Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

Options
17277287307327331586

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Yeah, we're still doing OK according to the HPSC reports.

    In week 44 2021 (last week) there were 362 admissions (new cases rather) for Covid.

    In week 44 2019, there were 360 hospital admissions for respiratory illnesses, described as a "medium" level. Typical peak is 500-600 respiratory admissions per week.

    As of 7th November we still had only 2 confirmed 'flu cases this year.

    ICU capacity in Ireland typically runs at 90% occupancy on average across the whole year - much higher in winter, the use of surge capacity is basically standard process. This is why elective surgeries tend not to be scheduled between October and March if it can be avoided.


    Caveats:

    How many non-Covid admissions we have at the moment, I don't know. They don't appear to be publishing that data this year.

    We do know that RSV infections are off the charts, but the level in adults is low and they rarely result in adult hospitalisations.

    The seasonal ramp in 'flu cases tends to kick in around now. If we can keep 'flu mostly at bay until the new year, we should be OK. Luckily we are mostly still engaging in the behaviours that suppress 'flu.


    The big difference/big unknown is that typical respiratory illnesses don't translate to ICU quite as readily as Covid does. Vaccination and boosters should be enough, but like the rest of the world we just don't know.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    nobody should be doing the job that they aren't supposed to be doing. If you dropped your car into the garage for a full service, you'll want the mechanic to do it, not the pretty secretary who was filing her nails when you arrived. It's the same in a government - different people have different jobs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Of course it's their job - they are the health and scientific advisors, it is exactly their job.

    It's not their job to balance things like the economy with health, that is a government job. But when NPHET propose restrictions to combat the spread of covid, they absolutely should be taking human behaviour into account - if you dont how the hell can you model the effect those measures will have??



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,278 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Again this is an absolute farce of a situation! Not even 1 month of hospitality being somewhat fully open and boom it’s all the pubs fault!!




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Would you trust the advice from a committee whose modelling has almost always proven to be universally wrong?

    Hairdressers have always been the litmus test for me. You know you're too far gone when you need to close hairdressers on the frankly ridiculous assumption that hairdressers would somehow cause enormous outbreaks of infection throughout the country.

    Only a complete fool, or a member of NPHET, could argue that this was a sensible and proportionate action.

    Go to watch any NPHET briefing and all you hear is the same crap: "Wash your hands, reduce your social contacts, wear a mask, and be mindful of others".

    Wow. That's some advice that we really needed to hear from an advisory committee.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,317 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Looks like clubs are back on the agenda to be closed according to reports now.

    We're a scandalously Conservative country. A whole section of the population wanted them closed from day 1.

    More unemployment, more misery. More foreign trips to avail of night life abroad. More money leaving the country.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    I bloody wish it was.😄Yet another notification this morning, my head is itching thinking about it (and I bet yours is now too!).

    No I suppose I mean the mixing among kids has been so limited over the last 20 months, that every single thing that can go round now, is now doing it (and doing it on steroids) basically.To reduce the mixing through restrictions would just pause the merry go round for a bit and while I am not a fan of....letting?encouraging? ..my kids to get sick, I don't think it is right to create an artificial situation of healthiness, and then open the floodgates again to every bug (preferably not the crawling ones) in a few months time. It solves nothing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,035 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    lol, pub hours being shorter just means more "dense" socialising and maybe house parties too

    The real solution should be to extend opening hours, so you can have less people in at one time, and less contacts. You want premises to be less busy not more



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,906 Mod ✭✭✭✭shesty


    Going to assume he is speaking for himself there 🙄



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Currently 600 people in hospital. In January, the peak was 2,000.

    When it reaches or approximates toward that latter figure, then perhaps think about introducing restrictions.

    In the meantime, no - just no.

    The healthcare system is there to protect us, we are not here to protect them from receiving patients.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭bloopy




  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    This nonsense of "blaming the pubs" again.

    Nobody is blaming the pubs. The blame lies with dense socialising. Pubs are a location of dense socialising, which the government can exercise some control over. That's why they get hit with this.

    There are many other - and worse - locations of dense socialising, that the government can do **** all about.

    On one hand you have people screaming at the government to do something, and on the other hand you have a very limited amount that the government actually can do.

    If we really wanted to get on top of this without getting back into lockdowns, we would ban all household visits for everyone and limit socialising to activities outside of households. But that's basically not possible.

    So in the interests of doing something, they look at the next available options.

    It's all pissing in the wind, of course. We need the MVCs back to full capacity. 200k booster doses a week and the most vulnerable will be covered by Xmas. 300k/week and they'll be done in 3-4 weeks. Why they're pissing about with this, I don't know.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    So the solution to dense socialising is to limit the hours and thus encourage more dense socialising? Seems counter intuitive, and then they're not doing anything about other forms like college lectures or even bringing back contact tracing in schools.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Well that's what I'm saying, it's pissing in the wind. I don't think it would encourage more dense socialising. Some people who would otherwise have stayed in the pub till 12:30 will now go back to a house party. Others who would have stayed till 12:30 will go home instead.

    People aren't going to go back to a house party out of spite. But overall what difference does it make if someone is in the pub till 11 or 12:30? **** all really. It'll reduce your number of contacts by very little.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,064 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    It's all pissing in the wind, of course. We need the MVCs back to full capacity. 200k booster doses a week and the most vulnerable will be covered by Xmas. 300k/week and they'll be done in 3-4 weeks. Why they're pissing about with this, I don't know.

    @seamus d'ya think there's a need for a 24 hours, 5 days a week type rollout? Take Simon Coveney's offer of using the army to assist.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just lockdown the country for the next yr.get the Garda and the army out patrolling all the highways and byways burning diesel like it’s going out of fashion.food drops to the door of everyone in the county and anyone who is outside is immediately flogged to death.will be classified as a covid death. We all reappear in 2023 and get reintroduced to the world.😏



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,393 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The reason socialising was curtailed during lockdown as well was due to the fear factor. “I can’t go to a house party because I have an at risk relative”. That’s all gone out the window now people aren’t afraid of it like they were. Close the pubs and the house parties will return. There’s no real way out of this because public compliance will not be there and the pubs closing early is just burning money on extra PUP payments



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,973 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Ya, I'd agree there. It probably does encourage more socialising as pubs pack people in more to make up for the shortfall, and people also go we might actually lockdown again so best get out when I can.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ah, sure, it’s not the schools, it’s the pubs



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,848 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    How is NI coping ? Open before us lower vaccine uptake .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    15 x 7. 7am to 10pm, 7 days a week. 24 hour sounds like a good idea, but the reality is that very few people will take an appointment to get a booster dose in the middle of the night. Especially people over 50. For the vaccine, there was some suggestion that people would be willing to go that extra mile, but not for a booster. So you end up with staff sitting idle overnight in the MVC who could be administering a lot more doses during a daytime shift.

    What I don't understand is the reliance on the GP network for this. At the start of the year, we did it this way to ensure that shots were appropriately prioritised by making sure that practically all vulnerable people were contacted and identified by their GP.

    We don't need that anymore. Open the system for self-registration of anyone over 70, and just have at it. Anyone who can't figure out registration or can't get to an MVC can call their GP to get sorted. The most important thing now is getting boosters in arms, not making sure that over-80s are done before over-75's, before over-70s, etc.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    ICU also down today, by 3 to 114.



  • Registered Users Posts: 620 ✭✭✭aidoh


    It's insanity at this late stage in the game.

    The hysterical focus on covid and only covid is so harmful.

    E.G. in the past 2 weeks I was made aware of 3 cases in my local area where people had gone in for routine checkups, after outpatient cancellations and difficulties getting a GP appointment etc. due to the impact of covid on GP surgeries and outpatient services, only for it to come to light that they were riddled with cancer. One of those people has sadly died.

    What else could be going undiagnosed in Ireland?

    Had these people been diagnosed earlier perhaps the story would be different.

    I myself have been on a waiting list for 2 years, and have had outpatient appointments cancelled twice (even though its only triage over the fvcking phone at first anyway). Because of covid.

    There will sadly be no accountability either way I suppose. If there's one single thing the HSE decision-making class is good at, it's arse covering.

    All hospital restrictions have simply got to go now. Our hospital staff are generally amazing but I imagine the over the top red tape brought in by NPHET is slowing down the show even further.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    they'd rather blame the pubs 10 times over than admit there's a problem with schools



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    I'm sure our rulers have thought of all of this before, but just in case....If I were the Government, I would immediately be expanding Hospital and ICU capacity. There are closed wards in UHG, and many other hospitals nationwide that are not staffed. Infection control - it is not being managed in any sort of an effective way in our public hospitals. Day patients are not Covid tested - should they be antigen tested at least? Only admissions are required PCR negative - which discounts many many people going through the hospital system. This is money well spent going into the future with our rising and aging population rather than closing things down and putting people on PUP payments.

    I would also look at what the Europeans did last year, and what we should have done. Don't close anything down, just bring in more procedures re bubbles, pods and groups re indoor dining and drinking to ride through the wave. Pygmalion bar in Dublin have announced antigen testing being a requirement of all patrons - great idea. Others should follow suit. It doesn't catch 100% of cases but catches all those being missed by the utterly useless 'Covid cert' which is just being used as a coercion tool re vaccination - while they're simultaneously trying to convince the vaccinated that the vaccines aren't working anymore and they'll need 'boosters'.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,663 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    We can all argue about restrictions and this/that but I think we can all agree the HSE are making a complete and utter balls of this booster rollout. Snails pace. Get the army in and let them take over.



  • Registered Users Posts: 729 ✭✭✭SupplyandDemandZone


    Pubs closing earlier kite now been flown. You can smell whats coming a mile away. Have our Xmas party this weekend will be going heavy on the drink and socialising before they call a halt to it all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 444 ✭✭eastie17


    Kinda obvious that they should have done something more concrete about school ventilation months ago, one second google on that topic brings up this research from John Hopkins:

    Antigen is another tool and NPHET should be disbanded due to their incompetence over that topic alone. Its not foolproof but it at least allows people to check themselves.

    And the boosters, what sort of clown car are they driving that they think "we'll wait and see for boosters". The current **** show is all on them, health care workers should all have been done 2 months ago before winter.



  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We are an absolute joke at this point. A bunch of lads on 6 figure salaries are now sitting in a room trying to think of ways to get us to stop going to businesses that they reopened a few weeks back with all kinds of red tape involved. Will we return to the Covid is more dangerous after 10pm science?

    Should have just left them closed and admit that we are pathetic cowards with a terrible health service and no idea what to do.

    You just know Tony was licking his lips the minute another country brought in restrictions.

    This nonsense will drag on for years unless enough people start to actively oppose it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,636 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    I don't necessarily think they should be disbanded but the source of some of their more questionable statements needs to be scrutinised and if necessary, they can be reorganised.

    Calling antigen tests snake oil was wildly irresponsible. I get that they're less accurate then PCR, but why not just say that? Calling them snake oil completely undermines their effectiveness in the eyes of the public and gives the impression that they're useless.



Advertisement