New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

I wasn't referring to the corporation tax rate.

To take an example, if you had 100,000 euros in a company account and took these funds out of the company, the net figure is approx. 48% tax (cumulative).

If the 100,000 euros is kept in the company account at year end, the corporation tax rate of 12.5% applies.

Of course, if you take a salary as a director at a lower rate, then lower tax bands apply.

I'm not plugging YouTube; I'm merely offering an update on this metric. I don't mind if you question my livelihood at all.

When BARB figures come out, I also post those, too. That said, I'm still hopeful that GB News will become a substantial success in the months/years to come. As I've said many times before, I could be completely wrong! Let's wait and see, though.

Former conservative candidate for mayor, Shaun Bailey, is appearing on Talking Pints with Farage tonight.

Dr. John Campbell, with his YouTube channel on COVID etc., is the current guest.

Perhaps you'd find it far more edifying to engage with views with which you disagree, rather than to casually dismiss those ideas ab initio.

Interesting conversation with Shaun Bailey!

Nigel Farage brought up his criminal past (something I had no idea about), and whether he condemns BLM (and Bailey did).

And to reply to the post above, I've never once advocated for economic migrants to drown in the English Channel. It's a complete and utter lie.

And still, falling back on a single host as proof of success. He does 4 hours a week. It's pretty telling that you don't point to the viewing figures of other shows.

Farage cannot win with you.

According to you, he's a racist.

When he has a black mayoral candidate on, who agrees with pretty much everything Farage says, you just refer to them as a bunch of right-wing men.

Farage isn't a racist. And you know it.

Watched by virtually nobody? Farage had a peak of 157,000 viewers on last week's show. The figures are rising, and rapidly so - not falling.

If Farage was the totemic racist you try to portray, why would a black man in Shaun Bailey have so much time for him?

Or perhaps Bailey knows that Farage is not a racist.

It's a lazy smear. As usual with creatures of the Left, they turn to labels to dismiss political opponents because they cannot effectively argue and make their case.

Throw a label, and off to sleep. This is how immature children engage when they're unhappy with something.

False.

Conservatives are allowed to use the term racist. Nobody is arguing that you cannot legitimately use the term racist. The problem with the Left is they accuse so many people of being racist. It's a question of scale. If you question trans ideology, you're auto-labelled a transphobe. In fact, even if you make the claim that a biological man cannot be a woman, that is by many regarded as transphobic. The list goes on.

I have a friend that leans to the left. He argues that even mentioning controlling borders is, in some way, an inherently racist position.

It's bonkers.

I haven't the slightest clue how you have drawn that conclusion based on my remarks above.

False, and not for the first time today.

It is well established that at least 90 percent of ATM crime in London is committed by Romanian gangs. Even if it were 9 percent, nobody would want a gang of males of any nationality to move in to the house next door.

BLM is an overtly political organization. It favours defunding the police, whilst also supporting identity politics to an extreme degree (which is incredibly divisive), and supporting a more socialist system of government. Their wider aims are well established at this stage, including other groups with which they associate. Do you seriously think that BLM, attracting many millions of dollars in donations, exist to just promote taking the knee? Come on. You'll also note that many of the founders of BLM are now multimillionaires with multiple properties. I wonder how that happened. A massive case of hypocrisy.

The problem is that you haven't exposed yourself to the evidence. Instead, you close up and think you have all the information you need to know - and anyone who disagrees with you must therefore be a racist or have racist tendencies.