Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Alec Baldwin fatally shoots woman with prop gun

Options
24

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,458 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    even if you are making a film with people shooting each you still don't aim directly at the other actors when firing blanks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 22,427 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I don't understand how any actor could be handed a gun by the film studio without being explicitly reminded every single time, that even if this gun is not loaded with bullets, you always treat it like it's an armed weapon



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    this happened before and it was down to debris in the gun from a prior shot in that case and it was something to do with the props guy being rushed

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,458 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    That was the brandon lee case. there was a squib from a previous firing stuck in the barrel of the weapon and the armorer never checked before loading a blank. the armorer wasn't rushed, they were incompetent. They tried to make their own blank rounds from live rounds and fucked it up.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Baldwin is a coproducer of the western movie set in 1880s Kansas and plays the eponymous Rust, an outlaw grandfather of a 13-year-old boy convicted of an accidental murder.

    Tragic irony right there.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 Bailey Calm Vent


    The chances of a blank harming someone is very slim, contrary an actual gun with live ammo is designed to kill and they’re not banned. I don’t see how it’s amazing tbh



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,084 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    If a cartridge holds enough explosive to fire a heavy projectile at greater than the speed of sound, then it pretty much goes that it also has the potential to produce gases and non combusted particles and eject them at such speeds, or even higher. So even tiny particles will pack a punch if they are travelling at 300+ metres per second, which is the case for a 9mm bullet.

    They shouldn't use blanks, they should dub in the sound later.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,084 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Article I read says a bullet was found lodged next to Lee's spine.

    “The death of Brandon Lee in a filming incident took a startling turn Thursday when police revealed the actor was killed by what was apparently a .44-caliber bullet.

    “What appeared to be a bullet was discovered lodged near Lee’s spine during an autopsy, calling into question the safety procedures on the set of the film.” https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2021-10-22/alec-baldwin-prop-gun-death-brandon-lee



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Christ, the poor woman's family and friends... and what a nightmare for Alec Baldwin, living with that for the rest of his life. The media/social media will absolutely go to town on him. Gleefully.

    Especially Trump supporters because of him taking the piss out of Trump on SNL (which is the freedom of expression that they claim to love so much) and you know how vicious they can be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,458 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    exactly. a squib is a bullet that failed to exit the barrel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    This is it ,the armour should have checked it ,and then another person or safety technician should have checked it again before it was handed to an actor to use



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Yeah, that's the squib. Fully armed bullets have the actual bullet, which is usually solid metal, inside a casing. In the casing is a small quantity of gunpowder to fire the bullet, and a primer - which is like the flint in a cigarette lighter. This is the familiar circular pattern at the bottom of a bullet.

    The hammer in the gun strikes the primer, which causes a small burst, this ignites the gunpowder, which propels the bullet out of the gun. The casing is then discarded.

    In Brandon Lee's case, the props team had self-modified bullets to remove the gunpowder but leave the bullet and primer together, so the gun looked realistically loaded. One of these "deactivated" shells was fired, and there was enough force in the primer to detach the bullet from the casing and force it into the barrel. When they removed the casing, nobody noticed the bullet was detached (or maybe thought nothing of it).

    In the next scene they loaded a blank - a shell with gunpowder and primer with no bullet - and when that was fired it propelled the bullet out of the barrel. He may as well have shot with a live round.

    What happened today, allegedly they were trying to get a shot of Baldwin firing directly into the camera, so the director and cinematographer were behind the camera looking at the screen as the gun was fired. The blank round could even have damaged part of the camera and that's what flew off and hit them. I guess we'll find out at a later time.

    Seems insane after so many accidents that there aren't very specific protocols about the use of guns on-set. I would have thought at the very minimum you would need someone with a specific qualification whose job it is to manage any weapons on set, and protocols such as never, ever pointing a real weapon - regardless of whether it's loaded - in the direction of other people.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    On October 12, 1984, the cast and crew of Cover Up were filming the seventh episode of the series, "Golden Opportunity", on Stage 17 of the 20th Century Fox lot. One of the scenes filmed that day called for Hexum's character to load bullets into a .44 Magnum handgun, so he was provided with a functional gun and blanks. When the scene did not play as the director wanted it to in the master shot, there was a delay in filming. Hexum became restless and impatient during the delay and began playing around to lighten the mood. He had unloaded all but one (blank) round, spun it, and—simulating Russian roulette—he put the revolver to his right temple and pulled the trigger, apparently unaware of the danger.


    Blanks use paper or plastic wadding to seal gunpowder into the cartridge, and this wadding is propelled from the barrel of the gun with enough force to cause injury if the weapon is fired within a few feet of the body, particularly a vulnerable spot, such as the temple or the eye. At a close enough range, the effect of the powder gases is a small explosion, so although the paper wadding in the blank that Hexum discharged did not penetrate his skull, there was enough blunt force trauma to shatter a quarter-sized piece of his skull and propel the pieces into his brain, causing massive hemorrhaging.


    Hexum was rushed to Beverly Hills Medical Center, where he underwent five hours of surgery to repair his wounds.[7] On October 18, aged 26, six days after the accident, Hexum was declared brain-dead.

    This guy was well on the way to being a big star when he had a bit of a Darwin moment.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon-Erik_Hexum



  • Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Does it really matter? His 'horse' aint so high now... Wouldn't have 'wrongfully', or 'accidentally' killed/maimed anyone, if the gun (and it wasn't a toy one) wasn't pointed at someone...



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Gotta love everyone saying guns shouldn't be pointed at people on set after them watching hundreds of movies in their lives enjoying that exact thing without ever thinking about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,221 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    I didn't know Boards.ie had so many prop-masters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 18,470 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    ironically if he had weapons training this wouldnt have happened

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Posts: 7,792 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've never heard of a wooden/rubber (a toy, in other words) gun (which are - or at least, were - most likely used in filming) killing anyone... Different ball-game when using 'real guns' , which can be modified/fire blanks/live bullets etc... And as far as 'sound' and 'muzzle flash' goes , well, the average punter probably suspects that these are added/cgi'd in to the scene...



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Registered Users Posts: 25,488 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    100% What should have happened was that whomever was going to be using the gun on set should have been sent on a course for a few hours. Have their brain aligned to the dangers of its misuse...

    furthermore as long as the gun was on the set it should have remained outside the control of actors until filming was commencing... ie. you are filming.. you are handed the gun by say security , in between takes you give it back...Baldwin or whoever wants to practice,, use a toy or rubber gun...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭thefallingman


    I used to go clay pigeon shooting years ago with a shotgun and the first thing i was taught was never point it at anyone, loaded or not. This point was drilled into any newcomer over and over again. Why they didnt just use fake guns like they do in alot of movies is madness why take a risk



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,458 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    they intended to remove the primer and bullet from all of the rounds used in the first day but they missed the primer on one of them. whatever about checking the barrel (and they definitely should have done that) they should have noticed that one of the rounds no longer had a bullet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,262 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997



    They also used a blank firing props as well as dummies.

    This is believed to be one of four “hero” Han Solo blasters made for Return of the Jedi. The production had one hero “practical,” or blank fire version (which sold for $201,600 at a 2007 auction) and three non-firing versions, two of which are believed to be at the Lucasfilm Archives.


    Post edited by Flinty997 on


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,262 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    AFAIK they generally use rubber guns for distance shots, and more realistic ones for close ups.

    That we only know a handful of accidents after thousands of movies and TV shows, perhaps suggests thats is very rare to have an accident. (or we don't hear about it).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    We don't even know the context.

    She was director of Photography so may very well have been staging the scene and he was just following her instructions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Are you paying for muzzle flash too?

    Lighting, flare out?



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I've seen clips of Harrison ford saying bang each time he used his Han Solo blaster on Star Wars. He mimed the recoil and such. Point is you don't necessarily need a projectile.


    Either way, sad loss of a young woman.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,190 ✭✭✭Be right back


    He has made a statement.

    Awful thing to happen.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement