Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Lions Tour

1717274767782

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The red card v France was hardly Gatland's fault. I'm not framing it as misfortune, red cards happen. But equally, you can't blame Gatland for the rash actions of one player. Was it Schmidt's fault Stander got sent off v SA or that Aki got sent off v Samoa? No, of course it wasn't.

    We should have beat Argentina with the players we had. The only position where there was a notable drop off from 1st to 2nd choice was out half. The fact that Madigan had never started a test match vs tier 1 opposition prior to the RWC was a woeful failing by Joe, it just was. There were plenty of November tests and summer tours to Argentina in 2014 to give him starts in the 10 jersey.

    Now I'm not saying Madigan was the reason we lost. The whole performance was a disaster.

    He also picked Keith Earls at 13.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    I got the jist despite table functionality issues! I do think the time at Connacht and Ireland is somewhat relevant, both sides were very poor that he dramatically improved, probably Connacht's best professional era seasons under him until Lam arrived. It's another thing that arguably Schmidt hasn't proved, in fairness he never got the chance to, I have no doubt he could as his very structured style would probably suit a team struggling even more so. You could say Ireland were a shambles when Schmidt took over but I think it's pretty clear they were underperforming rather than as limited as the Connacht/Irish sides Gatland had.

    But leaving that aside, It's also worth pointing out that in both 2009 and 2011 Wales won 3/5 which was the same record as second and third, they came fourth on points difference on whatever the differential was, those aren't very bad six nations really. 2011 obviously ended with them pretty unfortunate not to make the World Cup final losing by a point. So I would say that is one bad six nations really.

    Ultimately the top tier honours of 3 Grand Slams v 1 are a big difference and the World Cups are a massive difference. Lions too a factor. Gatland's sides always deliver on the biggest stages which unfortunately wasn't the case with Schmidt for whatever reason. 2015 was unfortunate for Schmidt and I'm not sure Ireland losing 5/6 key players could have won with any coach but 2019 was a disaster that he bears responsibility for just as gets credit for an outstanding 2018.

    Gatland is in the elite tier of coaches and Schmidt would be just one rung below in my view.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    You seem to be not taking World Cups into account when considering lows. Gatland didn't lose to Japan or get hosed twice in consecutive quarter-finals as Wales coach.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    But the GSs and SFs equate to just 4 games. And there's no mention there at all of the massive failings vs SH opposition.

    Also, the quality of players available to Schmidt is counted against him while the massive improvement in players for Gatland with Ireland is ignored. Either factor that stuff in for both or don't at all.

    And the 4th place finish excuses enable you to overlook certain failings, but are you giving Joe the same benefit of the doubt? For example, in the 2019 RWC we faced NZ in the QF while they faced a poor France. Major luck of the draw there. I'd argue we'd have beaten France. Would Wales have beaten either NZ or SA?

    Again, I'm not at all in the Gatland is a bad coach camp. He very clearly isn't. But let's talk about this with a bit more balance because there are failings in there along with some fantastic successes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,233 ✭✭✭ClanofLams


    I mean that's the way tournaments work. Singular games are vital. There's a huge difference between winning a Championship and a Grand Slam even though it obviously usually comes down to a single game. Had England won in Dublin in 2011 to complete the Grand Slam the tenure of Martin Johnson would have a far different complexion and may have even lasted longer. Three Grand Slams vs one is a big big difference.


    The 4th places are not excuses, it is a fact they had the same record in 2009 and 2011 as the team that finished second, they aren't barren years. Yeah he had a poor record vs SH teams with Wales but the Six Nations and World Cups are just far more important than Autumn Internationals or Summer tours.


    I wouldn't have any confidence Ireland would have beaten France personally. They won comfortably in the Six Nations but Ireland's decline picked up pace in the months ahead and France improved. The six nations was a few months on from Ireland beating NZ and when the RWC rolled around, Ireland lost by 40 odd. Ireland's decline was dramatic and fast.


    Gatland just has an incredible record at every level. Wales have won four Grand Slams in the last forty years, Gatland has been in charge for three of them. Aside from 1987, Wales have reached the RWC semis twice, both with Gatland. Excellent record with the Lions thus far.

    Schmidt is the best coach Ireland ever had but in my view, his resume is not comparable with that of Gatland.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We should have beat Argentina with the players we had. The only position where there was a notable drop off from 1st to 2nd choice was out half

    I'm afraid that's just not true. You could not have picked 5 worse players to remove based on the gameplan Ireland were employing. The defence relied on playing narrow and slowing the ball down in midfield. Every single replacement we had was significantly worse in defence and slowing the ball. That's why Kearney found himself constantly isolated on the wing. I would completely absolve Schmidt of any blame for that game.

    All that said, Gatland's record is comparable to Schmidt but I would still consider it clearly ahead. It becomes something of a ideological question as to how you rate consistent very goodness against intermittent excellence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    I think in all likelihood the Irish would have still lost the 2015 QF to Argentina even if O'Connell, O'Brien, Sexton, Payne and whoever the fifth injured player was were available. Serious defensive flaws became apparent in that match. They would still have been there with different personnel.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Let's not forget that had SOB been red carded in the opening 30 seconds of the French match of the 2015 RWC, Ireland would have undoubtedly lost that match and ended up with a quarter against NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    The biggest knock formme against Schmidt was Ireland repeatedly coming out flat in important games. Time again, we wilted when under pressure, despite the team being full of players with experience winning. Gatland had consistently shown that he can motivate his teams to elevate their performances. Look at the 1/4 in 2011, Wales blew us off the park. Look at the times the Welsh had to go to Paris or Twickenham to win the 6ns. I'd usually back them to do that, whereas I never had confidence an Irish team would.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,719 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Totally disagree - without Sexton and POC they lost leadership - Payne and O'Brien just made it impossible . If Sexton and POC had been on the field those defensive lapses would not have been allowed occur.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No they absolutely wouldn't have. Sexton and Payne in particularly were significantly better at stopping ball from getting past midfield and obviously O'Brien was something of a help at ruck time. The problem that that game highlighted was that the replacement players were not good enough to implement the same gameplan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    If the Lions win on saturday what will all the bitter people do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    I’ve mentioned on this forum before I think, but I’ve two good friends who played a significant number of games under Schmidt (who I intentionally won’t name), and both have said in the past that with Schmidt you couldn’t play your own game, there was a plan that you had to stick to and one little deviation and you were gone! It’s no secret he took no prisoners but from what they’ve said in the past it was ruthless and often terrified players….. maybe that’s why we choked when the pressure was really on as favourites, his need for perfection might have been a negative in the grand scheme of things!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I can't imagine that's unusual. It will all be to degrees I guess, but you obviously have to play to the gameplan. 15 guys can't be doing their own thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    True of course but I was speaking in the sense that there is a game plan to be played but often players would have a bit of licence to play what’s in front of them! Schmidt didn’t allow it at all! Unless you were Sexton of course lol!


    off topic but that’s where for me Gats differs, players are confident and allowed express themselves! It says a lot that the regions are largely sh*t yet Wales kept producing! Players enjoyed meeting up for camp and playing under Gats, hence for me he’s the better coach!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    But at the same time, people are writing off Gatland's achievement with the Lions 2017 series because of the SBW red card.

    We had enormous misfortune in 2015. Losing against Argentina did not make Schmidt a bad coach.

    They are both excellent coaches with stellar records.



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    Whatever happens it's been a series of puke rugby and tainted by the SA way of going about things, both on and off the pitch.

    The Lions concept will be in a worse state than it was before going there.

    Poite's "Calling a draw" finish to the last Lions tour was farcical but this is a whole different kettle of fish.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Folks down playing how important the draw is. I would have little doubt NZ would have spanked SA again had they met in the final. Likewise, I'd have backed Wales to beat England, had they played.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Yeah, I wasn't really looking to compare the 2 per se. Both are very good coaches. Both are quite different. And both have weaknesses that are okay to call out. Its when people only focus solely on the good or solely on the bad that it becomes an issue.

    In short, I'm arguing with everyone!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,816 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I can honestly say I have forgotten.

    What did he do?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    the rugby isnt spectator friendly, its cup final fight fire with fire stuff but with regards being results orientated if gats wins the series a lot of posters here will have to change their tune.


    People wouldnt crib if Ireland won a grand slam playing ugly rugby, or made a WC semi final with similiar tactics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 LV-426


    Thing is cup finals are normally muck!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That's a bit of a false argument tho. Teams have won plenty of finals playing rugby, something that this Lions team seem particularly allergic to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,617 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The boks didnt win a world cup playing expansive rugby, but i dont see any of their fans complaining, and if Ireland won next years grand slam with the same tactics nobody would mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    He got stitched up by the big cheating French bastards!

    (alternatively, he punched a French guy for very little reason)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,278 ✭✭✭slingerz


    Cant say the Lions squad/team is one that engages me. I also think Gatland should not be in charge for 3 tours. It should be a one and done gig. Also, why no coaches from B&I get the job?


    7 Welsh at the weekend is crazy plus Sam Simmonds who hasnt been tested at this level purely to stick two fingers up to Eddie Jones. Surely Farrell at 12 and Henshaw at 13 would be better to stretch SA than Aki & Henshaw. Would Aki & Henshaw be Ireland's first choice centre pairing, i dont think so



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    I'd say Eddie Jones would probably go for Farrell and Henshaw. The time under tension for Aki and Henshaw in a big pressure game against the world champions could be useful for Ireland for a world cup, though. I'd say they would be Ireland's first-choice pairing now.

    Ireland's backline for the next World Cup?

    9. Jamison Gibson-Park, 10. Harry Byrne, 11. Jacob Stockdale, 12. Bundee Aki, 13. Robbie Henshaw, 14. Robert Baloucoune, 15. Hugo Keenan; 21. Conor Murray, 22. Joey Carbery, 23. Jordan Larmour



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i hope not, aki and henshaw are a very limited pairing. ringrose (or even hume/addison) needs to be in there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,163 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Why should it be one and done?

    What advantages are gained from it only being one and done gig? There isnt any more than having someone come back again as coach

    It overwhelmingly has been coaches from Britain and Ireland as head coach and i dont see why it should be. Gatland doesnt care about anything other than doing what he see's as best for getting him a test series win. Picking Simmonds is nothing to do with Eddie Jones

    Aki and Henshaw may not be picked as Irelands main centre pairing but again this is a very different coach playing a very different style of game so it shouldnt matter at all that they may not be irelands first choice pairing in the centre



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    No matter what the result is on saturday...this has been the worst lions tour of all time....


    Should never have gone ahead...only happened for commercial reasons...


    A brutal spectacle....

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It only happened for commercial reasons?

    Yes...most definitely...


    The worst Lion's tour of all time

    Categorically no....



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    I think Ringrose is probably more limited than Henshaw as a 13.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    strongly disagree, henshaw plays well at 13 but hes much less creative. ringrose has been in and out of form unfortunately recently due to injury but when he gets a run of games hes fantastic. the lions could really have done with him (or slade. or davies. or daly to show some form. basically anyone with a semblance of creativity at 13)



  • Registered Users Posts: 906 ✭✭✭FlubberJones


    personally looking forward to the match, winner takes all, no quarter given etc. etc.... An Eddie butler montage would go down a treat at some point..

    "When Saturday comes...." A few beers, snacks, TV on loud (probably not the boozer, weather not looking the best to venture out) her we go



  • Posts: 18,962 [Deleted User]


    After the 2005 Tour aka "the Emperor Woodward has no clothes / BOD Spear-tackle" tour which was a disaster from the Lions point-of-view this is the worst of the professional era

    But at least NZ played some great rugby in that one even though it was a complete whitewash.

    Even if BOD had not been done in they would have been hammered anyway.

    But to be honest this one feels worse due to the absolutely terrible rugby matches and the SA video review stuff which imo has tainted things completely

    The Boks have a win-at-all-costs type of attitude on and off the pitch and their rugby is very much "drag-down" especially with respect to an abbreviated Lions tour where quick-to-implement systems and gamestyle had to be used.

    Only the All-Blacks really have the culture, confidence and ability in their game to avoid the drag-down effect of South Africa

    Peak England fell victim to it in the 2019 final

    All the knockout games that SA were involved in at the 2019 World Cup were crap to look at

    Gatland can't just tap into that though as it's something that is developed over a long period of time and even a rugby culture.

    Expecting the Lions to be some complete product after a few games is ridiculous and to be honest he can't be blamed much really for this debacle of puke rugby - it's a combination of SA drag-down rugby and expediency of rugby systems implementation

    The Lions concept will go on and on for money reasons but whatever the result on Saturday I wouldn't really miss it - the modern game and its demands have surpassed it (in terms of team systems taking time to develop and implement correctly)



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Richie_Rich89


    He doesn't really have any special ability in terms of drawing defenders to himself and then giving the ball to a teammate running into the space created. He's poles apart from O'Driscoll in that regard.

    He's a pretty good defender, both in terms of reads and tackling. He's good at grubbers in the wider channels. And he's good at scanning the defence, identifying space, and making breaks or half breaks to get his team on the front foot. But creative? I don't think so.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,325 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its a professional sport. Basically every game happens for commercial reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    disagree with the first point massively. its seen less often for ireland unfortunately but thats more down to systems than anything else.

    'And he's good at scanning the defence, identifying space, and making breaks or half breaks to get his team on the front foot. But creative? I don't think so.'........thats creativity too though. add to all that his very solid passing game and he is arguably the most well rounded of the main options ireland have in the centre.

    ringrose comes in for a massive amount of (usually unfair, sometimes warranted) flack but the other options mainly rely on physicality rather than 'creativity' (this is a massive simplification of course) in attack. there needs to be some bit of balance in the centre and for me, that works best with ringrose and any one of henshaw/aki/farrell (unless someone like frawley or scannell starts playing 12 but that doesnt look like its gonna happen anytime soon). henshaw has been good there definitely and had a fantastic 6N overall, but to me he still plays his best stuff at 12 with ringrose outside him



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What do posters think about the negative commentary about Lions attack coach Gregor Townsend?

    Personally I feel one of the weaknesses of Gatlands coaching style is that he tends be quite dictatorial/authoritarian or rigid with playing style, ditto Schmidt and tends to sideline his attack coach. If a back line player doesn’t fit the system, no matter how talented he might be, then he is jettisoned.

    I know Giovanni Trapattoni while as Irish soccer coach always had the mantra that “the system is more important than the players”. A similar narrative can be said about Gatland IMO.

    As for the match itself this Saturday, I feel that Gatlands strongest asset is his motivational skills. This week players prep would be all about getting the minds into top shape. After all the shenanigans of that Erasmus rant and questions over SA biased refereeing in the second test last week, there’s no better man that Gatland to use stuff like “siege mentality” and “referees are out to get us disproportionately” and all that motivational tactics can only respond positively by the players.

    Just want a bit more subtlety and innovation in the back line this Saturday. Hope that the negative coverage about the Lions’ over abrasive playing style might be just be the catalyst for the coaching group to give the guys more license to play with more ball in hand. More heads stuff up, touch wood. I also believe that Rees Zammit has been particularly hard done by the Lions coaches throughout this SA tour and should be starting, no ifs or buts.

    I still give the lions a huge chance on Saturday but a deviation from the bulldozing, direct, one out runner and blunt stuff in general has to take place in the first instance.

    But I still fear that Gats will continue to revert to type and arm wrestle and all out warfare will be on the menu come Saturday evening. If that type of puke rugby continues, then it will be the ultimate battle of survival, last man standing. Hope it doesn’t happen because that is playing into SA hands big time. It’s their biggest weapon, that confrontational aspect I where they are the best in world rugby for. That would be a recipe for Lions Armageddon.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Ah jaysus that's got to be one of the weirdest takes I've ever heard.

    (Also why do you jump to compare him with BOD? If every player is judged against BOD, then I suppose nobody is good enough seen as he's our best ever player)

    Ringrose is incredibly creative. That's his whole point of difference.

    Take a look at Stockdales 2nd try v Scotland in 2018.

    Look at McFadden's try v Scarlets in 2018.

    More recently, look at his try v Dragons at the end of last season, and how he starts the move with a brilliant cut out flat pass to Larmour. He's done this countless times before where it hasn't led to tries.

    His break and offload in Limerick in 2015???

    "Scanning the defense, identifying space, and making breaks to get his team on the front foot" ...that's called creativity.

    Obviously I can only give so many examples, but you just have to watch some games to see how good his vision and range of passing is.

    Just because he isn't throwing miracle balls like BOD did, doesn't mean he's not creative.

    What would you have him do to be more creative?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,225 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Richie is a troll, lads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    To be fair, I think he has a point in that line breaking ability isn't the same as creativity. Would you call Manu Tuilagi a creative centre?

    Obviously the thing about Ringrose not being creative in the true sense is cack, but breaking the line isn't the same as creativity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    In fairness, weren't we seeing GIFs last season of him running into contact, ignoring a huge overlap for Leinster (against Sarries?) and grubbering away turnover ball, with an overlap, in green? To some considerable frustration?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Those are called mistakes. I'd really love you to show me a player that hasn't made any of those. Ringrose isn't incredibly creative, but he is certainly more creative than any of the centres with the Lions at the moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,502 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Don't disagree with a word of that. Just thought I would add a bit of perspective to people genuflecting about games against the Dragons and from 2015.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    But they were also talking about 6Ns games too????



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I wouldn’t see every Leinster game by any means, but from what I’ve seen of him last season, my impression is that the last 6 months or so have probably been the poorest spell of form he’s had since he came on the scene, would that be fair to say?

    He’s such a classy player at his best tho, hopefully can get back to a bit of form this coming season.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement