Murder at the Cottage | Sky

Marie Farrell's husband has a conviction for assault.

The people who connect Bailey to the murder because of the domestic assault never continue this 'logic' to examine who else on the area could be similarly connected.

It's not a reason, it's a pretext.

Your the biggest conspiracy theorist in this thread anyways so don't known why your blowing that trumpet.

Any reasonable logic for the fact we don't know the fiesta drivers. There was no followups. No crime watch. No reenactment appeals or interviews of any kind whatsoever. Why?

Yes that reminds me there's an image of the phone still by the bed, i assume that was normally kept downstairs. I added direct quote from the housekeeper cos she may have meant into the grounds rather than the house.

It would seem strange when Jules has consistently made it clear she is convinced he had nothing to do with it. Even as recently as a month ago.

"However she has made it clear she is convinced he had nothing to do with Sophie Toscan du Plantier's death, and she would have left him sooner only it would have made him look guilty.

I am convinced of his innocence, always have been and that it was a stitch-up by the guards from the beginning"

I think it is more likely someone else.

I would hope not and the gardaí can interview the person who the elderly local claims told him they had helped wash bloody clothes at the time, otherwise it is just more hearsay. It may at least give a potential trail to follow albeit a cold one.

Sorry for being such a sheeple. In her ‘impressive’ article, what evidence or corroborating accounts did she give that suggests this supposed rogue Garda ever existed outside of her word processor?

GSOC expressed ‘grave concerns’ about aspects of evidence which are missing since the case was parked by the DPP, I think there is no reason to think they are likely to say the arrests were lawful when they weren’t. There’s literally nothing to support that view.

Hi. I am getting a bit paranoid. Seemingly "some" other Irish message boards are automatically binning posts.

Earlier I said the French documentary had Alfie Lyons saying he had got a "good guard dog" a few weeks before the murder. It didn't bark that night.

He also said he helped Sophie when she bought the place despite him buying 2 years after she did.

Just testing if anyone can see my posts and I'm not just wasting my time.

That's the conclusion I jumped to but didn't want to say for legal reasons...

I listened to Alfie again.

He says "it's a curious thing a few weeks before we had gotten a dog" then the French guy talks all over him.

I wonder if the French translation is accurate.

Surely you'd say "it's a curious thing we had a dog a few weeks before" if the dog was not there that night?

It is approx 19:00 - 19:30 on the video

https://youtu.be/OxZQTOaqwXk

hmmmm... 'can be at least partially proven' does seem a strange turn of phrase. It does seem to imply there is some impediment to fully proving the claim.

It mentions hoping to speak with the person 'now living in Europe' the local elderly man claims to have discussed it with last year but doesn't mention hoping to speak with the person who he claims confessed to him back in 2001.

Is it for operational reasons, wanting to build evidence before interviewing whoever helped wash bloody clothes and whoever they might have washed them for?

Or is it because one or other or both the person who confessed to the elderly local and / or the person whose clothes they confessed to helping wash can no longer be interviewed for some reason?

Either way it may lead investigations in a direction that might uncover new evidence and help finally solve the investigation and bring closure to everyone involved.

Well IB is clearly a litigous guy...

This is what I get

Found the comment from another site about the person who broke in

I don't understand about the axe. Also don't understand why Hellen thought Alfie had been using the bath, according to other comments sourcing to book by Jim Sheridan.