Kyle Rittenhouse found not guilty

It's about as significant as crossing from Westmeath into Meath, but the US media thought it sounded good.

Back when the story broke I don't think they were certain that they had sufficiently propagandised their base as to have them repeat a narrative in obvious contradiction to all evidence. So "crossed state lines" acted as a placeholder until they realised that actually their audiences were that brainwashed after all, but by the time the media could fabricate and introduce such corkers as "he went there to hunt black people", it had already stuck with (particularly) Twitter's extremist left.

I believe that every state has different gun laws and in some circumstances it can be illegal to bring a gun across state lines without the proper authorisation.

It was originally believed that Rittenhouse had brought the gun across state lines but investigations proved this didn't happen. If Rittenhouse brought the gun across state lines on the night of the Kenosha shootings, he would have been guilty of an offence.....but this didn't happen. The gun was already in Wisconsin.

Infowars?

Rambo probably investigated for his connections to the Mujahideen

One of them, the convicted sex offender, did try commit suicide / take his own life, but that's informative but not of legal moment. However, criminal convictions, particularly can be relevant. A domestic abuser often has difficulties with his or her temper. Charging a man with a gun suggests men who were brimming with adrenaline.

"Executed"

He have them up against a wall. Give them a final smoke.

No. 1 got shot grabbing the gun

No. 2 got shot attacking him on the ground

No 3 got shot after following him down the road, backing off and then advancing again this time with his own gun aimed at Rittenhouse.

Reddit turned to **** during the 2016 US election and never recovered. Default subs are just a play den for extreme left "supermods" now, but some of the minor subs and those related to hobbies/professions are still decent.

Please you chose your own word and you chose execute.

The trial will decide if it was homicide, murder, manslaughter, self defense ect.

Illegal execution not one of them

He killed them, that's a fact. Idiot 1 grabbed the gun as shown by the prosecutions' own witness, we've all seen the video of the second shot, and idiot 3 own testimony.

It’s nowhere near the same as going from Westmeath into Meath. The separation between states in the US is quite significant, and you know that.

I haven't trusted the corporate media in a long time and I was pretty certain of the facts of the case before the trial started.

I did drink the corporate media Kool-Aid about Rittenhouse possibly being guilty on the weapon misdemeanour, so I was surprised by that dismissal. And I was actually surprised by how weak the prosecution's case was, as witness after witness came along and confirmed the case for self defense. I'd be interested in exactly how weak a prosecution's case has to be to amount to malicious prosecution.

Ultimately I still feel the same as I felt the day after it happened: I'm glad I live in a country where regional and national political actors letting cities burn for political gain is not a thing, I'm glad I live in a country where guns are not the norm and the idea of a 17-year-old being out in the streets with a rifle is completely alien, but I think that in this situation, at this time, in that place, Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent of murder on grounds of self defense.