Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

"Green" policies are destroying this country

11718202223650

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    More likely he can't show his face in any dealership for fear of being lynched,



  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭hierro


    Haven't read the entire thread yet but it doesn't surprise me that all eyes are on China here.

    Ireland hasn't the population to effect change in any meaningful way. Being green though will be good for our international reputation. It will keep FDI in the coming years because international pressure will keep Multinationals environmentally honest in the future.

    Let's be honest though, we export our waste, import our cars, our cheap plastic, our metal, our timber (mostly) and loads of other items. We're against corporations paying meaningful tax where the real income is earned and we sure as fcuk would be against paying a real carbon tax on products from high carbon economies.

    We're a boil on the arse of world commerce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    we are part of the EU though and we import crazy amounts of stuff from China. The EU is a massive block of polluters, and importers from China, why should we get away with changing?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,249 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yeah, it's really kinda funny about the number of people who respond 'but china' when the topic of CO2 emissions comes up, who ignore the fact that china's CO2 emissions are so high because of the amount of stuff they make for the western world.

    if you think china's output is too high, i hope you've stopped buying goods made in china.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    yeah but it's all but China but China, here and on the journal.ie articles.

    Lots of our building materials, clothes, all the plastic, everything, comes from China. They are purely fuelling the globalised market of which we are all a part, it's not fair to point at them while continuing to live how we do.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,249 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    China skips alot of the health safety and environmental regulations that the Western world abides by. Helps them be cheap.

    It is 100% right to call out the hypocrisy of the consumer economies that have arisen off the back of this.

    To make it worse the EU wants to clear the Amazon basin for cheap agriculture. How such a trade deal could even be considered when the world is supposedly on the brink is telling. No matter what they say on the issue, actions speak louder than words.

    It's all part of the race to the bottom/endless growth school of economics. It's madness.

    I suspect all of the above will be ignored, because it is being ignored, but the average Joe will still get hammered. And this is why the average Joe will have feck all appetite for things like carbon taxes etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    My in no way detailed research has found a direct correlation between people who think rural housing is unsustainable and who also think 20 restaurants, 30 pubs and 40 coffee shops within 1km of each other is a fantastic idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,881 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    20 restaurants, 30 pubs and 40 coffee shops serving hundreds and thousands of people accessing them via bus, DART, LUAS & by walking is actually better than people travelling miles from everywhere to various different places in diesel cars to dine out. We'd be much better breathing life in to rural towns and villages and supporting them by populating them.

    Whilst all your anecdotes and stories are fascinating, if you live rurally in a one of house you have a very large negative impact on the environment compared to urban dwellers. You're also very expensive to maintain and service, one-off housing waters down the energy that will be necessary for widescale rural rejuvenation, bad for rural Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    There are other cities in Ireland that arn't Dublin and they don't have an €800million Luas BTW

    Lets just say I strongly disagree with what you are saying; China building 43 new coal fired power stations and Americans buying 2million new pickup trucks every year are what id classify as having a very large negative impact on the environment, not a new energy efficient home in the countryside.

    You should start a petition to turn off all the street lights in cities, get rid of all the fountains and return all the parks to nature, seems like all these are having a very large negative impact on the environment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,881 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Your right, the cities need massive investment. Less motorways and more public transport for the cities, particularly Limerick and Cork. We need a pendulum for Dublin. Dublin needs massive investment in metro policing and transport policing after the pandemic and the huge affect it had on cities compared to the rest of the country, also the homeless situation is very city centric. City money needs to be poured back in to cities to rejuvenate.

    There's a good bit of rewilding in city & urban parks and the cities host a huge amount of wildlife from deer, fox, badger, hedghog and seals to almost every type of bird to be found in the countryside... and our fountains are culturally appropriate and they have a very very minimal impact on the environment in comparison to a one off house.

    Complaining about China is great and very admirable. But it's best we look after our own country first.

    Post edited by John_Rambo on


  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    I don't understand the Green party hostility to motorways, cars arnt going anywhere in Ireland they will just go electric so we do need to improve our road infrastructure to ensure one charge gets you as far as possible, that means motorways and bypasses plus it will be another few years until all the trucks go electric so best to keep them out of towns, if they want people to cycle around towns and cities bypassing them with motorways is the best solution.

    I get your point but would we not be better off getting rid of the cities if we are saving the environment at all costs? They are giant concrete monstrosities.

    Overall I think we need to draw a line in how far the green agenda goes and how difficult it makes people's everyday lives, my opinion is that Ireland is already a leader in environment; loads of wind energy, small population relative to our size, no massively polluting sectors like the auto industry, temperate climate (the average American house uses twice the electricity of a European one and a lot of that is AC) and even our countryside is much more diverse as we have protected the hedgerows (drive across Europe and you'll see the likes of Germany have cleared out all the hedges so fields run right up to the road) so my question is why do we need to pay €1.65 per litre of petrol?

    Its just tax for the sake of tax, if any government was interested in the environment they would have introduced subsidies for installing solar panels and a feed in tariff like the UK and Germany did over 10 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,881 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Getting rid of the cities would be a disaster. Everyone living in one off houses reliant on cars to go everywhere, could you imagine that, there would be no rural Ireland, the country would be like parts of Galway and Donegal, a giant housing estate. No, cities are vital for environmental stability. Regarding your giant concrete monstrosities comment, you obviously haven't visited and Irish city, so you should go on to google earth and have a look at your cities and appreciate how much green space there is, as I said Dublin supports a massive amount of wildlife.

    I know it's easy to imagine cities being the "big smoke" and accuse them of being the bad boy, but it's the other way around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    That's your 15m city idea there and it is a good one but the issue is the misrepresentation of rural as all being that single house you can see in the distance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    A large amount of those Irish city green areas are either golf courses or pitches though and whats left isn't really at all impressive to someone who lives surrounded by countryside and wildlife in all directions, summertime will see large groups of people drinking in a lot of those city green areas anyway.

    I get the point you are trying to make but the reality is ill take a nice house in the countryside, with a garden and peace and quite with a commute over being boxed into some 100 year old BER D house in the city with no parking, with neighbors fighting, hobos drinking on the steps nearby and all the anti-social crap that goes on in most Irish cities at the weekend every single time. Ill admit there are always nice parts to each city but houses there cost three times that of a much bigger house in the countryside.

    15 minute city is a fantastic idea however the vikings that founded our main cities didn't really have that in mind!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,881 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    That's your choice. If it's a one off house in the countryside you have a huge carbon footprint compared to urban dwellers and that will end up costing you. That's the reality unlike your imagined idea of urban and suburban living. Personally I prefer suburban living with public transport, a tiny commute, a nice community, peace and quiet and amazing amenities.



  • Registered Users Posts: 765 ✭✭✭techman1


    But by the same logic our carbon emissions are also too high because we produce food for other countries that have high populations like Germany and UK yet we get lumped with the carbon not the consuming countries. However Saudi Arabia does not get levied with carbon penalties for all the fossil fuels it produces, the consuming countries get levied with those carbon taxes.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Each to their own. I swapped that suburban life for a country one. With as much self reliance, zero carbon, as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,881 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    Good for you. Some rural dwellers have attained epic layers of self reliance and low carbon emission, but they're outliers. I could certainly afford to buy rural and be mortgage free with some cream on top, but I'd be driving a lot more with the kids, work, sports, school, socialising etc... Not my scene.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Okay but can a couple on the median income afford a ready to move into 3 bed house with a half decent BER like over C2 in that area?

    €43,552x2x3.5= €304,864?

    If they can't then all you're talking about is more taxes on the poors because their little brains don't know about environment things.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    We have a limited budget, they feel that we have invested billions in roads yet very little in comparison in public transport. Investment in public transport is money spent better.

    We already have an extensive motorway network in ireland as well, we don’t have the same for public transport.

    The tax on fuel has nothing to do with the greens, once the Paris agreement was signed this was always going to happen even if Green were still part of opposition, who would you blame then?



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Well the budget isn't that limited when you look at the millions they have spent already just trying to pick a route for the Dublin Metro never mind the estimated €3billion (but in reality who know how much) it will end up costing.

    I agree Ireland's public transport is lagging far behind loads of European countries but how much taxpayers money and how many years will it take to fix that? Will there be any major improvements to get people to give up their cars in any meaningful way before 2030? So if they infrastructure isn't in place and houses prices in any area with good transport links are majorly inflated (partly due to planning levies for having a public transport amenity nearby) what is the benefit of raising fuel prices for everyone?

    The reality is people will move to electric cars prior to 2030 as there wont be sufficient public transport in place and/or they wont be able to afford to live in areas with public transport so we are left with electric cars that still need motorways as well as all the road haulage.

    I don't necessarily blame the Green party but this green agenda of taking money from people who cant afford it just for some fairy tale dream that Ireland's emissions have any impact on global warning is madness, there needs to be a balance but instead its all take take take and its gone too far, they need to reduce the other taxes on petrol and diesel if carbon taxes are locked in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    You won't get a better public transport system by investing in roads.

    The metro project is standard like any of these project, the costs before building are always high. How much has been used on roads to draw out plans etc?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,848 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    Do you really put on extra jumpers to keep your heating emissions low?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I do, and use a blanket on the couch. The horror! People are such snowflakes nowadays.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,249 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    simple, just think of a jumper like cheap, portable central heating.



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Why throw 3 billion at a metro for one of the most expensive cities in Europe to live in? Surely there would be far greater environmental and society benefits using that money to upgrade all the other Irish cities which have far greater potential for growth and lag far behind in public transport? Think how many more new energy efficient homes could be built in Cork or Limerick versus the diminishing returns and soaring prices Dublin offers.

    My point is very little of these great public transport upgrades will be completed before 2030, so people will have already have moved to electric cars so why do we need massively expensive public transport upgrades then if the goal was to meet our emissions targets? Ireland is small and nearly all of it is doable in one long car car journey, even more would be with better roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Electric cars are not the answer. This is a 1970s view of things. Private cars need to go, in as much as we can get rid of them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    It's a religious cause for the Greens , meeting emissions targets is like fasting or abstaining from sex for a nun, that this personal sacrifice has no practical effect globally is irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Do you think the EU should do nothing or just Ireland? The EU as a whole is a massive polluter and a massive patron of Chinese industry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    100% agree, replacing 1 million combustion cars with 1 million electric cars will not be a great success

    Replacing 1 million cars with proper public transport till be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,263 ✭✭✭alan partridge aha


    I love driving, let's hope the price of white diesel drops but on the upside my car is very efficient.

    Battery replacement for gen 1 leaf, going from 24 to 40 Kwh battery (2nd hand) is £8500 in UK. WTF makes no sense. To order 1 of nissan which is 24 Kwh and new looking circa £15000.

    Are you crazy.



  • Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is mining for gold and silver environmentally friendly?

    From yesterday’s Irish Times

    Community leaders in Co Leitrim say they feel “under siege” after learning that the Minister for the Environment, Climate and Communications Eamon Ryan intends to grant a prospecting licence for gold and silver in part of the county which had previously been targeted for fracking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    What's the point in shifting beef production to Brazil ?

    The answer is it's backroom deals, Brazil gets access to European beef markets while BMW and Mercedes-Benz get sweeter access to Brazil


    Ireland gets nothing for reducing emissions



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    What will a train or bus ticket have to cost to make up for the millions the Irish motorist pours into the exchequer every year? They are pricey enough as it is before we have 30years and 30+billion euros of public transport upgrades to get where ye want to be never mind the increase in annual running costs and wage bill for all those new services instead of people having cars which actually generate revenue.

    Ye should probably pick up the phone and tell the Green party electric cars arnt the answer too plus cancel a lot of those greenways because no-one will have cars to bring their bikes to them so they'd be a locals only kinda thing and not really benefit the local economies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    How much are the CO2 fines we are going to get?

    The roads that we currently have are great and they should maintain them. The cars that are already on the road as they are replaced should be replaced with greener technology. E.g. battery/hydrogen etc

    We should be trying to move huge section of the population onto public transport, especially in cities because the roads are not capable of handling any more cars. Look at all the major cities and the traffic is terrible at rush hour. The answer is not "build another M50" by the way. We should have learned when we decided to build another lane on the M50.

    Just because we push money into public transport doesn't mean we let the roads just die and no longer get used, a thread was on boards before and the only motorway really required was the cork/limerick one. After that the country is more or less covered. All the rest should be pushed into public transport while maintaining the roads we have in place. You might not like it but that should be the plan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    There's no point in doing that. We aggressively marketed our beef and dairy worldwide, so we made this market, they were doing fine before Irish beef and dairy.

    The whole planet needs to eat far less meat and dairy, whether it's produced in Ireland or Brazil. I agree though Brazil could become as natureless and barren as Ireland the way things are going.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Main reason for leaving urban areas is anti-social behaviour,Greens don't seem to have any views on tackling anti-social behaviour, town and city centres overrun with Junkies and they'll do is shrug and mutter about life choices,



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭Nermal


    A nation cannot be 'fined'. It's entirely open to us to repudiate any treaty that leads to fines, or indeed simply to refuse to pay them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Telling it like it is when it comes to delinquent behaviour isn't WOKE, hence why the likes of the Green Party are silent on the issue.


    Wishy washy liberals find the concept of personal responsibility " problematic " to borrow a WOKE term



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    The majority of issue with anti social behavior is because of bad parents. Maybe instead of blaming a political party you should question the parents of these children?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Plenty of antisocial behaviour by grown adults,in some cases hundreds of previous convictions but not a minute of jail time, centre of Dublin is an embarrassment for a supposed first world country, Junkies wandering around like the walking dead,



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    Greens are in favour of junkies because they don't drive cars or live in a house in the countryside and happily donate their urine to the local area to promote bio diversity.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    it is programmed into the journal commenters and boards.ie cranks to detest scooters and bicycles. I'm delighted these things will be on the road to annoy them, although it's only a bill, who knows when legislation will be passed, if it is even passed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Total bullshyte and typical Eastern - Dublin centric thinking.

    The country is not more or less covered by motorway.

    If you live North of Tuam and West of Kells or Mullingar how the fook are you covered by Motorway.

    And there are pretty large towns in that area that have a pi** poor train service that really only links them to the capital and no where else really.

    And what the fook do you do if you live in Donegal with no train service at all and no motorway ?


    Why shouldn't we market our beef and dairy?

    You never shut to fook up about our agri business, the one truly indigenous business we have that is not dependent on FDI and favourable tax loopholes.

    And would you give over the shyte that people would never eat beef or butter if it wasn't for the Irish convincing them.

    And if you think Ireland with it's hedgerows, it's bogs, it's mountains, it's marshes is barren you must not have visited many countries.

    Jaysus christ on a bike you are insufferable when you talk about farming.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    It’s a step in right direction, you go to lots of cities in Europe and they have a hop on hop off escooter service



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's all stick with you and no carrot. Private cars will go only when there's a public transport system than can cater for most journeys. I don't have a car because I live on the Dart line. I didn't have a car in London either. This is because of public transport.

    We can't ruin the economy to satisfy the whims of a few die hards who discovered a bike in middle age. If we do ruin the economy we won't fix climate change.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think its a particularly Dublin centric thing with him. He don't like our country brethren. You are right though, without our agri business we have nothing much in indigenous industry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,479 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk




  • Advertisement
Advertisement