Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part XII *Read OP For Mod Warnings*

Options
13893903923943951115

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    The only person I have ever heard mention permanent restrictions or mask wearing is you. I haven't been panicking at all throughout.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Ride, PJ Harvey, Pixies, Public Service Broadcasting, Therapy?, IDLES(x2)



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,008 ✭✭✭Quags


    I hope so. I go to a gym in a hotel and they keep saying the hotel manager wont allow the jacuzzi/sauna/steam room to be opened due to space issues and the need to clean after each use. Which makes ye think how often did they clean it before all of this



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Tegnell and Bhattacharya not being in favour of face masks would make me more inclined to believe that face masks do prevent the spread of the virus.

    Tegnell was chasing naturally acquired immunity and Bhattacharya was one of the people involved in the Great Barrington Declaration which advocated the same.



  • Registered Users Posts: 933 ✭✭✭darconio


    When was the time to initiate a 6 weeks lockdown to save xmas, or to suddenly shutdown the country on the 24th because of the surge, it was decided within a blink of an eye. Now that everything was stagnant for the past 4 weeks we still need to wait an additional 3 because it's "the science" and we need a period of observation. The case will inevitably raise after the 22nd, what are they going to do then? Will they be ready to accept overwhelmed hospitals like it was for the past X years? Ah well, let's wait for the next (crucial) 17 days and we shall see I suppose



  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭Nyero



    It's a bit ridulous saying people asked for certainly and then you think kicking the can down the road is an acceptable form of certainty.

    BTW dates have been pulled forward and backwards before, it's not like any date was set in stone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 531 ✭✭✭thebronze14


    The one in mine has been opened since the gym last reopened.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    I really hope this doesn't end up being a constant hanging over people's heads.



  • Registered Users Posts: 38,293 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    This time last year we were on the eve of Lockdown 2

    All this 'Lockdown can't be ruled out' is pure arse covering by our betters who will lose no pay and there lifestyle if it comes it or not



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So does that mean that they have all of a sudden ceased to know anything about medicine? This is what I don't understand. Dr Bhattacharya has been at Stanford for around 35 years. Not just any university. Surely he knows what he's talking about. Dr Tegnell is the State Epidemiologist of Sweden. Presumably that means he's considered to be the best epidemiologist in Sweden. I just don't understand how he can consider masks to be more or less useless while his equivalent in the Philippines and Peru, for example, advocate for masks + face shield everywhere and double masking everywhere respectively. That's why I say a debate is needed.


    Dr Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University, again not just any old university, says that people who had and recovered from covid have longer lasting immunity than the vaccinated: https://mobile.twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1440649075469295616


    So why is natural immunity being ignored around the world if that's case? Those are questions that are never answered, or even asked.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I predict that he'll be back in January looking for another extension for climate change. I have long believed that this has had nothing to do with public health. Just like the 'irreversible' return to normal in England that was quickly followed a few weeks later by 'we'll do everything we can to prevent another lockdown'.


    If almost 100% vaccination isn't enough for them to stop restricting people's lives then nothing will be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    What kind of lockdown are you expecting to prevent climate change?

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Ride, PJ Harvey, Pixies, Public Service Broadcasting, Therapy?, IDLES(x2)



  • Registered Users Posts: 490 ✭✭Avon8


    Its a real eye opener how many crackpots on that side of the argument happen to be from Mayo. Perhaps it's all coincidence. Or perhaps its lack of education. Who knows



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    It could even possibly be because you may not have paid attention in geography class.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,068 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Where is immunity through infection being ignored ? Here, and as far as I can see, in every other country it has the same status as being fully vaccinated.

    Tegnell`s predecessor as Sweden`s state epidemiologist, Annika Linde 2005 - 2013, said chasing natural herd immunity was a dream with little basis in reality. She was also considered the best epidemiologist in Sweden until she retired, so one of them got it wrong. From Sweden`s own antibody test results it does not look like it was Linde.

    Tegnell and Bhattacharya were both advocates of natural herd immunity. Tegnell was eventually force to drop the idea, and Bhattacharya I haven`t heard anything from since the first vaccination or even earlier. I imagine even he realised seeing how effective the vaccines are against serious injury and death, what the carnage pursuing his favoured natural herd immunity would have caused. That and the fact that anywhere it was attempted, or believed to have been achieved, showed how correct Linde`s assessment was.

    If you are chasing natural herd immunity then the theory on how fast you get there depends on how fast as many as possible become infected. If face masks are preventing that happening then I can see why those favouring the theory would be opposed.

    Post edited by charlie14 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,885 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Christ almighty, you have to be the single most pessimistic contributor on here. Constantly looking for the negatives, seeking out selective articles and quotes to suit your narrative, it must be exhausting being such a cynic. Here's an idea, how about you stop trawling the internet for confirmation bias pieces and go out for a few pints/dinner/cinema/concert/club and you might actually see that things have improved dramatically in the last 3-4 months and are continuing to do so. The 22nd is not far away and we will be almost restriction free. Yes, I agree that we masks should not be mandated going forward, so lets hope the conversation turns to those after the 22nd, but in the meantime people would be better off enjoying the freedom we have instead of obsessing over the ones we don't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 975 ✭✭✭Parachutes


    I’m not a violent person, but if they attempted a ‘climate lockdown’ I may reconsider my position…



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Ride, PJ Harvey, Pixies, Public Service Broadcasting, Therapy?, IDLES(x2)



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,526 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's more like a better to have it available, as an abundance of caution. He's just repeating what the CMO said. However, one would seriously question why an approach that may deliver almost 95% vaccinated would really need to resort to such tactics again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,323 ✭✭✭prunudo


    In the same way that people used to claim covid restrictions such as 2nd lockdowns, vaccine passes etc wouldn't happen, it would very naive to think that people won't be effected by climate change restrictions in the future. You can call posters pessimistic all you like, but if the last 18moths has shown anything, it's that nothing can be ruled out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Tbf, that same argument will still be valid on January 9th when it's coming up to being out of date again. At some point, you have to pull the plug on it and there's going to be no material difference in vaccinations between now and January 9th.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Oh, I think this is a box ticking exercise and all Donnelly knows how to do is channel the CMO. It just suggests they want to be prepared.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Ya, I get that, but to me, that's going down a rabbit hole of it always being extended cos we always need to be prepared. Kind of agree with SF's health guy here in that they can come in and agree new regulations quick enough and get things sorted if we're in a situation where we need them. Shouldn't just be blankly extending them just incase imo cos that's always an argument to roll them on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Well, we have them so why go through the dance again for new ones? They should be parked from 22 October anyway. Tend to ignore what SF rep has to say as most of it is rubbish. It's also ironic given how much harder they and others in Opposition wanted to push on restrictions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    "I'm not a violent person, but if aliens invaded my town I may reconsider my position" is about as useful a position to hold.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,810 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    :D

    I think this is the 1st post i've ever thanked by you - a sign of things improving !!



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Right but look at the y-axis. Then factor in seasonality. In terms of numbers alone we're in a worse position than this time last year




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Saunas and steam rooms have been open for a while now, but they've had restrictions in terms of numbers, and for many places they've kept them closed because they've found it too much hassle to open them.

    In effect, all restrictions are gone from the 22nd. There will continue to be prevailing health advice, which will include advice to restrict the number of people in unventilated close quarters, like a sauna. But it's just advice, and no individuals or businesses will be required to adhere to it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    One of the few times here that I'll be agreeing with Sinn Fein on something; in the event that these powers were required again it wouldn't take very much to convene an emergency session of the Dáil and bring them through. You're talking about a difference of hours rather than weeks. Viruses move quickly, but not that quickly.

    I totally accept the standpoint that it's often better to have something and not need it than to need it and not have it, but from an ideological standpoint allowing these powers to lapse when they are no longer needed, is the democratically right thing to do. Donnelly himself admits that they are "unlikely" to be required again, therefore on balance it makes more sense to let them go.

    We don't have a massive right-wing section of the Dáil that would resist new legislation on restrictions; quite the opposite in fact. Therefore there's no worry that we would not be able to bring in emergency legislation again if it was needed.



Advertisement