Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Options
1271272274276277696

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 45,621 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Trump is not becoming irrelevant. the current GOP is still in his thrall and we will see in 2023, just how relevant he is when he runs again. The fact they refuse to officially blame him for Jan 6 or hold him accountable in anyway for Jan 6th or the 'election fraud' shows he is still their plan for 2023. If they wanted him gone, they would have impeached.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Biden went against US military and US intelligence advice and ploughed ahead with a flawed plan. Blaming the execution and manner of the withdrawal on Trump is weak, very very weak.



  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭PropBuyer101


    A sky news reporter summed this up very well - he said there is the Policy - which is to withdraw troops from Afghanistan - nothing wrong with the Policy. Then there is the Implementation of that Policy - which as we can all see - has been an absolute shambles! Hard to believe that the withdrawal has transpired so badly. There are over 32 million people in afghanistan - that will now be subject to this regime. I cant imagine the horror that they have to endure. Those videos of the airport can certainly put to rest that the Afgan people support this regime - especially in kabul which has been increasingly westernised for the past 20 years. Can you imagine that teenagers there never had to experience the Taliban - and they now have to endure the atrocities of this regime. I'm heartbroken for them all. All the Afgan people who supported the Afghan government who effectively abandoned them to their faith. I wish there was something we could do from here. MILLIONS of people - dont forget. Ireland only has a population of 6 million. We are so privileged and spoiled - its unreal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Source? The only US military/intelligence advice I have seen evidence of is that he was informed that it was highly unlikely that there would be a quick Taliban takeover.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Very little political capital in this for Biden. He will be savaged for it for years, and rightfully so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,594 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    It is the quickest, simpliest way of doing it. Tear the bandaid off in a quick motion, rather than a slow drawn out process. Which would inevitably lead to US forces dying, and end up in the same situation.

    I don't blame Trump, Biden is POTUS he is free to make his own decisions, but this is what the US people want. All Trump supporters, and a sizeable amount of Biden supporters, would want US out of Afghanistan.

    Yes, the last few weeks, and the next few, will be pretty embarrassing for the US, but longer term this gets them out, saves vast amount of money, saves having to defend costing soldiers their lives etc.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I stay out of these threads because I don't care about American partisanship. However the attempt to blame Trump for the failure of the withdrawal under Biden's presidency is a bit of a joke. Biden didn't have to withdraw, he wasn't bound by Trump's deal which was broken by the Taliban anyway as they still continued to fight the government.

    In any case the 2020 deal was supported by the UN Security Council. And Russia, China and Pakistan ( of course the first two are on the security council).


    The responsibility for the chaos of the withdrawal lies with the present administration, however.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Glenn would be regarded as a left-winger....



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    It is all over Twitter by reputable sources, from CNN to the Washington Post to this tweet from Shona Murray.

    https://twitter.com/ShonaMurray_/status/1427188797159129094



  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭PropBuyer101


    There are alot of administrations to blame - Trump for the Policy ie. withdrawal of troops, Biden for the Implementation of it (which is worse and shifting the blame ), the UK for saying they have to withdraw as US did (shifting the blame) the Afghan Army for abandoning their people. Lots and Lots of blame to go around. Reducing this to bi-partisan politics - takes away the core of the issue - the Issue is that these poor people are now in very dire straits and all the international community can do is watch it happen. The international community should be so ashamed right now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,406 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Another analogy, if you get stabbed, you don't remove the knife straight away, you do it slowly and surely under controlled conditions.

    I honestly think there are 0 political votes in this for Biden, its all negative and no one will want to support such a capitulation and exodus.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't see how these tweets back up your statement. Even if they're true, how have you concluded that more general officers disagreed with Biden's plan than agreed with it based on these tweets?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,970 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Agreed. I feel like the Bush and Obama administrations should be up there for not getting more done. As people said they couldn't stay forever so a long term plan needed to be implemented at some point and I am not sure it ever was. Edit: Also add in anyone who does not immediately grant citizenship to those who helped their forces or their allies forces over there the last 20 years.


    This was bipartinisan failure on many levels.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well the policy is a good one. Unless the US was to be there for 20 more years.

    looking back the invasion should have had an end by date from the start.

    to be fair to Biden he probably assumed the Afghan government had a greater ability to fight than it has had. America’s intelligence and military as a whole bear a lot of responsibility.



  • Registered Users Posts: 154 ✭✭PropBuyer101


    wow!!! i think most sensible people would walk out of that meeting. so whats the agenda. its such an awful awful miscalculation that is effectively going to destroy the lives of millions of people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,594 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    But at some stage you need to remove the knife. US has been there for twenty years!

    There are two aspects to this. The military and the political.

    The military looks like a disaster. But politically it makes perfect sense. People in the US, particulary Trump supporters, don't care about the Afghan people. Never have,never will. So whilst I totally agree that Biden has done terrible in terms of humanity, in terms of US politics it will be fine for hi,.

    Trump can shout and blame all he wants, but he wanted to pull out last May! He has no grounds what so ever to cast Biden in a bad light, as whenever he tries he will simply be forced to admit that he would have done exactly the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,412 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    If you review the history of our drawdown in the country - we have indeed been removing that knife gradually, in phases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,705 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy




  • Registered Users Posts: 82,412 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I don’t see anyone on the roof. Reports from the other day was the flag was already gone, and the embassy was already evacuated.




  • Registered Users Posts: 19,191 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,191 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Jesus, the levels of deflection in here are off the charts.

    Biden has been in office for half a year now? And this was clearly flagged well in advance too, its not like the withdrawal just jumped out of nowhere.

    To pull the remaining forces practically overnight without consulting the sitting government or armed forces of Afghanistan - christ above. The current administration will have to own this mess - for its their making.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,412 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    “Practically overnight?” Can you draw me the timeline in your head for that?

    the original deadline from the previous admin was May 1. Unless overnight means 3.5 months, I think we need to check your math.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,618 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Seemingly the helicopters were taking off from a courtyard rather than the roof. Still comparisons to Saigon are inevitable, not too much of a stretch of imagination to see similarities.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,705 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    The Afghan army certainly seems to have been a ramshackle outfit.

    There were officially 300,000 Afghan troops, but the 300,000 included only 185,000 army troops or special operations forces under Defense Ministry control, with police and other security personnel making up the rest.

    Barely 60 percent of the Afghan army troops were trained fighters.

    A more accurate estimate of the army's fighting strength, once the 8,000 air force personnel are taken out of the equation, is 96,000.

    However the Afghan army had to replace 25 percent of its force each year -- largely because of desertions -- and American soldiers working with the Afghans came to see this rate as "normal."

    Worse, the salaries of the Afghan army had been paid for years by the Pentagon.

    But from the moment the American army announced its planned withdrawal in April, responsibility for those payments fell on the Kabul government.

    Numerous Afghan soldiers have complained on social media that they not only have not been paid in months, in many instances their units were no longer receiving food or supplies -- not even ammunition.

    The Afghan army fighting alongside American troops was molded to match the way the Americans operate. The U.S. military, the world’s most advanced, relies heavily on combining ground operations with air power, using aircraft to resupply outposts, strike targets, ferry the wounded, and collect reconnaissance and intelligence.

    In the wake of Biden’s withdrawal decision, the U.S. pulled its air support, intelligence and contractors servicing Afghanistan’s planes and helicopters. That meant the Afghan military simply couldn’t operate anymore.

    When U.S. forces were still operating here, the Afghan government sought to maximize its presence through the country’s far-flung countryside, maintaining more than 200 bases and outposts that could be resupplied only by air.

    Once the air support went these bases were isolated.

    Biden should not have withdrawn the final troops when it was obvious that the Taliban had reneged on the promises agreed under last years treaty.

    Biden’s determination to adhere to the treaty without a well-planned military transition plan, emboldened the Taliban and hit the morale of the Afghan armed forces just as the country was beginning its fighting season.

    The Taliban concentrated on overrunning the isolated outposts, massacring soldiers who were determined to resist but allowing safe conduct to those who surrendered, often via deals negotiated by local tribal elders. The Taliban gave pocket money to some of these troops, who had gone unpaid for months.

    By the time the Taliban began their assault on major population areas this month, the Afghan military was so demoralized that it offered little resistance. Provincial leaders and senior commanders replicated surrender deals struck on the local level before. The elite commando units were one exception, but they were too few in number and lacked aircraft to move them around the country.

    The Taliban now have control of all the advanced weaponry the US provided.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,191 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's not that hard to understand at all and the population of Afghanistan is closer to 40 million.

    The thing is once the panic starts in a situation like this, it becomes impossible to control, no matter what "plan" is on paper. Once the Taliban saw that they were given the go-ahead they swept through the country. A relatively tiny amount of people 80,000 to 100,000 have managed to control 90% of the territory. That doesn't happen unless there is, at least, tacit support from the majority of the people and sheer panic from those who are against.

    When that happens, your "Plan" is toast.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,412 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    You can slap down a photo of the Saigon photo and it requires little to no explanation. A helicopter just shown low over some building like this, meh ok, lots of photos like this abound. It’s just not quite that comparable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,618 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Fair enough. Sure we will see some iconic photos sadly before the week is out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 82,412 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    We already have. The situation is awful no matter who fingers are pointed at.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,618 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    True. The clip of various Afghans clinging to a USAF jet is horrific.



Advertisement