Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US and Nato withdrawal from Afghanistan...- threadbanned users in OP

Options
16970717375

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,248 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    The Chinese are well used to going into countries, bribing the right people and getting their resources, they have it down to a fine art.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    They had two elections plus a Loya Jirga, and there were no Taliban allowed to run, US Law or not. because the Afghans did not want them. Had the Loya Jirga decreed that they be allowed to run, they could have. But they were not wanted..they were hated at that point. If they had so much support from the Afghan population this time, why did they return armed to the teeth? They were an armed invasion, and took and will hold power at gunpoint. And they are rurhless. What Doha promised, and what's happening now on the ground are two completely different things. They are back peddling in a big way. When they were holding talks in Doha, even in their wildest dreams that the takeover would be so quick and complete, and the "soft talk" was because they expected resistance. Now they are out of control in terms what kind of government they will impose,Sharia , of course, but which version?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,332 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    The resources are spread out and difficult to get to, they will need specialists and heavy equipment but the Chinese like to do this themselves and not hire local labour. It will be interesting to see what happens. As much as people criticise the Americans for exploiting countries for their resources they do spend money locally and create jobs but not so much with the Chinese, they usually have their own labour and don’t spend much locally.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    They will in effect become " Little china" and as for security ( most important, especially in the context of Afghanistan ) they will handle that 100 % too. There will not be any locals wandering around uninvited and unsupervised.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,701 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,553 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    100,000 Uyghur slaves with picks and buckets will sort that.

    Oddly enough Uyghurs are aligned with the Sunni branch of Islam. Same as the Talibun.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    And we are now seeing newspaper reports of this equipment being used against the “REBELS”



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    These are the American machines not the ANA’s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Would you believe that one of the reasons quoted for not tossing a grenade into these helicopters was health and safety.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Actually all of the evacuees were taken to the Middle East gulf countries for processing prior to going to the USA, as of this morning, I think it was Bosnia has stated to accept any of these people who failed the checks for the USA.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Got this by email, not sure about its validity, but it makes sense.

    I Commanded Afghan Troops This Year. We Were Betrayed.

    Aug. 25, 2021

    By Lt Gen Sami Sadat

    General Sadat is a commander in the Afghan National Army.

    For the past three and a half months, I fought day and night, nonstop, in southern Afghanistan’s Helmand Province against an escalating and bloody Taliban offensive. Coming under frequent attack, we held the Taliban back and inflicted heavy casualties. Then I was called to Kabul to command Afghanistan’s special forces. But the Taliban already were entering the city; it was too late.

    I am exhausted. I am frustrated. And I am angry.

    President Biden said last week that “American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan forces are not willing to fight for themselves.”

    It’s true that the Afghan Army lost its will to fight. But that’s because of the growing sense of abandonment by our American partners and the disrespect and disloyalty reflected in Mr. Biden’s tone and words over the past few months. The Afghan Army is not without blame. It had its problems - cronyism, bureaucracy - but we ultimately stopped fighting because our partners already had.

    It pains me to see Mr. Biden and Western officials are blaming the Afghan Army for collapsing without mentioning the underlying reasons that happened. Political divisions in Kabul and Washington strangled the army and limited our ability to do our jobs. Losing combat logistical support that the United States had provided for years crippled us, as did a lack of clear guidance from U.S. and Afghan leadership.

     

    I am a three-star general in the Afghan Army. For 11 months, as commander of 215 Maiwand Corps, I led 15,000 men in combat operations against the Taliban in southwestern Afghanistan. I’ve lost hundreds of officers and soldiers. That’s why, as exhausted and frustrated as I am, I wanted to offer a practical perspective and defend the honor of the Afghan Army. I’m not here to absolve the Afghan Army of mistakes. But the fact is, many of us fought valiantly and honorably, only to be let down by American and Afghan leadership.

    Two weeks ago, while battling to hold the southern city of Lashkar Gah from the Taliban, President Ashraf Ghani named me commander of Afghanistan’s special forces, the country’s most elite fighters. I reluctantly left my troops and arrived in Kabul on Aug. 15, ready to fight -unaware how bad the situation already was. Then Mr. Ghani handed me the added task of ensuring the security of Kabul. But I never even had a chance: The Taliban were closing in, and Mr. Ghani fled the country.

    There is an enormous sense of betrayal here. Mr. Ghani’s hasty escape ended efforts to negotiate an interim agreement for a transition period with the Taliban that would have enabled us to hold the city and help manage evacuations. Instead, chaos ensued — resulting in the desperate scenes witnessed at the Kabul airport.

    It was in response to those scenes that Mr. Biden said on Aug. 16 that the Afghan forces collapsed, “sometimes without trying to fight.” But we fought, bravely, until the end. We lost 66,000 troops over the past 20 years; that’s one-fifth of our estimated fighting force.

    So why did the Afghan military collapse? The answer is threefold.

    First, former President Donald Trump’s February 2020 peace deal with the Taliban in Doha doomed us. It put an expiration date on American interest in the region. Second, we lost contractor logistics and maintenance support critical to our combat operations. Third, the corruption endemic in Mr. Ghani’s government that flowed to senior military leadership and long crippled our forces on the ground irreparably hobbled us.

     

    The Trump-Taliban agreement shaped the circumstances for the current situation by essentially curtailing offensive combat operations for U.S. and allied troops. The U.S. air-support rules of engagement for Afghan security forces effectively changed overnight, and the Taliban were emboldened. They could sense victory and knew it was just a matter of waiting out the Americans. Before that deal, the Taliban had not won any significant battles against the Afghan Army. After the agreement? We were losing dozens of soldiers a day.

     

    Still, we kept fighting. But then Mr. Biden confirmed in April he would stick to Mr. Trump’s plan and set the terms for the U.S. drawdown. That was when everything started to go downhill.

     

    The Afghan forces were trained by the Americans using the U.S. military model based on highly technical special reconnaissance units, helicopters and airstrikes. We lost our superiority to the Taliban when our air support dried up and our ammunition ran out.

    Contractors maintained our bombers and our attack and transport aircraft throughout the war. By July, most of the 17,000 support contractors had left. A technical issue now meant that aircraft — a Black Hawk helicopter, a C-130 transport, a surveillance drone — would be grounded.

    The contractors also took proprietary software and weapons systems with them. They physically removed our helicopter missile-defense system. Access to the software that we relied on to track our vehicles, weapons and personnel also disappeared. Real-time intelligence on targets went out the window, too.

    The Taliban fought with snipers and improvised explosive devices while we lost aerial and laser-guided weapon capacity. And since we could not resupply bases without helicopter support, soldiers often lacked the necessary tools to fight. The Taliban overran many bases; in other places, entire units surrendered.

    Mr. Biden’s full and accelerated withdrawal only exacerbated the situation. It ignored conditions on the ground. The Taliban had a firm end date from the Americans and feared no military reprisal for anything they did in the interim, sensing the lack of U.S. will.

    And so the Taliban kept ramping up. My soldiers and I endured up to seven Taliban car bombings daily throughout July and the first week of August in Helmand Province. Still, we stood our ground.

    I cannot ignore the third factor, though, because there was only so much the Americans could do when it came to the well-documented corruption that rotted our government and military. That really is our national tragedy. So many of our leaders - including in the military - were installed for their personal ties, not for their credentials. These appointments had a devastating impact on the national army because leaders lacked the military experience to be effective or inspire the confidence and trust of the men being asked to risk their lives. Disruptions to food rations and fuel supplies - a result of skimming and corrupt contract allocations - destroyed the morale of my troops.

    The final days of fighting were surreal. We engaged in intense firefights on the ground against the Taliban as U.S. fighter jets circled overhead, effectively spectators. Our sense of abandonment and betrayal was equaled only by the frustration U.S. pilots felt and relayed to us - being forced to witness the ground war, apparently unable to help us. Overwhelmed by Taliban fire, my soldiers would hear the planes and ask why they were not providing air support. Morale was devastated. Across Afghanistan, soldiers stopped fighting. We held Lashkar Gah in fierce battles, but as the rest of the country fell, we lacked the support to continue fighting and retreated to base. My corps, which had carried on even after I was called away to Kabul, was one of the last to give up its arms - only after the capital fell.

    We were betrayed by politics and presidents.

    This was not an Afghan war only; it was an international war, with many militaries involved. It would have been impossible for one army alone, ours, to take up the job and fight. This was a military defeat, but it emanated from political failure.

     



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,572 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Losing combat logistical support that the United States had provided for years crippled us


    So is he saying the Americans should have kept providing that support indefinitely? The Americans were in there long enough to at least try to ensure the ANA had absolutely everything they needed to stand on their own two feet against the Taliban. And clearly money was no object.

    And if the Americans were reluctant to remove the stabilisers from the ANA, the ANA should have been insisting that they do it, pointing out they would have to do everything on their own one day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,262 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Got this by email, not sure about its validity, but it makes sense.

    What makes sense about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    And yet they did use explosives to destroy at least some of them, thats what the reported explosions were.,



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    The single biggest reason for failure after 20 years input of money, arms and manpower was Corruption in the Afghan Government, which filtered down through the layers. The last few months after the handover was complete was just the final nail in the coffin. And at least the General acknowledged that much, but blaming the US / Nato at this stage was completely wrong.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    Wont be long before Afghanistan is divided into North Afghanistan(Russian backed) and South Afghanistan(Chinese backed).

    Then the real fireworks will begin.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,998 ✭✭✭✭josip


    The Taliban are claiming that they've taken the Panjshir valley.

    The valley which held out for 5 years against the Russians, and 4 years against Taliban 1.0, has now fallen in a few days to Taliban 2.0.

    What is going on?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭tara73


    all the excellent US weapons in their possesion now might have helped with it...



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    For sure!!! This time round the Taliban had aircraft. And not only Aircraft, but an unlimited supply of hi-tech weapons and ammunition. Now we will see how magnanimous the Taliban will be...



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Im not seeing any reports of American aircraft (or any aircraft at all) being used in this assault.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,998 ✭✭✭✭josip


    The Russians also had aircraft back in the 80s and pilots with years of experience.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,259 ✭✭✭ongarite


    It was Pakistan air support using Chinese drones that was used for the bombing.

    It's in Pakistan and Chinese interests to have this resistance ended as soon as possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,998 ✭✭✭✭josip


    All Indian sites not surprisingly. Doesn't mean it's not true, but..



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Yes. They did have aircraft back then, but nothing lile the type of aircraft and munitions they have this time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    What aircraft do they have now? What expertise (pilots/engineers/mechanics) do they have now? What evidence do you have that top American tech (airplanes/helicopters/munitions etc) were used this time?



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I'm done with Timberrr style interrogation,,,,,do your own research, and interrogate your own sources.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    So no evidence for your claims? Since when is questioning your claims considered "interrogation"?

    You made them but you cannot provide any evidence which concludes that there were no aircraft (US or otherwise) used in the assault and you have lied.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,538 ✭✭✭jmreire


    No Comment, best answer for you, and your style of conversation / discussion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,584 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Cool, all your pricing is that you made it up, its all a deluded fantasy un your head and you made up the aircraft part to make it sound cool.


    Nice try but epic fail, this is what happens when people call you out on lies, no wonder you're refusing to engage 🤣



Advertisement