Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

15859616364171

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    No no no no no


    It's not 157,000 a day, it's 157,000 for one day, but you disregard that and keep posting lies.


    As has been shown, the day before he got 86,000 viewers which would be 2.6 million views a month. Why are you taking the highest number and using that?


    What's Dan Wooton's numbers?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And you know how consistently good viewing figures beyond just a one hour show is what are needed to turn a profit? I imagine the reason you're not bringing up other viewing figures is that they're consistently ****. But sure, you've got good viewing figures for the guy who's actively arguing for the RNLI to stop rescuing refugees from drowning......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    He's only making a "thought experiment". Can you not see his broader point?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Your numbers (and reasoning behind them) are hilariously off.

    157,000 doesn't translate into 4.7m views per month, because Farage's show isn't on every day. But regardless, as I and others have said before you have a tendency to pick the highest number you can find. Even if Farage was on 30 days a month and it was 4.7m views per month, that's still based on the same 157,000 viewers.

    Viewers who aren't watching the vast majority of programming on the rest of the channel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    And just to add, it's not even a case of "I doubt as high as Farage's show". We have the data. The rest of the shows are barely pulling 10% of Farage's show.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,067 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    Yes because how are you going to decide which of them live and die



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,590 ✭✭✭LLMMLL


    I think the whole criticism of the RNLI shows the reason for some of our conservative friends principles and policies. I think they must have an empathy glitch. They have empathy but they can't apply it at a distance.

    I'm assuming that if the were out for a trip in their rowboat and came across a drowning person who had been attempting to avoid official detection they wouldn't just watch and shrug as the man, woman or child drowned in front of them.

    If the RNLI happened to be out on patrol and happened across some drowning people who had been attempting to avoid official detection, I'm assuming they don't think the RNLI should just watch while those people drown.

    I'm a bit less certain whether they believe if the RNLI is on patrol and get an alert that someone who is trying to avoid official detection 5km away is drowning, they should not rescue that person.

    And they definitely seem to believe that policies should be implemented that would lead to these people drowning.

    It's like they can't make the connection between abstract policies and the horrible human cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    It is a consequence of not seeing the "Illegal Immigrants", as they describe them, as people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Sainsburys pulling advertising from GB News will be quite the body blow because supermarkets as an industry are one of the heaviest spenders in tv advertising. They advertise 52 weeks a year and then leading up to big events like Christmas and Easter they vastly increase their weekly spends and absolutely saturate tv screens for weeks on end in an attempt to win new customers off their competitors. Marks & Sparks with their Christmas food porn ads famously take customers off all the other supermarkets as people are willing to spend more for quality at that time of year.

    Sansburys saying they are pulling advertising from GB News sends a signal to the other supermarkets. Its them saying they are not willing to associate their brand with a known racist like Farage for fear of the backlash if he comes out with something racist. The likes of Aldi, Lidl, Morrisons, Co-op, Marks & Sparks, etc will take note and stay well away from spending their money advertising on GB News, it is just not worth the risk to the potential damage to their brands. This then becomes a self fulfilling prophecy in other industries who have spent decades building up their brands.

    I would take a guess that in order for any tv channel to turn a profit it is essential that they attract advertising from four major industries that have huge advertising budgets and who also advertise all year round- supermarkets, banks, insurance companies and mobile/broadband providers. GB News has none of those industries paying them money despite them being the honey pot of tv advertising. The last time I flicked on there was adverts for Bitcoin, a dating app, a used car dealer and a bookies. They are only one step away from showing adverts for telephone psychics and ambulance chasing solicitors.

    If GB News cannot attract advertising from big household brands who spend the most money at the most frequent rate then that is an existential problem that will eventually be the sinking of them. I cant see any way that a tv channel with over 120 employees can survive for long without locking in big name advertisers with huge budgets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    A used car dealer? Are GBNews the tv equivalent of a local radio station?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Whatever else, Morgan seems more savvy than to hook his career to a flailing entity like GB News. He has reach both in the UK and US and I daresay would consider himself above the channel. Hopkins though? well given she was slumming it on Australian reality TV before she got fired, seems exactly the level. Honestly I was more surprised she wasn't on its original lineup. Maybe even she's too extreme for them.

    Correct me if I'm wrong but didn't she go one further than Farage and opine the immigrants be left to drown? Something of that ilk?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Morgan would be insane to tie himself this boat anchor. He has other work that would be instantly poisoned. Hopkins may need the cash.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Given that Andrew Neil's done a runner, it'd be the height of stupidity for someone like Piers Morgan to get involved with the channel now. I hate to admit it but he could almost certainly do so much better than the sinking ship that is GB News.

    Hopkins once tweeted asking about the need for a "final solution" (exact words) for migrants. Thankfully, LBC ditched her and she's largely been ostracised by the media.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    It was an ad for webuyanycar dot com, basically a bunch of bottom feeders in the used car market who look for stupid people to sell them their car for much less than its value so they can then quickly flip on it to another dealer at a tidy profit. In Ireland that market is run by back yard car dealers and scrap merchants and advertised by signs hung onto traffic lights all around the place



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    I doubt there is a hope even GB News would touch Hopkins as she is just too toxic now, even before she had to be deported from Australia a couple of weeks ago. She has cost the Daily Mail over a hundred of thousand pounds in a libel payout, she got sacked from LBC radio for talking about a "final solution" in relation to Muslims and then she had to sell her own house to pay out another libel award of £500,000 over a spat on Twitter, from where now she is permanently banned. So you could only imagine the damage she could cause if she was given a tv show on GB News, she would have them heading for the libel courts within the first week of broadcasting.

    Morgan is an interesting one because he does have a big following. Its surprising it hasnt happened by now given he lives for creating controversy and he has been off air for almost six months now. My guess is that either Piers wants massive money to take the risk or else (and more likely) he cant stand Andrew Neil. A veteran BBC broadcast journalist like Neil would look down his nose at a tabloid editor like Piers so Id say there is some bad blood between them, be that from the Iraq photos scandal, the phone hacking scandals or something else.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Ah yes that's what she said, what a pillar of empathy and humanity she is. She'll be perfect for GB News then, just the right mix of rubberneck appeal and "just asking questions" bad faith detritus beloved of the permanently afraid and angry cohorts on the right. Especially with Hopkins's recent vomit over CoVid conspiracies, she seems primed and ready.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Thing is, I imagine GB News' miniscule cohort being mainly older people and I don't know how big a market there is for covid denialism and anti-vaxxer crankology with them as they're the ones most at risk. GB News was heralded as being a tidal wave but it's more of a splash in a toilet. If they're so desperate that they need to have scum like George Galloway on, I think the only way forward for them is down and Hopkins would be a perfect emblem of their desperation.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Hopkins would be a low-water mark for them I think. They still want to have some air of respectabillity about them and Hopkins's output would make it too obvious what it is they're about. If it happens, you'll know they're circling the drain. I'd like to see that English infowars guy on it too for the same reason.



  • Site Banned Posts: 20,685 ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    Telling that there's been no reply to this one



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I think they've already hit that mark to be honest. They just seem to be digging deeper and deeper into the bin of human refuse to try and stand out.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,664 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Straight off the bat I can tell you that you need to define rape under Swedish law and compare it to rape under British law - and therein lies the problem: you dunt see the whole story because you only read the headlines and don't do the research to see if actually represents an accurate picture.


    Case in point: the news story you quote does make the same point your post does.

    Post edited by Princess Consuela Bananahammock on

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    That's the inevitable next step, no doubt. Hiring Farage must have been a bitter pill to swallow for Andrew Neil. He wanted a respectable gammon tv news channel but the respectable gammon demographic is already well-catered to.

    My crystal ball tells me that investors are going to want a return on their investment. They usually do, to be fair, and youtube views just won't cut it. I see a future where it'll be sexlines and premium number gameshows at night and hot-takes that the migrants wouldn't need to be rescued if they drank red bull during the day. They'll have lads promoting bitcoin and vitamins, ads disguised as news, drunk presenters who don't care anymore... the works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭Ahwell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    He'll be back when he can find a reason to say a number bigger than 4.7m.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't think it was bitter for Neil at all. Any sort of anti-woke channel was always going to go this way. Doubly so when the viewers failed to materialise.

    I think your prediction is likely to be vindicated as time passes if the channel endures. I find it illuminating that the best its defenders can do is to show that one programme had over 100,000 viewers in a country of 70 million people where 17.4 million voted for Brexit. I honestly see them going as full on with the InfoWars stuff as long as it lasts.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,225 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    As has been pointed out ( repeatedly) already using actual data and not cherry picked Hyperbole from Guido Fawkes, the overall GB News numbers are down about 30% over the course of the month of July.

    What has happened is that the extremely limited available audience for their output has completely coagulated around the 4 hours a week of Farage, which accounts for not quite 2.5% of their broadcasting output.

    The Data clearly shows that Farage now accounts for more than two thirds of their entire viewership.

    Great for Nigel, utterly appalling for GB News.

    Absolutely no one is going to be interested in advertising in any other time slot other than the Farage hour. Even the typical Satellite bottom feeders.

    So they have 4 hours a week to try and make enough money to cover their costs. Even if they could command absolutely top whack rates, which they absolutely cannot.

    Again, the data shows that they are at most making about £8k gross from each show , it's just not anywhere near enough.

    Their continued existence is solely at whims of their bankers.

    It's only a matter of time before the plug is pulled - And that's not politics, that just basic business reality.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    To your last line. You speak truth, however. If one thing's true of all these "anti cancel culture" professional worriers is that when GB News collapses, they'll 100% blame said culture and the great liberal cabal for being anti free-speech. The chances of Neil, Farage and co. taking this on the chin, that maybe they didn't read the room as well as they thought, are around nil IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    It seems that just like Farage, this poster only imparts his wisdom on the eager public four days a week 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Of course, I'm well aware of that; I'm just painting a picture of how well the channel can do with one show alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's a **** picture, because as I said, the show isn't on every day of the month so your number is wrong to begin with, the channel isn't one show alone so the fact the rest of the channel has abysmal viewing figures should be taken into account, and counting "views" rather than "viewers" is absolutely pointless other than to post a number which seems a lot higher as it's the same viewers each time.

    I mean, I can't claim to juggle 10 balls if I just juggle 1 ball 10 times.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That's fine, and you may well be right - and GB News may die an ugly death in just a short few months.

    I hope that's not the case. Time will tell.



  • Registered Users Posts: 746 ✭✭✭Heraclius




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Let's assume the worst: that GB News will fail, and fail soon.

    Even then, the political right -- the Conservatives -- are winning across the Western world.

    That, even if GB News fails, is a guaranteed assurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,112 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    They're not though....... Unless of course you count Hungary. Poland and Brazil as across the western world.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not referring to current governments etc.

    I'm talking about common sense conservatism; that which spreads among the population and common conversation.

    Anti-genderism is one such example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,112 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Oh lord.

    I just. .. em look. Ehh.


    I guess you have an answer for everything.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And you seem to have a non-answer for everything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,974 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    What gives you that idea?

    The last 30 years has seen massive progress in many countries in terms of marriage equality, freedom of sexual expression, access to abortion, advances in woman empowerment, separation of church and state, accountability of police forces etc, etc, etc. All things that 'common sense conservatives' have initially railed against and in many cases continue to do so.

    Conservatives in the US thought their day had come with Donald Trump and yet he got very little of significance passed, requiring executive orders to make decisions which he tried to brag about most of which were widely panned and easily reversed by Biden once the nightmare of 16 to 20 was over to some degree. What the conservative movement is left with is attempts to seek out wins through doing things demonstrably against the good of the people such as outlawing mask mandates as Covid cases rocket in their community and putting barriers in place for many people of colour in a last gasp attempt to hold on to the power in they enjoyed up until the late 20th century. To quote a conservative poster Boy, 'Facts don't care about your feelings' and the facts of a group of people who put God before law of country can be easily dismissed and likewise with those who seek to undermine any initiative towards sustainability in order to protect the environment.

    In the UK, the last Conservative who was driven by any sense of a 'conservative mindset or ideal was probably Thatcher' Since then, they've been largely taken over by weak characters with vested interests with a strong focus on financial opportunity for those in the inner circle more than any ideal you could ascribe to a political or philosophical outlook. You could argue that Theresa was an old school conservative and look at how she was treated.


    Maybe before I typed the above, I should have asked you what you mean by 'Common sense conservatism' and an example of where you think that is evident in the real world. Can you give us that?

    Post edited by Tell me how on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,974 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    ^^^

    This is what I was talking about what 'common sense conservatism' is up to in the US.

    They tell Greta to shut up because she is uneducated, and this is what they do when challenged with educated experts who have a different message to that which they want to hear.

    History will judge conservatives of the 21st century very very harshly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,974 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    ^^^

    And here's another example. It's worth mentioning, I didn't go looking for these stories, I literally saw them both as soon as I looked at Twitter.

    What do you think MTG means by this?

    Do you see any issue with an elected representative invoking 'the right to bear arms' is relevant when dealing with people administering a vaccine to protect against the most significant pandemic of all of our life times?

    Where do you think a society led predominantly with this mindset would end up?

    I'm aware this thread is about GB News but given the direction the conversation had moved in in terms of the phrase you've introduced of 'Common Sense Conservativism', these are relevant posts in my view.

    The people with this mindset have gone after and hunted down their own colleagues who voted to impeach the former President for inciting an insurrection. Is that evidence of common sense in your view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,974 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Again, I didn't go looking for this.

    Ffs, really? Is this 'Common Sense Conservatism'?

    I'll stop now.



  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    In relation to the last part of your post and the question of what common sense conservatism actually is It's sort of like a oxymoron, or as a metaphor, Turkeys voting for Christmas or sort of like someone who claims to be gay getting banned from various lgbt forums for being a troll.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's no such thing. It's all about xenophobia, conspiracy theories and venality, fascism and nothing else. It needs to be propped up in the UK and the US by broken electoral systems because Conservatives can't win in a fair contest. Then there's Hungary which is now a kleptocracy. Same with Brazil, Poland, etc.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,511 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Loving the claim that conservatives are popular,

    Looking at the USA, if you go on popular vote outcomes the GOP don't do very well at all from elections for the past 30 years, its the rigged system that wins it for them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,085 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    Common sense conservatism? Sure, conservatism now is an almost complete lack of common sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    If common sense conservatism puts forward arguments as strong as eskimohunt has on this thread, may God have mercy on us all....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,085 ✭✭✭Smee_Again


    If there are 100000 common sense conservatives in Ireland today, then that means there are about 3m of them each month.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    The problem is you're expecting something cogent from a catchphrase. "Common sense conservatism" could mean anything from Angela Merkel to Vladimir Putin and his Tesco Value Hungarian equivalent saving children from those pesky gays.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    It's like 'Make America Great Again' or 'Take Back Control'. They can mean anything you want them to based on your own interpretation.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement