Princess Diana - was she murdered?

I'm pretty sure I have seen this picture before. It is not recently released. A Google image search discloses that it has been used in literally hundreds of newspapers article about Diana and/or her death.

Who took it? The same search suggests that it is credited to Jacques Langevin/PA. Langevin was one of the paparazzi who photographed Diana and Dodi as they left the Ritz, and who followed them into the tunnel.

There's nothing in the picture to indicate whether it was taken as they pulled away from the Ritz (Diana might be looking back at somebody standing outside the hotel?) or at a later point on the journey.

Henri Paul and Trevor-Rees Jones seem to be avoiding a bright light because they are, in fact, looking into a bright light. Note that both their faces are fully illuminated from straight in front. So is the back of Diana's head, in the back seat, so this light is pretty much at eye level, directly in front of the car, and shining right though the car and out the back.

Extremely likely that the bright light (or lights) are the flashes from Langevin and the other paparazzi photographers.

I see nothing in this picture to contradict, undermine or call into question the conventional account of how Diana died.

This is a weird one for me.

There is questionable stuff around the accident itself but a lot of the theories to explain them are iffy too.

I never understood why the Brits loved her so much. She was never the ‘peoples princess’ as she was from a noble family. She also aired out their families dirty laundry on air while her children were in boarding school. Then shacks up with a Muslim playboy millionaire when her son is going to be the future head of the English church. Both seem very selfish and short sighted. The whole thing was a sordid affair.

I think the vast vast majority of the population think she was in a car accident, and died due to the fact it was travelling at high speed and she wasn't wearing a seatbelt.

However, this is a forum where people will believe the daftest theories, so I have no doubt many regulars will maintain she eas whacked by the royal family.

That pic has been around for years. Nothing controverisal- from one on the papparazzi on site I would assume. In fact, I believe the guy who took it had to jump out of the way.

Remember this was before online/Cloud based automatic uploads so it would have be developed the old fashioned way and the camera may well have been taken as evidence for a period of time hence a delay in it being released/publically available- not like today where everything is pretty miuch in real time.

She died in a car crash. End of as far as I am concerned. Obviously that is far too mundane and too much of a "common" way to die for some dreamers to handle.

LOL. Just be quiet. You've discredited yourself. 1+1 = 2.

Brad Barker

, PhD in physics

Answered 3 years ago · Author has 606 answers and 265.6K answer views

Originally Answered: What are scalar waves, and what is the purpose of it?

A scalar wave is a wave-like disturbance in a scalar field. What's a scalar field? Think of temperature maps, with contours for particular temperatures and colors in between. The temperature T along a particular contour has a shape determined by T(x,y)=To, where x and y are the spatial coordinates and To is the particular value.

If we can specify T at every x and y, it is a scalar field. Why “scalar”? It means the object is just a single number.

The scalar field has a wave pattern if there is one or more characteristic length-scales for some repeating patterns. There can be independent sets for both x and y. If there are more dimensions, then they get an I dependent set too.

Usually the wave has a time dimension, so now imagine the temperature map changing with time, like moving slides. We now have a function T(x,y,t), with t for time. It may show repetition, which has the scale determined by values of frequency. A function where the frequency and wavelength together determine a sense of motion is a wave. That is, there is some particular function v(f,lambda), in addition to T(x,y,t). A plane-wave has v=f*lambda.

He wasn't drunk, that's come out since. Mistake was made with his sample.

Well, exactly. The least plausible part of this whole thing is that a French police force & court would cover up a British MI mission on French soil, and find a Frenchman at fault. I have no doubt there was something of a sigh of relief from some royal quarters when she died, but if it was assassination they were after, it would definitely have been easier to pull off something low-key at home, like an apparent suicide.

Are you sure? Because I can't find any information on that. Between the crash and the official ruling, there'd certainly been all sorts of questions thrown around over it. Including his parents' assertion that he couldn't have been drunk and they'd never seen their son get drunk. It turned out that he was in fact an alcoholic who was on prescription medication at the time and several hotel staff testified that he was visibly drunk.

You are claiming that Princess Diana was killed in a conspiracy with mind control rays, correct or no?

If yes, please share all the details you have of that conspiracy (no other conspiracies or anything else, just that the specific plot to kill Princess Diana)

Mind control technology is real technology. Yes, Diana's driver was owned and made to crash the car against his free will. It's tied to Epstein and Maxwell, who both hated Diana, this is well documented. She found out about their kiddy **** parties. Lots of kiddy fuckers use this technology I am aware of it for reasons I'm not going to disclose at this time.

What do you think, I just came on here and I would take the whole world for a fool and make a wild claim that has no substance.

I'm often in the habit of also making the claim that you can turn water in to wine. :)

Now instead of playing message pong and having you label me as crazy, let's do this. Let's place a bet, I'll lay you 5/1 on any amount you want that I'm proven to be correct. End of discussion, furthermore, if you accept the bet, you are liable for defamation damages for trying to label me crazy. Shhhhhhh shhhhh now. Put your money where your mouth is or hush up.

I don't need to provide evidence, the media will do that for me in due course.

Either you accept the bet, or you be quiet.

FYI, water can be turned in to wine. :)

"Yes, Diana's driver was owned and made to crash the car against his free will"

Okay, how exactly?

Here's three names for you that members of AGS will be acutely familiar with. Frank Weston, his daughter Michelle Weston and his son Jason Weston (one sick puppy). I'll mention two things regarding Abe Lincoln. Nazis and the Tall Whites. No conspiracy is ever true if everyone has a closed mind, right?

The

You should look in to the premonitions bureau. There's no such thing as premonitions, both science and technology explains everything in this Universe, there are some startling premonitions

I gather you're not taking the bet, smart man.

Tapping out here, there's a big scandal about to break. Believe it, don't believe it, it's up to you. Don't bother wasting your time trying to discredit it, if it's just to make yourself feel better and or smarter than the information your questioning.

That's all, good night and God bless.

PS. I really can turn water in to wine.

A huge kiddy **** and kiddy killing ring tied to this technology. Enjoy the show. I trust you are not against children being protected and monsters that do this to kids being taken down.

I'm not answering any more questions. You were wise not to take the bet. Bizarre incidents of suicide won't be happening any more once they all go down.

PS. I really can turn water in to wine.

I would say at the time of death the car she was in would have been in the top 5 safest cars in the world to crash in, if there was a single car I'd like to be in a crash with that was it.