Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Acceptable Covid death rates

168101112

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Colds? They were supposed to be for covid. Many feared they would be used for flu and colds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    nphet aren't restricting anything now really.

    masks, vaccine passports, not really restrictions and not a big deal, they protect the public from those who refuse to get the vaccine because facebook or da gubament.

    we are able to live our lives to the full now, we actually may have been able to do so a lot earlier if it wasn't for a tiny minority who were set on ruining everything for the rest of us.

    sorry but those vulnerable have a right to live their lives as well as us and it is not up to them to stay locked up forever so you don't have to wear a mask, or wash your hands which is something grown ups should know to be doing anyway.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    me saying it again and again doesn't make it true, but the fact that it is fact and it is true makes it fact and true.

    local government across sweden defied the government and implemented local lock downs, because the original policy was a complete failure.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Uneducated people seem to be shocked at the concept of acceptable risk. Perhaps I'm being too harsh on those who haven't ever considered such a topic, since the focus of their lives to date must have been overwhelmed by The X Factor and I'm a Celebrity...

    Here's an encyclopedia entry to get you guys started.

    https://www.encyclopedia.com/education/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/acceptable-risk


    Good luck guys.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    we don't have restrictions like lock down or social distancing around flue because they actually wouldn't work due to low spreadability.

    covid's high spreadability on the other hand required restrictions and still requires a couple for now.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 443 [Deleted User]


    I for one will not be getting a booster shot unless the government clearly outline and end date for all restrictions, I've already done everything that has been asked of me but I've had enough it's time to move on with life and just accept the risks.

    Covid-19 for the vast majority is a extremely mild illness and isn't going anywhere in the foreseeable future, if the government truly care about the health of the people they need strong policies to encourage healthy eating and not being overweight as well as taking regular exercise, being overweight or obese is one of the biggest risk factors for having a negative outcome with covid-19.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the anti-maskers probably feared that but the rest of us didn't given there was never any talk of them being for colds.

    however realistically it actually wouldn't be a bad idea given there was at least, a bit of a proportion of people who had no manners and were coughing and spluttering all over the place and not doing ho grown up things like covering their mouths.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    in that case, restrictions would need to remain so as to insure as much as is possible, those who hav got all vaccines, and where required boosters, are protected from people like you who refuse to get one because da gubament, you being the perfect example of people i mentioned in 2 previous posts.

    and all for something the government, no government would be able to give you, but which could only be given when the evidence shows they can be removed full stop.

    for someone so anti-restrictions you actually seem to want them to continue and seem to want to try and ruin things for the rest of us, something which ultimately you are going to fail at in the end, because the majority of us who have been and will be sensible around this, will ultimately win.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Most people wear cloth or light 'surgical' masks. These are about 80% ineffective, meaning they are basically pointless. N95 masks are a different story, but they aren't what the public at large wears..



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 443 [Deleted User]


    Why must restrictions remain permanently why can't we seem to accept that some people will die yes it is a tragedy but it is a necessary part of life?

    Whether you like it or not from what I have seen from being out and about in the real world a sizable amount of people are ignoring the restrictions for example I was on a train with a stag party on board who were ignoring the mask rule and nothing happened to them, what I did find hilarious was some woman complained she was massively overweight and I watched her get off at one of the stations and waddle her way down the platform why should the rest of us have to suffer to protect someone who clearly doesn't give a damn about their own health?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    you aren't suffering to protect anyone.

    the restrictions must remain for deliberately unvaccinated so as to incentivize them to get the vaccine.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 443 [Deleted User]


    How is being forced to wear a mask not having a freedom curtailed?

    I'm from what I saw yesterday it does feel like we are being punished in order to protect some who can't even look after their own health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Incentivise = coerce. If that fails, just open concentration camps and institute regimented and strict 're-education'. The Chinese gave us Covid and they would be more than happy to share their concentration camp re-education expertise as well, I'm sure



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Adversial, it seems that unless you get every booster going then you're anti-vaxx and the only reason you won't get a booster shot is because of da government, Facebook, Twitter (take your pick).



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So if all the unvaccinated got vaccinated there would be no more restrictions? Is that what you're saying?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    we would be able to remove them a lot quicker, yes .

    mask wearing in public might need to stay, at least at certain times of the year but realistically that's barely a restriction anyway.

    and it would help even greater, those who cannot get a vaccine due to medical reasons or for which the vaccine genuinely won't work.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    What evidence is there to suggest the restrictions would, or will, ever be removed? People keep saying they'll be removed, but I don't know why they're so sure.


    People covering their faces isn't natural. It's definitely a restriction. What do you mean by 'in public'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    in public means in public.

    the evidence that the restrictions will be removed is that they have removed many of them and they lifted some at various times throughout the pandemic.

    covering faces is natural, i have saw plenty of people more or less doing it for years, granted nothing to do with a virus etc, but most definitely done whether it be because they are cold or whatever.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've no idea what you mean by 'in public', I'm afraid. For me it means 'on the street'. Maybe that's what you mean.


    So no evidence then. No restrictions have been properly lifted. In fact, even when NPHET half-lifted them they insisted on even more restrictions.


    Covering your face for hours at work, in every shop, in banks etc isn't natural.


    Anyway, I think we've gone way off topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,767 ✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    No it isn't. It's you losing credibility.

    19 months is not 24 months.

    7 months is not a year.

    If your employer gave you 80% of your wages would you accept it?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    I won’t be getting a booster either. Absolutely pointless



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    As has already been stated people are free to go to nightclubs etc and enjoy themselves. But during the week when they are at work, going to work or shopping please have some consideration to those around you, as you don't now if they are immune compromised or living with people who are.

    To those who say people like me can choose to stay isolating, we can't really choose as we have no other choice. Why would we go out and risk getting Covid? We are not stopping you living a normal life but please have some consideration for others and that must include masking up.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah the flu doesn't spread alright. It spontaneously generates in each individual.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ok I'm checking out of this thread. I've never come across so much ignorance and stupidity online. That's saying something.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are not being punished to protect anyone. You are being asked to continue to show some pretty basic civic responsibility. And no one said anything about any restrictions remaining permanent.

    How does a minor restriction like wearing a mask where still required weigh up on a scale of inconvenience against the major restrictions you expect those in high risk groups to impose on themselves, just so you can do what you like? Pretty low, in my opinion.

    Do you not see the double standard in demanding the government remove all restrictions so you can go back to living your life "as normal", when the cost of that would mean whole cohorts of people in high risk groups being forced to live under much harsher restrictions to mitigate the risks?

    What about their right to live as normal a life as possible?

    Or do you actually think they don't have that right, or your rights somehow outweigh theirs and the government should just ignore them?

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Where are you exactly ? On the tube in London , in Sweden , in Moscow? Sounds like you are not that restricted at all , more power to you !

    Ireland has Covid Certs, btw , not vaccine passports

    So why is wearing masks in some circumstances and presenting Covid Certs for entry to indoor hospitality for a while more such an issue then ," in the grand scheme of things " ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    I would call this as scientific point of view 😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,934 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    There is no booster shots for Ireland yet and not looking like any for the general population for a while.

    Is your reason for not getting vaccinated because the government told you to do so, or facebook fearmongering? Seems a pretty silly reason to have to live a restricted life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    Sorry for your situation op, but the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. This has gone on long enough, it's time to get back to normal as C19 is now endemic and it isn't going away any time soon (if ever). The vast majority of the people who I know or have talked to regarding another lockdown have been morbidly obese. They would rather have us all locked down again rather than hit the treadmill. I'm vaxxed, wear a mask and wash my hands regularly and socially distance. I have played my part as have most of us. I've never caught the Rona but I have zero fear of it, time for normality to return enough is enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,934 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I'd love for this to be correct, but the only way this works is if we stop treating those who are in certain categories and that's not likely to happen (for many reasons). An obese person who gets sick because of SARS-COV2 and exacerbated by being obese takes up just as many hospital resources as someone who lives well but happens to be susceptible for COVID. Unless there is a lot more hospital capacity added, "acceptable covid deaths" cannot occur unless treatment is denied to people which means restrictions until hospitalisations and ICU numbers drop.

    If those numbers rise too much we will have excess deaths due to denying treatment to some.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    I agree, however fat people and people who are immunocompromised should just stay home. I know that sounds harsh but what else can be suggested as a viable alternative?. The government needs to support those who have underlying health issues but I have little sympathy for fat people who have done that to themselves. Having said that I would never ever suggest that fat people be denied treatment if they contract C19. The vulnerable should stay home and the rest of us should continue on and take all necessary precautions to protect them, but be allowed to live under no more lockdowns or restrictions.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I wish I was in two of those places.


    They can call them whatever they want. Same difference.


    How do you know it's just for a while more? It was supposed to be two weeks, and that was almost two years ago. I wonder why people are confident that the restrictions will be lifted soon. It's not based on anything as far as I can see.


    And it's all circumstances. I'm not even sure they aren't mandatory outdoors. Mask wearing outside was supposed to be lifted outdoors on the 22nd. I remember reading that and wondering what they meant by outdoors. So for all I know they might be mandatory outdoors too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,934 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    That's already happening to a degree but the unvaccinated are loud and obnoxious about the restrictions on them when not following public health advice, it's a brave politician who would try and put restrictions on those who are following public health advice.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Please clarify what you mean by "necessary precautions" - in the context of no more restrictions.

    Overweight and immuno-compromised people along with everyone else in the high risk groups have lives to live too, including livings to earn, children to bring to and from school, errands to run which involve interacting with others in society, and so on.

    Thinking they can "just stay home" is unrealistic and overly simplistic.



    o



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    A brave politician indeed, something that we sadly in short supply of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,247 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    A cluster broke out near me and I caught it , it definitely came from a unvaxed crowd I know , and confidently say it would not have been as serious had they all been vaxxed, horrible bug



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    Well for the elderly, government agents can call out weekly to them and make sure that they are safe and sound, help them pay their bills and sort out the shopping as well as make sure they are getting their prescriptions. For the immunocompromised, they can continue on with normal if they wish, but accept the consequences should disaster fall upon them. For fat people, put the pizza down and join a gym. Society cannot be in perpetual lock downs or have tough restrictions placed upon us in perpetuity. I don't care about the vax cert in order to get a pint, having a pint in the local isn't a human right, however I also support the right for people to queue up for a nightclub if they so choose.


    As for my previous comment being unrealistic or overly simplistic, maybe it is. However, is it also unrealistic or simplistic to suggest that we return to normalcy as this virus is now endemic and most likely will never go away?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are aware that most of the restrictions have already been lifted right?

    There is no lockdown, everywhere is open again. You can do whatever you like, all you are being asked is to make a few concessions like wearing a mask in shops and on public transport.

    No one has asked for perpetual lockdowns or harsh restrictions to continue - not even those of us who are immuno-compromised or at risk on this thread, if you had bothered to actually read it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No . At the moment not being vaccinated is the biggest risk factor for Covid.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    I can't always stay at home. My bank is closing down early next year and I have to move banks. How do you suggest I do this if I am staying at home?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,000 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn



    So, if Covid doesn't go away do you think we should stay going around in masks forever?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,000 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    How do you know she doesn't?

    You are making some pretty sweeping judgements there . I cringed reading this , such a cruel post . . I hope nobody I know would ever behave as you describe .

    She could have arthritis and need hip surgery, which delayed by Covid and will be further delayed the longer this goes on, for example . She could also be on treatment which makes her vulnerable but unable to drive due to her condition.

    This is why the train drivers want more support from the police or transport police , so that drunken yvbs can ejected when causing issues for other reasonable passengers .

    Shame on you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    The infection numbers are going to rise now that winter is coming. Once that hits a certain number, conversations will happen. Conversations that will determine whether we enter another lockdown or not, as well as increased restrictions. If this happens, then the government will have admitted that they are in over their heads and have utterly failed as we were promised and end to lock downs and restrictions once we got vaxxed. As for concessions, I do make them and continue to do so. Perhaps if you would have my read my earlier comment you would have known that, if you had bothered to actually read it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,156 ✭✭✭✭Lumen


    It's quite straightforward to set up banking remotely, e.g. with N26.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    " For a while more ", as in "the grand scheme of things " ,seeing as 5 months mean nothing to you , from your previous post .

    If you were actually here, you would know they are not "mandatory outdoors ".

    So where are you living then ?

    Moscow, Ukraine ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    Perhaps I worded that poorly, apologies. But I also said that immunocompromised people like yourself will have to accept the risk in the outside world, as does everyone I suppose. The only reason that I got vaxxed was to protect people like yourself and the elderly, doing my civic duty if you will. I'm not afraid of catching C19 but if I do and I die, you can have "I told you so" written on my gravestone :p. At the end of the day, this virus isn't going anywhere and life has to return to normal.


    Now I know that most of the restrictions are gone but they could also very well return this winter if the numbers get too high, and the icu overwhelmed. The question is: do we accept this or do we move on and let will be, be. If we do enter another lockdown, then whats to stop another lockdown next summer, or winter? Will we have additional lockdowns every year forever? This cannot happen. It's also not fair to begrudge people wanting to enjoy their youth by going clubbing, you're only young once.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It's not endemic.

    Endemic is when there are predictable number of cases or small outbreaks but controllable

    Pandemic is when it is unpredictable and still spreading .



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy




  • Advertisement
Advertisement