Sexual assault at high school in the State of Virginia.

No nor you and neither do the tiny minority who are attacking woman and girls who don't want men or teenage boys in their changing areas or toilets .

I think some posters think if she arranged to meet him in a janitors closet he magically would have acted like the perfect gentleman.

I don't think that "all men are dangerous". That cannot be anything but a deliberate mis-reading of my post. Men are far more likely to commit violent and sexual crime than women, and women are often the victims of those violent and sexual crimes. Perhaps you disagree with this. If so, present evidence to the contrary.

You may also wish to respond to the post I made earlier, where I provided thirteen examples of something happening that you had confidently stated never happens and never will happen.

You may not see women's bathrooms (or any other female-only space, for that matter) as being a "safe space" for women, and that is entirely your prerogative. But many women do, and their safety concerns—grounded in actual instances of their fears coming true for other women and children—should not be sacrificed on the altar of someone's potential hurt feelings.

To quote you from earlier in the thread: You do not speak for all women.

Of course this is all nonsense as was Your earlier post.

You state that if people saw a man going jnto a woman's toilet and reported it Might save some of the women and children in the cases you mentioned above. This is completely false.

I read through all the cases pertaining to bathrooms. Not one of them supports your point.

Case 1: man hid a camera in gender neutral toilets. That was not a man entering a womans toilet. Nobody would have called and reported him due to seeing a man entering a women's toilet because that didn't happen. They would have seen a man entering a toilet for both men and women.

Case 2: Woman assaulted in gender neutral toilets in a nightclub in Bristol. Again was not a man entering a women's toilet.

Case 3: trans woman assaults 10 year.old.girl in UK supermarket toilets. Even if you are transphobic and consider the offender to be male, they appear from their pic to present quite feminine. If you want people to take "safeguarding measures" against people they suspect are trans then you're going to get a lot of embarrassing incidents for cis women who present masculine, butch lesbians etc. And if you are restricting it to cis men who present as men and enter women's bathrooms well this isn't a case of that. So again your supposed safeguarding measures amount to zero extra safety in this case.

Case 4: trans woman assaults girl in bathroom in US: did you even read this one? It was a home bathroom not a public bathroom. Are you going to start reporting trans people or.men using their own home toilets 🙄

Case 5: man grabbed Walmart employee In women's bathroom. The only one that's even slightly relevant to this thread as it's a cis man in a womans bathroom. And like this case it has nothing to do with trans people using women's bathrooms.

So out of the 5 cases you gave about bathrooms:

2 were cis men in gender neutral bathrooms

1 is a trans woman in a woman's bathroom.

1 is a trans woman in a house bathroom.

1 is a cis man in a woman's bathroom.

Only one of them is even vaguely similar to this case and could be prevented by people intervening if they see a man enter a women's bathroom.

So no there would not be a wonderful increase in safety in these cases as you claim.

And by the way your use of "trabs-identified male" is gross.

It's equally interesting that posters who are very much 'not all men' when the conversation is about whichever recent event where a woman was attacked in a 'conventional sense' but reading this thread it appears many are of the opinion that even though a female might be attacked in a very rare and specific way, every step should be taken to ensure that does not happen in this specific way.

That's nice

Not at all. You're still a man and still a male. People only use the word cis when discussing trans issues.

So they should provide an alternative word to use in discussion.

Why would they need an alternative word - man or a woman suffices. If you want to label people outside those norms then give them names like trans, binary etc

A man or woman who in the absolute essence of the meaning of the word is just that doesn't need another description of who they are because some people want to describe them as some kind of abnormality of what being male or female means to fit their agenda of sexuality is not one of the other

Being gay doesn't mean you are not a man and think of yourself as a man, ditto for a lesbian and so on

Don't label me with some pejorative term

Pejorative term is cis man - I'm not a cis man, I'm a man/male

Rest of your comment makes no sense - a trans man or woman is the opposite of their birth assigned gender, go ahead and have sex change surgery or live life as the gender you feel you are. You don't chop and change everyday as it suits you tho.

I don't need to meet you half way on anything - you can call me man, quite simple really but don't make up some new gender name you want to refer to me as and I won't insult you with some insulting terminology to describe you