Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Remote working - the future?

1101113151631

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    Again, absolute zero of any of the above being a problem for myself, my colleagues or friends. No problem whatsoever switching off, no blurred lines and no extra costs when offset against cost of transport to and from work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 691 ✭✭✭jmlad2020


    The scramble is now on to find accommodation in cities like Dublin, where the pandemic has led to a lot of landlords selling up. The joys.. oh and the CAO offers are out next week too so students and professionals alike will be competing to rent a **** mouldy basement flat that costs you €1000 a month.

    I thought looking for a flat before the pandemic was bad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,833 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    I don’t believe that for a second, all your colleagues and friends want to work from home ?

    its a problem for lots of ‘real’ people I can assure you :)



  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Young_gunner


    Hey cool the jets, no need to be nasty - it's an anonymous internet forum, plenty of more productive ways to expend your energy!

    Remote work suits some people / roles - doesn't suit others.

    for those that want to maintain it, it is amazing and, of course, they should be allowed maintain it - it's the future. for those that want to revert to offices, by all means do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    Likewise. I start at 9 and finish at 5.30. I have a dedicated office room. My wife works full time and my kids are teenagers are largely self-sufficient. The improvement WFH has brought to my quality of life has been enormous, and yes, I do get more time with my family. That tends to happen when you get back over 3 hours per day. Any increase in electricity or gas bills as a result of WFH are well worth it. That's how WFH is for some people and many do not want to go back to working in an office, many don't mind either way, and some people can't wait to get back because they need the interaction, feel it will improve their employment prospects, or for whom WFH is a pain for a variety of different possible reasons. This is a subject where generalisations don't really work because each person's set of circumstances, personality, attitude and requirements of the job will be different.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,709 ✭✭✭cloudatlas


    We have been told we will be working 40% of the time. My office mates have complained about the ventilation in winter etc., So good luck to them trying to get us back in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Young_gunner


    This is on the money.

    My neighbour now walks his sons to school every morning, then gets a coffee for himself on the walk home and is at his desk to work at 8.45 - he loves it and couldn't imagine not walking his kids to school anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    The amount of emails flying aropund in our company asking if anyone has a spare room to rent while people find their own place once work gets back to the office.

    Also a few asking for rooms for their kids going to college in various places.

    Thats only in the last week.

    I think there is a major panic on now from people who have just realized they have to come back to the office. In our place anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    I did miss going into the office for a while, but not anymore.

    I save 2.5 hours commuting. And I save an hour just hanging around or walking at lunch time outside the office, because hanging around in the office at lunch time is not lunch when they know where you are if something comes up. And the 10 or 15 minutes that I usually arrive in early because the timing of the buses so as not to be late, is mine now too.

    Conservatively I think I have 3 hours a day to myself that I dont have when going to the office.

    In the mornings i do the school run. 15 mins. Its a pleasure actually.

    Alas that is all coming to an end as we have been told we are going back to the office.

    Still hoping against hope that we get at least a couple of days working from home.

    Dont care in a few months anyway because im quitting, and after that will probably only ever work in a place with WFH again if its widespread enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Imagine if you continued to get all that time saving AND you got reimbursed for the additional power and heating costs? Your employer should be paying these anyway, from the considerable savings on office costs over the coming years.


    There's a bit of Stockholm Syndrome going on here, where people were stuck in such desperate commute patterns that they grasp any opportunity to get away from those. Don't miss the opportunity to negotiate on costs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    yes, im fake and so are all of my colleagues and friends. Im just here on a PR campaign for Leo and the lads. 🙄

    Yes, they ALL, want to work from home for all of the reasons I and others have described. All of the above folks I mentioned can and do WFH and our jobs are easier to do WFH at this point, with none of the hassle that travelling to the office brings and lots of extra benefits the office doesn't.

    Folks seem to keep mentioning kids as a problem, eh, what are you folks going to do when you ARE back in the office?!

    Real problems have real solutions, which most real people can overcome with a bit of effort.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭Snotty


    Our employer sent around a questionnaire on what would be your preference for wfh, or blended or back in office. 1600 employees, 92 staff want to return full time to office



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    What proportion want permanent off-site working?


    TBH all the talk of 3 hour daily commutes strikes me as mad: Most of you should have been looking for better located jobs long, long ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,994 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I really can't see how anybody can think the old way of walking over and chatting at a desk can work out better than using online chat.

    You literally have the information saved in front or you where you can easily forget something while chatting in person.

    Also again I really don't mind helping someone, but when you are trying to work through something and somebody comes over you need to stop and lose concentration.

    If online you can just ignore the message and respond once you have time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,994 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Likewise you should have been looking for better jobs, because you seem to have never worked in a place that resembles a modern workplace that trusts and cares about the well being off staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    They're usually the ones that don't do as much work in the office and want to disrupt others.

    Since we've started working from home, our metrics have been in the green compared with working from the office and there was red metrics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    (a) What makes you assume people haven't been doing just that?

    (b) What makes you assume those jobs exist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    Perhaps if you lived in the real word you would realize that not everyone can live close to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Did you ever get valuable information or build a valuable networking relationship from an impromptu chat over coffee or lunch or at the watercooler?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    That would be the icing on the cake but it's not a big increase and WFH arrangements/availability haven't been finalised so I'm not prepared to rock that particular boat right now. It has nothing to do with Stockholm Syndrome and everything to do with picking your battles, knowing which ones are worth fighting and which, even if won, could lead to losing the war. Anyway the small amount involved means it's more a skirmish than a battle.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,994 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    No but I am not in the office to chat and gossip.

    If I need valuable information my manager or team will provide it.

    You can talk online and you don't don't a water-cooler to talk to someone.

    You can meet up with team members in a coffee shop on lunch or after work also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭blue_blue


    Whoever this person is sounds like no fun at all!

    No fun bobby. Great at office parties I'd say!



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Even when I was in the office I would IM my colleague sat beside me, because in open plan offices, there is nothing more annoying than someone wandering over to the person beside you for a work-related chat, that often turns into the match at the weekend or what Mary Said to Declan in Fair City last night.

    Likewise I prefer people to IM me, even if they are just feet away, because I might be in the middle of something, and can respond when I am finished.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭Snotty


    In fairness I do know one person who lives in a small house and has small children so wfh during covid wasn't great for her and she would like to go back to the office full time, but she is literally the only person I know who wants full time in the office.

    Regarding the work survey of 1600 people, I'll find out what the break down was but I know of the people who wanted to go back in some hybrid form, and this was small, 1 day a week for "team day" was most popular choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    More naive I think.

    If your manager provides you with all the information you need, then count yourself lucky. Many people don't have this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,595 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    What is missing here is the need for management to assess the social and other soft skills of staff if they will be client facing or team working.

    This includes dress standard, personal hygiene, odour, nails, hair and deportment and simple things like table manners.

    Now the use of personal phone and social media during work time is a new headache.

    When I started in a FINCORP back in the day, we all got invited to an in-house dinner, full 4 courses, with alcohol and cigars.. yes back that far.

    Next day all who needed it got one to ones on table etiquette: eg, the guy who chased the peas with his knife held life a shovel got guidance

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,108 ✭✭✭Electric Sheep


    Perhaps the commute was offset by not renting a barely furnished shoebox that can't even fit a small desk,?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,994 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I am great at office parties probably too great.

    I am not sure how not wanting to have awkward smalltalk at watercoolers makes somebody no fun.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Or, you know, the employee could use the savings from less commuting to pay the additional power and heating costs.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭C3PO




  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭Young_gunner


    I think the headline there could be a little misleading when you read the article. Let's see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    When commuting costs went up, train fares or Luas fares or fuel costs, did the employer jump in with an offer of salary increases to cover? My ass they did.


    Commuting costs were the responsibility of the employee in the bad times, so why should the employer get the benefit of reduced costs in the good times?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,174 ✭✭✭screamer


    There will be people now who have purchased a house far away from the office and can be forced back, into commuting. That, or be at the mercy of employers who will never, ever give them another pay rise. We’ve all handed over too much of our lives to employers, and I really thought this government would take the opportunity of making working from home a realistic work term, but alas the coffee shops and sandwich joints need cash, not to mention the revenue from fuel when commuting, so, work life balance be damned. For those saying find a better/ equivalent job locally, yeh, if such a thing existed, there would be no commuters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    I think if the job is fully remote, i.e. they have no office space, then they should definitely cover at a minimum the cost of electricity and heating at home. If there is a desk in an office and the employee chooses the work at home, I am not seeing why they should do so. Surely they could just say, there is a desk here for you, come on in if you want to keep home costs to a minimum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Fwiw, one of the companies I am working for is planning on expecting any one who wants to work at home to have a suitable desk, chair, private work area and fast, reliable broadband. The first hint that one of these isn't available, and the message will be "a suitable desk is available here, use it".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,013 ✭✭✭✭Kintarō Hattori


    I'm not at all looking forward to heading back to the office. When all this kicked off my daughter was 3+. I was up and out the door before 7am for an hours commute to a drab business park. Now I can wake up beside my 4+ year old, help get her ready in the mornings and drop her to playschool. I used to have an hours commute back in the evening which meant I might have gotten 60-90 minutes with my daughter before I put her to bed. Not to mention that I'm saving €300+ per month by not commuting.

    I live in a small house and have a desk in the main bedroom which is fairly large and work from there. I can sit here with no shoes on, make a coffee whenever I feel like it wth no-one judging you for not being at your desk permanently. The biggest thing for me though, apart from all my daughter related benefits is that I can sit here and listen to music- something you absoluely couldn't do in the office. Have a pair of earbuds in while working? You were anti-social.

    Post edited by Kintarō Hattori on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    Well that makes perfect sense surely? You can hardly work from home if you don't have suitable space or reliable broadband!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Bit of a clickbait headline, no? It says further down that 2/3 companies are planning that employees work at least 2 days from home. This kind of hybrid working is always what was expected. I don’t think anyone realistically thought that there would be much full time WFH (and not many people actually want that according to the surveys - most want flexibility)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭C3PO


    This is one of the big concerns for companies that are considering allowing blended/full remote working. During the pandemic a certain leeway has been allowed in terms of a suitable home work environment. But going forward it will be the responsibility of the employer to ensure that an employee who is working remotely has a safe and ergonomic facility to work in. This will be a nightmare for facility and IT departments!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    God I hope you don't work in accounting or anything financial related, you're really bad at this



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    I really feel for people who upped and moved far away from Dublin.

    I know for a fact in my place of work they will be checking addresses and use it as a tool to negotiate lower salaries with new staff who live far away.

    I also think you are right in that someone who is working from home will be susceptible to smaller increases in salary since the employer knows it will be harder for them to move to a competitor.

    And it looks like a fair few people who left apartments in Dublin to move home to parents will now be paying up to 50% more in rent when they finally do get another apartment in Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    A friend of my other halfs, last January got told she could work from home until the lockdown was over. Possibly the rest of the year or even longer if it worked out.

    Herself and about a dozen of her colleagues crafted a compliant that they now wanted money for heating for working from home.

    Employer refused and just told them they were all to come back after the lockdown was over. They will probably all now have no opportunity to WFH in that ccompany.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You write as if this is a new thing. It’s been around for years in many companies. I’ve not worked more than 3 days a week in the office for almost a decade, and have never had to do anything more than a questionnaire and some basic personal attestations. And these have been in companies with sophisticated HR departments. London especially has had tens of thousands of people hybrid working for many years.

    it is not that big a deal and people are trying to overplay it to make it seem like an insurmountable problem

    same with GDPR



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn



    I guess some managers could be a bit vindictive like that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    It might be the first time where heavily unionised companies/organisations allow remote working. The likelihood of cases related to accidents at home etc would be a lot higher in that type of situation. I can just imagine in the future reading about someone bringing a case because they weren't properly trained to use their home office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,089 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    People have been WFH in vastly unsuitable conditions since Mar 2020. Be cause it was "successful " in their eyes, some expect to be able to continue in the same way. I spend a lot of time at the moment explaining that a transaction failed most likely because of a timeout in someone's broadband (they're using software which was not designed for unstable connections ).

    Some are quite incensed when I remote access their machines and run a speed test to show how bad it is. People with teenagers in the house (probably streaming games or movies during working hours) seem to have particular denial issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Some employers might try to hardball in such negotiations. However, there is a legal obligation in H&S legislation for the employer to provide whatever equipment is necessary for a safe working environment. If a desk and decent chair is required to ensure that the employee isn't going to cripple themselves working with a kitchen chair at a kitchen table, the employer is obliged to provide this. There is a lot to gain for the employer here in reduced office accommodation costs, so they might be shooting themselves in the foot by playing hardball.

    A single one-off speed test is fairly meaningless, and can be heavily influenced by other users in the house (as you said) and even other users on the road, if they are sharing services to some extent. You'd really need to see a trend over a few days to come to any useful conclusion.


    Really bad because I'm not letting employers away without pushing their office accommodation costs onto their employees?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It just shouldn’t be this hard. Literally hundreds of people worked from home every day (pre-pandemic) in my company with none of this angst and worry. I get that there might be difficulties with unionised workers to whom this is new, but in the private sector for WFH 2/3 days a week (for those that want to do it) there really are no issues other than intransigent management



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    In your example the employer will have to weight up the increased costs in terms of equipment/electricity/heating/remote IT support/potential H&S issues with WFH vs the expected cost savings in the office. It may not stack up at all.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I was just going to say this. Paying the individual equipment/electricity/heating/remote IT support/H&S support among 100s of workers at home or have all workers located in a single open plan office space will probably be cheaper. Escpecially since most employers will have an office space anyway.

    There is dedicated companies out there that can analyse an office space and work out how to cram as many people into that space as possible.

    Tip for you @AndrewJRenko , look up what economies of scale means, you might learn something new.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement