Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US and Nato withdrawal from Afghanistan...- threadbanned users in OP

Options
1646567697075

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,595 ✭✭✭thecretinhop


    mindboggling



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    The whole 200-300,000 strong national army has been touted time and again including by the media. In reality it was less than 100,000. Biden was shown one report which put the national army at 75,000 in reality and the Taliban a bit more and yet he still thought the national army could hold off the Taliban.

    The 300,000 figure was what the Afghans and US agreed was needed to hold off the Taliban, but it never came near to that. The US president, Intelligence and media were laughably wrong about the size of the Afghan army and based everything on that. Meritocracy it certainly isn't over there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes the present Taliban seem to have changed at least some of their fanatical Islamic credidentials....pictures of the leadership on the airport runway taking pics and videos on mobile phones is one such change.....in the past ( MK1 model Taliban) taking pictures of any living thing was completely forbidden ( only one of hundreds of forbidden activities ) Also back then, the whole Country was defunct in terms a functioning society. They ran it into the ground, with nothing working and only for the UN and a few NGO's supplying such basics as food and medicine, there would have been wholesale deaths due to Famine and illness. People were turning against them big time, and even a lot of the Taliban themselves realized that their ideas were not working, and sooner or later, they would be ousted. So what we are hearing from the Doha Taliban, and from the Taliban in the remote rural areas, are two different thing's. Time will tell. But I think that you are right about at least some of them will form some kind of mutual alliance with the US / Nato. Its their best chance really to gain credibility with the west / US etc. Sure China and Russia are first out if the traps recognizing the new Taliban Government, but they will make strange bedfellows.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes, and the people who do genuinely believe it are mainly from the Islamic world, where it's hailed as a great achievement. But any western countrys / people who honestly believe that the Taliban militarily beat the US / Nato forces is definitely deluded. If they were that good why did it take them 20 years? in an election year, Trump playing for votes used the "Lets bring the boys home" card. And that was what happened. Now if for some reason, the US decided to remain for another 20 years, they could have done so. And in the same vein, again if for some reason they decided to invade, they could do so, and again they would drive the Taliban out. The Taliban specialise in fighting from the shadows,,,suicide bombers, etc. While there were direct military confrontations the Taliban generally came off worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,262 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    We've no idea what these numbers are. Did the Taliban do an audit in the last 24 hours and sent it to the worlds media :)

    Or is this the same list pulled from 20yrs of audits of equipment used by the US and Afghan Army, since 2003. Much of it no longer working or worn out. Much of it captured in previous battles.

    What will they do with it anyway. They've already captured almost the entire country. Whos left to fight.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    So you are saying they are kinda like Taliban Lite.

    Saw Yalda Hakim and Afghan/Australian lady on BBC News TV program the other night where she had been in Afghanistan earlier in the year and had interviewed Taliban leader.

    When asked about treatment of people caught stealing or guilty of adultery, he quite simply said sharia law would apply with cutting off of hands and feet and stoning.

    When asked about allowing girls go to school he said they could go until they were 12/13 but must go to school with only girls and women teachers.

    When interviewer asked him if girls in his Taliban controlled area could go to school he said no, since they had no girls school.

    Then he dropped very matter of fact statement that they weren't going to build one either.

    Yeah they may have got more media savvy, they may use smart phones and take pics and videos.

    Hell they may even have social media accounts, but good old sharia law and the view of a girl's/woman's lot in life hasn't changed for these lads.

    Post edited by jmayo on

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    I pity any body putting up any resistance against that fire power and there lack of compassion if you do, i say a swift bullet to your head if they catch you. I say areas not under tabilan control are in for a world of hurt. Hard to fight against that fire power.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    What I'm saying is what the Taliban leadership were saying in Doha, and since then. I saw the same article as you about a mullah in a rural area, saying that while girls could be educated up to 12-13 years of age, but only according to sharia, and I made the same point in my post. But now,as I mentioned the Taliban are taking pics and making movies, something that was one of the many forbidden activities in the original hard core sharia Taliban. And I wonder in what other areas they have "relaxed" sharia law? So we wait and see what the "new Taliban " are like. The fact is no one knows what they will be like, but hopefully, and optimistically, they will be more humane and open minded than their predecessor 's.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    First they will try and cajole them to try and get them to work, and if does not succeed, they will threaten their Families, and if they still refuse to "Cooperate" they will be killed, but only as a last resort. The need these guys. Its one thing for a Taliban to learn how to drive a humvee, or even a Bradley fighting vehicle, and of course using US rifles etc. would come naturally. But flying helicopters and Planes are a different kettle of fish, and so is regular maintenance, which is highly specialised.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well even if the actual figures are incorrect, and the real figures are only 50% of fully operational units, its still a hell of a lot of fire power. And propaganda wise, it looks really impressive. Unless the US / Nato steps up to the mark with support for Achmad Masood in the Panjshir, ( their most likely local target) he is in big trouble, especially if the Taliban have operational aircraft.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Plenty of ex-Afghan Military and beyond who will gladly provide the skills for a pay cheque.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    And you don't think the Afghanistan people who were evacuated on those military planes would be those people? I doubt there is an Afghan pilot or engineer who worked on those machines still in the country at this stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,324 ✭✭✭thomil


    And how many commanders do they have that are actually versed in combined-arms tactics? The Taliban are primarily a guerilla force, accustomed to hit-and-run attacks in areas where the terrain is on their side. Attacking an entrenched enemy, such as in the Panjshir, requires a completely different skill set, both on the operational side, coordinating infantry advances with air and artillery strikes, or even coordinating units beyond the company level, and on the logistical side, keeping the soldiers fed, the vehicles fuelled and working, and ensuring that everyone has enough ammunition.

    There's a reason why the Taliban leadership is desperately trying to get as many ANA soldiers, officers and pilots back to their posts as possible. These people possess skills that the Taliban desperately need. The current situation is akin to tossing the 1916 rebels the keys to a battleship like HMS Warspite. They'd know not only what it is but what it can do, but they wouldn't have the slightest idea on what to do with it, even if they could man it, because they simply didn't have the need for it.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users Posts: 36,155 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




    '' gay man raped and beaten by Taliban for being gay''

    ''It comes after the Taliban horrifically vowed to crush gay men to death by pushing walls on them as they plan to reinstate Sharia law across Afghanistan.''


    The logic, wtf



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,572 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


     Unless the US / Nato steps up to the mark with support for Achmad Masood in the Panjshir,

    What would be the point of this, unless Masood and co. have a realistic prospect of achieving 'regime change'?

    It might serve US strategic interest to have an internal insurgency badgering the Taliban, but in what way would it benefit the Afghan people?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321



    The car with the rocket launchers did not blow up because of an American airstrike. It went on fire due to the heat from the rocket launchers as the rockets were fired at the airport. Different car to the suicide bombers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Oddly enough the Soviets had even more firepower. They had bombers, tanks, Katusha rockets, jets, attack aircraft, APCs, a large professional army, etc. Still had the same problems as the Americans did fighting guys in sandals with AK47s. The Taliban might have firepower but nowhere close to the firepower the USSR or US had and they couldn't win.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,406 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well for a start. it would help the people in the Pamjshir. Plus it will provide a beacon of hope for the Afgha people as a whole, who as we have seen with the nrs trying to escape, do not by any means and in large Nrs want to live under Taliban rule,,,they have not forgotten the Taliban inflicted terrors of the past. And bear in mind that the Taliban have no legitimate and legal right to rule Afghanistan. What they have taken was taken at gunpoint. They have no Loya Jirga endorsement. And now the positions are reversed..IE the US ( and others) can now covertly supply any anti-taliban force to harass them. Unless of course, the US decide to take a different route, but first, everyone is waiting to see what the Taliban will do.



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,406 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    In fairness I wouldn't be relying too much on the "skills" of the ANA



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Well, I'd say that everyone ( and especially those associated with the US / NATO ) who could leave have done so, And theres reports of Afghan pilots flying their aircraft out of Afghanistan, and ANA commandos and soldiers driving their vehicles to the Panjshir, to join with Masood. What is unknown at this point is exactly how many escaped, and how many did not.Hopefully everyone who was involved in flying / driving / maintaining these machines has escaped...but realistically, I'd say not all of them did.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Up to now, the Taliban have never controlled the Panjshir..even after killing Shah Masood, they still could not take it. But the difference between then and now is that now they have aircraft. I take your point about having it being one thing, but how to use it is quite something else. And they have always fought from the shadow's...Suicide bombers, IEDs, VIEDS, intimidation tactic's etc. They have never been good against any force that could hit back hard. Before all the advantages were with them..they could choose the target and when to hit it. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and if they do manage to take the Panshir, their death toll will be very high. Their ace card will be planning on Masood running out of ammunition and weapons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    The Taliban know very well about invading the Panjshir valley.

    They've attempted it before, more than once.

    The Russians also met their grave there, they had air support, combined arms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,572 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But does any other potential government command broad popular support? The western puppet once clearly didn't, as we see from their fate after their puppetmasters cut the cord. My suspicion is a large swathe of the population are not actively enthusiastic about Taliban rule but see it as the least worst option, for the foreseeable future anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Neither the Russians the US or anyone else has managed to defeat the Afghans permanently. Many nations have held it for awhile, only to lose it at some stage. And one of the main reason's is the Afghan is fighting in his own back yard, whereas the US / Russians etc, are many thousands of miles away from home, and the very magnitude of maintaining an army that far away is immense. Its a very distinct disadvantage for foreign army. I remember being out in a very remote mountainy rugged area, and I saw an single Afghan walking along, he was wearing normal Pashtun clothing and carried a staff, but no weapons that I could see ( its quite possible he was armed, but hard to see under his clothing.) The point is, he knew exactly where he was (within walking distance of his destination, obviously but that could still mean many miles.) He knew where he could get food, water and shelter. He was in his own environment. Now take what kind of supports would have to be put in place for foreign soldiers to survive there? And of course the best friend of the Afghan has always been time. Now if there's going to be a revolt against the Taliban...the scales will be tipped a little bit differently.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    True but I don't think they will stick with the Geneva convention to be fair. More like resist us and you die, might as well kill all your family as well. Send out the message, if you fight us this is what happens to you and your family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Maybe the Russian Wagner group??? and score browny points with the Taliban? As for local Afghans??? I'm not so sure about that......paycheck or not. Afghans bombing their fellow Afghans??



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Those night vision googles will come in really handy tho for them, it will give them a major advantage if it comes down to a battle.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,324 ✭✭✭thomil


    Afghan society is still very much tribal. There really isn't much of an overarching Afghan national identity, apart from maybe the shared heritage of having humiliated every major empire that ever tried to conquer them. Tribes and clans will work together when it suits them but if one tribe feels they can get more of what they want by turning against another tribe, they'll do so. That's one of the reasons why so many western nations had trouble getting to grips with the local power structure in Afghanistan. It remains to be seen how well the Taliban will be able to manage this. The fact that there are already clear discrepancies between statements made by the Taliban leadership and some of the local commanders on the ground could indicate that a rift is already forming.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    The Taliban were clever when it came to fighting,they didn't do up close and personal fighting , the like fighting at distance and when they have the high ground ,in relative small scale skirmishes ,a couple of aks ,a belt fed ,RPGs and mortars ,the Ak 7.62 gave them greater stand off ranges against NATO forces , but if you took a NATO force Vs Taliban fighters on face to face combat the Taliban get anilated ,and thats without Air power ,

    Even videos of them fighting recently showed they had no real tactical awareness ,run into Streets doing a mag dumps waving aks over their heads in any and all directions ,the same with RPGs randomly firing at anything and nothing ,

    The current Taliban are made up of multiple Tribal allegiances , multiple Islamists groups and factions who are likely not interested in being controlled by the so called leadership ,they are not the former mujahadeen most apparently weren't even born before the Russians left and after the Americans and NATO arrived ,on top of a new likely stronger Northern alliance and isisk now gunning for control , already surrounded by enemies and groups opposing their rule ,

    It's going to get messy



Advertisement