Thoughts on this please.

Best I can tell is that it's a post with a link to a video in it. The video is hosted on youtube where anyone can post almost any kind of video. Above the link to the video appears to be a synopsis of the video in the link below it. Taking a holistic view of the post, there's an implication that there is a letter from a hospital which can be viewed in a video. This is quite brave of the creator of the post as video is not the traditional medium used for sharing the contents of a letter. Letters are usually shared through through the post or more recently, in an electronic format such as email or as an image or text on a social media post. Publishing a letter via video is quite uncommon although it's not as uncommon to see them in a type of video called Reaction Videos.

Reaction Videos are a kind of meta-video whereby the creators of such videos take some piece of created content, often another video, and react to it. Reactions can include but aren't limited to funny faces, animations onscreen, expressions of incredulity and sound-effects. Often derided by actual content creators for their ease of production and reliance on the work of others, these reaction videos are nonetheless quite popular with children and poorly developed adults. As the population of children and poorly developed adults is such a marketable demographic, such creators have been able to sustain youtube careers by making nothing but reaction videos.

So, to summarise my thoughts on this post, it's not too bad an attempt when we consider that the poster is still quite inexperienced. I found that it lacked any opinion from the OP which to be fair, it looks like he noticed that himself and made an attempt offer some commentary of his own in a subsequent post. That's beyond the scope of this opinion, however, which is confined to the post on which thoughts were requested. In terms of positives, I liked that the post had a link to a video and some text describing it. I would have preferred to see some of the actual text in the post in the form of an image or even the text itself but a link to a reaction video is till a good effort when inexperienced users often have difficulty with hyperlinks.

Finally, to summarise my summary, I would rate this post as a good attempt from a beginner. It could have included more information but it did contain a link which is still something even if it demands work from the reader. My score is 2 out of 5 which may seem low but I'm sure I'll be seeing 5/5 posts from this user in the future when they get more of them under their belt.

Thoughts are, this is a great idea. Why would you want unvaccinated transplant patients on a ward with immunosuppressed people?

also your one is nuts.

Additional thought, your one in the video is a bit thick. It’s Beaumont, not Beaumount.