Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sarah Everard Murder - Serving Met Officer Arrested *Mod Note in OP*

Options
11516171921

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,711 ✭✭✭Allinall


    It was not his personal business when the event was a work event.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Escorts at work parties may not be too uncommon. But certainly in Ireland and the UK, bringing a prostitute or a stripper to a work party and openly bragging about it, is definitely very uncommon.

    Not least the fact that it was a party filled with police officers. One may reasonably argue that police are amongst the worst for engaging in the "coke and hookers" trope when they're in small groups and behind closed doors. Maybe if this had been a stag party or a very select private birthday party, you might have a point.

    In this case, he and his wife were invited to a colleague's wedding anniversary party - presumably along with other colleagues and their non-police spouses - and he turned up with a prostitute instead, that he openly admitted was such. There is nothing normal or even remotely "common" about that kind of behaviour.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,380 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Maybe I don’t get the “socially acceptable” element again.



  • Administrators, Politics Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,947 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Neyite


    I've worked in a few different industries for well, coming up on 30 years now and I can't think of a single job where overtly sexualised behaviour was remotely acceptable -and I'm counting the industries where colleagues hooking up and recreational drugs were fine and dandy in that. There's not a single job I've had where bringing a sex worker to a colleagues birthday party where other wives and friends would be present would go down well at all.

    There's usually an office weirdo in any job. In many of them, it's 'just' a weirdo. Usually harmless. But sometimes there is the guy who hits on a new female employee, or who female colleagues know as a creep and stay well away from. We know WC was that guy. We know that his male and female colleagues alike knew it and had known it for years and not only tolerated it, but joined in the banter or behaviour with him. He groped fellow officers, he was reported twice for flashing.

    That behaviour, plus the open use of prostituts is indicative of a man who objectifies women. And when you work with a man like that as a woman, you won't trust him as far as you'd throw him, and imagine in a police partner scenario, how much less you'd trust going out to call outs in remote/unsafe areas alone with him. Even if he 'behaved' while on duty and didn't assault you, even listening to his banter would be hugely distasteful and you'd want to get the fcuk away from him. As a police officer, it points to concerns as to how he might treat a distressed and vulnerable crime victim, or witness if they were female.

    If serving police officers can get sacked for tweeting about celebrities , or racism, then why was WC not sacked for his conduct while on duty? On a scale, sexual harassment or sexist messages should be equal to the two examples I've linked but the police don't seem agree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,380 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    There is little point debating why and how workplaces address internal and external issues differently. And people who are too stupid to understand how their public online activities can impact their career do not deserve any better tbh, but that's another matter.

    I didn't object to the claim that the ball was clearly dropped somewhere, and that there is no effective assessment procedure in place. But what's the point in listing all of the things that now appear to be "clear indicators" in hindsight? Just because someone is a bit of a creep and objectifies women does not mean that they will go on to rape and murder a woman, and you can bet that there will be people in the force who now feel bad for having interpreted his behavior incorrectly.

    The rumor mill after an event is a funny thing, because hardly anyone will know what superiors were notified about. And hookers at a Christmas party will have been the least of their concerns in comparison to the flashing ones.

    And to avoid confusion. I am not trying to be difficult here and have an argument for the sake of it. My post that you had quoted was an admission that I struggle with understanding some social expectations and boundaries because they make no sense to me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    If anyone watched the program about the Minstead Rapist the other night, you would have to question just how seriously the MET actually take rape in the first place. This guy was going around raping old grannies and they let it go on for 20 years.

    He was driving around to victims houses in his own car



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I did watch that and I did not get the same impression as you at all. They put in a lot of effort over many years to find him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,013 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Like many others, I keep thinking about Sarah the last week. It’s your worst nightmare as a woman, it really is.

    Did he take her phone off her when he arrested her? That would be even more terrifying. Presumably police used her phone to try trace her location, and it was turned off at some point very soon after the “arrest”.

    Also how was it known she was raped, if the body was burned- did WC volunteer this information?

    It’s all so grim and distressing, it really is. I keep thinking about the moment she would have realised something was wrong, and how he managed to restrain her when he took her out of the car in Kent. Much easier to do if she was handcuffed. Otherwise she would have hit him in the head at traffic lights and tried to get out of the car… except he’d obviously locked all of the doors.

    I’m the same age as Sarah- 33 when she was murdered. Except I’m 34 now and she isn’t. Just so exhausted and endlessly saddened by these incidents of depravity and violence committed by men against women, which I’ve been hearing about as long as I can remember. Rachel O’Reilly, Manuela Riedo, Sophie Toscan du Plantier, Anna Finnegan, Nadine Lott, Karen Buckley, Elaine O’Hara, Ana Kriegel, Sabina Nessa, Sarah Everard- on and on and on it goes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    you must have watched another program so because the lad in charge of the investigation looked on the verge of tears that the whole thing was so under resourced, I think he said he had two officers working on it at one stage

    Multiple others mentioned the same, how they felt sorry that he was seen as carrying the can for this.

    They caught him after doing a week or 2 of stakeout, he was committing 3 or 4 burglaries a night. Its not like he was waiting months between attacks.

    Someone that brazen is asking to be caught.

    Imagine the if someone was after raping maybe 30 grannies in south dublin, thats the level it was at



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    the stakeout only worked because they completely changed how they approached the investigation and had an idea where he might strike next. Prior to the new officer coming onboard they had very little go on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    Yes

    they they moved from doing nothing to doing something

    it had been going on for 20 years, when did they suddenly get an idea where he might strike? The data was not new and he had been doing it for 20 years, hundreds of offenses

    I mean they got a lead on the car type he was using, early on in the stakeout, through some fairly crap cctv, and the guy who spotted the type, wow what a job, a silver zaffira and then did nothing with the information that they mentioned, i mean the first thing they should have done was start going through the list of those owners who matched the profile and re-checking them

    you would have to go out of your way to not catch a person like this



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,181 ✭✭✭Be right back


    He probably did. Or either she wasn't able to use it due to being handcuffed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The Met police really covering themselves in glory with their behaviour towards women




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    about 50 police ......... or security guards...



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah stop!

    she's on a dating app so that she can meet men, what's the issue?



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    I know you feel duty bound to defend the police but try and actually read the article before responding.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    That the articles says police or security guards, she seems to be unclear

    And she seems to have an agenda, so slightly skeptical of someone who would get arrested at a vigil for a lovely photo op



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    from the article

    "They were all in uniform on their profiles or it said 'I'm a police officer'," she said.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    were in their security guard uniforms or said they were police officers

    or...

    dubious

    its good to be skeptical of unverified stories



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    "I'm a police officer" is pretty clear in my mind. Perhaps not as much in yours.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,380 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    So she did not report these dating app threats but feels the need to go public about them? Very credible that there is no evidence for this continuous harassment



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    report them to the people that were making them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter


    so one police officer and 49 security guards have a penchant for redheads?


    how does tinder work, i presume you cant get unsolicited messages? is it not if you both match?



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    There's nothing to report. She said that she had reported the threats, but someone connecting on a dating app hasn't done anything reportable, even though such a high rate of police officers doing it would suggest that it's been shared on WhatsApp or similar and the intent is intimidation.

    This woman is very much a high-profile activist as opposed to a "right time, right place" person. But that doesn't make it any more OK for her to be a target for threats or harassment. One might say, "She's looking for media attention", and even if that's the case, it doesn't actually matter.

    In these kinds of campaigns some people deliberately make themselves lightning rods; public faces that attract ire so that they can go public and make a lot of noise about it. Another woman might try to go quiet and get on with their lives. This woman is making a point of standing up and shining a light on what happens to people who dare to stand up.

    I remember at the time people trying to discount her arrest because she was a known activist. When the reality is that it was a vigil for a murdered woman that became a pretty harsh police crackdown. And although the argument is "covid restrictions", there were many events after this one which were considerably more violent and dangerous, and never got the same police response.

    Which implies that the UK Met saw this vigil as a direct attack on them, and used the opportunity to defend their honour by engaging in a bit of brutality.

    And her treatment afterwards continues to suggest that there are some police officers (and men) who take umbrage at the suggestion that Everard's murder might have something to do with police or men.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    of course, it was just the one police officer. sweet suffering jesus.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,380 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    So if you received texts like this from people sending coordinated messages (incl pics wearing their uniforms) would I you not screenshot them and report them? Not even to the dating app provider?

    She reported the other threats, but not these ones, so something isn’t adding up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,442 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    they weren't explicit threats. They were "we know who you are" implicit threats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,651 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    She does.

    She wants the police to stop acting like see you next Tuesdays.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,791 ✭✭✭monkeybutter



    you seem like someone well versed in Tinder, how do you connect? Do you both need to swipe is it?



Advertisement