Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty

I was replying to the the fact another poster saying someone else lied because be wasn't shot in the back ,

He was 4 foot away when he was shot

I think he's a right wing idiot why would he go to a protest armed with a rifle which he has no legal right to carry, the judge in the case seems to be a racist too,

The right wing in America survives by making everything into a culture war the clothes you wear, where you buy food, what beer you drink eg some senators said young men spend to much time playing video games because they are under attack by Liberal women

Young men have been playing videogames since the PlayStation 1 was released. You are not allowed in bars in USA under the age of 21

Every week right wing Americans are dying of covid because they refuse to wear masks or get vaccinnated

It's yet to be proven that Rittenhouse was carrying the rifle illegally.

I've a link posted earlier where a US lawyer breaks down the penal code in simple language and explains why he thinks it wasn't illegal for Rittenhouse to be in possession of the rifle.

This made me chuckle.

His own friend who purchased the rifle on his behalf was holding it until he turned 18 because he wasn't legally allowed to purchase or own it , until he turned 18

It wasn't denied. It was presented as evidence by the pathologist that a bullet entered his back.

And it's a criminal trial, not a "Gatling gets to decide everything" event. The evidence is the only thing that's relevant.

He was shot in the back ....

There is nothing else to add I'm not doing anything or deciding,

I backed up what was denied and several people called liars for suggesting he was shot in the back ,

Fact he was shot in the back ,

No amount of bs or Junior CSI will change that

Yesterday it was a talking point leaked to all the usual suspects so if you follow them chances are you probably think he is.

Amusing as the same people who are calling him racist would defend Biden for using the negro word Yesterday.

On the case, not sure really, he should not have been their, but its probably self defense.

I don't think he is the hero that some on the right are saying, nor do I think he is as evil as the other side are saying.

Its going to be very ugly no matter the result though.

The new video which isn't very clear (even after its been enhanced) shows him charging hands out, and falling forwards. Which explains the pattern of the shots and way he had powder burns. Its not clear if he grabbed the rifle or hit it with his hand reaching for it, or swatting it.

It's a bit of an ecumenical matter.

A round went through his back but it wasn't the first one that entered the sack of sh85.

So while he was shot in the back it was not the first one.

Shot in the back makes it sounds like he was talking to his granny and he was shot between the shoulder blades.

Again people are clearly making stuff up ,

Have I said he was running away when shot in back ,No

Have I said he was just randomly standing there and having a chat when he was shot in the back -No

Have I implied anything other reason -No

So here we are

And yes he was convicted of sexual assaulting a minor a few years back ,he was also a victim of horrific sexual abuse from a very early age till his teens,he was also mentally ill

I didn't say you said those things but it needed clarification, for the public, in my mind. As I said it was an ecumenical matter.

This is just nonsense. How could he prevent MORE people from being killed if he was the first person killed.

According the pathologist. The first wound had power burns and debris. His hand was either on the barrel or right beside it. In the video, they were both running. Rittenhouse away from Rosenbaunm and Rosenbaunm chasing and catching him. He caught him otherwise he wouldn't have powder burns.

He fell towards Rittenhouse due to his momentum. Which explains the pattern and the order of the shots. I didn't really understand it until I saw the video.

You have to consider the reason a mentally ill person was out wandering through a riot and a kid was there with a rifle is entirely down to US society, health service, gun control everything. Trying to pin this any one part of that is senseless.

That said we have long history of violence ourselves and violent crime. I wouldn't be throwing stones.

This Rosenbaum person - is he the one convicted of raping five kids aged 9-11?