Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dun Laoghaire Traffic & Commuting Chat

1656668707187

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    In decisions on what kind of parking they provide for staff, which is the issue we were discussion, they can absolutely do what they like.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If you want to incentivise people to work out there, maybe try initiatives that reach a much wider, not just the better off. How about a shuttle bus, how about bike facilities and showers. But regardless, your suggestion that employee parking is unique to the public sector is just wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Again you are trotting out this better off guff, anything to back that up?

    And how do you know these places on pottery road with car parking dont have showers and bike facilities?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,679 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    The bike2work scheme isn’t funded. It’s a tax relief that represents a saving of about 100 a year. I don’t see how you think motorists find it , it’s only available to PAYE workers


    the tax saver can be worth several thousand a year and is used for public transport where journeys are already subsided.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Sounds pretty well balanced to me Ted.

    Considering the conversation is about workplace parking, we are talking about a cohort to whom the bike to work relief is almost universally available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 761 ✭✭✭p15574


    It seems that all here are in agreement that there is way too much public sector car parking. If there are problems with introducing BIK on it, then probably the next best thing is removing the spaces...for the private sector, perhaps charge companies €1000 per space per annum. For public sector - where they'd just accept that and have the taxpayer pay it, there should be another method, like a (mandatory!!!) directive to remove 75% of spaces if within a city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    how is a tax saver ticket worth several thousand per year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    In fairness, depending on your PAYE tax rate, typical annual savings over retail cost, using the Taxsaver scheme, are between €1,500 and €3,000 to the user.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Companies already pay commercial rates on Parking provided on premises. For parking provided offsight, they pay the owner in leasing and the owner pays Rates on it. In the same question I would ask about motorists, how many times to you want to charge them for the same thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    maybe so i didnt realise how expensive some of the tickets are, although you would imagine the majority of users are getting the annual rail or bus which is 1,450 or so, tax benefit is only 700 euro on that,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    Probably because burns is a cyclists in an position of power which allows him model the roads to suit him, vastly out of touch with the community.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I'd have thought it was fairly self explanatory given the relative costs of buying and operating a bike vs a car. You'd get a decent new bike on the road for just the tax and insurance costs of running a car.

    All those charges are shared by the organisation, not paid by the motorists who use the space. What's the resistance to expecting those who use and enjoy the facility to pay something for it?

    When did we all agree that? Did we look at the proportion of parking spaces to employees? Did we look at the nature of work carried out by those employees and how many of them visit multiple locations as part of their work?

    Whatever BIK we bring in should apply to all, and should be paid by the drivers who use the spaces, not their employer.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Who cares what multiple locations the staff have to visit.

    They can buy cargo bikes, walk or get the bus.

    End of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    It's not self explanatory at all Andrew, if I'm wearing a rolex and you are wearing a casio can you say that I am better off than you?


    There are plenty of my friends cycling around on bikes that cost more than most people's cars, in fact their peripherals probably cost more than a cheap run around.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So just to be clear, you're happy to reduce the productivity of staff just to satisfy your own spite, correct?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Broadly, the answer is probably Yes, if you are wearing a Rolex that you are probably better off. For everyone one of your plenty of friends with expensive bikes, you have ten friends with more expensive cars. And for your friends with the fancy bikes, their car running costs leave their bike running costs in the hal'penny place.

    Just look around you, it's not hard to see. Unless you reckon all those Deliveroo cyclists and 3rd level students slip into their Beamers and their Lexii to drive home? Are you really going to base the credibility of your position on this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,294 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    It's as credible as proclaiming those cycling to work are less well off than their Co workers that drive.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I thought you were arguing that bikes were the most efficient form of transport, you have been banging on about this since forever.

    Are you now saying bikes reduce the productivity of staff, can you at least try to be consistent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,679 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    How can you justify those actions. You are just as bad as the person making the threats



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Andrew has a sort of Paul Murphy socialist view of things, which makes it entirely unreal and far easier not to engage with. Its quite simply not how the World works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, no because. No ifs, ands or buts. Making personal threats is absolutely disgusting as well as being a crime.

    I disagree with a huge amount of what Burns' policies are and also how he conducts himself on social media and so on as an unelected public official, but that is the only basis on which I'll tackle him.

    His family, his home, those of his staff, they are all one hundred percent off limits under any circumstances, end of story.

    Anyone who threatens someone in that manner is no better than the pond scum who have shown up to harass government ministers at their homes, often with their families inside. Its a tactic of fascists, cowards and bottom feeders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Where exactly did I argue that please? If you want to spend productive time on three DLR sites spread over Stepaside, Blackrock and Shankill on any given day, you're probably not going to do it on a bike. In fairness to DLR, they're done a fair bit of work to encourage staff to switch over to eBikes and cargo bikes, which is great - but let's be honest, this is just spite from your good self, and nothing to do with active travel.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How many have actually switched over, how many are driving to work who live within 8km of the office, isnt the advice walk to work if you live within 5km and cycle if you live within 8km. I dont see much tweeting about staff cycling or walking in their droves to work.

    I mean " what does a fair bit of work to encourage staff to switch over mean',if the council arent actually achieving success in reducing the numbers of their own staff who drive to work unnecessarily how can they persuade the general public to ditch their cars.

    So now its clearer to me, the ordinary person who wants to drive to Blackrock and Stepaside and Shankill should be using cycling or using public transport but the council officials are such busy bees they need to drive. There is a very good Dart service between Dunlaoghaire and Shankill and the station is a minutes walk from the council offices. The officials can bring their bikes on the Dart and off they go, simple as.

    An official can make good use of the Coastal Mobility route and cycle to Blackrock within minutes, are you seriously telling me any official needs to drive to shankill or Blackrock.

    You have no credibility left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Was down in DL yesterday took the dog for a walk from the ferry terminal to the forty foot and back via the Peoples Pk and Georges St. Beautiful day, only problem was that the place was absolutely jammed with cars, completely chocablock. Very unpleasant with the fumes, horns blaring and people getting irate with the traffic jams.

    Seems to be much worse since they reopened Lr Georges St as cars are increasingly using it as a rat run. DLRCC should consider closing it off again, at least at the weekends.

    Also a huge amount of cyclists out, taking advantage of the cycle infrastructure, only problem is that there are not enough cycle racks in Sandycove and the Forty Foot. The council needs to address this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Homesick Alien


    Yeah was down there myself yesterday and noticed that too. Traffic was backed the whole way from the people's park through Glasthule village. We locked our bikes to each other at the forty foot as they were all full. Nice to see so many cycling though. Right by the 40 foot some cars had parked up against the cycle parking blocking in the owners of the bikes 🤷‍♂️



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Its really nice fir you that you only had to take the dog for a walk.

    Other people have young children and are coming from far and wide to the coast.

    Many others take elderly family members for a drive to Dunlaoghaire, shame these old folk dont just stay in their nursing homes so their cars arent inconveniencing you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The traffic from Glasthule northwards is only because of the coastal cycle path.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    That's a bit two faced isn't it? It doesn't take much to be civil and less sarcastic. One of my children was also with me, before you start jumping to further conclusions.

    And if you had read the post you would have gathered that these same elderly people that you are bangining on about, were stuck in traffic jams and further more would have found it very difficult to find parking. I know this because I drove down there yesterday, because of the dog and children and experienced all of the above.

    But as is your usual MO you couldn't be bothered!! So less of the sarcasm and more civility please, to borrow from the other thread.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dunlaoghaire belongs to all citizens, access to it for many is by car so no point in you grumbling about fumes.

    Every coastal area is the same, long lanes of traffic coming and going, do you want roads closed everywhere so only locals can enjoy the sea.

    You didnt mention a child, you said you walked the dog so i posted how nice for you, no other care in the world.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Homesick Alien




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If you want to live in a scenic location free from cars then move to a low population area.

    Dunlaoghaire is no different to Bray or Greystones, all three areas full of cars at nice weekends.

    Why suggest closing off the Georges Street exit from the town if you want less cars.

    You have a main route into the town closed off to cars and you want a main exit route closed too, the result is total chaos, drivers stressed, horns blaring etc.

    Best to just enjoy the walk and forget about the cars, nothing anyone can do about people wanting to use their cars at the weekend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Cut and paste, cut and paste.......................................................YAWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What an intelligent thought out response.

    Thank You



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It has.

    I haven't decided yet whether to have the coastal cycle route removed or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    You might give us the heads up here first, when you do decide!😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,530 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Doesn't matter how many times you say 'nothing can be done' or 'no point in grumbling' - there is loads that can be done, and it will be done, in agonisingly small steps apparently but the tide is absolutely turning, despite your best efforts to keep expectations on the floor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Appreciate that Labre. We could help you iron out any wrinkles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You can be my wing man anytime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    I find it hilarious how virtuous and assuming some of the anti-car retoric is. There are people who by choice or ability wont want to cycle just like there are those who dont want to take public transport or walk. It is called freedom of choice.

    Punishing those who choose not to cycle or walk by implementing measures based on the very myopic and one sided DMURS/NCM is obnoxious. It is the next best thing to a violation of civil liberties.

    For businesses, this sadly results in a tonne of compliance related paper work and resultant overheads. This builds a huge amount of risk into the decisions of any would-be entrepreneur wishing to establish a traditional brick and morter shop in suburbia. That doesn't include the inconvenience that will drive (no pun intended) many potential customers away from those shops.



  • Registered Users Posts: 213 ✭✭qb123


    It's not anti-car rhetoric, it's pro-cycling. (ok, some of it here is anti-car or anti-cycling, but that's largely because of the decline in the tone of this thread, especially since a certain contributor joined.) Cars can easily and safely access all areas of the county; for those who choose to cycle it's can be an unnerving experience given the lack of road space afforded by cars. This is a big part of the reason why fewer women and children cycle - they don't feel safe. Whereas if you do provide safe cycling infrastructure, ala the CMR, you can see greater numbers cycling and more women, children and older people. Unfortunately to make it safer for cycling entails taking a little road space from cars (it can't be taken from pedestrians as they already have pitifully little), and this does put drivers out because they have to drive a little bit further or wait in traffic a bit longer. But the road is a scarce resource and the dominance of cars has to be reversed, not just to cater for cyclists, but also public transport initiatives such as bus connects.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Women and children dont cycle because its easier to drive or take a bus.

    so patronising to link women and children together as if women are pathetic weaklings afraid to cycle.

    The CMR is mainly a nice jsunt on a sunny day, its empty most of the week.

    And closing off half of Seapoint Ave isnt taking a little bit of roadspace, its caused traffic to divert to other roads and its causing gridlock on Monkstown Road.

    This decision needs to be reviewed, it was al very well doing this in March 2020 under a covid emergency cover when everyone was at home.

    Traffic is worse than ever now and both Roads to Dunlaoghaire need to be open to traffic, close Seapoint southbound on sunday afternoon but it definitely needs to be open the rest of the week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    @patrickbrophy18 : What does this mean? Thanks

    DMURS/NCM



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    DMURS: Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets

    NCM: National Cycle Manual



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,253 ✭✭✭Mav11


    Thanks. I didn't know that these publications existed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    DMURS is a farce of a thing. Biggest threat to safety, particularly cyclists in my opinion, in decades.

    I know of at least 10 schemes around Dublin where roads and junctions and roundabouts were revamped according to DMURS specifications and the inherent dangers they introduced had to be rowed back on after local outcry. It has removed left slips, narrowed turning radii and changed yield priorities in some instances.

    So bad was it that the 2013 version was substantially replaced in 2019. There was a supplement issued for Covid guidance, but in really it was toothless and without any sort of strategic basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,487 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Freedom of choice, but it shouldn't be freedom of choice. You shouldn't be allowed drive and park your toxic fume spewing tank wherever you want. It infringes on other people. People used to say the same about smoking before it was banned indoors, they're taking our freedoms.

    Your so called freedom is wrecking things for other people. Private cars need to be cut out of our lives as much as possible especially in cities, whether granny wants to drive around Dun Laoghaire or not, and very slowly the tide is turning that way.

    And personally I couldn't care less if a few very old people can't get to certain places because of the banning of cars, tough. We must do what is best for the majority. I wont expect to be driven wherever I want to go when I'm old and decrepit, the world doesn't revolve around a tiny percentage of people who can't walk a few meters, and nor should it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You showed your true colours there TM.

    The mark of a society is how it treats its most vulnerable and those with less of a voice. Thats why your zealotry won't be allowed succeed, in Dun Laoghaire or elsewhere.

    Personal private transport will change - is already changing in fact - and there will be a greater rebalancing of safety and accessibility, but it won't be to the exclusion of one mode or another. You might as well get that notion out of your head early on.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement