ISI Fighter Shamima Begum Not allowed to return to the UK

it was more then an opinion, and ultimately a government minister of bangladesh is going to know about the country's own laws better then those of other countries.

so i can take it therefore that you have no reason as to why i should disbelieve bangladesh on what it states, which realistically there isn't one, as they have less of a reason to lie, by miles unlike britain.

Of course Bangladesh should do that if it could.

States used be bound to protect the safety of their population from external threats.

Now, not so much, that's old fashioned and so lumpen prole.

thank you for being honest.

now, would and should that apply to all criminality and criminals where and when a country is trying to deport them back to their country of origin? their country of origin should be able to strip them of their citizenship if they have citizenship of the country they are in and are being deported from? or might have a chance of gaining citizenship of the deporting country or another country?

Interesting that she dropped the hijab and changed her look completely. I'm pretty sure she doesn't possess a lot of knowledge on Public Relations. It would be interesting to trace to see where her professional advice is coming from and who is funding it.

bound to be a slew of NGO's in the background, I'd imagine most people in the camp dont have access to world class makeovers

Doesn't the argument go that the decision to revoke her citizenship took place when she was under 21 and so was still a citizen of Bangladesh, even if that was in a 'dormant state', and thus, by revoking her British citizenship, it became impossible for her Bangladeshi citizenship to expire as it would then be the Bangladeshi state leaving her stateless.

The real issue for me is that we will possibly never get to hear this actually argued in court, as although she does have a legal right to appeal, and also a right to contribute to her own defence (which she cannot fully make from outside the UK), the decision was made that those rights can effectively be suspended as long as her return to country represents a certain level of threat to the security of the UK.

As somebody who would have had no issue whatsoever had I heard that Begum had been lined up against a wall by the Kurds (or anybody else), it's still an absolute bullsh!t decision.

they won't unless they are in the exact same situation as her or the couple of others in that very unique situation.

it's more about supporting international law and the concept of not palming by-birth citizens off on other countries based on a slight link to those countries, rather then the individuals themselves.

after all we all want our countries to be able to deport foreign criminals home, which would become impossible if cases like this became the norm, which they would if britain got away with this.

Not going to change the fact she's not going to England

……….

But thats not what happened is it ?

she aligned herself willingly with a group that she thought would put here in a powerful position over her fellow humans.

She sought to join a sect of clearly and obviously evil religious cult whos stated goal was to rape and pillage the western world and destroy its civilizations in favor of its own brand of extreme and ruthless control ,

f her and all her ilk , Lisa smith very much included they should be left in the desert to die live so many of their victims

She was born and radicalised in Britain so she is their problem. They shouldn't be allowed to abdicate their responsibility to Bangledesh and Syria.

it is comparable in terms of the double standards that are in place and how what is excepted normally can change when it suits a government with an agenda.