Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Acceptable Covid death rates

16781012

Comments

  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It’s not mandatory for people to work. If you are afraid to go to an office, maybe working is not for you.

    You can always sign on and get social welfare.

    But let me guess, that’s not good enough? You want your salary and a nice handy work from home job as well.

    No appetite from most in this country to actually get back to normal.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    the concept of hybrid working and WFH is not all Covid related. I’ve been working 2/3 days a week in the office for nearly a decade now and would like to see everyone have the same opportunity. It’s about building a better society and work life balance, not just ‘getting back to normal’ after Covid. ‘Normal’ wasn’t all good



  • Registered Users Posts: 369 ✭✭sekiro


    I feel sorry for your situation but the reality is that everybody dies eventually.

    When talking about acceptable or preventable deaths it's a bit of a difficult conversation. Many deaths in this country are avoidable. We could stop people from eating junk and smoking and drinking and so on and save a good few lives. We could help people who are suicidal. We could help people who may become suicidal. We could do more about deaths from the flu and deaths from accidents and really we could go on and on there.

    With COVID the friction is coming from asking what is a reasonable amount of freedom to give up so that someone else might live? Where is the border between "take responsibility to keep yourself safe" and "stay locked down to save others".

    There would obviously be two polar extremes here. On one side we could have absolute lockdown until covid is gone. No mixing, no going outside, whatever it takes to keep people apart and safe. On the other side we would have no lockdowns or restrictions at all ever and it's survival of the fittest, I suppose.

    If the best solution is somewhere between those two extremes then unfortunately "how many deaths would be an acceptable number" would need to form part of that conversation.

    As an example, in a car crash, it's very possible that an airbag can cause serious back or neck injuries. However it is also far more likely that an airbag can save a driver from injury or death. The decision is then made that a certain number of negative outcomes are acceptable when the bigger picture is considered. Try telling that to the guy who is paralyzed because of an airbag.

    Maybe the message could have been delivered with a better bedside manner but at some point there is going to be a "bigger picture" to look at with lockdowns and restrictions and difficult questions will need to be answered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    Yes I understand that, but it's not correct to say they didn't know about it.

    As we were locked down for months the government sat and did nothing to stop people travelling here, knowing that variants from other countries would come in. Even when they eventually brought in mandatory hotel quarantine India wasn't even on the list initially. By then it was clear delta was a huge worry.

    The government did not want to bring in hotel quarantine at all and that's when a lot of people started to become increasingly angry and frustrated about the situation. I understand with the UK it may not have been possible but they could have stopped others from travelling here. They chose not to and wanted all the restrictions on the citizens instead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,642 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The masks are a good idea in crowded areas to deal with respiratory viruses outside of Covid as well. The culture of wearing a mask has been common in the Far East for a very long time, sometimes it was because of a response to extreme air pollution, other times in response to repsiratory illnesses.

    Lockdowns and restrictions are needed to ensure that our hospitals are not overwhelmed.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nonsensical solution.

    But, in your wisdom, please advise what social welfare payments those in high risk groups can claim, if they give up their "non-mandatory" employment.

    Jobseekers requires the claimant to be actively jobseeking.

    Diabetes or severe asthma is not sufficient to qualify for Disability Benefit.

    Illness Benefit only applies when you are actually ill, not just managing a condition.

    And even if by some miracle, this was feasible, (given the numbers in the high risk cohorts) how long would it take before the usual suspects would start calling those at high risk scroungers, and complain about having to pay higher taxes to cover the increased social welfare bill?

    Is it even necessary to mention, that not everyone who is high risk is in the kind of employment that can be done from home?

    I guess it is. 🙄

    Lol, whatever happened to "we need to get everyone back to work to get the economy going!"

    Now its turning to "let everyone in the high risk groups stop working and claim welfare!" ?!?

    😏

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    No solutions are needed. If you want to work, work. If you have to go to the office, off you go.

    But people need to stop using Covid to whinge that they should be at home.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't see anyone here who is high risk whinging that they should be at home.

    If anything the ones whinging that they should be at home are those who are put out at being inconvenienced by them being in the workplace or anywhere else outside of their own homes, basically.

    Thanks for the non-update on the social welfare benefits available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    you were never told we would go back to absolute normal once vaccinated.

    what we were told is that with a high vaccination rate we could go back to near normality at first with a few minimal restrictions, with the ability to go back to normality down the line as cases go down and down.

    ultimately yes, as it has been through out this pandemic, it is the few who refuse to protect themselves and others who have ruined it for everyone, the vast majority of those won't be over weight however but will just be concerned about going against the government, nphet, or just about anyone else.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    well get caring as you are factually incorrect.

    it's that the comment is so stupid and cringe worthy that is the issue really.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    the government give dates based on the evidence at that time, the evidence then changes meaning they have to extend as the numbers didn't go down to the level needed.

    restricting unvaccinated people makes a difference, as it should keep them away from vaccinated people as much as is possible, and it might incentivize some of them to get the vaccine, so it is a good measure and perfectly justified in this case.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    that's wonderful, but other then the fact you run now and then, the rest of your post is just meaningless sound bites that don't work.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    yes, the poster wants to do their work, that's far from a surprise.

    there will be people working from home indefinitely now as some employers see the savings to be made from not having office space.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,348 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    More silly juvenile stuff ..read my answers yesterday . Not wasting my time posting the same stuff over and over .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road



    your arguments about cars, junk food etc have been done to death and found to be invalid to covid as there are laws and rules and guidelines and advice in place to minimise the effects and potential deaths that can happen.

    the argument to have a somewhere in between the 2 extremes are what those who you suggest want lock downs until covid is gone are actually looking for, but the throw open the doors brigade, the very vocal minority that they are, won't even except that.

    the only people who seem to want long lock downs are the minority who complain and won't abide by the restrictions, minimal as they are now, since if they didn't want lock downs then they would abide and do everything possible to avoid lock downs, and would have done so through out, since if you don't want something then normally you would do what is needed to be done to avoid it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    The dates they gave definitely were not based on the evidence they had at the time, they knew from previous lockdowns that the numbers don't go down that quickly so that's simply not true.

    It won't keep the unvaccinated away from the vaccinated as much as possible, it just stops them going into pubs and nightclubs. They are still going to be mixing absolutely everywhere else over the busiest time of the year. The difference is going to be miniscule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    You can not create and deposit fat from thin air. Apart from the camp guards, there were no fat people liberated from extermination camps at the end of WW2, no matter what metabolic disorders they had. Fat goes in through the mouth, and that's the beginning and end of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,348 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,113 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    To those criticising fat people, it's not always to do with over indulging. I know somebody who could not loose weight. They finally found out that they had various food allergies. So don't assume people are fat because they eat too much, you don't know anything about them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    Yeah they could just be big boned. Massive arse bone and gigantic belly bone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,348 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    There are an abundance of ignorant people out there, Skimpydoo, who think they have the answer for everything that medical science doesn't by a quick scroll through a ' health' website or by reading some influencer's story in the daily rag.

    We wil not be changing the minds, of those who don't even read posts properly.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Sesshoumaru


    People who can't adapt to the world as it is now are the ones who are whining about others who are capable of adapting. Not everyone needs a cubicle to work. There are lots of jobs that can be done more productively without wasting time on commutes, damaging the environment and also helping to support the local economy by working from home offices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    If people take the easy wins such as wearing masks on public transport and in shops etc. then the other things become more possible. The couple of times I've had to get on public transport over the past few months I've noticed a complete disregard for simple measures. Those people are pissing away other people's past sacrifices and everyones potential future gains for nothing except laziness and ignorance.

    To the poster moaning above that people should go on the dole instead of working, well if you actually really want people to be back working (rather than just talking about it) then wear your mask when you can. That is how things get back to normal.

    Numbers are huge today. But the last time they were this bad the hospitals were getting overrun. So I can't understand why others are whinging about being "fooled" by the vaccine. We have hardly any restrictions now relatively speaking and yet we are still managing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It is nothing to do with "justified". They will do it if it is necessary unfortunately. It won't be done based off peoples' acquiescence



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You are right. As mentioned above you will see the lazy ones who have no interest in getting the country back to normality. And they are fairly obvious about it. They are the ones who can't even be arsed to properly wear a mask and observe social distancing in the few places it is mandated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    But is it necessary? With our high vaccine rate? I plan on getting a booster when the time comes but then that's it. It's time to move on and accept that the virus will be here for a very long time and accept the new reality. The government needs to invest in more icu beds instead of taking the "easy road" via lockdowns, if of course they actually plan on initiating another lockdown, it's all speculation at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You might not be saying that if you have an upcoming procedure scheduled in the hospital and it is cancelled 2 weeks out and put back by 6 months because the hospitals are dealing with a surge. The virus will be here and we need to learn to live with it. But that means knowing how to manage it and behave appropriately. Some people appear to think that "learning to live with" means pretending it doesn't exist.


    I don't want more lockdowns. Which is why I get frustrated seeing people not making a slight effort to do the easy things right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy


    A complete overhaul of our health service with increased funding would solve that, but good luck with that in Ireland. I lost an uncle to cancer last January so I'm aware of the issue with crowding. It's simply not realistic to lockdown whenever the going gets tough with high case numbers. The cost to our sanity and economy will be immense. Again, I'm speculating, hopefully it won't happen.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 186 ✭✭CivilCybil


    I don't mind the country getting back to normal. But if a person is at high risk of actually dying from contracting covid and they can do their job from home I don't understand the issue?

    I've been working from home since march 2020 with no issues, meeting targets etc etc. I'm high risk, have had my booster. Work from a socially distanced office. Happy enough so far. But am not keen on going back without any social distancing when I know there's people who won't get their vaccine sitting near me and people who will come in sick etc.

    I can work perfectly well from home, keep myself safe and let people who aren't high risk back to the office without having to wear masks etc.

    I don't think I should throw away 20+ years of education and experience and sign onto social welfare. Who will that benefit. But working from home will benefit me and my health plus benefit my employer, plus I pay taxes etc etc. Seems very short sighted to suggest all high risk people who might prefer to work from home should pack in their jobs and go on social welfare



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Stephen Donnelly was on Prime Time earlier and part of his and the government's plan to combat the latest Covid wave is to have people behave responsibly. Something Donnelly think is easily achievable. Sadly as we know that's not the case, so don't be surprised if another lockdown is around the corner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Why would another lockdown be around the corner? Hospital numbers are reducing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    whether it may be necessary or not going forward is not an answer we can give you since we don't have all of the information that would be required to make that decision.

    if everyone does what they are supposed to do however, i would suspect we might be able to avoid another lock down now that we have a high vaccine rate, but that is just my own personal view based on the information that is available.

    investing in more ICU beds absolutely should happen, but it's not as simple as going out and buying a bunch of beds as i am sure you are aware, you need to staff and equip them and that does take time.

    you have to get all of the tenders together so as to decide who will supply everything and that takes time, as well as training the staff which takes even more time.

    so unfortunately it cannot be done over night, or done quickly.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,494 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    if everyone does what they are supposed to do

    What does that mean?

    What is everyone supposed to do?



  • Registered Users Posts: 48 oookkkaaayyy




    I agree. But the government had more than enough time to sort out the icu beds issue. Here's an, perhaps extreme example of what should have been done: business insider .com how china built a new hospital in ten days (I can't post links but Google that to see what I'm talking about). Obviously we don't need one as large as that facility but if the government had of collectively rubbed all 5 of their braincells together then we'd be in a better position than we are now. The staffing issue is a tricky one but it can be solved with investments into hiring and training new staff. Here's an article stating this: www. irishexaminer .com Investment in ICU beds and staffing long overdue, warns consultant.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 483 ✭✭Fred Astaire


    They hired 1% of the 73,000 applicants for the Be on Call drive.

    They can take a running jump before daring to talk about staffing numbers. Absolute spoofing cretins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,522 ✭✭✭✭noodler


    ICU beds are a misnomer for me.

    Take us up the EU average overnight, fine, click of the finger, what does that mean? Does it mean 3000/4000 cases a day are sustainable?

    Does it mean regular hospital capacity won't be impacted (because of the interconnected nature of hospitals)?

    No to both really.


    We probably need an elective only hospital or a covid only hospital but these are years away even if the will was there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,230 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    more then enough time in that increases were needed long before covid certainly, but realistically if they had started just as covid hit it is unlikely that the needed increases would be here now, at least not the staff.

    to be honest no western country would be able to build infrastructure as quick as china.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr


    How far along are they in the process? Have they started? 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,348 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yep. 65 ICU beds open and staffed and another 20 on the way by January . Need about 80 more for our population needs , at least, but medical and nursing staff with the qualifications take a bit longer .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 733 ✭✭✭marilynrr



    I see there was an increase of 7 in 2017, 8 in 2018 and 6 in 2019 so some of the increase from 2020/2021 would have already been planned anyway.

    It's not great is it to only have an extra 50 or so when we are this far into a pandemic!

    Post edited by marilynrr on


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not surprised he didn’t answer this. This nonsense gets repeated again and again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,965 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Cases are increasing and a lockdown would be used to stop a hospital surge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Or maybe he just didn't stay up all night reading boards.ie. In fairness the question was posted after 11pm last night and it isn't half 9 yet.


    What do you think should be recommended that people should do if they want to minimize the spread of covid? Should they:

    A) Pretend it doesn't exist. Sure doesn't medical evidence from Facebook says if you pretend it does exist, then you can't catch it and it will go aware

    B) Follow simple guidelines such as washing hands and also wearing facemasks in crowded enclosed public areas. Get your vaccine when offered. Make sure you get your booster when offered. If you have any symptoms, isolate and have a test done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,757 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    I'd love an answer on this. They usually imply they people shouldn't be socialising indoors, shouldn't attend busy pubs or nightclubs, shouldn't attend large events or matches. And Fintan, if everyone does what they're supposed to do we'll be able to keep pubs, nightclubs, events and matches open. The behaviours they attach to keeping society open don't actually match with society being open.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    How can we be more than 18 months into this and you still don't know what the basic recommendations are?

    1) Wear mask in crowded public areas - especially the likes of public transport.

    2) If you have symptoms, isolate and get a test done.

    3) Take your vaccine, and any booster, when offered

    It's no wonder that that the numbers are flying up. How have you not noticed any changes over the past 18 months compared to previously? Did you not realise that something was going on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,757 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    All of those things are the very basics, and they will not keep numbers down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,921 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Wear mask in crowded public areas - especially the likes of public transport.

    But does this include arenas like nightclubs and gigs? Is it realistic to expect people to do this? And if not should they have been allowed to reopen at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    You'd better get onto the scientific and medical communities with your findings. Those lads have been wasting their lives researching and putting those techniques into practice for years when some randomer on an internet message board could have just saved them a lot of bother and put them straight.


    How on earth do you come to the conclusion that people isolating and getting a test when they have symptoms won't keep numbers down??????????



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,473 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    No. The recommendations are that you can get away without masks in certain circumstances. There is a level of infection that is manageable. But we have to keep control of it. So you have to prioritize - do you want to wear a mask in a nightclub (and close it down if that is not obeyed) or do you want to wear a mask on a bus?


    If people won't wear the mask on the bus then we might need to close the nightclub. Take the easy wins to keep the numbers down to manageable levels to allow things to get back to somewhat normal



  • Advertisement
Advertisement