Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Two health insurance claims

  • 22-10-2021 11:54am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭


    Hypothetical question:

    In the past both myself and my partner had health insurance through our employers, both of which covered spouses and kids.

    Both policies would pay out 50% for things like GPs and dentists.

    Would it have been possible to use one policy to pay 50% of a bill, and the other for the other 50%?

    I imagine this is not allowed, but just wondering?

    We cancelled one of the policies as there was no point in having two.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Not allowed



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Definitely not, it is in fact a criminal offence.

    Furthermore, you are usually required to inform the companies that you are double insured so that each company get to contribute to the 50% claim, so each would pay 25% or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,624 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Technically there is no overlap. One policy covers half the expense, the other policy covers the other half. You are not recouping more than you paid so where is the problem?


    Just spotted Jim's response above. If you are only partially covered under an insurance policy, surely it's possible to take out a policy 'B' to cover you 100% i.e. the excess which is not covered under policy A. Isn't that what you do when you buy car rental excess insurance?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Not unless a policy specifically says you are entitled to do so. Since the same underwriter often ends up cover the risk, they will exclude such a double risk and that is passed down. I worked on the design of AI systems to seek out such cases back in the day...in fact one of the features of our system was that we could handle the various tricks of the Irish market - combinations of Irish names and place names.



  • Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That's nice. Where are you getting the customer data from other companies?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,612 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Why do you think you need data from other companies? You don’t care what risks they are taking on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,624 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    Jim2007 said: Not unless a policy specifically says you are entitled to do so.

    But in post #3 you said it was 'definitely not' possible.

    Is it the case that, with no overlap, it is possible to spread the cover for the same risk over two policies? Both policies underwrite part of the risk but not adding up to more than 100%.

    I don't understand why you're claiming that the OP is 'double insured'. Isn't it simply the case that he has two policies, each of which covers half his exposure? He cannot claim back more than the expenses that he incurs. So he is fully insured. No?

    Post edited by coylemj on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,720 ✭✭✭Lenar3556


    We would need to see the detail of what is being proposed, and the terms of the individual policies. In fairness there is no suggestion in the OP’s post that he is intending on committing a fraud.

    There could potentially be opportunity for some additional reclaim of subsidies for certain treatments etc, where the total value is not exceeded.

    However, Any benefit is likely to be minimal and a fraction of what you or your wife are paying in BIK on two policies.



  • Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    One assumes that the OP was insured by two different companies, your "AI" isn't going to catch that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,636 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    Many underwriters use different trading names to target different segments of the market, so what may appear to be different companies could just be different faces of the same underwriter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,088 ✭✭✭fjon


    Just to be clear:

    For a time me and my wife were covered by 2 separate policies from the 2 biggest health insurance providers. When one was up for renewal we cancelled the "less good" one to save money on BIK and because we didn't need 2.

    When I was recently charged a ridiculous €280 for a 15-min consultant visit I just wondered if we still had the two policies I could claim 50% and 50% from each.

    Interesting to see the conversation that has arisen from this.



Advertisement