Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

They stopped publishing it due to the hack. I'm assuming it's way down the list of priorities, but it is very annoying not having it.

The 14-day epidemiology reports from the HPSC shine a clear enough light on the impact of vaccination without having to look at hospitalisations. 95% of all cases at the moment are in the under-65s.

Unless they were rushed to hospital these were just faints a common reaction to needles of any sort and can affect anyone .

If you are so concerned why not get your daughter to have a private blood test for antibody levels ?

Then contact the Dept of Health and NIAC and get them to change the law all over EU for your daughter ?

Would be a good thing to do as you feel so strongly about it .

I was wanting to see what are the current covid restrictions in various countries around the world.

Is there a website that would give me that information without me having to look up each country separately and laboriously?

You are right . Only Auckland since July . I think .

Ahhh right.

So all those years of putting needles in people and they fainting , it was THE VACCINE all along !

Wish I had known that 😯

No offence Shesty , but maybe they were sparing your sister's boyfriend's blushes!

2,098 new cases, 251 in hospital and 52 in ICU. Hospital numbers holding up.

Absolutely nobody who collapses, faints or otherwise feels ill in the vax centre, is experiencing an immune response from the mRNA part of the vaccine.

An immune reaction to the takes a minimum 12 hours to kick in, even in the healthiest individuals.

The 15 minute observation period is to watch for severe allergic responses like anaphylaxis.

Anyone fainting in the vaccination centre is experiencing fainting as a psychological response. It doesn't have to kick in when the needle appears, there can be a delay of a few minutes.

Someone doesn't have to be afraid of needles to experience this, it can occur quite randomly and even without the individual necessarily "feeling" nervous beforehand.

12 hours? What are you basing this on?

Its stress of getting a needle I am talking about .

Most people don't even realise they are under stress until they faint .

It's called a vaso vagal response and is part of your body's 'fight or flight 'system and is totally unconscious on the part of the person .

I have young people at home myself so understand what you are saying but tbh think you are over egging it a bit , taxiperson !

Wow! What an attack !

Yes on reflection I apologise for that. It was insensitive as the woman is obviously distraught with grief .

It is tragic , maybe an allergic reaction but we won't know until the post mortem .

RIP .

And as for Beaumont please read my post.

Anybody with a cough or a sniffle puts everyone including themselves at very high risk . Never mind unvaccinated people .

Those will be put back on the list no doubt when their immune / vaccination status is verified.

Do you realise that every single person who even looks in the door of any transplant unit has to be tested negative repeatedly ? And yes, they have to be vaccinated to work in a unit like that .

Is that an affront to their freedom to take precautions like that .

I don't think so . No nurse / doctor working in an area like that would want any harm to come to her patients .

So why should patients who have been screened and vetted and are about to go through major surgery and receive one of the most valuable gifts another person can bestow , the gift of a new kidney or liver or cornea , just decide to put everything at risk ?

Because they wouldn't , no way .

This is a non issue being drummed up by" she who has been to the high court " and those relentless fvcking eejits followers of hers .

But if there was an outbreak everybody would be all over it straight away blaming staff and the hospital, and how dare they put such vulnerable patients at risk !

Those patients with already compromised organs and immunity would never survive Covid .

If you go back to October 3rd - 30th (closest month with single digit positivity rate)

On the HPSC reports, it breaks down cases vs hospitalizations:

HPSC report from a week ago has:

They rejigged up the 0-24 age groups, so I used average admission rate. The past 7 days, we should have expected 382 admissions, we have had 186.

As the 0-24 age group would be the least fully vaccinated, the 92 expected admissions would account for nearly half of admissions.

You could go a little further, removing the 0-24 group, assuming none are fully vaccinated, (based on 2 weeks post second dose, 1 week to show symptoms and 1 week to end up in hospital) It's a stretch, but it would mean, of the expected 382 admissions, the 0-24 would have accounted for 92 of them. So we should have seen 290 admissions for those aged over 25, but ended up seeing only 94 (assuming 92 of them were the 0-24 age group)

Good luck if anyone understands what I was trying to explain!

Without knowing the breakdown in age of hospitalizations lately, it impossible to know. But we should have had 382 hospital admissions the past 7 days, we have only had 186 (92 of those would have been expected as they are 0-24 and the most unvaccinated group)

Positivity rate is actually quite higher now compared to October, meaning we're missing more cases than last October, yet the admission rate is lower. So it's all down to the vaccines.