Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1168169171173174806

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    When there is no source to confirm that it's true on major events, it can be considered as conspiracy theories.

    If I say that timmyntc, tells that current government is incompetent, it is not a conspiracy theory, because I can show the source of it. But if I say that because of this timmyntc is pro-opposition(Sinn Fein) supporter, it would be conspiracy theory, because this is based on my believe.

    Note. There is no clear solution to the housing crisis, if someone thinks that has a solution, there will be plenty here to contradict it. Everyone sees housing problem from different perspective. Even those who oppose current government doesn't have solution that would agree on.

    Post edited by Marius34 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    The canary is long dead. Back in the spring I was speaking to my then-manager about how many remote workers were refusing to come back to Ireland, let alone Dublin. The delayed census will make interesting reading..



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Funny you should say that.

    My family rent a house in Donegal all year round as a holiday home. None of us live in the house. Its purely rented as a getaway. We've been renting it for 3 years now.

    We pay €600 pm between us and one or other family uses it almost every weekend and for every day during the summer. We even went there for Christmas last year. 3 families.

    The owner could easily get €1000 or more for it now. I thought he would give us our notice this year. But I was talking to him during the summer and he asked us to sign a 5 year lease if we wanted to keep it on. If we didnt he would have to sell it. We signed the lease as we were happy with the arrangement.

    I asked him why was he thinking of selling. One word he said - "legislation". He will not be renting it under the control of the RTB or the council. He had rented another house to the council and said it was a disaster and now he cant even sell that house until the council lease is up.

    But he is happy with the arrangement with us for another 5 years at least.

    This particular guy is happier getting €600 from dependable people who dont have it as their PPR than getting around double that and being under the kosh of legislation and risk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,065 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Your definition of conspiracy is severely lacking.

    You've equated belief directly with conspiracy which is totally wrong. Conspiracy is a real thing, conspiracy theory is an unproven allegation of conspiracy, hence its a theory and not just a conspiracy (which implies fact in the absence of "theory" qualifier).

    Furthermore, a theory is as yet unproven, neither proven true or false. "Conspiracy theories" can and do turn out to be true.


    Anyways it is far more likely that government action deliberately inflated rental prices than a string of accidents, especially since FG manifesto circa 2011? said they wanted to increase property prices as part of the recovery. Encouraging REITs and others to invest in Irish property was a FG policy as a way to buoy prices, and in doing so that pushed rents up too as REITs became some of the largest landlords in the state, and investors were encouraged to buy irish property for its rental yields. Rental yields which are tied to property prices paid for the asset, because if the rent drops then they wont get their desired yield, and if yield falls so too does asset price.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,173 ✭✭✭Marius34


    You are right, corrected now, I should say conspiracy theories, not conspiracy. I use those to terms constantly interchangeably, although in most cases when I say conspiracy, I mean conspiracy theories.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I have a feeling this is why the big tech MNCs have "delayed" the return to the office proclamations in Dublin, if they have not already offered full WFH forever. It is not that half the staff won't come back but instead that a meaningful number have decided that they won't come back to Dublin if they are told they need to come back. Losing 5-10% of people would be bad enough in the current, tight labour market. I have a few different friends who work in some of the larger tech companies (so of course this isn't really my own experience) and they all know of a few people who moved to their home EU country during the pandemic and won't be back ever.

    I look on Daft this morning and search for general "Dublin (county)" rentals, seeing there are 1,029 in total available in the whole county (down from 1,700 in early/mid- August). The dearth in availability of rentals even with most workers still fully WFH would mean that any sort of a push to get staff back will push up rents even further and that small collection of rentals available will drop even further. The American Chamber of Commerce gave a reaction to the Budget yesterday;

    "The American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, which represents US multinationals here, welcomed the decision to increase income tax bands and tax credits, noting that among its members, “93 per cent call out personal tax as a barrier to attracting/retaining talent, with 40 per cent seeing it as a barrier to further investment and expansion”.

    As if housing wasn't already enough of an issue for companies, income tax is cited as a fairly big barrier to hiring and staff retention, but the government doesn't seem to have any appetite to materially reduce the income tax burden on workers. It's sad that the big companies are the ones who might finally tip the government into action as it should be enough for the average person (who actually votes) to be able to prompt action, but this is where we are heading; slower/no growth in multinational activity in Ireland rendering our "balanced budget" notions impossible without significant cuts to spending and tax increases.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    The threshold into the 40% tax bracket is becoming even more of an issue with inflation the way it is, if you want to poach mid level staff from another company there's no point offering them a 5k payrise when the govt takes half of that, same goes for internal promotions and payrises. It gets even worse as you go up, someone on €100k pays €38k in direct tax, that's a massive amount of money to hand over every year!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    The government should forget about reducing tax or increasing wages and focus on reducing the cost of living.


    I don't need a wage increase or tax cut if rents/property falls by 20%



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,121 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Exactly, I'd of rather seen the people who are been rode with rent get a credit or tax rebate that would put a months rent back in their pocket.

    Affordable housing or accommodation should be the corner stone of our society/economy and that is the one thing the Government have had control of but did nothing about it before it became a crisis. A near decade of austerity measures and little public spending from FG has created this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Unfortunately people never learn from their mistakes.... The crash in 2008 was brought about by banks lending to much and generating a bubble in the housing market. The solution to fixing this was to introduce new regulation that meant that banks needed to hold more capital for risking lending such a real estate financing or investing in financial assets to ensure that banks did not lend to much to inflate financial assets. The logic of this all makes sense and from looking at banks balance sheets this appears to have worked. But it also had an unintended consequence of reducing the capital that is required to build new housing that was required to meet population growth and as a consequence generated a housing shortage.

    In order to address this housing shortage the solution was to get the capital to build new houses from Funds. The logic of this makes sense whereby you have investors with excess cash pooling it together in a fund to provide the required capital to build the required housing.

    However this quickly developed into a situation where funds were used for speculative investments whereby they issued Debt to invest in financial assets (As opposed to providing capital for the creation of the assets) which increased the value of the financial assets because by issuing the debt they created money and you then have a situation where more money is chasing the same financial assets which in turn leads to asset inflation and more people investing in the fund which creates more money which leads to higher asset prices. This spiral continues with the funds sector growing year on year. This money creation by the funds is unregulated unlike the money creation in banking following the 08 crash.

    So all that has happened is that the speculative lending has moved out of the banks due to regulation to hold more capital for risky lending and into the funds where the regulation does't exist.

    When you incorporate QE into the mix you end up turbo charging the funds industry as you have more and more people looking for an alternative to keeping their savings in a bank account and getting a zero return. This results in a massive increase in Debt around the world accompanied by a massive increase in asset values the exact same as we saw during the 08 crash.

    Will this result in a similar situation to 08 is the big question?

    Back then we had banks that were to big to fail and needed to be bailed out... They are now more secure and risky lending is not being undertaken by them. So the question is will central banks bail out the funds in crisis or will it let them go to the wall.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Hell I dont even do overtime anymore. Over 50% of it goes in tax. Waste of my time.

    I even changed to a 4 day week. Only losing less than 50% of the money for that day anyway as the rest would have been tax.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭wassie


    Significantly lower rents would also have the effect of redirecting a lot of peoples take home pay into actual productive parts of the wider economy enticing people to spend, especially retail and hospitality which is on its knees.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    If the funds and QE are creating a bubble in property/asset prices and Irish banks are almost exclusively lending into property, would the banks be overly exposed to property and thus be at risk of collapse when the bubble bursts.

    Same problem, same result



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Consider maxing pension contributions to avoid tax



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,367 ✭✭✭JimmyVik



    Been maxing them for the last 30 years. It was drummed into me when I started working job with a pension.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I think they already have been bailed out. On a small scale, HAP leases are almost like a pre-crash bailouts for some investors. But on a bigger scale the ECB bond-buying since 2015 has possibly found its way into the portfolios of investors. I noticed this first with one large fixed income asset manager of an Irish fund with billions of mortgage backed securities in its portfolio dating from the 00s in the U.S., these were essentially guaranteed MBS by the Fed's QE. I know there are transparency issues with the ECB's QE programme but would not be surprised if it is similarly buying "bonds" connected to property investors.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    No the banks don't have the same risk because they are required to hold enough capital to cover a stress in the lending they have undertaken.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    But an issue it is nonetheless.

    It shows that there is a common cause which is external to Ireland and therefore the risks which could cause a crash cannot be managed in Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,761 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Having spent half of lockdown overseas I might have just about tolerated returning to Dublin dysfunctional housing situation, but then I worked out that I would get to keep an extra 7% of my salary if I stayed abroad permanently. Clearly I am not the only person doing the sums.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭wassie


    And their lending has been more prudent. This time it will be the Pensions funds in strife as they have been duped into buying these overpriced assets.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    There's something in this that makes me uneasy, in the context of a "manufactured housing crisis" discussion.

    John McCartney has joined BNP Paribas Real Estate Ireland as head of research, a role which will see him develop the group’s market research resource.

    Mr McCartney most recently worked for the Irish Housing Agency, where, for the past year, he helped strategise on Dublin’s chronic under-supply of housing. Prior to that he was director of research at Savills Ireland and head of research at Lisney.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭wassie


    What makes you uneasy.....it's all very Irish to me.

    Kind of like this was....




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    and can people who have a mortgage get the same ye know if the magic money tree exists



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,627 ✭✭✭Villa05


    How do you know if you have sufficient capital.

    Maximum Exposure to 1 asset class in 1 jurisdiction is extremely high risk.

    This is what Irish banks are plus we still have significant arrears from the previous bust



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    A former official with the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) is moving to property investment firm Hibernia Reit.


    Mark Pollard joins Hibernia in May as the company's director of development. He follows in the footsteps of Hibernia chief executive Kevin Nowlan.


    Mr Nowlan, a former Irish rugby international and Leinster full back, worked in Nama as a portfolio manager for three years and held a similar role in Johnny Ronan's Treasury Holdings for four years. He also worked at Anglo Irish Bank.

    On the face of it, it looks terrible but I am generally a cynical person when it comes to corporate Ireland. I am somewhat looking forward to these lads having to cosy up to the Shinners in a few years though when their long-term FF/FG relationships don't get them as far as they used to!



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    we ve been doing everything we can do to promote another credit fueled property boom, lets hope that doesn't happen, or else....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    They have sufficient capital because the EU directive CRDiv requires them to hold it. Plus they have all been stress tested to ensure that they have sufficient liquidity and capital in the event of a market crash that was worse than '08.

    Add on top of that the Loan to value of the mortgage books are 50-60%.

    Even if this this was not enough to cover it they have issued convertible bonds that would recapitalise the bank in the event of a failure which would mean that the government would not need to bail them out.

    The other thing that they don't have this time is huge lending to developers and CRE because it is not a good use of their capital due to the new regulations that were introduced.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    .... but you can see, our current government is refusing to take the reins here, its hardwired to push our economy towards a more credit fueled one, which will more than likely have the same affect as the last time, i.e. increasing property prices....



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,513 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Any government will have difficulty controlling it because it is an international level which can be seen by the post above Brantley Ambitious Sunburn.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29,514 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    very true, but again, our economy is currently perfectly primed for such a boom now, our primary government parties have completely failed to understand the fundamentals of the previous boom bust, they ve maintained implementing policies to create this situation, this is highly dangerous for us all, including for current property owners, landlords etc. there will probably be intense pressure placed onto the central bank to relax rules soon, hopefully we dont go full retard on this one!



Advertisement