Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1176177179181182809

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,656 ✭✭✭C14N


    But it shouldn't have to be that way. Living in an urban area shouldn't be a privelage for the wealthy. People living in cities is generally economically preferable to them living elsewhere. They can be closer to work, they will have more job opportunities, they are easier to provide things like utilities and public services to, they can make better use of public transit, etc. People in cities tend to generate more value while costing the state less to provide for.

    Imo the big difficulty with doing this from a policy standpoint is that we don't invest in the kind of transportation needed to allow high-density living, and then also don't allow building of high-density housing. It's a chicken-and-egg cycle.

    You can say its financially responsible, but it's also kind of a luxury to be able to make that financially responsible decision in the first place given the current costs of housing relative to many people's salaries.

    It depends. I think talking relative to asking price is a bad barometer. That's just the estimate of a homeowner or estate agent and not really a precise indicator of real market value. However, if you want to talk about prices that are up substantially from a few years ago, then you're still often not better renting. There's the danger of negative equity on one hand, but on the other there is a very good chance you will be paying more for the rent than you would on the mortgage. The apartment upstairs from mine went on the market a few months ago and if my partner and I bought it even for the price it ended up going for, we'd still be paying a lot less than we are renting, even though the apartments themselves are virtually identical (the main difference being that the upstairs one has nicer interior finishings).



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    There is no affordable alternative to buying

    Buying is only affordable to the top 20/30% of households, despite multiple incentives for buyers and developers. These buyers are competing with investment funds who pay no tax and have access to 0% capital. This requires the tapping of Bank of mom and pop for many

    Those that are renting are economically neutralised

    Average age of ftb in mid 30's and increasing.

    Billions of taxpayers money spent subsidising rents and fighting homelessness. People called in on Saturday may be paying less tax had we a fit for purpose housing system. This from a position of surplus housing supply less than 10 years ago.

    Price trends imply people are moving further and further away from work to secure housing. This suggests the cities prices are out of reach and price trends in rural towns will now be out of kilter with the local economy pushing workers there further away. All this leads to development away from where its needed and building a new crop of ghost estates at the highest possible price for the next bust.

    All very predictable, all symptoms of or re-engineered mechanisms of the last bubble.


    Oh, beans on toast in the 80's was a treat for many



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    With the news over the weekend that parents/grandparents have pumped an additional 1 billion quid into the property market over the last year, that most certainly is not sustainable long term!



  • Registered Users Posts: 995 ✭✭✭iColdFusion


    And the rest of society is still paying the price for people who couldn't pay and wouldn't leave, higher mortgage rates and post 2008 fear of banks to lend meant people couldn't get mortgages leading to prolonged renting and leaving cheap houses to be hoovered up by cash rich landlords.

    Handing the keys back is the only right thing to do if you cant pay and wont be able to pay for the foreseeable future.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Overall we're happy and in the area we wanted roughly. Probably 5 minutes too far away from the Dart, in a house that's slightly too big, on a plot that's slightly too small but that's very much being fussy and given the Burnaby is out of the question, we needed to be realistic.

    Was a torturous journey alright, think we struggled to fully commit to anything as in the back of our head we always wanted the new builds on Church Lane, Greystones (Sillan) but every time we rang about them the price went up. From "it might go up as high as €1.1m" in December 2020 to "due to cost inflation and demand, it will be well north of €1.3m" in July 2021 (cheers government for closing construction!). Also worryingly they have indicated that they may not do the usual "first past the post" and may go with private treaty bidding. Not sure if that's likely to trickle down to cheaper new builds, but it's a scary thought!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 614 ✭✭✭random_banter


    In a very similar situation to you. Sale agreed a couple of months now but things are dragging due to some issues on the seller's side. We're willing to wait. The place needs work but we're happy to DIY as much as possible and take our time. We think the current high price of materials has definitely put people off the likes of a fixer-upper like ours.

    What we've seen is an even worse slowdown in supply for the areas we're looking for. March-July very intense and quick bidding like you said. A few heartbreaks during that time. August-October a lot quieter - less homes on the market, less bidders around. It's not even that these homes are being listed at asking 100k-200k more than what they would have been a few years back, they're just not going on sale - there is no supply. We have seen a few properties hanging around a while, like yourself. We decided to go for a fixer-upper during that time and we're happy with the decision so far. The contracts are taking a really long time to issue but we're still thinking positively.

    I was wondering if it's the case that the desperate bidders have now come and gone, have spent their extra savings?

    For us, we can see this weird cool-off/extra scarcity happening BUT it isn't phasing us from our decision - at the end of the day, this home is right in the middle of an area we'd be happy to spend the rest of our lives in. It has room for expansion should we need it. And we need to get on with starting a family. Currently lucky enough to be staying with parents while we try to save enough to keep up with the increased costs of property & materials. So for us, we're willing to push for this one, and eat the baked beans for a year or two when we're in. Fingers crossed we can get a close date soon. 🤞



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    But in terms of a bubble bursting type scenario, I'm don't see that as a short term catalyst for anything and can't see it having changed dramitcally in the last month nor in the next. In the short term horizon I thought that a huge flood of supply that was deferred during COVID would be the only remedy, and that hasn't happened (yet anyway).

    I agree that long term prices can't stay as historically unaffordable in real terms as they are today. Main reason we're buying is that in an inflationary environment (wages seems to be going insane from I'm seeing), a "crash/correction" in real-terms might look a flatlining/small growth in nominal terms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yep, I see the exact same. There has never been fewer houses in our area, yet most of the bidding pressure has come off. Seems odd.

    I also think you're right on the fixer uppers, and even had a few EAs say as much and that people are now beginning to really factor increased costs when bidding on properties needing work.

    I could definitely live with a 10-15% reduction over the next year or two, in fact, I'd welcome it. We'll likely never leave this house. Would feel fairly sick if things dropped 30% by Christmas though! I think we have probably paid c.10-15% more than we would have paid in 2019, but also 5% less than we bid on the same property 6 months ago, so kind of feels like a win. I can imagine a scenario where supply picks up in Spring and the 15-25% inflation over the last 12 months coming off quite quickly (as you say maybe that was down to stuff like excess saving). But it's hard to envisage prices going back down to 2017 and prior nominal prices anytime soon with the job market this strong.

    Best of luck with the purchase, hope it goes well from here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Congrats on the purchase

    Ref bubble, there's plenty of air left. The shared ownership impact hasn't hit the market yet. I suppose it is in all our interests to cool it a little but policies don't appear to match that yet



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163



    Just to say, we lost out on our dream home due to being in a chain.

    Now looking at a house again but a bit alarmed as homes in our area were going sale agreed almost straight away but now seem to languish and final sale price considerably lower. Market definitely seems to be weakening but agree on inflation. It's a tough call and timing is difficult.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Sorry to hear that, are you still looking in Dun Laoghaire and surrounding areas? We also lost out on ours too - it came back to market after going sale agreed €250k over asking in April. We "won" the bidding war at €100k over asking in August, but the seller decided not to sell for that and said we'd have to pay the previously sale agreed price to get it to which we refused. Rang for a final check-in on it before we went sale agreed on current place and it's currently €375k over asking with 3 people still bidding. Should have stumped up back in August but I guess everything is easy in hindsight!

    Timing is impossible, I thought things were softening early summer but then it seemed to rally again. So have no doubt if we did pull out now, things would take off (or at least feel like they're taking off) straight away.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The average house price is still attainable for the average couple working for 50k under the current financial paradigm that people use to buy a property in this day and age. Beans on toast may be a treat but not when its your one and only meal of the day for a year I think you will find that treat has outstayed its welcome. Not mention the damage being done to your sphincter muscles :)... We really need to stop confusing our supply issue with affordability.

    Also 10 years ago we had 1/2 million less people living here. Your right about people moving out of the cities and this is what is known as urban sprawl a phenomena that has been going for decades all over the globe - why do you think Ireland should be immune to this given our new population size and our decision to stop building for people on welfare. I mean if you want to live somewhere desirable you have to pay the price as other people also want to live there this is economics 101.

    As for the average age for people buying a property this also has a lot to do with people wanting to live more as apposed to being saddled with a mortgage, same goes with the average age of having kids and getting married they have all increased. It has very little to do with affordability with the exception of maybe earning more in your 30s as apposed to your 20s. but the younger generation have other things on their mind when it comes to spending your money goes on things like the latest phone, car or a 3rd or 4th holiday this year. (Now the covid years have been an exception for holidays.)

    You keep saying we are in a bubble I don't see it not yet anyways. I do see prices going up higher due to a supply issue that is not a bubble. Your drawing conclusions with comparisons to 08 well think of this comparison if the availability was the same as that of say 07 when we had a huge over supply and in 07 prices were still increasing if we had that oversupply differential now prices would not be going up - well thats my opinion. Hopefully they can build enough houses to prove my theory.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I never said I agreed with the practice , just stating how it is and I couldn't agree more with you with regard to what should happen if someone cant afford to pay, the only thing is that is out of step with our left leaning political and social sphere in the country and anyone not towing the line or stating anything different is open to all kinds of criticism.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    In case anyone is trying to buy to let for long term leasing with the Counsil, apparently the plan is being phased out.

    Co Meath has phased out the programme. When i spoke to Co Dublin this morning they said that they are going to phase it out too and have already stopped taking apartments



  • Registered Users, Subscribers Posts: 5,945 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think considering the real cost of any fall in prices after inflation is very wise.

    I am not buying the transitory inflation argument and think we're in for a bout of sustained inflation.

    The most interesting aspect of this will be interest rates, rising inflation will place central banks in between a rock and a hard place. My own view is they will have to raise rates sooner or later.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,037 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Speaking of greystones am I missing something or is this not relatively reasonable value ?

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/burlington-lodge-victoria-road-greystones-co-wicklow-a63av82/4530648



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Went to see this thinking it looked crazy underpriced based on the advert (was up at €1m in 2020 and thought it would make that now). Really didn’t like it. Getting in and out of the driveway is an accident waiting to happen, the house feels cheap inside but definitely biggest factor is the dart line is literally a 10 feet from the bedroom window with a clear view into the garden.

    Still suprised it hasn’t sold as there was 30+ people viewing it. But the advert definitely flatters it.

    I also thought this one looked incredibly underpriced

    https://www.myhome.ie/residential/brochure/linden-lodge-killincarrig-delgany-co-wicklow-a63-f720/4541673



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    I was googling this property and found an interesting article on it from 2006. Built in 2002 and was on the market asking for €1.65m when the article was published.


    https://www.businesspost.ie/legacy/wicklow-home-in-walk-in-condition-69b16acc



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yeah the premium end of the market is still a mile off where it was in Celtic Tiger times. Before it became a basket case full of headcases, ThePropertyPin had some decent material on it. There was a very good piece showing how the best houses in D4/D6 fell on average 75%+ from 07-11. Always makes me laugh when people say that the best locations will keep their value through economic downturns. It's the complete opposite in reality.

    House we're buying, the owners paid 550k more for it in early 2000s and had it listed for €1.1m over current price in 07.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    This was a great article over the weekend, among others. I was almost surprised to see it in the IT given how strong it was against the lobbyists (e.g. Pat Farrell and his IIP lobby group - who is undoubtedly well connected with FF and FG; and clearly does a good job for those interests he represents). Eoin Burke Kennedy likely got an email or two from aggrieved vested interests after that article as possibly the IT editor did as well but it is a vital article in a market which has been tilted to big corporate interests for a number of years now.

    906 available, 9 days later, showing for me in "Dublin (county)" on Daft.ie. As a renter, I am grateful to be in a decent place right now as the options for moving to a decent place that is somewhat affordable are greatly curtailed from this time last year. Not an enviable position to be looking for a decent rental at the moment - I actually have a friend who moved back home when the lease was up on the house they were renting and the landlord was moving back in, as they could find nothing habitable with two bedrooms despite their budget being up to €2300 pm and being in their 30s - a horrible and humiliating thing to have to move home to the parents in your 30s and not good for our society.

     

    Dublin City Council is to seek a derogation from Government policy to continue using long-term leasing deals with private developers for social housing.

    The Government’s Housing for All plan published last month commits to ending the practice of leasing social housing, in favour of the ownership of homes by local authorities and housing bodies.

    The city council had already committed to leasing more than 400 social homes this year. However, it planned to ramp this up by another 2,500 over next year and 2023.

    Senior council housing officials are now to seek talks with the Department of Housing to secure a “dispensation” to allow the council to continue the “judicious” use of leasing in certain circumstances, particularly where it needs to clear old flats for regeneration.

    Farcical and incompetence at the level of Dave Dinnigan (the same Dave Dinnigan who claimed that they were being too hard on themselves when it came to criticising DCC's delivery of social housing, even when confronted with figures of Dublin City Council directly building 90 social homes in 2019 and 124 in 2020), Owen Keegan etc. in Dublin City Council that they would push back against the government's plan to phase out councils entering into these bad value leases. However, what this push back shows is that there is more fighting against the Housing For All strategy and the government giving in to the arguments against aspects of it mean it is going to fail. SF must be laughing at the total inability of the government to treat the crisis with the same urgency as covid as is needed - they are soaring in popularity and this will continue. Our last 20 years will go down the drain when SF get in, not because of SF, but because we made no effort to build a sustainable society and economy that worked for the people, which is what lead to SF getting in. It feels like a slow motion car crash.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    I believe the lack of repossessions was to protect the banks rather than the inhabitants, an extension of NAMA so to speak. Hardly a left leaning ideology.

    Sourcing social and affordable at the most expensive price is more about feathering the nests of the super wealthy rather than solving an issue and achieving bang for buck



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,604 ✭✭✭Amadan Dubh


    A tin of beans, buttered toast/baked potato and some sausages is a nutritionally sound, delicious and budget friendly dinner that costs around €2 per dinner to put together once you have the bread, butter, spuds bought in bulk. I will not have you tarnish it by referencing it to the Baby Boomer war era of the 1980s.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    What's happening in Dublin is a rather loose definition of urban sprawl. More than half the people working there live outside the county. Is it Dublin City or Leinster city.

    Housing and childcare would capture the entirity of 2 median salaries in Dublin. Maybe that's not a detterent to having children. Some would disagree I suspect same for the increased age for ftb. Add in the high tax rates when you go over median wage and the situation is rather bleak. This is at a time of close to peak prosperity.

    The system is awash with money and those that pay high taxes (citizens) have to chase investment funds paying 0 tax, have access to 0% rates and their risk underwritten with citizens taxes long into the future in order to meet housing need. Can you not see how that scenario leads to a bubble

    I'll deal with your 2 average earners affordability metric later with research from the LDA. It's an annual argument and time to put it to bed



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    interview with the LDA chief exec., John Coleman

    There remit appears to be almost entirely affordable cost based housing.

    He breaks household income into deciles. The top third its envisaged can afford there housing need. The bottom third are covered by council and subsidies.

    John claim the middle third is not served by the market and not supported by any subsidies.

    The income range of the middle third household is between 45 and 80k. This is someway of the so called average couple on average wages and I would hope that they have done more research into this than anyone else

    The remit of the LDA appears to be to provide housing solutions at affordable rates for this section



    The system up to now was to source housing at the price paid by the upper third decile. This increases the price in this market and consequently reduces the number of households that can afford there housing need. This eventually leads to collapse of the housing market and that will pull the economy down with it.

    It will be interesting to see how it plays out and if its enough



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,037 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    the demise of the property pin is sad, there was some excellent analysis and sources of information on that site once upon a time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 148 ✭✭Eclectic Econometrics


    I still use the search facility to find out information about houses, roads, areas...although it is becoming increasingly out of date.

    On the plus side, if you believe George Soros (wink wink nudge nudge) is conspiring with Wuhan scientists to reshape the plant then it's an amazing source of information.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    So you think allowing someone stay in an asset where the loan is not being paid to the bank for 10 years+ is protecting the bank , really can you explain this. ?? I dont see any upside for the bank. This is to protect the FAMILY HOME and its as left leaning as it can get. Protect the banks will you come off it. Your trying to spin that this has gone so far left its actually gone around the globe and is now a policy from the right side of the political sphere. You have to look at who benefits , who pays. The bank are left with a loan that is not being serviced and an asset they cannot access. The family dont pay anything and get to live in the house. I dont see how this is right leaning in any way shape or form.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Well as I pointed out this is what happens when your population grows by over 10% in the space of a decade and government make decisions to stop building housing? I don't see why you or anyone else think Dublin should be any different to any other major city in the world, can you show me one main city that does not have a premium placed on its property when compared with the rest of the country? You only need to look at London , Paris, New York where people travel in their droves from outside to work where the action is.

    I am with you with regards to how high we pay for childcare we also pay a lot for our PS, our Welfare and all of that is based on our tax take but people do have the choice not to have kids and some could live in a less expensive area. So the averages I put up where country wide there are areas that are cheaper if you want to pay less to live.

    Once again I agree with you with regards to investment funds vs private citizens. I am not sure if I had it on this thread it may have be been another, but I believe people should pay for rent/mortgage, childcare and any other necessities like food, clothes out of your pay before you get taxed and even the field. I think we agree on a lot of things I just think you may be confusing a supply problem with a bubble but we wont really be able to prove it as most bubbles are only labelled after they have burst..

    I mean you still never answered the premise of if we had the same over supply now as we did back at the start of 07 would prices be as high? I don't think they would be.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,603 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We had a very long thread about how the inevitable repossessions would crash the market further around the time prices hit the floor. The reason repossessions never happened on any scale is bcos of the damage it would do to banks, NAMA, government.

    I suspect it would have significant cost on the state had they to assume the cost of housing repossessed families.

    Agree its not ideal and a big part of dysfunction in the market, but I dont think it was driven by leftist ideology rather a cloak to disguise real intentions



Advertisement