Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Dun Laoghaire Traffic & Commuting Chat

Options
1112113115117118144

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    First car registered in Ireland, 1898.

    Number of cars in Ireland in 1914, 20,000.

    Now, it won't be too much of a leap, even for you, to imagine that not many average houses built before that had driveways to accommodate such cars. In fact the most of older parts of Dun Laoghaire would be an excellent example of that.

    So yes, that real world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So you don't think those 20k cars would have been largely owned by the landed gentry with their big houses, driveways and garages and all that?



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,524 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    20,000 cars with a population of 4.3Million.

    are you really trying to suggest that 1914 and 2021 are comparable?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,243 ✭✭✭Mav11



    Sometimes people need to be nudged in the right direction.

    Seems to me what you are suggesting is less nudge and more coercion?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Nope, simply that cars have been parked on the public road in this Country since there have been cars. People like Burt and yourself seem determined to deny this easily verified fact.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,524 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Not to the same he extent , the population has exploded as has car ownership. The status quo can’t remain



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Where's the public consultation on the impacts of the huge increases in car ownership?




  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    You seem determined to deny the fact that cars are bigger nowadays, and there are a lot more of them. What was acceptable twenty or thirty years ago can no longer be acceptable because it's no longer practical. People who do the right thing and use public transport should not be punished by those who won't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Where's the public consultation on the impacts of the huge increases in mobile phones, or outdoor jacuzzis?

    Like cigarettes, cars remain perfectly legal. And like cigarettes, they are a personal choice that does impact on others. So, its for the Government ,elected by the people, to come up with balanced policies to moderate that reality. And they are.

    Theres no point creating or citing daft platitudes like this Mr Noonan has there, because its not grounded in realism. In fact, I would say be careful what you wish for, because its a safe enough bet that in this Country,if some sort of citizens assembly, for example, was held about the future of car ownership and the limitation of personal choice in that regard, you wouldn't be thrilled with the outcome Andrew.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 20,407 Mod ✭✭✭✭Weepsie


    There were designated vehicle stations in places for the purpose of keeping vehicles off public roadways and a vast amount of bye laws and lots of powers to enact restrictions in the first rta 1914 approx 35 cars registered in then Kingstown, so yeah I imagine parking on the streets of dun laoghaire was a real problem.


    There are photos out there of the main streets in which there are at most maybe 4 cars. There's some in which there are more bikes than cars, and predominantly is the old tram



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    People don't store their phones or their jacuzzis on public space.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Obviously. But enough people store their cars on public space that its accepted practice and you'd never manage to overturn that reality.

    In fact, the Council's have regularised the practice, by the issuing of residents parking permits for a small fee, under appropriate bye-laws.

    For the rest of us, we pay motor tax to operate our cars legally on the road and that extends to parking them on it also. So you might as well drop it as a false premise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It was accepted practice that people smoked in pubs, on buses, trains, in offices and more. That reality was overturned.



  • Registered Users Posts: 813 ✭✭✭Homesick Alien


    People will still have the freedom to own a car and people will still have the freedom to smoke. Just because it's being suggested that except in limited circumstances parking on public roads should be curtailed to allow for better public transport and safer walking and cycling doesn't affect anybody's right to own a car. The fact that you pay motor tax is totally irrelevant. There's no point in sticking your head in the sand and hoping nothing will change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yeah, so come back to me when you have succeeded. I won't hold my breath.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There was a lot of smokers saying the same thing around 2001.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    You're like a dog with a bone. Go and do it, campaign for it, make it happen by 2041 and I promise I'll be impressed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Jesus I hope not. In her crusade she has divided and infuriated Parisians, as well as DOUBLING the city's debt level in just 7 years!!

    Shes a socialist zealot, a dreamer with a total lack of realism and economic savvy and her vanity exercise of a Presidential run is destined to end in a fourth or even fifth place finish.



  • Registered Users Posts: 927 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    Of course you don't overturn something like that overnight. It's only fair that people should be given some time to come up with alternatives to the indulgence of misusing public spaces for the storage of their private property. In many cases, the availability of improved and reliable public transport (i.e. not hindered by private cars) should be a sufficient incentive to get rid of the expense of a car altogether. For others, who can't or won't, there's always the option of renting off-street parking spaces in nearby apartment blocks. Perhaps a limited number of small spaces could be provided for people with cars small enough to fit into them without hindering public transport. Whatever they choose to do, it's their own problem to solve. Just because something has been accepted practice for years, doesn't mean it should remain indefinitely so - especially when it effects other people.

    Why should public transport users (i.e. people who are doing the right thing and keeping cars off the road) be forced to endure longer journeys, just because a minority choose to block half a road with their parked cars?

    Also, what's the point in buying loads of extra buses, if they're going to end up getting delayed because the roads along their route aren't big enough to accommodate them alongside parked cars?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭patrickbrophy18


    Unfortunately, without a more cohesive public transport network and the necessary infrastructure to make it run quickly and efficiently, all statements against car use and parking hither and tither is just virtue signalling. Moreover, many of these statements reek of begrudgery or those with a chip on their sholder.

    There are loads of gaps in the public transport network that need to be filled in. This coupled with the varying and often narrow width of many of our main arterial roads make this car free paradise very difficult to pull off without serious inconvenience and a near violation of motorists civil liberties.

    Buses need to be able to traverse far more of the suburban fabric and with greater comfort than at present. The same goes for cyclists but with safety. The current state of our infrastructure makes this idea impossible with members of each road user group forced to encroach on each other which is what gives way to dangers, perceived and actual. The reality is that proper segregation is needed to safe guard the different road user groups from one another.

    Then, there are the entitled road users who feel marginalised at the mere thought of (god forbid) keeping to themselves. Next, there are the sanctimonious types who think that because they are using greener and more sustainable modes of transport, it exempts them from being observant and even gives them a right to be an inconvenience.

    A uniform and continuous layout to all arterial roads would be a start. In architecurally sensitive areas, a mixture of this and one way roads would suffice. Look at the relatively recent job on Pottery Road as a benchmark. It is spacious and smooth for all road users. Next, install cameras to identify and penalise motorists who park in bike lanes or cyclists breaking red lights.

    Introduce new bus routes along the roads and/or improve existing ones. Make sure that these routes go to destinations which currently generate high car use. Once these conditions have been met, then we can start talking about this car free paradise. Until that time comes, this car free paradise is like the cart before the horse.

    @AndrewJRenko We need more of a Georges-Eugène Haussmann and not an Anne Hidalgo.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The fella who demolished half of old Paris to create Napoleon's vanity project??

    Jesus wept....



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Funny how she keeps getting relected though. It's almost as if most people who live there have a different view or something.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭qb123


    Em, that's just a bizarre comment. He's responsible for what is widely regarded as one of the most beautiful - and architecturally admired - cities in the world. Of course, there's a small number of critics (which you obviously side with), but the consensus view wouldn't be with them. And I think, unlike the French revolution, we have had enough time to judge it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    "We weep with our eyes full of tears for the old Paris, the Paris of Voltaire, of Desmoulins, the Paris of 1830 and 1848, when we see the grand and intolerable new buildings, the costly confusion, the triumphant vulgarity, the awful materialism, that we are going to pass on to our descendants."

    Jules Ferry - Prime Minister of France, 1880-85

    "in less than twenty years, Paris lost its ancestral appearance, its character which passed from generation to generation... the picturesque and charming ambiance which our fathers had passed onto us was demolished, often without good reason."

    René Héron de Ville Fosse - eminent and renouned 20th Century historian, writer and curator and recognised authority on the history of the City of Paris and the wider Ile de France.

    I guess it depends which consensus view you attach yourself to, but personally I prefer the original rather than the theme park version.

    You have to ask yourself, would Haussmann be able to do today, what he did under Napoleon? The answer is of course, not in a million years, and that rests the case against him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,997 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How many Irish politicians would cream themselves with excitement at the possibility of getting more than 50% in any election?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    In a run-off model like the Paris Mayoral, they'd lose if they didn't.

    Hidalgo won just 29% in the first round and won the final two-horse by the skin of her teeth.

    The nearest comparison we have is probably the Presidential election. In 2018, President Higgins won 56% in a six horse race! Extrapolated to a two horse run off, he would have won 81%.

    Hidalgo is divisive and an incompetent waster and we don't need the likes of her in Greater Dublin or Dun Laoghaire.



  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭qb123


    I think few people would regard Paris as a theme park - if so, it's a fantastically developed one. Also showing your age if you preferred the original version given it's been gone since the mid-1850s ;)

    Seriously, I don't think this is the hill you want to die on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 24,074 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No worries QB, if the vandalism of built heritage is your thing, you knock yourself out. You and Patrick and the lads can set up a whatsapp group or whatever.

    Wood Quay must've been the glory days for you.



Advertisement