equivalent of pumping more and more sand under the structure as it begins to sink in the hope it stays upright.

    All that being said, whilst being a part of the problem, QE is giving our government a fantastic, blank cheque to at least light a fire under the supply side with a proper, sustainable and long term housing strategy. Targeted outcome of significant increases in supply mixed with a gradual, but material correction in rents and house prices will go a long way to creating a more stable market.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,501 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    I don't agree with the policy of long term leases but even if the government built their own properties this would have an impact on the supply side as less properties would be built in the private sector due to a shortage of builders who were building for the government and no longer the private sector.


    The Shortage in supply is down to 2 things in my eyes:

    • Planning laws that take years and years
    • Lack of government Planning/willingness to address the issues.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    Really annoying, this is not in yesterday's newspaper. Can you give a general thrust?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    QE printing is not a foundation of sand. As dollar is not just a paper. I was involved in "bye bye Dollar" discussions back in 2008. The "papers" are still there, with it's value.

    You say state support third of rentals, and calling not sustainable. I'm not sure if you even looked at the expenses, what part it cost for Public, to evaluate that it's not sustainable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    Those are some of the reasons for supply constrains, but there much more than that for the constrains.

    Workforce, building costs, price, etc.

    If price goes let say 30% up from 2020. I'm fairly confident construction output would increase to 30K/annual, in matter of couple of years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    It's unsustainable as it is in a viscious upward spiral, creating higher rents despite apparently being a measure supposed to deal with people falling through the cracks due to high rents, which then leads to more people falling through the cracks due to the high rents and needing support. It requires the State to constantly raise cash to throw at the problem, which is already a billon annually on this measure alone and will need to keep rising unless significant supply and big drops in rents happen.

    It's like using a bucket to empty the water from a boat with a hole in it, with the water seeping in the equivalent of demand for social housing and the bucket the State supports for the rental market. If the hole (ie high rents) was smaller, then maybe we would be okay and could empty the water faster than it fills, but right now the water is filling up quicker than the State can empty the boat while the State decides to just use a bigger bucket as the hole gets bigger rather than fixing the cause of the leak.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Where would the extra output come from?

    There's already a massive shortage of construction workers/tradies, and there is far from a shortage of money in the sector. Also for the foreseeable, price rises due to materials will outstrip price rises due to increasing demand - if anything we may hit a point where prices are too low for new builds to be affordable from construction POV, but any higher and most buyers could not get finance to purchase!


    Ireland's construction sector will soon be in crisis if materials keep rising - we need a quick solution for the forestry/lumber backlog first of all, and then proper trade schools that can train up larger numbers of new carpenters/plumbers/electricians/plasterers etc etc. Current apprenticeship approach doesnt have the capacity for large volume of new tradies needed in this country going forward. We need to copy the European model for teaching these things



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    Some people are fairly flexible with their jobs/location. There are people if they see financial benefits by changing location/work, they are willing to change it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    There is already a large premium charged for construction labour - at what price point will we see more people relocate to Ireland? It can't get much higher really, because if labour costs increase too much then the houses are unaffordable and wont sell - so they wont build them in the first place.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Whatever happens with short term fluctuations, reading all the climate news over the weekend (most notably the fires in the US that are now staggering in their scale and duration) makes me think that Ireland will become a destination of choice for many. Seems like one of the best places to see out what is happening in the world. We have a massive diaspora and all those west and mid-west Americans, and British Columbias and Australians etc etc with an Irish grandparent will be looking for somewhere to go.

    long term, Irish real estate will benefit from climate related migration IMO, so no reason to hesitate buying now. Pressures will only be upward due to migration as Ireland becomes the place to be



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,036 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It's just as likely that Ireland becomes frozen over and inhospitable than it becomes some kind of tropical island paradise - climate change could change anything - if the gulf stream were no longer warming us we would be frozen over. Not to mention being an island, and the prospect of rising sea levels. We are far from a climate safe haven



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    there is no specific price point, the more benefits, the higher the wage growth in construction, comparing to other sectors/locations, the more people you can expect to move in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18 Seeds2098


    New home prices in US dropped 5 percent from $380,700 to $361,800 median in the last month.

    This is a massive drop and interesting to see if other Countries start to follow.

    Hold on tight.



Advertisement