What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

No it wasn't.

It was determined that that's what MIGHT have happened. There were only two witnesses and one of them was dead by the time the cops came. And as Zimmerman was on trial for murder and Martin was already dead, the benefit of the doubt goes to the accused. So he got away with killing a 17 year old kid.

And even if that WAS what happened, who was at fault? The kid who had been walking home from the candy store minding his own business, or the paranoid blubber butt who had made a "Karen call" to the cops saying that there was somebody behaving suspiciously in his area? ie Wearing a hoodie on his head after dark while being black (it was raining); walking in a meandering seemingly directionless way (he was engrossed in a phone call with his girlfriend) and not being known to the man with the gun (he didn't live in the area normally but he was staying in the area with his father as an invited guest of a local woman)?

Remember that the kid actually ran away from the man with the gun, spooked by the weird older man who was stalking him. It was only after Zimmerman chased him (despite being specifically told NOT to by the police dispatcher) that the fight ensued.

Many people in America rejoiced at the not guilty verdict and then seem bewildered when the "Black Lives Matter" movement explodes a few years later. You don't get away with excusing irresponsible gun toting paranoiacs who provoke unarmed kids into fights and then claim that they have a right to shoot to kill because THEIR lives are threatened by THEIR OWN guns!!! It mystifies me how so many Americans wanted to absolve Zimmerman of wrong doing. In any decent society he'd still be chewing his pillow in prison.

And good thing too.

The cyber ninjas are not qualified to check for machine and database tampering, they may actually be responsible for tampering with the ballots themselves making the audit worthless.

What evidence is there that the machines or databases may been tampered with?

I'll go through the basic line of logic (not that I believe it) - Biden won. So, how can that possibly be? It's not as if Biden wasn't polling much higher than Trump in virtually every opinion poll that was out there.

Yeah, but 2016 opinion polls. Hillary. Etc. Look at the early leads for Trump and how it all suddenly turned around. Does that not strike anyone as suspicious???

Frame like that, out of context, and it does sound fishy. Add in the context, however, Trump and Biden's messaging on how to vote was completely different. Trump's was vote in person. Biden's was Covid is real so vote in whatever way you feel safe to do, but postal voting is a perfectly valid option. Add in the further context that many states counted the postal vote second, and now the situation becomes much clearer.

I get all that. I understand it. But then again I use my brain and I'm not a devoted follower of a cult. Was wondering if Obtuse could provide some evidence 🤣🤣

"Siri - show me the definition of utterly pathetic"

So did the most transparent administration address he crux of the question, " if we can't get information about minor stories, why should we have faith in the administration's account for larger issues like Afghanistan?" Absolutely not.

The follow up if reporters were any good should be about how she can't give a straight answer to a question.

Sean Spicer can sit the **** down. He was one of the most ridiculous liars ever to gaslight the public and given the others who went after him, that's saying something.

Fox et al being so incensed about a dog has strong "tan suit outrage" vibes.

Well this is how we know people are moving on from the evactuation story I guess. Complete and utter nonsense to be worrying about a dog.

Good thing Biden reversed the drone strike reporting then.

Hopefully one thing in Trump's future is that he'll go down as the most crass and undignified US president of modern times by a pretty huge margin. I would say all time, but can't say with certainty that certain U.S. presidents of olden times didn't get rough and rowdy. But then again, it wasn't unheard of in the 1800s to challenge someone to a dual with pistols if they slighted you, though that was at least that was in keeping with custom of the time, whereas Trump doesn't even have that excuse.

Anyway, here's an hilarious video directly contrasting Fox News's treatment of claims of electoral fraud in 2016 vs 2020.

Yep. For a man that proclaims himself innocent and whiter-than-white in every single possible situation, he doesn't half try hard to conceal pretty much everything he does.