Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

An Post returning packages from outside the EU-See 1st post

Options
1222325272869

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 20,926 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    One thing which was mentioned a few times is that An Post / Revenue (and presumably any country using the electronic system) cannot change the information declared by the sender.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    andrewfaulk

    It took great effort not to laugh excessively at pasts of your post.

    You’re actually saying parcels and letters is a dead end business that the Post Office should get away from?

    The extra staff will appear from job adverts and paid for by the ‘growth” engineered by McRedmond.

    On 3:

    Firstly Air Cargo and Aircraft are not my specialities. I don’t know how you got that idea

    unless you don’t understand the sub divisions of the aviation industry yourself.


    You’re loosely right that most mail would travel in the cargo holds (belly is an old wartime term no longer used).


    “the aircraft is going anyway for the passengers, the mail in the hold in coincidental in revenue terms, aircraft MTOW and fuel burn”

    I just hold my hands up in despair because nothing in this remark makes any sense. If you are using the terms “MTOW and Fuel Burn”

    in the same sentence, it makes no sense without mentioning other things. If you know what you’re talking about, you’ll

    have no problem correcting the remark.


    You should also understand that you remain very very wrong in your interpretation

    of the fuel consumption / carbon footprint of a commercial aircraft.


    “What do you want to know about the B737? Any particular Gen or Model?”

    Again a meaningless remark. For a start, do you even know the difference between Gen. and Model?

    What is it you can tell me about the 737 anyway? I’d really love to know.


    Lastly,

    I’d also love to know how this advances the cause of solving the difficulties with the An Post approach to non -EU parcels.


    Nothing in your response to me contributed anything to the subject. You clearly took exception to my criticism

    of your ill informed remarks. I’d have had more respect for you if you’d simply ask why I made them.

    If you want to discuss An Post, please continue. If you want to score points, go buy a football.



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Sparkling Gamorreans


    Which brings me to my previous post. Step by step, does anyone know what this looks like for the exporter. At what point does the sender of a parcel to Ireland from abroad input an electronic CN22/CN23? When and where does the information become crystalised and unalterable?



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,926 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    @rf4c

    This is what I read on Andrew's post, not what you said.

    "David McRedmond was lauded for pivoting away from old dead end business like letters to parcels/ecommerce/fulfilment etc."



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    Apart from not getting each word in specific order, I still fail to see that there's a difference.

    The Post Office getting out of the physical movement of mail is surely the point?

    Feel free to tell me what I'm missing, and could we all turn down the heat around here, it's not helping any of us!

    Lets try to get along!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 80 ✭✭Mattie500


    I know it is not an example of incoming parcels but from my limited experience of sending stuff out it is at the post office that the declarations happen. The sender (if they choose regular post) needs to work with the carrier to ensure the requirements of the destination are fulfilled. In my cases the cost was higher but it provided “peace of mind” and all deliveries were made. As the data was input a label was created and attached to the package. I was told it would be sent back if it was wrong. Postal service in conjunction with customs can/do open/inspect all packages.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,884 Mod ✭✭✭✭whiterebel


    MOD - Much as I'm sure we're all enthralled with the possibility of finding out the carbon footprint of B737s (Which will be an Airbus from Aer Lingus to LHR anyway), and the virtues of McRedmond's leadership, that isn't going to move on our problem any. Lets keep it to examples, news and information on here please. I don't have the time to go refereeing squabbles and this thread is important to a lot of people.

    BTW, it is extensively known in the freight business as the belly hold.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    Only by those in the admin and ops offices. Pilots still use forward and aft holds and it's a moot point whether 737, Airbus or any other make as far as performance is concerned!



  • Registered Users Posts: 850 ✭✭✭ordinary_girl


    Got a parcel sent from the US to Dublin a few weeks ago, it's a gift so I assume there are no customs charges. The last update was almost ten days ago, saying it had departed Portlaoise (a fuller tracking history is below).

    08 September 2021 19:35

    Your post has left An Post PORTLAOISE MAIL CENTRE, CO LAOIS

    07 September 2021 12:30

    Your delivery has been sorted DUBLIN PARCEL HUB, DUBLIN 12

    07 September 2021 12:23

    We have your post in DUBLIN PARCEL HUB, DUBLIN 12

    07 September 2021 12:22

    Your delivery was received by An Post in DUBLIN PARCEL HUB, DUBLIN 12

    When I've gotten similar deliveries sent from the US in the past (which were also gifts) they've arrived within a week. I'm starting to worry if this will arrive at all at this stage...



  • Registered Users Posts: 190 ✭✭Marlay


    It has been said, it will depend on who they are sending with. It will be their system that they will use. Again here, https://personal.help.royalmail.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/106, explains how it should work with Royal Mail. If you use their click and drop it should handle it all for you:

    "If you have provided the required data, Click & Drop will send this information automatically whenever you pay for your labels (Personal accounts) or manifest your orders (Online Business Accounts). 

    Failure to include this information may result in delays or rejections during customs clearance in the destination country. 

    You will need to complete customs declarations form (CN22 or CN23) for goods sent to EU countries.

    You can enable customs documentation in Click & Drop from your label format settings page. " (https://business.help.royalmail.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17432/~/click-%26-drop---customs-information)

    Other postal operators will have something similar for posting either into, or out of the EU.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 437 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    “In best Monthy python roman centurion style” Read my post again 50 times and let it sink in, old school letters bad, parcels good



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Sparkling Gamorreans


    Marlay, thanks for the clarification. So insufficiency of information is likely to do with a deficiency in the system of the carrier/courier. Is it possible to send a parcel from Ireland to the UK through An Post without the appropriate label and information or is the system airtight and would An Post funnel you into providing the correct information automatically? I'm curious that there's no complaints about Irish people having parcels rejected by Royal Mail. What's the differential?



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    Thanks for the post and yes I stand corrected. Doing too many things at once clearly tripped me up! However could you tone down the cutting remarks! It's becoming weary.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭Touch Fuzzy Get Dizzy




  • Registered Users Posts: 437 ✭✭andrewfaulk



    Ok noted, then no need to constantly nit pick and question my posts in minute detail..

    For the record, I have been involved in chartering over 100 74F, 76F and 77F aircraft(did an IL76 once too, that was fun) and although it is not my primary role, do also regularly arrange airfreight shipments of DG cargo to out of the way destinations such as Algeria, Mongolia, Dominica, the Maldives, and the Bahamas as well as more vanilla destinations like Hong Kong or Mumbai.. I also have a degree in Transport Engineering including aircraft, and a second degree in freight forwarding. Plus I have done more customs entries than you have had hot dinners..

    So all of this is what informs my thoughts on the current situation in An Post and the freight market in general..

    Post edited by andrewfaulk on


  • Registered Users Posts: 9 kev765


    This seems like a really weird way of addressing this.

    If the time, effort and money that went into producing and printing this guide and distributing it to every home in Ireland (which isn't completely informative anyway if it's exactly the same as the page they are linking to as the electronic customs declaration change/ HS code issue that seems to be happening to a lot of people isn't mentioned as being part of the July 1st changes, only mention of that seems to be that it was introduced January 1st(in the "Why is a customs declaration needed for incoming parcels?") and just wasn't being enforced until now, and seemingly still not being enforced elsewhere in the EU? It also includes that kinda weird dig at "smaller, more specialist British retailers" when we know for a fact the issue is affecting much farther afield than that.)

    was instead spent liaising with other international postal services surely it would be of more benefit. If everything in that regard was working correctly then the general public doesn't need to know anything about it because it should be seamless to them (with maybe the exception of the removal of the under €22 exemption, but exact information on that change seems pretty freely available online anyways.)

    A guide to the recipients of the post that is getting returned(~3 months after the changes) with some information on why it got returned with the impetus to tell the senders ourselves why they made a mistake (and have them try to charge you a second time with no guarantee they have fixed the problem which has been the overwhelming response I have seen so far) seems like a half-baked measure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,019 ✭✭✭Touch Fuzzy Get Dizzy


    I couldn't agree more with your post @kev765

    I was kinda sad to see it too, they've seem to be really stuck into this now and not letting go, so I doubt if they can backtrack or say even anything else differently or being more helpful now after sending it out like that.




  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    Hi,

    Your history provides context for all your posts, and I get where you're coming from now!

    Mentioning customs entries, when I escaped school after the Leaving Cert (a very long time ago) my first job was doing customs entries the paper way, with mountains of documentation, but probably not near the volumes you'd have dealt with!

    As for my own past and all the references to civil aircraft and in particular "my forever love" (B737), I used to drive them!


    Back to An Post, I've had a couple of helpful and friendly messages out of the blue through Facebook, so credit to them for that! I'll post anything interesting to

    the community here in a day or two.


    In the meantime, all the best!



  • Registered Users Posts: 190 ✭✭Marlay


    Well, yes, although the issue seems to be that it isn't clear what the deficiency is and how and when it started to happen. At least some of the communications from Royal Mail seems to indicate that they think they are doing everything right, so hard to tell.

    Yes An Post have a similar click and drop that should handle things for sending to the UK:

    "Sending to Great Britain will require you to complete a customs declaration form for anything you send that contains goods. This form is known as a CN23. You can complete this form either at your local post office or online using Click & Post when you are buying a label for sending to Great Britain. The form will ask you to give details of what you are sending to Great Britain, the value of the item and its contents."



  • Registered Users Posts: 143 ✭✭labrik


    Stop trolling Andrew Faulks. Don't take his bate. An Post are responsible for this fiasco. No the customer. It's ridiculous to think we are responsible for telling a seller how to put the correct taric code on a package when An Post are unsure about it, too.


    An Post just let the packlog through and sort out the customer who make your profits get the packages they've paid for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭rf4c


    labric, please clarify your comments with more details!

    I was pretty annoyed with andrewfaulk's comments, but when he explained his background I understood why he thinks as he does.

    None of us has the definitive answer. All we have is an opinion based on our personal experiences.

    All we can hope to do is understand each other and contribute something useful/interesting to the conversation.

    Some of us think everything is down to An Post. Others feel there are many players involved, with different levels of culpability and none of us

    will agree 100%. Suggest something useful!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It looks to me like the system doesn't work very well.

    From what I understand of it, when you send a package internationally through the post, you pay your local carrier e.g. An Post, Royal Mail, USPS etc, and little or none of that money is paid to the receiving country's postal administration, on the basis that post in the past was a two-way flow and there wasn't all that much remote commerce stuff going through in terms of small packages.

    Now you've certain countries originating HUGE volumes of small packages and their postal operators are dumping those into their destination markets. That worked ok with Ireland / UK distorted relationship, which is a very much one-way flow from the UK to Irish customers.

    The US had this issue with China, to the point that the US Postal Service almost left the Universal Postal Union.

    An Post would seem to be in a similar situation with UK retail and when you add customs to the mix due to Brexit it ads an enormous amount of overheads to something they're probably making no money on. So, if it's not being paid for - it'll go back.

    The system isn't fit for purpose, but it's more than An Post. The whole package post system is unfit for the internet shopping age.



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Sparkling Gamorreans


    Convolved, those are very salient points. There are a lot of forces and external factors at play here beyond the control of An Post (legislation, behaviour of external stakeholders etc.) and no doubt they are facing volumes that challenge their capacity but at the end of the day they exist to fulfil a service within Ireland. Yes, ideally they do so in an efficient and profitable manner but they're here to provide vital logistical infrastructure but it does not benefit people here to be firing the packages back with no clear learnings that can be taken for the people involved. More thought and communication needs to be going into what's happening. The very fact we've got a long thread here and there's multiple people every day on twitter that just do not know what is happening and how to proceed would suggest something is quite wrong and the level and clarity of information out there is insufficient.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Their communications may be bad, but if you've a sudden huge overhead being created by something that isn't generating any revenue, the risk is the company would just fold if it didn't do something.

    I would be very curious to see what is going on with how they're being paid for this. If they're making losses per package processed, it's very understandable.

    Inbound packages should be presented in a way they can be quickly automatically processed. If there's no electronic information, I don't really know how the people designing these systems expect them to work with a huge volume of packages.

    It's a public service, but it's operated commercially. They're also not a charity for e-tailers. That whole mess has to be resolved.

    If the Universal Postal Union systems don't work in a transborder e-commerce era, they need to be fixed ASAP or the whole system will just fall apart in some countries.

    It shouldn't be a case that domestic postal operators are swamped with stuff they aren't paid for.

    The huge uptick in e-commerce due to the pandemic. It was already busy, but got a lot more hectic and the end of the customs union with for the UK due to Brexit coincided with all of that, with very poor planning on the UK side.

    I would like to see a proper breakdown of what's actually going on though. They need to be very clear about it, as I don't think there's much point in pretending that it's a glitch if it's actually a major problem that's going to be difficult to resolve without some kind of systems change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,448 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    you pay your local carrier e.g. An Post, Royal Mail, USPS etc, and little or none of that money is paid to the receiving country's postal administration


    The receiving country receives fees based on the weight last I checked, I believe Amazon have a separate deal in place with An Post

    China got away with it for so long as they are classed as a developing nation, but that is soon to change



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Sparkling Gamorreans


    Is this a relative scale issue in your view? That Ireland imports more parcels than it exports therefore An Post are hurting more from this than peer postal services and this is lending to the apparent higher rate of rejection?

    Again, I think you make very pertinent points but could it not have been surmised in advance that this is how it was going to play out? Was the strategy always going to be that they'll end up rejecting a lot of parcels and knowing they'd get public backlash but just proceed and not escalate this politically in advance or truly warn the public?



  • Registered Users Posts: 437 ✭✭andrewfaulk


    yes, this has essentially been my point all along.. An Post have a plan at board level likely with ministerial knowledge and agreement and no amount of hassling the CS team on Twitter will change it.. The CS staff are just worker ants trying to deal with the fallout..

    Also An Post would me more impacted than most EU postal agencies due to our long-standing economic relationship with the U.K., so the impact of Brexit is much more here than anywhere else in Europe..



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    My daughter got an email from David McRedmond's secretary apologising for the "inconsistencies" and asking her (again) to confirm that she'd received her packet. She also said she ws forwarding the case to customer management to look into.

    Wondering did anyone else get a reply like that from McRedmond's office?



  • Registered Users Posts: 139 ✭✭Sparkling Gamorreans


    Any large corporation I've worked for would categorise complaints directly addressed to the CEO, made via social media and that garner wider media attention to be high risk and would undertake urgent actions that could quell this within reason. They shouldn't escape discomfort merely because they're intransigent. If they've elected to take the flack, let them receive it. If they're not going to clearly articulate the impact this is having on them and why recipients, who although not their direct customers in this instance are the people they exist to serve, should be taking this pain then they should continue to come under scrutiny.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ... Delete, wrong thread....



Advertisement