Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1202203205207208716

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Ah the auld black or white, right or left, all or nothing polar BS. I call people out for moaning all the time and about things that might not even happen and that gets equated to saying people are never allowed to ever moan.

    People can moan and have opinions. Of course they can. I do. Moaning [i]all the time[/i] and/or moaning about things that haven’t even happened and/or moaning about almost every aspect of things (“that selection is crap because youth”, “that inexperienced selection performed crap” etc etc) which suggests that the coaches simply can never win. That’s not the same thing.

    This forum has been dominated recently by people spending the vast, vast majority of their time moaning, taking pot shots at coaches, taking pot shots at players and even in one case actively hoping a person loses their job. It’s been relentless and joyless and at times pretty pathetic. And the level of context that gets ignored in order to facilitate that behaviour has been utterly crazy. It’s already driven a number of long time posters away from the forum. It’s going to drive others away too. Just so this place can become another 42 comments section of whinging and moaning. I’m sorry if I’m not happy with the near complete collapse in the quality of the discussion here. But hey, that’s my opinion and I’m entitled to it I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Two things happened yesterday.

    1. Ireland called up a pacy winger who's scoring lots tries but has only played five games since he landed in the country.

    2. An Internet poster didn't understand the difference between 'possible' and 'probable'.

    Then today, we have a load of people ignoring the first but seizing on the second to have another cut off the national coach for being conservative, even though the guy is capping new players and cutting dead wood faster than any of his predecessors.

    It is utterly bizarre. I also find myself asking why people don't just limit themselves to complaining about things that actually happen but invent ludicrous hypotheticals and then get even more angry about those.

    I just wonder why people do it to themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Lol do tell the big difference in this case between possible and probable. MK isn't guessing at the team. He's been given a heads up from someone in camp at how training is going and what the team is shaping up as. A lot can change and it could be totally different, I think everyone knows this. Would it have made any difference if I said "possible team". People would still give their opinion on it.

    But deepest apologies for mixing up the words. I hope it hasn't caused you too much anger lol



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,719 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Your last sentence is bang on.

    Not only are people just pure determined to find negatives in absolutely everything, they defend the negativity by saying its "just their opinion"

    Someone whose actively trying to opine such negative thoughts constantly and complain about it all just kinda wears me down. Hence rarely posting or scrutinising this thread.

    It's just not good for me. I work hard to keep myself in a good mental state and there's people in here that just wear me down. It's why I stopped visiting the Ireland subreddit too.

    It appears the intersection on the Venn Diagram of "Irish forum posters" and "people who find flaws in everything and moan about it" is extremely large....

    Life is short folks, it's only rugby, try smile see some good in things. Your mental health will thank you :)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I call people out for moaning all the time

    So you're the arbiter of what constitutes too much moaning and will call people miserable and unhappy when you don't feel the moaning is warranted.

    The coaches can win, as you well know because I was on your side backing Farrell when UAEguy was calling him a gutless coward



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Reading the article in the 42 I think he pretty much is guessing. The way he was phrasing the article didn’t sound anything like some form of inside track. It was just an educated guess from him I reckon. He’s probably not far off of course, as I said this needs to be the warm up for next week. Otherwise next week becomes a complete waste of time at best and a massive issue for our development and consistency at worst. Farrell still has to manage the squad beyond also managing our depth and upcoming talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Nah, you're doing the classic social media shuffle of someone pointing out your mistake and instead of saying, "oops sorry", you're digging your heels in.

    It's an anonymous internet forum. There is no face for you to lose by admitting a mistake.

    It didn't cause me any anger at all btw, but it certainly riled up a lot of other posters.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Well, if you do the lotto, do you think it's probable that you'll win? Or possible that you'll win?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I never said my post applied to you though. I never mentioned anyone specifically in it at all. I’m making a general point about the state this place is in at the moment. As AB1 said, this place is just wearing people down. A lot have left already. More will leave. And this was one of the few places left for reasonable discussion. I’d like if we didn’t lose that.

    Some people are far more guilty of the behaviour I mentioned than others. But I’m not going to start singling people out or grouping people into “misery categories” or anything like that. We all could do with checking ourselves every once in a while to make sure we aren’t falling into that pattern of behaviour. It’s all too easy to do (I’ve been guilty of it myself) and it’s become completely normalised on the internet. But it’s f-ing toxic as well as being completely pointless. It’s not like it changes anything.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof



    It's a shame, tho. There are posters who's opinion I would have valued that pretty much never post here now. I largely put it down to the absence of modding since the change over. There's plenty of stuff that previously would've been infracted, which might've nipped the worst of it in the bud. I'm expecting it to be even worse once the AI's kick off.

    Incidentally, does anyone know if the modd-ing functionality is likely to be back any time soon?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Eh, probable, obviously. Every time I do the massive Euromillions jackpot I know I’m going to win it. It doesn’t matter what happened last time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    Agree that he'll use this for a warm up for NZ. I think he'll use the Argentina game to try a couple of things but a NZ scalp will be his main target. NZ are getting a lot of praise but I think it's a game we can definitely win. I don't think they're as strong as past NZ teams.

    Yeah maybe Kinsella is guessing but he's done previous articles like this and been very accurate with his team. I should have said possible team but don't think it would have made any difference to the chat. But at least it gave a couple of posters something to moan about lol



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    This is exactly the kind of optimism we could do with around here!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭phily2002


    It's quite clear I used the wrong word but again would the chat have been any different if I said possible?

    Your going on like people wouldn't have moaned about the team if that was the case which I beg to differ

    But here you go

    "Oops sorry everyone for getting the word wrong"

    Money I spend on it I'd go with probable!



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Alessandro Vast Numskull


    Sure same could be said for the likes of balpucoune, Coombes, frailty,doak to be fair. I'm not saying we should throw them in at all but to say you learn nothing is not true


    Edit:frawley

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Frailty? Is that Carbery's new nickname? ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Team I'd like to see vs NZ;

    Porter Kelleher Furlong

    Ryan Henderson

    Beirne Conan VDF

    Murray Sexton

    Larmour Aki Ringrose Baloucoune

    Keenan


    Herring, Healy, Bealham, Baird, Doris, Casey, Carbery, Zebo


    I think we'd learn plenty from that side and still be competitive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,194 ✭✭✭Must love hardship


    The actual team won't be out until Thursday so yesterday was a bit too early for Murray to have the exact team. I'm sure he will have at least 90% idea of it tomorrow evening

    Yesterday he might have seen training and who was taking reps.

    Alternatively the 42 makes money by clicks so putting in a few bombs on the team automatically draws more traffic to the comments section.

    I think we all know the team for Japan will be at close to full strength. And In a number of positions there is not a lot between players.

    Any 3 of Bierne, Ryan and Henderson could be picked in second row.

    Any of the players in the squad could start in the in multiple combinations in the back row.

    Its a pity the US game was called off last weekend. It think if that game had gone ahead we would have had a number of combinations tried out over the 2 matches.

    I'm suprised when that game was called off the IRFU didn't organise a 4th game even for a "wolfhound" team this weekend to get additional game time into players.

    Maybe they tried and failed?

    With no URC games oncurrently An original squad of 45 or so could have been announced for 2 weeks and then reduced down to 35 or so after this weekend for the last 2 games



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,816 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    It isn't an ideal time in the season to have such a prolonged break. We're only 5 weeks in and the non internationals are getting a month off and the bulk of the Ireland 1st XV have probably only played 2 or 3 games at most, some Lions have played considerably less than that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,037 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I agree. Couple of youngsters in the forwards and a couple more in the backs. See how they go.

    Start Kelleher and Doris or Coombes (have the other on the bench). Start either JGP and Byrne or Casey and Sexton. Have the other combo on the bench. Start Hume in midfield or Balacoune on the wing. If they perform ok against the ABs they're ready for the 6 Nations.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020



    1. Andrew Porter
    2. Ronan Kelleher
    3. Tom O'Toole
    4. Ryan Baird
    5. James Ryan
    6. Tadgh Beirne
    7. Josh van der Flier
    8. Jack Conan
    9. Conor Murray
    10. Joey Carbery
    11. Simon Zebo/James Lowe
    12. Ciaran Frawley
    13. Garry Ringrose
    14. Robert Balacoune
    15. Hugo Keenan

    Bench (1 = 16, 8 = 23)

    1. Rob Herring
    2. Cian Healy
    3. Tadgh Furlong
    4. Iain Henderson
    5. Caelan Doris
    6. Craig Casey
    7. Jonathan Sexton
    8. Bundee Aki


    Simply put out 70-75% of the first team as like its been said here get them minutes before NZL but also through in some youngsters to see how they fit in to the match day environment. On the bench fill it with first team players who also need minutes which should give Ireland a huge advantage in the final 20 if needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    We are but I seriously worry if we are going into this game playing Sexton when its clear we have real problems at finding his replacement. When you struggle in a position it doesnt mean you sit back and do nothing and hope the problem fix's itself, it means you go out there and fix the problem. If we have problems at 10 then use the Japan and Argentina games to look at the alternatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,816 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Aye well I agree to an extent on Sexton. I'd be surprised if he is involved against Argentina and I dont think he will play 80 mins against either Japan or NZ so Carbery will keep game time and probably a start, and Byrne will hopefully get a good half hour against Argentina.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't have an issue if he wants to start Sexton here, with a view to the NZ game, but I hope whoever is on the bench gets a good 25+ minutes. Part of the problem tho is if he intends for Murray to start vs NZ, then I think he's a cert to start here as he's only played 21 mins all season.

    I think I'd prefer to see Murray/Carbery with Sexton getting 20 odd mins off the bench.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    But is it really worth sacrificing valuable minutes for Carbery, just to gain a slightly better chance of beating NZ in an ultimately meaningless game, when beating them is already highly unlikely?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I’d absolutely hate it if anyone in the Ireland set-up thought like that tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Like what?

    Using November tests to prepare for future 6 Nations and World Cups.

    Like every other tier 1 nation does.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    I’d hate them to think that it’s a meaningless game that they are highly unlikely to win. You know, the thing you said in the post I quoted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,586 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    How much is Carbery going to improve by playing 80 minutes against Japan in an Autumn international?

    It would be valuable gametime at a higher level for Harry Byrne. But Carbery?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Yes. If it’s 50/30 mins for Carbery/Sexton or vice versa, I think that’s reasonable enough. If Sexton is still on after 70 mins, then I'd be much more critical. Or if a combo of Murray and Sexton are on beyond 55 mins.

    Question for you, TRC. Presumably you were absolutely delighted with Farrell's 8 new caps in the USA game, given all your criticism in the lead up around it? It was exactly the kind of thing you were calling for, right?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You must've missed this post of mine. I'll leave it here for you, for your reference. It's almost like he's doing exactly what you want.

    Out of interest, I checked how Farrell compares vs his peers and their predecessors also. In terms of new caps per game, he’s ahead of everyone bar Galthie.

    Andy Farrell - 22 new caps in 16 games

    Ian Foster - 14 new caps in 17 games

    Steve Hansen - 22 new caps took 29 games

    Eddie Jones - 22 new caps took 20 games

    Stuart Lancaster - 22 new caps took 18 games

    Galthie - 27 new caps in 15 games

    Brunel - 22 new caps took 17 games

    Pivac - 18 new caps in 16 games

    Townsend - 22 new caps in 18 games

    Dave Rennie - 17 new caps in 17 games



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    You're missing the point completely.

    It's not about giving new caps.

    I have never once criticised Farrell for not giving enough new caps. He's done brilliantly in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,253 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And why should they?

    Our win ratio against them is 50% over the last five years. Yeah, they'll be hot favourites but they're not invincible.

    We absolutely can win.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I'm not sure how Farrell giving new caps in the summer (which I was happy about and never once criticised him for not giving new caps) is relevant to the out half discussion.

    Farrell is clearly going all in on Carbery as his no.2 (wouldn't have been my choice but that's the direction he has gone. So what better opportunity than an Autumn international against a side we'd expect to beat to have him steer the ship and gain experience against.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    So just to be clear, you're happy with the squad development for the rest of the squad? It's just the 10 situation you have issues with?



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    If Carbery doesn’t start this weekend he will come off the bench. He’ll then almost certainly come off the bench against NZ and start against Argentina. How much benefit the extra 30-40 mins vs Japan will be in the long term is very debatable. I’d argue it isn’t going to make much difference come September 2023. So is it really something to be getting hung up on?

    The problem I and a lot of others have with this style of posting is that you are effectively setting criteria that you can use against the coach if he doesn’t do things “your way”. What if Sexton starts and he gives both of them 40 mins? That’s wildly different to Sexton starting and playing 75 mins. Yet your position is pretty categorical despite your knowledge of what is going to happen being anything but. You make no allowance for the nuances of what might happen or what the plan might be.

    You haven’t acknowledged that the USA game may have led to a totally different approach more aligned with what you are thinking and the cancellation of that game needs to be accounted for. All this stuff makes you seem unwilling to give credit or allowance if the exact thing you want doesn’t happen.

    I’d love to see Joey start this weekend. But if it doesn’t happen I also understand why. Because I’ve made at least some effort to consider this from Farrells perspective. Farrell has shown absolutely no issue throwing young lads in once he feels they are ready. He’s also made plenty of effort to look at other options at 10. Hopefully Carbery and Byrne can repay the faith he has shown in them. But we need to acknowledge that this isn’t a coach who refuses to back youth, or a coach who doesn’t have a longer term plan or anything like that. He’s already proven that he is those things. So from that perspective at least we should all be able to cut him a bit of slack.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,952 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Absolutely.

    I'm actually pretty objective, even if people want to portray me as being a moaner who criticises no matter what.

    I've acknowledged umpteen times that Farrell's hands have been somewhat tied regarding the 10 situation over the last 2 years, and I've stuck up for him in here when he's been getting dogs abuse from some.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    And maybe I’m being harsh given some of the other posts on the topic. If so, I apologise. I just see so many posts that set out a “if this doesn’t happen then Farrell is wrong” stuff that seems to be designed as a kind of pre-emptive strike.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Lads! These matches are probably the best opportunity to bed some younger players. I realize MK is probably just guessing. But why not play O'Toole, Hume and Coombes from the start!

    Sexton can bench! Jesus, he's played more domestic matches this season than he has in years. At least so far. What's the harm of giving Casy the start? Win or lose this is a golden opportunity!



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Hallelujah. ;)

    Look, fair play for admitting that Farrell is in fact doing a large amount of what you're actually calling for. It's just a bit frustrating as I don't think I had seen much acknowledgement of this from you, especially in comparison to the volume and tone of criticism e.g. "Jesus Christ", you'd be forgiven for thinking you've no praise for Farrell.

    (And admittedly your criticism was nowhere near some of the other guff we've seen...).



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,767 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Sexton hasn’t played with Ireland in over 7 months. Murray has only played 21 mins this season so is in desperate need of minutes, even just from a match fitness perspective. Porter, Furlong, Henderson, Beirne, Conan, Aki, Henshaw etc are all in the same boat as Sexton. Some might be able to just slot in against NZ without any previous run out in green, but I’d imagine most need the game time in the set-up.

    As for the “win or lose” bit, the IRFU and broader rugby public would not take losing to Japan at home well at all, regardless of selection. Imagine losing 2 from 3 AIs!? The reaction would not be good. They’d then need a win vs Argentina or risk losing 3 games in a row at home.

    Farrell has been bedding in players and will continue to do so. He doesn’t have to do it all at once.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,816 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    This is my sentiment. We've beaten NZ twice, beating them a third time would be nice. But developing the squad for the 6Ns and beyond to the WC is more important. Hence why I'd chuck 2 or 3 younger players in against NZ.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 10,640 Mod ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I think I'd largely agree with that tbh. That doesn't have to be Carbery or Harry Byrne tho. Personally, I'd love to see some of Baloucoune, Coombes and/or Kelleher get a start.

    It's possibly worth mentioning as well that there'll be a cohort of guys like Keenan, Doris, even Conan (maybe surprisingly) who'll almost certainly be involved but have never played a test vs NZ before. It'll be a good experience for them too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Farrell has been fantastic at bringing in new blood. No doubt! But, shouldn't the new blood be included in games that ask a lot more than the U.S?

    That's were I think he falls a little short. Capping lads against poor sides is not much of a benefit. I get that the squad hasn't been together in a while, however, dropping a couple of new lads into this fixture and having the regulars on the bench is not a bad start, imo.

    How about this line up v Japan.

    1. Porter

    2. Herring

    3. O'Toole

    4. Henderson

    5. Dillane

    6. Coombes

    7. POM

    8. Doris

    9. Casey

    10. JC

    11. Zebo

    12. McCloskey

    13. Ringrose

    14. Balacoune

    15. Keenan.

    Bench. Kilcoyne, Sheehan, Bealham, Beirne, Timoney, Murray, Sexton and Larmour.

    A couple of youngsters and Sheehan and Timoney included on the bench! That would be my preference. I know a few lads don't rate McCloskey and would not select him. My thinking is he can get over the gainline and he has offloading ability. Carbonless a start. It will give us here on the boards lot's to piss and moan about. Henderson needs minutes as does Beirne! Of course, lot's may disagree and so on, but mixing the squad up a little I think is beneficial in the long run!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    He shouldn't start against Japan, I can accept maybe 20-30 minutes to get some extra minutes into the legs for the NZL game the following week but this is a game where Carbery should start if not Byrne so they get that extra experience at managing a game against tier one opposition. We probably have only 3 games we will play between now and the next autumn where a 10 will realistically have such an opportunity, to waste one of them would be extremely frustrating. Realistically we should be beating Japan and Argentina with any of our 10s playing and if that's even disputed then our problems are far greater than who's at 10 anyway.


    Im of the belief that while we have issues at 10 I feel our issues are compounded by that fact our back play is so pretentious and dare I say it amateurish at times. When you have a backline that functions so poorly as ours does you probably need you're 10 to step up even more than the average 10 in order to be able to somehow make it work hence why maybe our other 10s while they havent set the world alight maybe look worse than they actually are because of other compounding issues like the reasons I give. I mean when we have a penalty advantage +90% of the time Sexton just aimlessly kicks the ball away rather than release the backs, that in itself probably tells you the state of our backlines general attack.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020



    Well I definetly dont accept sacrificing a game just to give a 10 game time ( thats the mindset of a loser, something we dont need if we want to compete at the RWC) but I agree about playing Sexton being a waste of time in this fixture. Realistically we should beat Japan with any of our 3 10s playing and if anything playing a more experienced team might be detrimental as they may have 1 eye on NZL the following week and may not give 100% and as a result struggle and create a negative vibe with the public, something we dont need going into the NZL if we want to have any chance in that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Its not just 80 minutes against Japan, its that plus an hour versus Argentina, 15 minutes or so in each 6N match (bar Italy) , a start potentially against Italy and potentially the same 15 minutes in the summer, its about him building minutes overtime. No 10 is magically going to improve in one match, it takes a run of games in the shirt. If not Carbery then Harry Byrne but either way we need to be giving our back up 10 game time like this at the very least if they are going to improve at this level, continuing to chop and change and only play Sexton may not cost us games now but we can then have no surprise when we ask ourselves why is no-one challenging Sexton.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,621 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    I agree! Sexton should probably come off the bench in the non 6nations games! If he still out guy come the world cup, it says a lot about his class and desire.

    There isn't too many matches left to bed somebody else! It's the same issue for scrum half! But, I don't worry too much about 9, because there's a lot of lads that can step in and do the job! Imo.

    If we do beat the All Blacks, great! But we did beat them in 2018 and by 2019 we were gash! We have 3 bites of the cherry in the summer series too!

    I think changes now are beneficial down the road. I wouldn't change players just for the sake of changing, the changes are purely to get lads up to speed at top level international rugby. This to me is very important.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,098 ✭✭✭UAEguy2020


    Another factor is beating NZ is exactly what Farrell needs to get most of the Irish public onside atleast for the moment so I do think he will want to go all out to do so. It's the one win he could have that would make up for alot of the negative things that have happened under his tenure so far.

    I wouldnt change for the sake of change either but there has to genuinely be a plan to get other 10's involved, it doesnt have to be drastic but we simply cant keep playing games where Sexton plays 78 minutes, thats just utter madness especially if he's going to be 37 next year.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement