Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US and Nato withdrawal from Afghanistan...- threadbanned users in OP

Options
1181921232475

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    There was massive corruption in the government bribery and contracts going to relatives crony was common the taliban were simply waiting for the USA army to go the taliban were never really defeated they just retreated and waited the Americans did not build up a proper civil society and democracy and a strong independent well trained army buy no one expected the taliban to advance on kabul in a short time

    It's basic military strategy the taliban will capture the airport as soon as they can they want to stop rich people from leaving and Politicans or adviser's who were close to the American government

    The taliban are sadistic and ruthless they don't follow the rules of law or the Geneva convention.

    The average person in that country does not respect the taliban no more than most Irish people did not support IRA bombing civilians in the 80s

    Yes American has bombed weddings and killed civilians with drones and called them enemy combatents eg America has never admitted killing innocent civilians in the middle East so there's blood on both sides I think we, ll see a flood of refugees from that country if they can escape in time it's well known what the taliban do in areas they control the country will go back a 100 years



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Melanchthon


    You can't say that, Biden admin overruled numerous concerns of the military, theres many articles online now about it and has been for a while, the concerns they raised and Biden ignored have been proved worse than even their worse case scenarios.

    Not suprising though when you hear what Robert Gates has to say about Biden and foreign policy



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    How much do you this multiple advanced technology aircraft cost to develop,and build , along with ships , helicopters and other craft

    The next generation stealth bomber ,F35 program ,ships and helicopters they don't come cheap



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog



    They still have thousands of US citizens and families to evacuate. This is quite extraordinary really.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    It's a public relations disaster for Biden and does a lot of damage to the US's standing in the world.

    It raises the question whether US Intelligence was really poor or if they were giving good advice but Biden chose to overrule / ignore them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    They can say that and they did. Trump wanted us out in May. This same outcome was inevitable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Not securing the airport as a first priority was a major mistake.....unthinkable! Unless even at the 11th hour, they have managed to land a few thousand marines, and a couple of attack helicopters, the chaos will continue. And you are dead right about the Taliban closing it down to prevent "escapes". Not a good place to be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    One wonders if this rescue mission can go well as it was supposed to. Kabul has been overrun much, much faster by the Taliban than was anticipated and they (Taliban) are now everywhere. It's open to debate if the western powers will even be able to get all their citizens out of there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It's a very dangerous situation.

    They clearly have enough troops to take back Kabul and more if they have to but that would put every one of those families in danger. I guess they are relying on discipline being a thing among the Taliban forces and nothing insane happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    The Taliban walked in and basically took over in a few short days. The Afghan military apparently was a paper army for the most part it seems.

    I do wonder where all the money has gone, as it had to go somewhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭ChickenDish


    Yanks acting true to form, normally takes them around 20 years for it to dawn on them they have lost. Kudos to biden for realising whether it was a year or 5 years, the result would be the same.

    I don't understand why everyone is so shocked by speed at which the Taliban have taken back control on the country.

    Trillions of dollars and countless lives later, what did the US achieve - they updated the Talibans arsenal, plenty of helicopters, Apcs, humvee and the likes.

    The world is acting like its the end of days, meanwhile in the land of the free toddlers are shooting their siblings with handguns. War on terror fizzled out and went no where.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Apparently, all the US and British troops are at Kabul Airport but thousands of overseas citizens are surely not there as well. It's a question now of how the Taliban react and if they let these foreign citizens make their way unimpeded to the airport from around the city (and further afield).



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The US hasn't "lost". They could have stayed as long as they liked but Trump and then Biden made a deliberate decision to leave abruptly.

    The chaos now is because Biden ignored advice. They could have staggered an exit over weeks and avoided this.

    Make no mistake that whole country could be taken within days very easily if the US really wanted to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    But I never heard any of them speak well of the Taliban, and many were very reluctant to even speak about them, on the other hand, when it came to discussing the Russians, they were very vocal and proud of their achievements..completely different outlook.

    That's hardly surprising. The Russians had gone. The Taliban never left.

    Jimmy from Serkay won't be risking anything talking about how he kicked the Russians arses out of the country in 1989. But he sure as hell isn't going to risk the wrong ears overhearing a conversation about how he hates the Taliban.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Biden is the one that oversaw the actual end and did nothing to stop it.

    If Biden had sent more troops over and tore up Trump's agreement with the Taliban he'd be getting called a "warmonger" by the same gobshites. It has nothing to do with an honest appraisal of the situation. It's only about cheap shots.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Are you denying the US military could with extreme ease clean out Afghanistan again?

    Of course it could. Same as in 2001.

    There was no fighting. The US let them walk in. They didn't have to. That's the Trump/Biden policy.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Trump ignored advice too. There were concerned voices being raised last year when he signed the agreement of withdrawal with the Taliban. It wouldn't have mattered who was in charge here. This was always going to be a mess. Once the Taliban saw that the retreat was on, they were always going to go hell bent for leather. The problem is that US and NATO presence was just too small and limited to urban areas. All the Taliban had to do was hop in a few pickups and tear around most of the country before they set about going to Kabul. Which is exactly what they did.

    Would you rather Biden had torn up Trump's agreement and sent more troops instead?



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Trump and allies caught trying to revise history on the withdrawal from Afghanistan, as Trump calls for Biden to resign, just months after praising Biden for sticking to the withdrawal, back in April - however he criticized Biden for not doing it sooner than September:


    “I wish Joe Biden wouldn’t use September 11 as the date to withdraw our troops from Afghanistan, for two reasons. First, we can and should get out earlier. Nineteen years is enough, in fact, far too much and way too long,” Trump said in self-published remarks, adding: “September 11 represents a very sad event and period for our Country and should remain a day of reflection and remembrance honoring those great souls we lost.” (CNN)


    "A vote for Joe Biden is a vote for forever war in the Middle East," Donald Trump Jr. wrote last September. "A vote for Donald Trump is a vote to finally bring our troops home."


    The RNC rapidly nuked a page on its website praising Trump for, and detailing his "Historic peace agreement with the Taliban," noting it was Trump that signed the Peace agreement in February 2020, agreeing to withdraw troops in exchange for (empty) promises that Afghanistan would not "be used for transnational terrorism."The RNC page noted "The deal has been called 'the best chance to end this conflict,' a 'decisive move' toward peace, and 'the best path' for the United States. The RNC noted that the war cost us 3,5000 US and NATO troops and 900 billion dollars.






  • Registered Users Posts: 160 ✭✭ChickenDish


    OK, you say the yanks have not lost, so they won?!

    What chaos are you taking about, the mostly peaceful transition of power to the Taliban.

    So after 20 years of occupation the US purposely didn't "take" all of Afghanistan.....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ...We were supposed to leave May 1st, and this WAS the staggered exit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    If it cleaned out Afghanistan, why did the military and police fall over for bribes? Where did the Taliban pop up from? A No-Ship?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    To be fair to the US, if the Afghans were not willing to fight the Taliban, then their was little they can actually do. The Afghan government was clearly absurdly corrupt, and as such unable to defend their country and now the average person will pay for the corruption of their leaders, especially the Women of Afghanistan.

    The US can't make the Afghans fight the Taliban if they don't want to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    No the point is they could have held certain points, held positions and handed over incrementally while everyone who needed evacuation was evacuated. They could have attacked Taliban forces if they breached these lines.

    They chose not to which is hard to understand. I don't understand why they (the US military, not the Afghan army) did not incrementally hold positions and give the evacuation a lot more time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,340 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    The US increasingly marginalised the Afghan govt. They weren't even at the negotiations with the Taliban in Doha. It, honestly, wouldn't surprise me if the Afghan govt. simply "fuck it, let them have it" because they knew they were going to get no help in the long run.



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Underestimating the Taliban, ISIS, Al Qaeda as “goat herders” and the JV team has, historically, never gone over well.



  • Registered Users Posts: 83,457 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    That’s not what the agreement we were tied to allowed for it would seem.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    Remember when Iran rebels captured the American embassy it was a major story for months , if the taliban capture a dozen American citizens it will be a pr disaster for Biden , it seems the plan was a gradual pullout and rescue of civilian translators etc, they did not conceive of a taliban capture of kabul for weeks from now. Is there no strategic forward military planning in the US military at all?



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,872 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    But they should have anticipated this sudden collapse. They overestimated the strength of the Afghans and underestimated the Taliban - it's a catastrophic failure of intelligence (either that or Biden overruled good intel).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,760 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Well they are holding the airport with 6,000 troops but it's just bizarre why positions far wider than that were not held which means you wouldn't have the images and optics we had today.

    This is basically the small area those troops are protecting (or will protect, not all there yet).

    Why is ok to hold HK Int Airport but not Kabul itself? Doesn't make much sense.



Advertisement