Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Would you be happy for your children to receive covid-19 vaccine

18911131436

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭mohawk


    This is a very important point that many posters are overlooking. A small fraction of the world has been vaccinated and it’s likely to be that way for some time. Our efforts in Ireland alone will not be enough to prevent variants or stop it being endemic. So there is no point getting upset with parents who would make a different decision to yourself. Right now in Ireland we are using the vaccines that we are getting in via deliveries. We are not in a situation where there are thousands of vaccines sitting in warehouses because people won’t take them. People are taking them. Some people will delay but if someone else is taking that vaccine it’s not that big a problem.

    We are in uncharted territory regarding using vaccines to get out of a pandemic. It’s never been done before. Theoretically it is very possible to end this pandemic using vaccines, but I don’t believe it can be done with only wealthy nations vaccinated. There is really no point getting upset with parents in Ireland that are planning on waiting. As we see from childhood vaccination program the vast, vast majority of parents are not anti-vaxxers in this country. It will be same with Covid vaccine but it might take a month or two for some to sign their child up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    We absolutely can achieve herd immunity. It will never be 100% effective - that is eradication, not herd immunity, and that's not what we're going for.

    If enough people get vaccinated, then the proportion of people who are potential carriers drops and drops, meaning the risk of vulnerable people coming into contact with a carrier drops and drops. That's what herd immunity is.

    We will never eradicate Covid, we will have to live with it. Getting as many people vaccinated as possible will make living with it easier and quicker. That's the objective here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    My 12 year old is double vaccinated and has been for a few weeks - no underlying conditions and no side effects.

    My wife works in the industry (not directly related to this vaccine) and has seen a huge amount of actual data (not facebook data) and as a fully informed pharma scientist with access to the clinical data had no reservations about getting the vaccine herself or for our daughter.

    She spends her days absolutely furious with the horseshite she hears and sees across social media and the main stream media. She understands why some parents are hesitant .. but that is due to the onslaught of misinformation and irrational thinking and theorising by unqualified ‘experts’ .

    Viruses will mutate as long as they are able to move freely around any demographic …. This free movement is aided by unvaccinated people and therefor the more unvaccinated vectors in the population the greater the chances the virus has to mutate … and of course the greater the chance of a mutation which is either more transmissible or more damaging to public health and even more resistant to vaccines.

    The argument of ‘it doesn’t affect kids’ .. shows a total lack of understanding of the basics of managing a virus from a public health perspective.

    I even had to listen to someone on Newstalk yesterday saying she had great experience of travelling around the world and using holistic medicines as a reason to not take the vaccine - its mind boggling how we can allow this nonsense to be broadcast.

    There isn’t anyone forcing a vaccine on anyone … its a personal choice - however as with all personal choices there will be implications - and at the moment that is not being allowed inside to have a pint or a bit of lunch … but the implications to society at large may well be greater.


    The good news is that the vast majority of Irish people follow the science and are willing to take the vaccine … so hopefully that large percentage will offset the choices the rest make.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8 Head


    Maybe if the vaccine was designed to prevent infection this is not the case it was only designed to prevent serious illness. Does anyone have numbers on the actually reduced transmission as a result of the vaccine.

    Also it is less likely to achieve herd immunity within an open population. What where the numbers coming into dublin airport last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    No, this is wrong too.

    The vaccines are highly effective at preventing transmission. Greater than 95% effective according to some very large studies. They absolutely prevent transmission.

    Seriously, we need billboards to this effect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    what some people are failing to grasp is that these vaccines have been subjected to some of the most intensive studies of any vaccines ever - even in a relatively short time frame. The largest pharmaceutical companies in the world have almost unlimited budgets to throw at resources to get these over the line. The relevant scientific communities globally have focused their efforts on a scale never seen before to the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    They're about 80% effective at reducing infection from Delta on average (see link below). That doesn't mean 20% of people are going to get it, it means your chances of getting it are reduced by 80% so in reality the situation is better than the figure would suggest at first glance. They're 95%/97% effective at keeping you out of hospital. I haven't seen much in the way of transmission data, but it is a relatively small number of vaccinated people who bought get infected in the first place, and then generate enough virus to go on to spread it. The CDC are now advising even vaccinated people to wear a mask again, but they use the word "rare".




  • Registered Users Posts: 8 Head


    I think you will find that was for the alpha variant and not for the delta variant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    You're mistaking "transmission" with "infection".

    The data is showing more people can become infected with Delta. But most infections are asymptomatic, and the volume of virus expelled by even a symptomatic vaccinated person is likely to be a lot less (e.g. a headcold which clears up in a day or two, versus an unvaccinated person being infectious for a week). There's very little stats on the likelihood of transmission by vaccinated people simply because it's hard to find cases.

    In the long-term, we're probably all going to become "infected" with the virus. Antibodies won't hang around forever. What matters is whether your body can recognise the virus and react quick enough to kill it - this is what the vaccine gives you. Without the vaccine, your body doesn't recognise it and mounts a very disorganised and slow response.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Correct, but even if the numbers are lower for the Delta variant, they will still prevent a lot of transmission. My bet is that the numbers will eventually be shown to be similar for Delta.

    The notion that they only prevent illness and not transmission is simply not correct.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8 Head


    Thanks for your reply. It is much more beneficial to get articulate concise responses. Then vitriol from both sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,808 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "...There's very little stats on the likelihood of transmission by vaccinated people simply because it's hard to find cases...."

    That's true. But You can kind of see it indirectly in the stats. As vaccination increased the number of cases (transmissions) declined. This isn't the full story though. As we had lockdown, isolation, masks etc., which also had a similar effect. But then we also opened up allowing people to mingle. often in the younger ages groups when they were mainly unvaccinated, which then caused a rises in case. Which is the reason for vaccinating younger ages groups. Also not everyone has the same Vaccine. Some are more effective than others, against new strains, delta etc. Even if everyone was vaccinated, when we open the numbers will still rise, as the Vaccines do not have a 100% success rate.

    The idea is all these measures drive the numbers down, both in cases, and hospitalizations. Down to a sustainable level. Are their concerns with Vaccine. Sure. Is there a better performing alternative no. Should be stop vaccinations while we have nothing better. Logic suggests no.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Not sure why some posters, previously sane and reasonable, are losing it over this question and resorting to outright abuse. Some people will have different views of vaccines, up to and including being completely anti-vaxx. On that spectrum are those with concerns, fears and questions and yet they get lumped into a big pot of crackpots. We need to remember that the prize is to get as many vaccinated as possible and we are doing very well on that anyway. For those that remain some can be persuaded to sign up. What they think about it is irrelevant as long as they get a shot but they will not be persuaded by insults nor aspersions cast on their intelligence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    But isn't that essentially "Treat me like an idiot, but don't let me know you're treating me like an idiot because then I'll get angry".

    The facts and data are in abundance and repeated very often (witness again above someone having to be corrected about transmission pre and post vaccination), if someone is coming onto a message board and willfully ignoring the data, they can't expect to go unchallenged because it might make them feel silly, human nature just doesn't work that way, the slightest bit of validation for their viewpoint becomes reinforcement to continue making silly decisions into the future, which gets worse when all the anti-vax tropes start leaking in (they're not approved, they were rushed, they don't stop infection, they effect fertility etc.). I've said this before, but the amount of data points for the vaccine vs. basically every other medicine developed in the last couple of decades is off the scale to the point where we can detect the really really rare effects, there is no concerns about safety, the experts who look at this data are absolutely clear on this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    Maybe its time for some reverse psychology … once the vast majority get the vaccine - then Simon Donnelly to go on RTÉ and tell everyone that the vaccines are dangerous and the government policy dictates that no one should get it … then you’d see a surge of the likes of the people at the protest the weekend queuing up to get it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Only if you feel people care that you think them an idiot or not. This is really not their message. It's the equivalent of extolling the superior qualities of a new Samsung phone when all they want is a phone to take pics of family and use that "WhatsApp thingy". With respect, this is long and very boring even for me. Far too much science in it for some people.

    You have to get to their concerns whatever they are. The HSE have engaged with frontline staff to do that to boost vaccination rates, even though the numbers are small. You're also ignoring the aim, to get more people vaccinated. If some can be persuaded to do so, who cares what they think?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Sure, but that's really just a roundabout way of saying "tell people what they want to hear so they'll make the correct choice" which is fine, the problem is that if someone is that malleable, it's very easy for them to be persuaded the other way through disinformation as well, and on the disinformation side they can target areas that people might feel to be true rather than actually true, if someone is here, on a message board, asking questions, they should be treated as a rational adult, not as someone to be tricked "to get the vaccination % higher", open minds rather than close them.

    It's not nice being wrong about something and have to backtrack on a position.

    It's even worse to be wrong and not know you're wrong because everyone around you is too polite to tell you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    We kind of had this with the travellers who were being targeted for J&J so they could get 1 shot and be done with it (knowing that getting them back for a second shot would be problematic) que spokesperson coming out and saying they wanted Pfizer as they thought it was the "better" vaccine, so it created a demand in a group that would normally see low uptake. The government have been quite good at dripfeeding demand to encourage high uptake, it's uncertain whether this was planned or happened by accident :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's not trickery. You establish their concerns, see if you can address them and maybe they will change position. People change positions when they process situations and rationalise that new position. How and why they do so often doesn't matter at all. Again you seem to be imaging a homogenous blob of distasteful people who have no interest in anything else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 223 ✭✭One_More_Mile


    The lady on Clair Byrne earlier who was involved in the process for recommending vaccine for over 12 year olds was very specific and precise with her wording. The recommendation was to offer vaccines to children in that age group. The recommendation was not that children in that age group to take it but offer it. Covering themselves from any fallout in advance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    And if people have irrational concerns? Would you point out that they are irrational, or just give up in case you offend them?

    As a simple example "I want to wait longer", you can point out that waiting longer won't change anything and that waiting is increasing the risk in the meantime (especially with school starting again in ~5 weeks), but if that is still their response, there is nowhere else to go, you might even try and get them to say what longer means (next week/month/year/decade), in those cases, I believe, you can only point out the irrationality of the position and at least the person has to come to terms with that fact themselves, they may not reply as such (as it means backing down) but at least they have to own the position and can't blame others for it (which seems to be the way these days, they didn't say it was that dangerous).

    You're right, the starting point should be finding out the concerns and then presenting data in a way to allay those concerns, if the person continues those concerns, you need to point out their ignorance (as nicely as possible), if it continues, you'll often find their goal is to spread misinformation among others or to get enough other people in their group that their stance can be justified (thus the danger of the Facebook echo chamber).



  • Registered Users Posts: 223 ✭✭One_More_Mile


    Didn't insinuate anything draw your own conclusions



  • Registered Users Posts: 991 ✭✭✭Stormyteacup


    The last paragraph could be applied to those fully vaccinated but still have the irrational fear of indoor dining or flying.

    There has been a lot of irrational thinking the past year and a half.

    Why the rush to pressure parents into vaccinating their children? We will likely achieve decent herd immunity at some point. Does anyone really think that if 90% of the population were vaccinated tomorrow everything would immediately revert to normal? We will have restrictions right through this Winter at least, regardless of how many we vaccinate.

    If herd immunity is declared it will be after a long period of observation and further study. In the meantime vaccines will continue to be administered and those hesitant will have time to make/change their decision.

    Achieving herd immunity in Ireland only will not stop variants.

    It looks like those pushing hardest for vaccination of children are doing so from a place of fear, not rationality. Rollout for under 12s will be soon enough, those concerned for their children’s safely from long-covid will be able to get their children vaccinated, and more will follow in time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭sergioaguero


    no chance, not enough study done into it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    Can you define what ‘enough study’ means.

    These vaccines have been subjected to the most intense studies and research ever seen … billions of does have been administered and never heard of before resources and cooperation globally have been directed to them.

    So I’d be interested as to what you believe as ‘enough study’ is ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭sergioaguero


    a few years to see the effects it has on a growing child



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    so you'd be happy to keep the virus mutating and spreading around for a few years then ?

    Also - what would you be concerned about in the vaccine that would hinder growing children which hasn't been factored in by the masses of actual scientists and researchers ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8 Head


    Again people think that this virus is going to mutate in ireland. On that basis there must have being quite a number of mutations that originated in Ireland so far when we were not vaccinated.

    This virus will mutate in densely populated countries with low vaccination. Like Brazil, India etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,166 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    Why are you not concerned with the effects of Covid on a growing child?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭boardlady


    As a parent of a child who has already had covid - just to add another dimension to the discussion - I will be vaccinating him at this point for pure efficiency. I am not afraid of the vaccine for his age group, and neither am I afraid of him catching covid (obviously). We will be vaccinating him so he can travel again with the ease we are now able to with our EU covid passports. While he did struggle for several months after covid, he has made a full recovery now. In my non-professional - and purely maternal capacity ;) - I am satisfied that he has no long term complications from covid. Vaccinating him feels like the belt and braces approach to prevent infection from a more dangerous variant. The nice side effect will be ease of international travel. Truly a personal decision though and the government narrative seems to be impressing this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet



    Mutations will happen in any environment where it can spread. There may well be mutations already from ireland .. but none that were significant enough to merit global news like the UK and Delta variants ... however .. just because it hasn't happened does not mean it can't happen.

    The likes of Brazil and India will have far more mutations than ireland .. so the chances of a significant mutation there is obviously greater .. but does not rule out it happening in ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8 Head


    Agreed potentially it could happen but I wonder what the likelihood is compared with other populations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    i'd leave that to the scientists .. but it is a risk to public health and one that needs to be managed. The child population is a significant proportion of the population to allow a virus to spread easily and widely and a risk that needs to be managed.

    As I've mentioned before my 12 year old daughter is fully vaccinated and my wife is a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry - as part of her job she has seen and read a huge amount of the research etc and had no issues with the vaccine for her.

    So i'll be trusting the science



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool




  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭sergioaguero


    Dr Martin Feeley senior doctor at the HSE says Covid-19 is “much less severe” than the average annual flu



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,185 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    New studies from CDC in the US shows that breakthrough infections in vaccinated people have the same viral load as unvaccinated people. So your statement is false.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Del Griffith


    People put their own kids welfare first? Colour me shocked



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,709 ✭✭✭whippet


    He is a cardiologist .. not an infectious disease expert and his 'opinion' wasn't reflected by his peers and he had to resign.


    doctors have specialities ... his isn't anything to do with covid



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    so one doctor says done thing and most of the rest say the opposite, including those who work in the field. Let’s believe the one though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Del Griffith


    The amount of pontification from some posters here is comical :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,216 ✭✭✭Del Griffith




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    It's almost like you are picking and choosing data. Swabs in the nose and throats of vaccinated people are similar to unvaccinated, yet the course of illness is shorter so it stands to reason that the infectious period is going to be shorter.

    Anyway I'm not sure what point you're trying to make other than nitpicking. 0.098% of vaccinated people are seeing breakthrough infections in the US, and this is still (as the CDC director repeated yesterday) a pandemic of the unvaccinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,357 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Didn't this happen a year ago?? Like, before the second wave, before we hit thousands of cases per day, before any of the variants...

    The guy was proved resoundingly wrong and it's bizarre to be bringing that up now.

    www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/hse-rejects-senior-doctor-s-comments-covid-19-is-less-severe-than-annual-flu-1.4353641



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight


    I have not read the whole thread yet but am intending to. I would just like to inquire where can I get photo ID for a 16 year old in the next couple of weeks please. Anything I’ve looked up other than a passport seems to be for over 18 only. Would appreciate if anyone can help.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,157 ✭✭✭Immortal Starlight




  • Registered Users Posts: 223 ✭✭One_More_Mile


    My conclusion is I'll wait for the medical professionals to categorically state they they absolutely recommend children get the vaccine as opposed to recommend it be offered to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,086 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    🙄 What, they have to use exactly that formula of words?! Jebus... What's wrong with "We recommend the vaccine for the 12-15 age group because the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks of the virus", like they announced tonight?


    Parents urged to avail of Covid-19 vaccine

    The Chair of the National Immunisation Advisory Committee recommended that parents of any child with an underlying medical condition should avail of a Covid-19 vaccine at the earliest opportunity.

    "If you have a child with an underlying medical condition, absolutely avail of it at the earliest opportunity. If you have a child, for example, that is living in a household where there are other people at risk, absolutely avail of it at the earliest opportunity," Professor Karina Butler said.

    She said that vaccination is primarily for benefit of children themselves. She told the briefing that the benefits outweigh the risks, but parents are entitled to make their own decision. Prof Butler also said that the uptake of Covid-19 vaccines in young people has really been "quite remarkable".

    Warning over misinformation

    The Deputy Chief Medical Officer has warned parents of misinformation on social media around vaccinating children.

    Dr Ronan Glynn said it is important that parents do not assume that everything they see on social media is accurate.

    He advised parents not to share anything on social media or messaging groups unless the data is verified and found from multiple, different reputable sources.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,962 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I suspected that with such selective quoting that you were pushing an agenda like this and you can immediately see in response that the health professionals have been unequivocal.

    Unless of course you misread in which case the quotes from TaurenDruid satisfies your requirement.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement