Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pensions Age to ..... 72 !?

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭dotsman


    I don't think you understand public debt or leprechaun economics works. Comparing anything to GDP in this country is going to give extremely misleading results. To use another simple metric - we have more public debt per capita than any other EU country. Every single man, woman and child owes €50,000. Given most of the population don't pay income tax, it works out at well over €100,000 per taxpayer. But given that the majority of income tax is paid by those earning over 50K, we are talking about every major income tax payer owing several hundred grand each.

    It is all down to how we service this debt. Are you happy to slash 10 Billion from spending (what kind of public sector layoffs or paycuts would we be talking?)? Or raise 10 Billion in additional income tax (gonna have to lower the tax bands to make sure even minimum wage earners pay the 20%, while the marginal rate would kick in only a little above that, with probably a third band (50%) kicking on on those earning over 50K). Either one would cause massive social upheaval, destroy the economy and likely trigger another property crash (bringing all that private debt into doubt). Except, this time, we can't borrow to bail ourselves out again. Because, when interest rates rise - and they will - we will be paying 10-20 billion in interest alone - every single year. Hell, despite the past number of years being relatively zero or even negative interest, we are still paying more in interest (4 billion) than we do on justice today.

    Oh, and one final thing - we are still borrowing. Not for capital investment or anything, just keeping the country afloat. So we already need to slash and burn spending just to stop borrowing.

    This is akin to someone clocking up a credit card bill several times their annual salary. And they are still continuing to spend more than they earn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    When the PRSI fund is in deficit, which is increasingly common, it does.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,443 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    No it most definitely is not. We need actual workable solutions not an excuse for racism and narrow mindedness.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,443 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    No we can’t, the current pension system is no more sustainable in Ireland than it is any other EU state. Ireland has a relatively young and productive force and as a long term net exporter the country was able to reduce its national debt from a high point of around 124% down to around 68%. But without an inflow of young workers the workforce will begin to decline and that ability will fall off. That is why we are needing to deal with the issue in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s neither racist or narrow minded to control your borders, population and wellbeing of your taxpaying citizens as your priority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    We were and still are already paying for water through our motor taxes. A lot of what the Govt is saying is scare mongering to force more people to start pensions earlier,short of actually making it compulsory to start one as soon as you join the workforce. It would serve the Govt better if they increased the maximum allowable pension pot so that people can save more. They moan about the cost of pensions yet they won't establish a State pension fund to put monies aside for future pensions. They also talk as if a paid out pension is dead money; it's not. For the most part,pension money is spent as soon as it is recieved and it is back in circulation in the economy and inevitably finds it's back into State coffers as direct or indirect tax anyway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Motor tax was drastically reduced in 2008 depending on CO2 rates. Do you think that the cost of maintenance of roads or water reduced by the same amount? No. Then how can you still be paying for water through car tax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The idea that we're paying for water through our motor tax is risible! Where did you get that? Some Paul Murphy propaganda pamphlet through the door?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    People usually put up the same grainy screenshot of the bill that removed the old council by council water rates in the 1990s and replaced it by LGF funding.

    Outdated, revoked legislation being rabbited by those that don't understand it to begin with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭Multipass


    How many employers are going to employ 70yr olds? Maybe the public service desk jobs will carry on until that age, but for many sectors it’s going to be a huge burden having workers in physical and cognitive decline. There will be huge numbers on the dole before reaching pension age.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    People are going to have to get used to - and prepare for - moving to lower responsibility/lower pressure jobs toward the end of their careers. Everything has been structured with the idea of you retiring from the top, and final salary pensions in the public sector (now gone for new entrants) were a clear part of this.

    When pensions came in, the age was 70 and the average health of someone at 70 was far, far worse than the health of someone at that age now. But you didn't continue doing the same job all the way to the end.

    I already know of plenty of cases already of people who were perfectly capable of doing their current job when promoted to it; but are absolutely lost / failing in it by their late 50s due to early decline.

    Problem is there's plenty of people with mortgages going at the full repayment rate till 65/66 already, and without significant inflation those payments will become unserviceable if they drop to lower paid employment towards the end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    My mother saves a hundred quid per week on the state pension, often more than a hundred



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s going to get like the US so. Where you go into a supermarket and see 70 plus year olds stacking shelves and working the checkouts... why ? because they have to.

    their quality of life being abused having paid in all their lives, just so we and they can support the new arrivals? Fûck that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The "new arrivals" are going to be the ones paying the tax to pay those pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    My post was deleted?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe



    No. It was posted on several threads during the time of the water protests and it was shown that local councils were empowered to divert monies from the accumulated road tax in each county instead of passing it directly back to central Govt. It saved the bother of having to ask for it back,administratively,for each Council. So,the councils embraced it enthusiastically and instead of having lads going around filling potholes, they went around patching the many leaks in the pipe network. As long as each council passed back a certain amount, they could retain an amount proportionate to the size of their population. The upside for councils was that they could address genuine water quality issues and get money from Europe for doing so and stop wasting money on pothole filling to humour county councillors. That was the whole point of paying your road tax in your county of residence;the money had an effect ,locally, instead of the perception that it was ringfenced for big urban areas. I'm not making this up out of my head.Murphy and others pointed it out at the time and he was laughed at until the relevant by-laws were pointed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Well done,her, but that money is simply at rest for now and will be spent in future so it will be hit by VAT at some point so some of it will go back to the coffers in time. Pensions are not a one-way street. I always find it incredible that you can contribute a great many taxes to the State for 40 years and more yet when you want 13 grand a year back and usually live for about 20 years after retirement, the state reacts as if you are stealing from their pockets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    well said, and a good percentage of that 13,000 goes back into the state coffers via VAT you pay on purchases, around 23%...give or take.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,994 ✭✭✭c.p.w.g.w


    How does the government dipping into private pensions actually work in real terms?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    By putting duty or a percentage when you want to draw it. Or by reducing the untaxed amount you can take out. These are the little things you have to pay attention to when the Minister is reading out the Budget and after droning on for a few hours, slips it in that "pension duty has gone up from 0.5% to 0.75%". No-one notices until they read the small print and realise that the Minister has just stung the pension holder for a few hundred a year more. His pension is safe and secure but yours has just been "raided" and there's nothing you can do about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It's Ireland, what would you expect. Worlds highest inheritance taxes, one of the highest CGTs in existance. DIRT - must be the worlds highest because no one else is stupid enough to have one. Deemed disposal of ETFs so they can get their hands on CG you haven't realised. Does any other country have that one? VRT... levies on all forms of insurance that already cop a massive 23% VAT.

    One day this country might wake up and ask itself why it has one of the least efficient and highest paid civil services on the planet, besides the cute answer that if it didn't, the taxes might need to be reduced or some even done away with.

    Due to just the health issues associated with aging, 72 is disgusting.

    Give the civil service a pay rise and then extend the pension age. The neck. Glad I decided to emigrate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    It’s turning into an even more dangerous, unfair, unhealthy, divisive, unsafe, malevolent kip of a place to live...

    where rewards and handouts are free and plentiful for those not or whom haven’t contributed... cash, property, healthcare etc... but those who try get off their holes, sacrifice to make something of themselves are denied help, support and opportunities at every fûcking turn, this pension idea should be proof 100%...yet are expected to fund that help for others out of their own sweat and hard work... this country is a dump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,909 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    again, it truly is down to embracing public debt, its not as dangerous as we think it is, we should be trying to use some of this public debt(money), and literally just give it to citizens to spend, it worked very well in relation to pandemic payments



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Just wait for the climate emergency taxes to hit. Their recently announced plan of action is without exageration, terrifying. It includes stuff like 1.5 Gw of solar, which simply is not economically viable in such a cloudy country, where only 14% of the hours in a year of actual sunshine. The only way that solar will be built is with substantial subsidies. There have been several chancers already lobbying the government for subsidies so they could go ahead and build their money printing machines driven off the taxpayers purse, while they retire to the Cayman islands, like a large number of the Scottish and UK wind farm owners. Currently 10% of gov't revenue comes from taxes and charges on ICE. They have been offering subsidies - pension money - to get people to buy EV's. Every EV not only costs the gov't, it elimates part of the 10% money generator. Then ther's the subsidy to install a charging point, toll exemptions, negligable registration fees. Im semi suprised it's only 72.

    Then you have the push to retrofit and upgrade buildings and a massive big stick will be required to disuade people from cheap kerrosene and get them to put in very expensive heat pumps - €25,000? - no bother, lucky I don't already have a mortgage to pay, don't need to buy an expensive EV due to 'incentives', and have several times that amount just lying around not already paying carbon taxes, so even though the break even is several decades away (if it doesn't need repairs) sign me up. /s

    The whole response to the 'climate emergency' will be so expensive that the pension will probably have to be eliminated entirely - of course you don't actually, being a bunch of cute hoors, you just raise the age to 84.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I'm not sure where this will end up. On the one hand we have the plan to raise the pension age, and even to support the present system, we need an ever growing increase in the Nrs working. And on the other hand we have the situation of AI and automation reducing the nr of available jobs......



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You're not going too get much work out of a person in their 70s. Physical work, forget it. Office work? Not even, rsi will be widespread. Remember Office work for previous generations involved lots of walking around searching for Physical files, going to the fax etc. Today it's click click click.

    Decades of that all day long will ruin your wrists, forearms, neck and back too.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I suspect you'll end up with loads on the dole and of those who still have mortgages some will work, others will effectively sell to the bank to stay In their homes.

    There will of course be some who can and will work on and enjoy it. Just like today.

    For most it's a massive smack in the face and backwards step



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Over in the UK


    nobody is really thinking this through..workplace accidents will rise,nobody will want an older worker etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    A lot of people plus 65 will end up ‘going sick’ ... more pressure on younger colleagues and the business financially... it’s a boneheaded move...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    I hope that you are right.....do you have any areas in mind?? Now while its not going to happen overnight, we are in the dying days of vehicle's needing drivers. All new EVS are automatic transmissions, and HGV have been heading for automatic transmission for a long time now. This is all leading to driverless transportation. All computer controlled, if you think that's a crazy idea, just think how many people sit into their cars each day and switch on their SatNavs....thousands of them, and they are all working at the same time. So its not such a big step to have them actually drive the car to its destination. When they can fly drones many thousands of miles away from their base, and control them, putting the same technology into vehicles is the logical next move. Just think how many jobs will that eliminate? And that's just one area. Even in the supermarkets now, its hard to find one that does not have several self-service checkouts in operation. Lots of jobs going to be lost, I think anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    One of the lucky ones so, good luck to her. A friend of mine, living solely on his pension, is finding it hard going. He lives 15 miles away from the nearest town / city, and neither smokes, drinks or gambles. His one extravagance is his car and this he needs as he lives in a rural area, 15 miles out from the nearest city, and no public service. I know him very well, and when he says that he is now counting the pennies, I believe him absolutely. Considering all the price increases in recent times, he is really worried as to how he will get on during the winter, once these price rises filter into the system. He will not be the only one either.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    When did pension age first hit 65 and what was the average lifespan then, what was the typical health of an average 65 year old?


    Seems only obvious that if longevity and health improve then you have to allow for a simple recalibration every now and again in age-related benefits


    Whats the problem folks?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Problem is people should be enabled to enjoy their lives at that point free of the requirement to have to go to work and having paid in, should be of the ability to get something back at 65...

    rest, a pension and absolute enjoyment of life... anything getting in the way of that is bolloçksology.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why 65?


    You've avoided the question, and the point?


    Why not 40, so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,536 ✭✭✭touts


    I was young enough (late 20s) in the last recession to realise that there will be a couple of more before I hit retirement and they will screw me badly each time. So I have planned my retirement on the idea that since I'm stupid enough to have a private pension I won't get any state pension. If I'm wrong then it will be a bonus. But I upped my contributions to allow for no state support at all. It's a pain but it's the smart thing to do. I'm going to retire at 65 and the state can't do a thing to stop me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,580 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Thats the way anyone starting out now should plan, base it on the fact that by the time you will retire, there will only be the most basic of pensions available. ( if at all !! )



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Some people live to 120 but I`d bet they are useless to the workforce the last 50 years of their life.

    UK but relevant:

    "About two-thirds of men and three-quarters of women now reach the age of 75, according to the ONS


    Remember life expectancy is an average. We live longer but because of medical intervention. Your last few years can involve cancer treatment. Cancer is the leading cause of death.


    It actually doesnt matter a bit what any of us think. The reality is you cannot get blood from a stone and it`ll cost in unemployment payments or in a pension. With jobs for life a complete thing of the past and contract after contract for many people you can expect a very high unemployment rate for those in their 70s. Ageism is a well known thing when it comes to employment. People also generally do not want to work into their 70s.

    The labour force participation decreases and unemployment increases the older you get after a peak in the 35-44yr old age group in men and the 24-35yr old age group in women (likely due to child rearing but it never recovers).

    It is all in here for those interested https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-wamii/womenandmeninireland2016/employment/

    Great recipe for workplace productivity. I can imagine all the workplace claims for bad backs etc. Nobody will want to touch a 70yr old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Story doesn't add up unless not as frugal as claimed



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Because people are at peak productivity at 40, there is also a period when they can pass on their experience to younger staff.

    Pensions were brought in during an era of lower life expectancy. They were also tougher economic times. We have far more productivity these days. We have far better economies so it is not a straight forward comparison.

    How about you work till you drop dead and leave the rest of us alone. You are in the vast minority on this one. The only people who want this are those who will never be affected by it and those who have nothing else in their lives other than work. Go get a hobby.

    The people landing this on us are some of the same people who blew the national pension reserve fund through their mismanagement. They, of course, all have gold plated pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,302 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    Post edited by Mr. teddywinkles on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,834 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    An article I’m reading suggests that we pay the 14th highest tax rate across the board on all taxes, in the world..... yet we might have to wait till we are half dead to get a pension... nice



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The idea that just because i can see the sense in the basic concept means that you think its somehow my problem and not yours, or that you somehow have a licence to whinge at me as if i caused it to arise is frankly pretty childish.


    We live longer, healthier. There's nothing magic about 65 except that we are used to it, but the factors behind that change.

    If the weatherman tells you its due to rain do you bark at the telly?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28 veil


    If you work for 30 years, you are pensionable; I believe is above the minimal; pension and gratuity are different....🤨



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users Posts: 28 veil


    Total pensionable service; Total years work

    Pensionable qualify years: Minimum year you must work to be pensionable.... From 10 years or so.

    Pension payable age; age you must attain before payment is paid out, though there are some exception.



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    40 full years for a full pension. Still stands.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28 veil


    That's maximal..... State law in relation to tax matter ( Accounting).

    This comment makes me🙂 even when I don't want to.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement